thus math aren't any better than sociology.
> implying maths exist outside of our conceptual realm
maths isnt even real
>>7685060
So your house and a castle are the same thing to you? They're both constructions right?
Daily reminder that you have no clue what an axiom even is.
>better
None of them is "better", what's that supposed to mean?
>proteins are needed to build muscle so proteins are better than carbs
To get back at your claim, axioms are the beginning of a formalized theory, but the "axiomatic phase" in math research is usually the last one - normal research is almost empirical trial and error and, in any case, mathematics papers are always non-rigorous when viewed through the lens of a logician or comp. scientists in automated theorem proving.
>>7685115
>what's that supposed to mean
Better as in producing valid conclusions.
>To get back at your claim blah blah mathematics are empirical
Thanks for proving my point.
>>7685063
>Anti-realist
Oh fuck off.
>>7685060
>all maths are based on axioms
False.
>>7685133
>Thanks for proving my point
What would that be? That you're a biased first-semester humanities major trolling those who have the ability to comprehend higher mathematics?
>>7685180
>being so butthurt
You know you're just a parasite, right?
My job will help people, yours will just take space on a dusty arXiv server.
>>7685196
>My job will help people
Yeah, they'll look at you and laugh. Your existence reminds them of how much lower than themselves someone can be. That'll help them a lot.
>>7685196
>Stop pointing out that I suck at math!
>>7685312
>Mechanical Engineer
>Math is just bullshit
The only people you'll be helping are the ones at the unemployment office, making sure their jobs are secure.
>>7685312
>engineering student
>thinks he can talk about math
Go back to your plug'n'chug calculus classes, kiddo, and leave the real math to the mathematicians.
>>7685340
So what kind of "real math" do you do?
>>7685060
Math makes logical conclusions from its axioms. Sociology makes conclusions from politically-biased studies.
>>7685357
pseudo-elliptic frobenoid cohomology on Barnett-type sub-stacks of semi-integrable A2-schemes
>>7685357
Quadruple integrals. You won't understand if you're IQ is lower than 200.
>>7685370
>You won't understand if you're IQ is lower than 200.
Are you telling me there are <200 IQ tards on this board?
>pic
>>7685060
>not calling them postulates
pleb detected
>>7685370
>you're
