What does /sci/ think about global warming?
Don't say shit unless you have data links. I'm trying to throw together an opinion for tonight. I'm having thanksgiving with a table of ultra conservatives.
>>7683380
Memes.
>>7683380
What's the point of making this thread? What does it matter what a few anonymous posters think.
>>7683386
I'm really just looking for good sources hoping you could help, I'm pretty new to the topic.
Your conservative family members are probably more right than you are
>>7683380
It's real and caused by humans.
Nothing significant will probably happen though.
well yeah they are conservative.... of course they are right.
>>7683412
So it is carbon emissions? That's what I'm leading towards but how would it not leave a huge foot print?
It's more or less all lies
Any real effects will be slight, and negative effects limited to third world countries
If it was real, they wouldn't need to lie so vigorously
>>7683428
I just don't get why you (And many others.) think scientists, that would usually be at odds with each-other within the scientific community, would do separate research then lie about the results so they can both reach the same data.
>>7683438
Let funding depend on the promise of politically correct results.
Natural selection: Who pays the piper calls the tune.
