>>7674982
chop it off and weight it, use a hot blade to cauterize the wound instantly and keep the correct amount of blood within the foot.

>>7674982
Your best bet is probably to extrapolate from a volume measurement gotten from dipping in water.

>>7674982
Tourniquet right above where you want to weigh from. Wait until you can't feel your foot, ~2-3 hours. DON'T REMOVE IT. Doing so could be harmful to your health.

Have a hacksaw ready. Saw below the tourniquet. Be sure not to lose too much blood, as it will compromise the accuracy of your measurements. Weigh the foot.

It doesn't get much more precise.

>>7674982
The literature seems to give between 1.3% and 1.4% of your body weight per foot.

>>7675000
too time consuming and messy. thanks anyway.

>>7675011
True, it's not the most efficient method, but there are always tradeoffs if you want the utmost accuracy.

You're welcome anyway though.

>>7674982
I was just taking a bath, and I found an answer. I'll tell you what it is, but first I need to run through the streets naked shouting something. I'm just so excited.

>>7675018
Kek, nice

>>7675018
water displacement doesn't give you the weight of something fuccboi
go learn physx101

>>7675025

Humans are approximately the same density as water.

>>7675025
>not getting that on-point Archimedes allusion

>>7675033
>what's an on-point Archimedes allusion?

type of writing utensil?

>>7675054
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=on+point

Man, I'm glad I've moved past that age when I used to nitpick people's dialects. Being 14 was interesting.