https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finitism#Classical_finitism_vs._strict_finitism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrafinitism
is this for real?
If it is, are these people the flat earth society of mathematics?
Yes and yes.
Yes they are.
pls respond
>>7671841
Yes it's real.
No, but retards who can barely into math think it is.
Here is an interesting text describing a use case scenario for ultrafinitism.
ftp://pier.botik.ru/rented/logic/papers/SAZONOV/lcc.ps
>>7671841
The spectrum goes both ways, there are also nuts that think V≠L
>>7672154
How do I open that file?
>>7672171
It's a postscript file, you could convert it to PDF somewhere online.
>>7672171
ghostscript
>>7672159
get this hothead out of here
>>7672700
Hot heads think Bane =/= big guy(4^U)
>>7672159
imho anything that uses a powerset of a countable infinite set is automatically only understandable from a formalist perspective. So why does "believe in V=L" matter? To choose it or its negation...it's a matter of interest and convenience.
Lecture me.
There's a point, though.
If you consider numbers much larger than the particles in the current state of the universe, and large than the configurations in which you could put those to form any sort of computer, and hence numbers which you can't possibly express explicitly, only in hypothetical shorthands like pic related - but you can't explicitly work with them ... those are odd numbers and we should acknowledged this. Not sure if this is math or another subject, though.
>>7673043
Where can I find black girls like this
>>7673059
Only the internet.
Every weird race mix you want too, pic related.
