ok, so what if i came up with the solution to make things travel faster than light, would you recommend i submit it here; online. Or publish it in a paper with my name on it, because i fear that i may be a target if i submit this, because ive been sitting on the solution for about 2 days and i fear that my safety may be in jeopardy if i release it.
But you didn't
The pasta is stale m8
>>7664848
Just post op why would your safety be in danger? Your either a genius (unlikely) and you've figured it out (unlikely) or your an idiot and we'll laugh at you (likely) either way I don't see why anyone would try to hurt you.
>>7664951
>Your either
>your an idiot
>your
Ayy lmao
Kill you'reself XD
inb4 already proven theory with another name and drawings of a 5 y/o
>>7664848
IF you did (because we know you didn't) then your claim would be so extraordinary that there would be no place you could post it online where anyone would even take notice of you unless your solution was so self-evident upon sight that no evidence was necessary.
Failing that, you would need to actually build something proving the core concepts of your necessarily physics-redefining concept. The physical laws preventing FTL travel have been tested to a very high degree of accuracy. You would need to explain how all those tests could be wrong, or no one would feel the need to listen to anything you had to say.
Guys this is obvious b8, it's old pasta
Faster than light = infinite mass according to general relativity. Have you got a workaround?
Post it here please. I'm genuinely curious.
Be sure to use an VPN though!
>>7665175
According to special relativity. General introduces the theoretical work arounds through manipulating space, wormholes/warp drives.
