Why can't kekstructivists construct the largest prime number?
>>7654422
holy fuck did it change my kek to kek??
>>7654424
wordfilters, faggot. now get where you belong:
>>>/trash/
>>7654432
Still can't construct it huh? Yeah, I'll wait.
I guess constructing the same reply to an anonymous poster on a japanese imageboard over and over is the only thing you're good for
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXOuzytkHGA
Anyway, I'm done with this place. Later kuks
>>7654451
>hah they're so mad now! and I'm not mad at all! i'm playing it so cool hahaha
wow
>>7654422
n1 + 0 where n is the maximum of the set of prime numbers
Is it filtering kek?
if there is a largest prime P, then the number of primes is finite and you can multiply every prime. if you do that and add 1 you get an integer that is divided only by 1 and itself and therefore a prime, also larger than P.
also, is con filtered for some reason or what?
>>7655618
it's c(uck) like
kek a doodle doo
>>7655618
No, the number you get is not prime. Revisit the proof.
If the universe is infinite, then aleph, null exists.
>>7655804
Yes it is. It is not necessarily the next largest prime, but it's a prime.
>>7654429
What was the original text?
>>7654424
more like kek
If only there were some sort of free encyclopedia where you could look up information that's constantly added and/or modified by individuals who know about a certain subject.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%27s_theorem
>>7654422
>Why can't kekstructivists construct the largest prime number?
Don't tell anyone, but a small team of idealists is busy somewhere deep in the Arizona desert, constructing the world's largest prime number in a deep underground bunker.
It's made of Popsicle sticks and it's WAY bigger than 17.
>>7655668
kek or cock
>>7656016
Proofs by contradiction dont work in constructive mathematics, we already had this discussion with OP and he isn't actually serious - he's just (still) "pretending" to be retarded.
>>7654422
I want young Tami Stronach to suck on my dick, how's that for largest prime number? :^)
Through days of research and performance testing, /sci/ has finally identified that word filters are a possibility within the universe.
>>7656459
how the hell is it constructive mathematics if you cannot construct the very thing you posit to exist?
literally a kek
>>7655804
He's right.
[math]\aleph_{0}[/math] is the largest prime number.
Prove me wrong.
>>7654422
There is a prime number that is the largest that can be represented within the observable universe in unambiguous terms. Larger primes do not and can not exist in any meaningful way.
>>7657019
Posit to exist? You can't prove a largest prime doesn't exist but you certainly can prove it's false that it exists. So obviously you can't construct it.
>>7657021
You people are fucking thick. Somebody earlier already posted a counterexample, yet you continue to say that it's correct. Just look at the fucking Wikipedia page if you won't listen to reason -- it has Euclid's proof.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%27s_theorem
