>>30022624
nah its more like an unintended side effect.

what the feminists want was/is the best of both worlds. They want a guy to be dominant in the bedroom but a pushover with his credit card. they want to be both successful career women and full-time mommies. they want to be recognized for their ability and achievement, but they want affirmative action so they don't actually have to earn it. They want more of the good, easy, high-paying jobs in offices, but they're perfectly fine if all the garbage collectors are men. They want to ditch gender roles when they don't favor women and enforce them when they do.

Now the plan was that they could guilt men into making this world a reality for them. This is why they're shocked and indignant when men decide that pussy ain't enough of a reward, and that there's nothing to be gained from chasing women. or material prosperity beyond what's needed to fund their own interests, since the whole goal here was for women to skim off that extra income the men work for and live off of it.

Feminists wanted to make men play a rigged game, herbivores are the ones that shrugged, took their ball, and went home. They're exactly what feminists *don't* want, actually.

>>30022994
Huh, good post.

For me, it's not really that I didn't want to play their rigged game. Maybe I would if I wasn't so depressed and demoralized.

I don't think they correctly accounted for mental illnesses and extreme demoralization in their grand scheme. Well, actually they did, mostly. For the most part it's working OK. Just not for us.

>>30022994
Yeah but dont use men truly want someone who will fuck us like a porn star then be a perfect miss suzie housewife?

>>30023146
Do we want it? Yeah. Is it worth what you have to do to get a small chance at getting it in this day and age? Not even close.

the more you demand from men the more men will just say "fuck that, too much trouble, I'll buy an onahole if I'm that horny"