Who is /r9k/ voting for and why is it based Gary Johnson? He is the only one who truly supports limited government, free markets and free trade.
>>30000066
Jill Stein.
Right wingers are the nemesis of NEET life.
>>30000066
He is the best candidate for people who believe in individualism, social liberalism, and fiscal conservatism
Anyone who doesn't support libertarianism is economically illiterate
>>30000066
Trump, Gary has almost no chance of winning and he's doing a horrible job advertising himself to normies.
>>30000066
>"Free Markets"
Kek. Might as well say corporate feudalism.
>>30000300
NEET here...voting trump
vote for what is best for your country not for yourself
and think of the memes if trump won
>>30000300
Fuck man left wingers support NEETs
Why do they do this to themselves
>>30001482
>taxpayers don't prop up failing businesses who can't compete and workers are too stupid or lazy to retrain into a 21st century industry
poor baby
>>30000066
Libertarianism is a cancerous ideology of the Jew.
>>30000332
Nigger i've been trying to take intermediate economics but my college won'r let me
on the other hand toy['v never heard of market failures or search cotsts or puboic goods problems or some shit
>>30001482
kek tats a ood pic
>>30000332
>ACLU
>personality liberty
>doesn't believe individuals have the right to own a gun
This image is fucking retarded
>>30001522
Shit man thy are all jewish, (((coincidence detecror))) shit man
>>30001520
>Implying corporations won't try and make everyone who works for them have wage slavery level wages without regulations from the government.
>implying any of the dribble in your post is even remotely true.
Get out of your parents basement you autistic faggot. Neckbeards like you will be the first to get plowed under under the anarchy you promote.
>>30001585
>Implying corporations won't try and make everyone who works for them have wage slavery level wages without regulations from the government.
Did I say we should have no regulations?
>implying any of the dribble in your post is even remotely true.
I mean that is literally what anti-FT activists propose. Taxpayers should prevent businesses from failing via tariffs to enrich the select few workers there and the owners of those factories at the expense of literally everyone else including the poor.
>Get out of your parents basement you autistic faggot. Neckbeards like you will be the first to get plowed under under the anarchy you promote.
>free trade = anarchy
you're a dumbass.
Gary Johnson, but I wish Petersen won the nomination. Johnson's still closer to my ideals than the Big 2.
Gonna have to figure out how to get an absentee ballot
>>30000066
not going to win so until 3rd parties gain more clout i'm sticking with trump. and even if these third party types stop clinton and trump from getting the magic number, the GOP majority congress will put trump or paul ryan in
>>30001585
>>30001622
FUCK NIGGERS IT DOESNR MATTER WHt ur POLITICAL BELIEFS ARE
EVEN IF UR right about politics that wint do anything for ur life
stop thinking about it senpai
just work on self-omprovement
>>30000066
>open borders
Fuck that shit
>>30001623
im pretty politically aware but i un know who peterson is informie me pls
>>30001499
>vote for what is best for your country not for yourself
How spooked can you get?
>>30001683
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016
The guy who wasn't Johnson or McAfee
>>30000066
I'm honestly wondering you people think that "free market" is a good thing. Do you just think it's a good thing because you think you'll somehow make it into the upper class of the market? You realize that the reason humans have government is because when we're all left to run free and do what we want, some people gain a lot more power than others. It's basic fucking logic.
>>30000332
>FDR is more left-wing than Marx
>>30001666
Open Borders is an eventual ideal. She's not gonna immediately let loose the flood gates you absolute fucking retard.
What's the best political/economic system for robots? Socialism?
>>30001773
>>30001731
First of all, freedom is the default. It's on you to prove to me that I shouldn't be able to spend my money how I want it and earn money using my talents and skills.
> Do you just think it's a good thing because you think you'll somehow make it into the upper class of the market?
Some people choose which political opinions they think are right, not which will benefit them the most.
>some people gain a lot more power than others. It's basic fucking logic.
So do you think we shouldn't have a president? The police? What if I invent something brilliant and get money and power because it's so useful? Obviously some people will have more power than others. It's impossible to have it any other way. if you want total equality, you want communism, which is totally evil and disastrous.
>>30001812
Constitutional Republicanism.
>>30001812
No. Real socialists will make you work. You want whatever Australia calls itself, a dole-centric economic system I believe.
Why are Trump voters so worked up about "we don't make anything" when we're like the #2 manufacturing country in the world? We make lots of high-tech shit like jet engines, you just don't see it at the store because China makes all the low-skill low-pay stuff like shirts and ties.
>>30001903
sounds like Social Democracy (regulated capitalism with generous welfare)
>>30001812
Maximum communism.
A 4 hour work week is possible.
He's a cuck who's ticket isn't even airtight invincible on gun rights, the VERY MINIMUM a libertarian candidate should possess. I can't believe he picked that fucking jackass for a VP.
>>30001967
Yeah, he has no principles and is no different from the other career politicians.
>>30001703
Stirner is the ultimate meme philosopher, I don't think there's been a person on this planet who ever took him seriously.
>>30002065
Say what you like about Stirner. But he was 100% right about spooks and self-interest.
>>30001843
I don't want total equality, and i should probably clarify that i don't think some people gaining more power because of their labour/ideas is a bad thing. I think that the system as it is could be a little more fair though at the least. I don't think CEO's who don't actually do anything should get billion dollar salaries. My ideal would be a very well regulated capitalist system. The candidate that i see bringing me a bit closer to that is jill stein.
>>30002135
>CEO's who don't actually do anything
spoken like a true berniebro
>>30002135
>well regulated capitalist system
>>30002133
He was a legit autist that spent his whole life trying to intellectually justify actively antisocial behavior. He ultimately fooled nobody, not even himself.
>>30001959
Why not a zero hour week?
>>30001499
>vote for what is best for your country not for yourself
How fucking cucked can you be
Jill Stein or Hillary
>>30002524
nice meme
zebra oregano
>>30000066
libertarianism is literally chad-tier social darwinism, any robot that votes for this guy is going to get decimated
>dude just be yourself lmao if you work hard enough you can be a millionaire too
>if you have any mental or physical disabilities then get fucked the free market doesn't need you
>regulations, why would anyone need those? if you get poisoned or seriously ill, just buy from another company then!
i'll take any authoritarian in the running over this clown
>>30002764
>if you get poisoned or seriously ill, just buy from another company then!
Kek I've seen this argument hundreds of times
libertarianism is awesome...
But Gary Johnson talks like a faggot.
Trump 2016.
>>30002865
it's a solvent argument though
if you studied history you would know that tainted food was widespread before the FDA was created in 1906
>>30001928
Easy appeal to the working class. Either they or their fathers lost their jobs to the evil foreigner bogeyman so they're understandably a little miffed. Their anger's misplaced but it is understandable.
>>30002947
Well it's a good thing I'm not a buff boy. :-)
>>30000300
too bad she's batshit crazy
also, robots voting for women, that'll be the day
>>30001499
Anyone with half a brain knows this is /pol/ false flag.
>>30001812
Basic income is about as robot as it comes. You get money from successful normies, without the need to interact with people to convince them you're a failure.
>>30000300
Well at least you aren't a retarded two party defeatist cuckold
GJ is my nigga, voted for him last time and voting for him again. Give him 5% and we might have a functioning election system someday
>>30000066
>limited gov
my ass
>free market
Just fuck my economy up
>free trade
Haha that TPP though, am I right?
>>30000300
Only answer.
>>30000300
>Voting for an SJW
>>30001461
He's only being pushed in order to divide Trump's voterbase.
Here is based Gary Johnson btfo'ing Drumpfkins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_T5-KEkYNI
>>30004865
"I can't tell the difference between an Social Justice Warrior and a Social Justice Activist, so anyone that ever wants better for any marginalized or oppressed group is a SJW and a fucking marxist"
>>30001522
>None of those figures are Zionists
Kinda defeats the argument. Good try, though.
>>30002065
t. not a philosopher
>>30001585
>implying corporations could get away with impossible standards of compensation
>dribble
I believe the word you are looking for is "drivel."
>Gary Penis
>Libertarianism
>too pussy to hold on to any hardcore social conservative ideals
>too pussy to let go of their corporate capitalist masters
Libertarianism is for pussy "conservatives" that wanna pretend they care about social issues pertaining to others, but don't wanna do a damn thing about the economic issues that bring about and perpetuate social issues.
>>30000066
>lolbert shills at it again
Yeah, I bet Gary "Jusburself" Johnson will be a great candidate for us, your fellow NEET-KHV-wagecuck robots, amirite?
>>30005127
>"entrepreneurship"
>"create your own job"
What a crock of shit.
What about the individuals that do not wish to dedicate their lives to running an enterprise? Plus if everyone does it, who the fuck is gonna work for them? Are these people to just fuck off and live miserably in their perpetual poverty?
Just a bunch of vague bullshit slogans and buzzwords.
Christ.
>>30004978
>implying corporations could get away with impossible standards of compensation
And why exactly they can't? Do you know that working conditions of the labourer were regulated for centuries, right?