Straight up, don't give me any bullshit:
Why aren't white women as fertile as non-white women?
>>29973029
Because god wants the white race to be the cuckers not the cuckees and we're fucking it up.
If you're a white dude, it's your goal to purify as many minorites with your superior white cock and genes.
Weaker genetics, that's why whites get bred out
>>29973105
>purify minorities with white cock and genes
>white is a recessive trait all other races flush it out even if they are female
How do you expect to win if you've already lost fampai?
>>29973029
Civilization and human society is based on the psychological act of sublimation, which Freud defined as "the process of deflecting sexual instincts into acts of higher social valuation," ergo white people prefer women who are not whores
>>29973029
for science how old of a white chic should I try to fug?
White women are better off socioeconomically, which means they get more education, use more birth control, choose to be single/have less kids due to feminist reasons (not SJW reasons, simply like having their own job and apartment and shit).
Other races are worse off, in turn having less education, using less birth control, more content to be mothers over pursuing other life goals.
>>29973744
I'm assuming you fertility as in birth rates. If you mean chances of getting pregnant after having sex IDK
>>29973029
because non white women need to make more offspring to balance out aids and crime death.
>>29973029
because the neanderthal genome is recessive
since whites carry the most, they are more likely to have recessive traits, like infertility
>>29973181
But that's not true.
>>29973029
OP you must take part in the longstanding tradition of finding weaker races, generally with darker skin, and impregnating the fuck out of as many of their women as possible. Welcome to the colonialism.
>>29973181
>he thinks african traits can't be bred out
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadroon
>>29973029
As a nations gdp goes up their birthrates go down europes birthrate is at replacement cause thier gdp is high north america has a high gdp and were at replacement levels even Mexicos birthrate has lowered not because our women aren't fertile but because when they have careers they are less likely to be having 3 or more children
>>29974767
oh ok, but why are whites so highly neanderthal?
>>29975081
Neanderthals were mostly in europe and the Mediterranean we mixed with them while blacks stayed in Africa and have no Neanderthal DNA
>>29975081
Basically, a long time ago the first humans that came out of africa traveled the coastline until they reached eurasia, more specifically the caucus mountains, some split from the group and stayed, others went back.
The ones that stayed intermingled with neanderthals while others traveled further east into asia. Fast forward for a few thousand years and the phentotypes evolved into their own as asians blacks and whites
>>29973029
>Why aren't white women as fertile as non-white women?
Should be:
>Why aren't white women in the U.S. as fertile as non-white women in the U.S.?
White women in the U.S. are more often reared in households that aren't below the poverty belt. Black and Hispanic families in the U.S. generally subsist in ghettos, trailer parks, housing projects and other impoverished areas. Poorer people aren't afforded as rich of an education and have to contend with negative influences from their families, peers and other elements of poor culture, and as a result, tend not to make very good life choices.
>>29974891
They can, Whites are mutated Africans, who's environment and sexual selection made them who they are today.
Want the real reason? Because whites historically lived in harsher climates and evolved to suit it. Thus white reproductive systems are hardier as they need to be, to be pickier about conception so to speak. Basically having a baby in harsher climates are more dangerous and less likely to succeed, so white reproductive systems are more stringent with fertility, leading to less offspring but ensuring they are better. Quality over quantity so to speak. The problem is that modern technology has made living in harsh climates possible for anyone, so the evolutionary benefit whites have for harsh climates, doesn't really count for anything anymore. Well, other than having fewer but better offspring.
>tl;dr whites evolved to sacrifice fertility for survivability, though it's not really much a benefit in this day and age
>>29975493
>implying any environment at that time wasn't dangerous and harsh
brown women have basically been bred to shit out as many kids as possible
they're like chinese iphone factories of the baby making world
>>29975556
Winter of the north that humans traveled into vs. plains of the south that humans evolved into?
Yes, one is incomparably harsher than the other.
>>29973029
They are, post industrial society doesn't encourage fertility though.
>>29975694
>cold weather or dangerous predators
no, they are not incomparable, you just have a shitty superiority complex over the most prosaic things, typical of whites
>>29975792
It sounds like you're suggesting the north doesn't have dangerous predators.
>>29975792
uh, you can pretty much die just by not wearing proper clothing in the north
>>29973029
Happening here btw.
>>29975817
im suggesting that your ready to argue over who had it worst as if both places didn't have their own pro's and con's actually. if it was THAT hard to survive, the earliest humans would have died out when they reached it in the first place. turns out things are more complex than "it's so cold you die easy kid"
