Why do normies talk a certain way that gives off that they're normie? It's like as soon as they open their mouth you can tell you don't want to be around them.
How do I get a non-normie gf?
>>29912453
Because they don't have asperger's like you do.
Its called social competence, you should try it sometime.
>obese girl in my class
>second she opens her mouth she starts spewing autistic reddit shit
>She came from New England to attend uni in the southeast US
>heard her call some niggers "people of color"
>nogs visibly upset but have the social competence to tell that she's the equivalent of that fat kid that goes around with a cape making Naruto handsigns
>the only non-normie girl I have ever seen in my life, and I hated her even more than normie girls after two minutes of talking to her
>>29912500
"uhh like I know, right? It's just like totally not my thing noticing faces like really?"
>>29912522
I sure love when people talk to me about pointless shit like what their gf is doing or making jokes that aren't humorous in the slightest.
A normies life is just fluff, and I hate fluff
They all have canned lines and ways of speaking that take way longer than they should in order to fill silence. Normies' ultimate goal is to have no silence. 99% of the time they are barely thinking about what they're saying.
DUDE I'M DOING OR TRAINING FOR THIS SLAVE WORK AND IT'S SUPER INTERESTING MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL HAPPINESS
WHAT IS YOUR INDENTURED SERVITUDE PLAN FELLOW NORMIE?
>>29912662
The truth.
>>29912453
You'd enjoy Finnish people. Lived with a guy from Finland and it was such a fucking pleasure to share a coffee in the morning in utter silence and just enjoy the companionship.
They speak from their diaphragm.
>>29912453
they speak in a way that they think makes other normies like them and agree with everything they say, rather than actually acknowledge the point (if any) that they are trying to get across and discuss it.
>>29912623
Gotta cut out that fluff so you have more time to wallow in your isolation and anime
Not even trying to start shit, but your autism stops you from realizing not every conversation has to have a point. Talking is just a thing people enjoy doing. It makes people comfortable.
Listen up faggots. The ego, ie, the sum composite of everyone's socialization, is an EVOLUTIONARY DEFENSE MECHANISM.
That's right. Your so called sense of identity, the concept of you as an individual, is like a computer program running on the hardware of your body.
People are SO DELUSIONAL they actually believe that they, and their ego-state are the same thing. Your ego is like a remora fish in a commensal relationship with your body.
People have NO IDEA that free will is an illusion and that they are carrying around a parasite like ego construct that has taken over their body.
Why do normies talk in a certain way? It is their ego states mutually interacting to exchange information. Good lord you people have no idea why it is so difficult for me to leave my house. Imagine everyone is a bloodsucking zombie with a brain slug attached to them and you might get an idea.
>>29914238
Tell me more, tell me morre.
The purpose of most social interaction is ego stroking. Even basic life functions such as "feed me" is now rendered as ego stroking, ie, "I love your cooking"
>>29913928
I know. I had to learn this lesson the painful way.
In school I was always alone because I thought I have absolutely nothing to say and people would get bored. I thought normies talked only about relevant, important, exciting stuff and the fact that they talked so fucking much made my self-esteem even lower. So I didn't talk to them at all, which of course resulted them talking to me or insulting me.
You idiots, it's not that I was too arrogant to talk to you, I simply fucking overestimated you.
When I was a child I thought talking is EXCLUSIVELY about exchanging important data. Socialising is super-complicated stuff and the people who engage in it are like generals who are planning the defense of their country.
That they did it so much fucking intimated me. You see, this is how fucking autistic I was. I thought that EVERYONE was better than me and knows a lot more than me. I don't even know why. Can someone relate?
>>29914238
You're incredibly misinformed.
>>29914553
Fascinating. When did you realize they were just sucking air and avoiding silence rather than systematically exchanging useful information?
>>29914587
Actually I'm not. I'm completely correct.
>>29912662
This annoys me so much. People need to just shut the fuck up once in a while. Not all silence is awkward
>>29914238
Correct. But do you know what terrifies me about normies the most?
You can't undo something you said. It's like scripting in a complicated programming language and the syntax must be correct, or else the result will be unpredictable. If you made the tiniest error, it will branch out and will get more complicated. They might get hurt, they might feel contempt, they might feel hatred, they might even feel sympathy but 10 minutes later you made an error and you lost the sympathy and hurt them and made a new enemy. It's just so damn complicated.
Why are these people triggered so easily? I think most robots agree that people can say to us what they want and we won't care or judge the people for it. A guy can behave like an idiot or be pathetic or ridiculous in front of me, but I will not see him as a lesser human being.
But normies are different. They expect that you treat them like frail porcelain or earn their eternal contempt. There is something totalitarian about it that terrifies me. They JUDGE every millisecond of your existence like they are fucking god. Just be a human being, Jesus Christ.
I guess this fits perfectly with your theory about the bodies which were taken over by totalitarian ego functions who will not differ from the script which their ego wrote for them even by a little bit.
>>29914639
Well I had sort of a cognitive dissonance about it. On one hand I was aware that they were just exchanging garbage on the other hand I couldn't understand why. I felt there must have been a deeper reason behind it.
Normies just always seemed like a hivemind to me. 1 rumor spreads and suddenly the entire school knows it and EVERYONE reacts exactly THE SAME to it. I had no idea how this was possible. I didn't even had an idea why this rumor was "important" or why they reacted the way they reacted. Normies were always just a huge mystery to me. How could all of them have one type of thinking and one mindset? You know the saying: When you know 1 normie, you know all normies.
But now I know the reason. Normies have instincts. Robots don't. Normies come into this world and know exactly what they should do, what they are doing, what they should avoid doing, what domination means... what social capital means etc... normies came into this world with a manual and this manual is called instinct.
Robots didn't have this manual. We simply observed the world, observed humans and tried to emulate them but most of the time we simply didn't know what we were doing. I still don't understand this world, I still don't understand emotions.
What is hatred for example? I don't know if I ever felt it. What I felt is irritation and the desire to go away and not interact with a person which behaves irrational. But when you are gone, why keep a person in your mind and feel "hatred" to it?
The egotistitical brain is constantly analysing the speech pattern of other ego-bodies and inserting the correct language variables into the pattern to maximise ego stroking. "Conversations" are basically echo chambers where one ego-body says X and ego-body two says Y and the pattern is complete, onto the next pattern. Amazingly, the human brain is so powerful that it does these calculations without allowing the ego to appreciate that the script is even being run, hence the illusional of free will.
The more primitive the pattern, and the larger the socialization payoff, the more ingrained the ego-state. Why do you think normies go to sports games or talk about sports? It is an incredibly simple program for the brain to run that profits the ego immensely with egotistical comments and strokes.
Remember: people believe that the reason they talk about sports, for example, is because they as an "individual" love sports. In fact, their egos are using the body to achieve complimentary ego stroking with a low brain power investment and high reward function. It's extremely disturbing for people to realise this, if they ever do. I suspect most people spend their entire lives under the thrall of their ego without even realizing it.
No wonder the world is a disaster.
>>29914553
Holy shit that feel. I never have felt like I had something important or relevant to say in my life. I get that most people don't say anything of importance most of the time, but I'm just afraid of saying something that the other person doesn't get or isn't interested by.
>>29915243
Think of your own thoughts and your emotions as departments in a store. You're in charge of your own department, this is what you call your conciousness. But your emotions are in charge of their own department and the manager is some paki fuck who can't speak english. So nothing ever comes across right but you can tell when he's pissed and when he's generally happy.
Sometimes his say is more powerful than yours to your boss. Sometimes your word gets accepted above his. Who is the boss? Nature.
>>29915250
If all you say is true, then what is the goal of the ego? What does it achieve out of acknowledgement in the most petty of tasks besides knowing it's accepted by others of its kind?
>>29915243
Hatred is an interesting case.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UA7cgIg4Lfs
Anger and hatred are reactions aimed at reinforcing the ego, vindicating it, when it is challenged. At a biochemical survival level anger and hatred release adrenaline and raise blood pressure which are useful in physical combat. Likewise, hatred allows the ego to feel justification for actions, which are imperative to prevent emotional or physical paralysis in crisis.
Again, this is why I find it so difficult to interact t with normies. How do you explain to an ego-bodies that their anger is an expression of parasitical ego, and in fact, is conclusive evidence that they do have free will? You'd be likely attacked physically.
>>29915474
It is literally an evolutionary survival method from early human evolution. A much more violent and uncertain time.
>>29915509
I thought it was obvious that emotions were the product of survival.
Does the act of thinking with your brain being comparable to computer scripts through a processor sound like part of the theory? After all there isn't a single solution to all answers, sometimes it takes time to analyze the full situation and come up with a response.
>>29915250
>>29915486
It's disturbing that we are doing the exact same thing right now. I guess this is why robots are Internet-dwellers. We know that this shit only exists for the ego and all humans are egoists, so we replaced humans with a computer with the same result. Honestly, it's probably more efficient since on the Internet you can talk to everyone from the entire society instead of just random normies from your neighborhood.
But do I like your posts because they are the truth or because they reinforce my ego and give me an excuse to be an antisocial recluse? Probably both. What a fucking paradox, my brain hurts.
>How do you explain to an ego-bodies that their anger is an expression of parasitical ego, and in fact, is conclusive evidence that they do have free will?
You mean that they don't have free will. IMO Emotions/instincs and free will don't compliment each other. I would argue that I have more free will than others because I have far less emotions, but maybe it's the opposite.
>>29915675
You probably consider yourself an intellect, right? That is who you are, not because you chose to be an intellect but because everyday since as long as you can remember you woke up and thought until you went to bed.
To you thinking is your natural job, and your body reinforces itself with us stroking your ego by telling you 'yes we think you are right'. It makes you feel as if your job is important in some way.
>>29915675
The text on an anonymous msg board certainly strips away some of the ego layers that otherwise would cloud judgment in a physical environment. Also, it would be unlikely that this conversation could take place because of our no doubt vast distances in terms of earth location.
But, yes, this is still essentially an egotistical activity that makes the ego-body feel stroked for its cleverness. At least it is demonstrable that I can say I know that is what is happening.
>>29915748
Lenin said the Intelligentsia is not the brain of a nation but the feces of a nation. Sums it up pretty well doesn't it especially regarding my NEET status?
And yes, since back as I can remember I did nothing but thinking, but with extremely meager results in real life. Somehow my thinking self is isolated from my automatic real life self, which doesn't have those resources and can only be compared to a zombie to an observer.
Is there some intrinsic value or enjoyment in knowledge even if you can't apply it? Anyway I guess I'm not that different from a normie but the difference is that normies think they know everything, while I know that I know fucking nothing. At least not now. My only goal in life is to call myself one day truly knowledgeable. Because when I'm old the only question I will ask myself is not: Did I "enjoy" life to the fullest? as normies do but rather: Did I absorb as much as possible of the human experience in this century, with these informations, in this universe etc... When I'm old I won't say: "Shit I wish I fucked more stacies or climbed Mount Everest"... this is childish to me. But I will say: "Shit I wish I knew I understood more about what this shit was truly about."
i hate normies too, but unfortunately, this bitch is a two-way street
>>29916058
fuck dammit wrong pic
>>29915971
I believe that old philosophy that says existence is pointless but to keep searching for a meaning anyway.
I think the 'true' nature of the universe is something really simple. Like a function that is only correct when x > y but it doesn't know y so it just mashes in every x value it can until it finds the answer.
Kind of like warfare, two sides get so angry over an idea (could be a yes or no answer) that they invent the craziest technology you've ever seen and hire strategic geniuses to compete against one another.
>>29916092
Warfare is not a bad term. The universe IS warfare. Warfare of ideas, concepts and information. And the dominant concepts like the concepts of our elements or gravity or our physics etc... don't exist because they are the only alternative or because some intelligent creator devised it that way, but because they won the war and are thus the most efficient in this particular circumstance. Just like with civilization or human behavior. They behave not the way they do because some brilliant geniuses devised it that way. They simply won the war. Might makes right.
We exist because our ancestors were sexually attracted to females and the females liked cute children, and then we suddenly found enough stuff to fill our time with that we didn't choose to suicide or because we are programmed not to. But change any of those variables and we disappear. The wonder and beauty of existence is pretty trivial. No intelligent creator. Simply the outcome of warfare.
And this warfare will continue until the function you described is solved. But when it is solved, the answer will generate a new function in a new universe with new variables etc... this is what I believe: That it will go forever. No ultimate purpose, but sandbox with infinite potential so the inhabitants can evolve and create their own purpose. The more evolved and conscious our universe becomes the more the slogan: "Do what you want, want what you want, redefine what you want and then want something else and then want to not want and then want everything at the same time" will come true.
>>29916299
no, this is wrong. this is /pol talking. warfare is a political instrument, it has nothing to do with the universe. might does not make right. you've been spooked by nazis, I'm afraid to inform you anon.
>>29916389
You believe in right and wrong, right? Then you believe in a god right? Those concepts have no basis in reality. In reality only might has a basis.
Just open your damn eyes and see the subjectivity of everything. Killing is wrong, right? Wrong, killing is right when your tribe is endangered. What constitutes a danger? The other tribe just wants to survive and maybe has better ideas than your tribe. Who is right? Would you rape a woman if you knew your child would discover a cure against cancer?
>>29916602
oh boy. you should read the Republic by Plato.
>>29916620
And why was Plato right? Because he won the warfare against other philosophers. But just because someone didn't make arguments against his philosophy, doesn't mean they don't exist.
>>29916685
http://www.iep.utm.edu/thrasymachus/
>>29912623
I have to agree with this guy.
Normies are horribly vain, boring, bland, vapid, and predictable people. I actually had some success with making "normie" friends so to speak but quickly cut ties with them because I had no joy in interacting with them. They are so uncreative and uninteresting. I would honestly prefer to talk to you autists/nerds than make small talk at parties with these human automatons.
You guys really aren't missing much by opting out of "mainstream" culture. Everyone who partakes in it is incredibly fake, and only doing so to "fit in". On the other hand, you guys don't seem to mind expressing your interests and opinions which makes conversation more genuine in my opinion.
Just my two cents.
>>29912662
>>29914713
Let's be honest, silence with robots is pretty fucking awkward
>>29915486
Actually, anger gives you the confidence, courage, and motivation to defend yourself from, as well as attack threats.
Anger is extremely useful and is one of the haul marks of a truly assertive person. People without anger tend to be delusional narcissists and/or cowardly weaklings who bend easily stronger wills.
Hatred gives you the energy to obsess over and focus on threats to yourself or your community/family.
It will remind you that something is a threat and give you the motivation to destroy it.
Hatred and anger can be apart of an egotistical behavior pattern, but they are not caused solely by it. I would say that anger and hatred are actually the roots of many higher emotions and thoughts.
>>29916826
>silence
>don't know where to look
>girl is looking at me
>look down
>scared of this eye contact despite te fact I normally stare at or have direct eye contact with people when they are talking
>>29916858
Can you provide an example in history of anger producing positive results?
>>29916858
Anger is delusional. There will always be someone who is even angrier and crazier than you and has even less to lose. It has a disgusting taste of self-righteousness to it.
>get angry because of trivial shit
>get clubbed to death
Unless someone killed your family you have no reason to be angry.
Hatred is a weakness. You're shifting the focus away form yourself and onto someone else - damaging and destroying yourself and your target in the process.
The cowardly weaklings who hide in their caves because they don't want to risk confrontation over a few words or who don't give a shit if they are called a bitch by barbarians are evolutionarily smarter. Because remember one thing anon: Most of those alphas will eventually die in a war, then the coward will crawl out of his cave and make love to all the widows.
>>29916971
The French revolution.
The American revolution
The french Resistance during WW2.
The partisans of Russia during WW2.
Those are the four most obvious examples that come to mind when speaking of how anger can motivate people to great things and great success. Obviously there are many other examples that can be listed, most of the time when an invading army threatens a people one of the primary motivating factors for fighting back is anger and hatred towards the overbearing enemy who is attacking them and ruining their livelihoods.
Also, let's not forget the criminal justice system. It is motivated by the desire for justice, that people who hurt others are brought to court and punished for their crimes against others. Tell me the victims of murdered family members or the victims of robberies don't hate or feel anger against their abuser.
I am not saying anger alone is what motivates or drives these revolutions/defenses/wars or other events but it certainly is a major factor. Obviously good planning, logistics, and leadership changes the world but motivation is always a factor, and anger and hatred are excellent motivators.
You have to be a giant autist not to see this.
>>29917029
>Anger is delusional.
I bet you think useful survival instincts like the will to survive, sexual attraction, and the craving for power are also "delusional" right?
I have always been a person who thinks better when motivated or inspired. Anger has always helped me think more decisively in dangerous situations. It's like it turns on and turbo-charges the analytical side of my brain.
>There will always be someone who is even angrier and crazier than you and has even less to lose.
Choose your battles wisely then, and fight them smart. Also, almost no one who is angry is a club wielding maniac. You are retarded.
It has a disgusting taste of to it.
>Implying self-righteousness is a bad thing.
>>29917029
Ran out of space continuing with this post.
>Unless someone killed your family you have no reason to be angry.
Speak for yourself faggot. If you actually go out and live in the real world you will realize that their will be plenty of things which make you justifiably angry. You are not the decider of what other people do and don't like to deal with.
>Hatred is a weakness.
No cowardliness is weakness.
>You're shifting the focus away form yourself and onto someone else - damaging and destroying yourself and your target in the process.
This is one of the single most beta things I have ever read on this board. People who always blame themselves for everything are pussies and incredibly self destructive.
When someone robs you, hits you, or otherwise wrongs you, it is very often their fault. And they deserve the blame and deserve the consequences for their actions.
To say that everything in life is your own fault is downright delusional. People are constantly effected by their environment and factors outside their direct control. Sometimes they can be changed and other times they cannot. Placing the blame completely is objectively false.
>The cowardly weaklings who hide in their caves because they don't want to risk confrontation over a few words or who don't give a shit if they are called a bitch by barbarians are evolutionary smarter. Because remember one thing anon: Most of those alphas will eventually die in a war, then the coward will crawl out of his cave and make love to all the widows.
>This is what beta faggots actually believe.
In truth is that cowards and weaklings are typically the ones who are enslaved in society. They are the cowardly peasants who get picked off first when roaming knights wander into their village to scavenge for supplies. And of course, they are more likely to be bullied by others because they are weak and thus don't fight back. Stop trying to justify being a pussy.
normies talk like wiggers/niggers and talk about the latest shoes they are going to buy
>>29917794
The French Revolution was primarily motivated by the quest of justice
The American Revolution was motivated in large measure by the quest for human liberty
Russian and French partisan actions were motivated by the desire for national struggle, no doubt love of country being key here.
I'm not suggesting that anger was not a motivating factor for many- anger at unfair taxation, anger at military defeat, anger at wealth inequality, etc.
What I am suggesting though, is that anger could not have written the declaration of independence, the declaration of the rights of man, or sustained any of the struggles you mentioned.
In fact, I would argue that love was likely the force that motivated most, and certainly, the strongest warriors and soldiers in all of the these events. Purely angry soldiers tend to die very quickly from suicidal acts of bravado.
The criminal justice system, as you correctly observed, is motivated by the quest for impartial justice, and anger can only cloud that quest.
The craving for power is delusional.
You sound like another rather typical, very young, very naive, /pol or /his user.
>>29912621
>"people of color"
why do SJWs think this is better? it's literally saying "coloured people" like it's the 1960's South
>>29914553
>I thought that EVERYONE was better than me and knows a lot more than me. I don't even know why. Can someone relate?
then you eventually realize "hey hang on it's not me, these people are fucking boring" normies talk to fill the silence, they get extremely agitated if there's periods of silence in social interactions, theres no "awkward silences" because they interpret ALL silence as the terrible awkwardness that kills them.
yeah I can relate, it was only maybe 5 years ago that I realized normies dont want to talk about things like the state of the world or politics and current events, or history or the arts or any leisure activity thats not "holidays" or "going out" shit normies dont even want to talk Game of fucking Thrones beyond "OMG I LOOOOOOOOOVE IT OMG YAAAAAAAAS" just to signal they are "in" on it.
Normies are the boring ones, they are the ones with nothing to say.
>>29914553
>tfw thought this for the first ~15 years of my life
>still dont fully understand
Does anyone else just get the impulse to ask people who take their lives seriously, why they do it? Nothing that you or I do is remarkable in any way. We dont engage in large or risky undertakings, our contribution to the division of labor anyone could do, and by no objective standards are we at all influential to anything at all. Do you actually think anything that you do is above mundane?
>>29919360
Status Anxiety
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1MqJPHxy6g
>>29919458
I get status anxiety as a product of people taking their lives seriously, but it still doesn't explain why people do it in the first place when there is no reason to at all.
>>29919534
The video argues that status anxiety in the modern world is derived from a complex series of factors, social, psychological, material. Firstly, the transition from aristocracy to meritocracy has tended to reinforce the sense of entitlement among the wealthy and famous while simultaneously undercutting arguments in defence of those who have not succeeded. Secondly, access to higher standards of living have raised expectations so high that there is no ceiling, and one is never satisfied with one's possessions or status.
There's one millionaire entrepreneur who is interviewed who explains that many leaders in business are driven by a desire to prove themselves to their peer competitors, but also to their former teachers and parents- essentially, anyone who doubted their greatness.
So, in fact, there is very good reason to take life seriously in the modern age, if you consider yourself deserving of merit, status or wealth.
>>29914238
>refers to the great debate of determinism versus free will
>boldly claims one thing to be correct in an absolute sense
You dogmatic fucking idiots who think they have any true sense of knowledge whilst disregarding the thousands of people who know their shit better than you ever will piss me off.
>>29919717
except I really am correct, and I do know more than you ever will.
>>29919756
Sure thing mate. For someone who believes to see the Ego for what it really is you sure as shit didn't lose any egocentric tendencies.
>>29919825
I am certainly an egoist. It would be delusional to believe that you can live outside of the ego. Have you ever ingested dissociative drugs? Life without egotism is nearly impossible it is profoundly ingrained into our bodies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_CfHtNICzc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBcj3rivOEk
