Should sex be a right, when you live in a developed first-world country that is capable of providing for all?
>>29879369
No socialism is stupid, I prefer libertarianism where people are free to make choices on what individuals they choose to have sex with. Some losers just aren't cut out for the free market, and only the capable and talented should be allowed to thrive.
You know that roasties will be against this 100%, because such a measure would make them lose most of the social power that they currently hold.
>>29879408
I don't think you know what socialism is at all. How old are you?
>>29879438
If sex was state provided it would be socialism, and it would mean state owned sex-slaves. Therefore they don't get to choose
>>29879408
Why is a system where a small group of people owns everything and makes everyone work for money until they die "free"? You act as though this is the default "base" system that people naturally defer to, when capitalism has only existed for 200 or so years.
>>29879369
if we get sex robots sure, but you can't force people into prostitution
>>29879463
State ownership =/= socialism, you dumb teenage fuck.
>>29879408This is an oregano condiment right here
Genital integrity should be a right, so that you can provide yourself with the full amount of self-love that nature/god intended when it crafted your body
The foreskin is basically a man's vagina. If he has his own, he will be able to enjoy its pleasures himself.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foreskin_gliding_action_in_masturbation.ogv
>>29879369
I would prefer a system like Islam's Sharia Law where women simply don't have rights, or where public shaming of whores and adulterers is widely accepted and espoused.
>>29879471
>You act as though this is the default "base" system that people naturally defer to, when capitalism has only existed for 200 or so years
Alright, and how did societies work before capitalism? Nobles, kings, and clergy were the owners. Peasants were taxed as the nobles saw fit and sent to fight in wars together with mercenaries. Moneylenders and early banking already existed. Sounds like it was the default for a long-ass time. Even those emperors back then weren't as all-powerful as Stalin or Hitler, that degree of big government is pretty recent.
