So if """FEMBOTS""" exist, how come none of them are taking a robot bf?
I think the idea of a "fembot" defeats itself.
If they took a robot bf they are normies and the robot is a normie.
Because """fembots""" think they're robots just because they can't get Chads. They reject robots all day.
>>29780033
Being a normie with a gf that browses 4chan wouldn't be so bad.
Think about how many normans browse this board with a girl sucking on their dick.
People here occasionally mention finding romantic partners on r9k. Pretty certain I've seen at least a few people imply they've gotten married to fellow robots too.
>>29780078
How?
Are these people taking cross country or international trips?
How can they afford it?
They are normies.
>>29780025
>if """FEMBOTS""" exist
you answered your own question
no female is a robot
>>29780111
Checked.
Of course, I know this. What I'm trying to do is see how the roasties respond to this. How can they rationalize themselves as losers when there are hordes of males ready to take them, most who are actually 5/10 dead average guys?
Interesting how no one claiming to be a "FEMBOAT" has replied yet. Could it be that this question makes you uncomfortable?
Maybe, after all, all you really are is a roastie who wants Chad's thick meat hammer, and would never settle for a "fellow" robot.
