Why is race mixing with Asians acceptable but race mixing with blacks isn't?its been proven time and time again that mulattos are more attractive than Eurasians.
>Why is race mixing with Asians acceptable
It's not
Race mixing is never acceptable. Fuck off soros shill
>>29720122
If race mixing with Asians were acceptable Elliot Rodger wouldn't have had a shit self concept
>>29720279
On the contrary. Race mixing is always acceptable especially in an individualistic free society
>>29720279
How can you say this cute face isn't acceptable?
>>29720122
>Why is race mixing with Asians acceptable
That's an illusion based on all those threads you see where guys think that an Asian (read: Japanese) girl will be submissive to them or whatever, but that's it. When we talk about Asians we only mean Japan anyway, overall speaking Asia is a dreadful place.
>>29720409
>grotesque negro frog features on caucasian skull
+.15, made me respond
>>29720511
>Asian (read: Japanese) girl
Asians are lower on the totempole than white women and therefor obtainable, even to a loser anime dweeb.
>>29720122
>tfw ugly as shit mulatto
>it's mostly just because I'm fat but still
>most people just think I'm Mexican
It's alright I guess, My older brother is mega chad tho. If you have a questions ask.
>>29720520
She's more beautiful than any girl you could ever get
>>29720554
Post pictures of your brother
>>29720608
lmao I thought it was a guy when I posted >>29720520
>>29720684
I know most white men look very feminine but this is what a girl looks like
>>29720724
I don't see it desu. I don't expect you mulattos to have good taste though. Like attracts like.
>>29720768
You don't see her obvious tits?nevermind..i know most white men have huge breasts so, I guess having tits isn't a female trait for white people.
>>29720800
kek now it looks like a tranny. I'm sure you can do better than that.
>>29720865
whats wrong with a good tranny?
>>29720865
Her face is feminine as fuck
Mexican-American here.
Honestly id be so bummed out if my kids were dark skinned.
My family and alot of other Mexicans are kinda fucked up towards darker skinned people, blacks are an automatic no-no.
Im light skinned myself (often get confused for white or mixed) so thats a blessing.
My friends that are 1/2 Mexican 1/2 black have it the worst. I try not to to judge at all since theyre really cool people but even they acknowledge that racism is still a very real thing.
>>29721062
>Mexican
Literally nobody cares about what you have to say, beaner.
Oh, we're building that wall also, say buh bye to your free ride
>>29721286
>implying im not a US Citizen
>implying i cant trace my family lineage to when California was still part of Mexico and not the US
Get fucked
>>29720122
>its been proven time and time again that mulattos are more attractive than Eurasians.
Said no one ever.
>>29721390
We all know the only way you could be "legal" is if your little maria mom slithered across the border and shat you out here. But don't worry, Trump is gonna take care of you and the rest of you anchor babies
>>29721418
No one has to say it. Anyone with eyes can see it.
>>29721440
Nice troll attempt but no go.
Literally no one in my immediate family has crossed the border.
Proud California born and raised.
>>29721440
Youre paying taxes so i could go to school :) thank you
>>29721574
>I can either go with hard statistics and simple facts, or I can believe paco in his silly attempt to claim he's American
Hmmm, I wonder which to choose
You're silly. Eurasians have the potential to be the most attractive people. Of course there's a few that turn out like Elliot Rodgers but they're few and far between, unlike ugly half-blacks. You see those all over the place. The girl you're posting is so amazingly average, her black features are muted out by white ones which is her saving grace.
>>29721836
Eurasians just look Asian or like white people with Down's syndrome
She's 48 and looks amazing. Your mulatto chick is gonna be 200lbs at that point.
If you think this looks like Down's Syndrome you need to get your eyes checked.
>>29721904
I can't even tell she's mixed. She just looks like a plain Asian woman. There's nothing memorable about her. This girl has a look that a person will remember. she was scouted to be a model numerous times and she eventually gave in and became a model. She's so beautiful that she had agencies begging to sign her but she rejected them all.
>>29721951
Yes she does look like a downy. Bad example.
>>29722044
Sorry that you can't afford eye treatment, friend :(
>>29722067
Fat chubby face, fucked up teeth, small eyes.
She looks like she has fetal alcohol syndrome or she's a downy.
>>29722085
Why did you link a picture of a white girl? They look nothing alike.
>tfw you'll never be a half-Korean Adonis
>>29722125
She looks exactly like a white girl with Down's syndrome
>>29722140
He looks like a white guy with too much plastic surgery
Stay buttmad
>>29722180
Looks like like an basic Asian woman. I would have no idea she was mixed until you told me. What's the point of being mixed if you look 100% Asian?
>>29722211
But they don't, you just can't tell the difference yourself. Unless you have huge nigger lips on a white-frame you can't see racial distinctions. It's interesting. Are you full black or mixed?
>>29722249
She looks exactly like a Korean woman after plastic surgery.
What's so great about white peoples axe wound lips anyway?full, soft kissable lips are better.
>>29722294
I agree, whites are ugly unless they're mixed with Korean, or even the lower Asians. But are you full nigger or only half?
Because negroes have a mean IQ of 85.
Their low-IQ genes are toxic to humanity's progress.
They're like toxic waste. They should be removed from the rest of humanity's gene pool or failing that they should be kept as seperate as possible. Every time a non-black breeds with a black it's like a little bit of that toxic waste leeks out into humanity's gene pool.
If every single non black in the world interbred with a black then in one generation the mean IQ of the world would plummet from 100 to roughly 92.
This would make geniuses like Einstein or Von-Neumann far less likely to occur.
That's why race mixing with niggers should be discouraged as much as possible.
You might say "but what about the <16% of niggers whose IQs are greater than or equal to 100?" But even if you know a nigger is one of the minority who has a triple digit IQ , by having a child with him you will be encouraging the trend, and most people who end up breeding with niggers will not have checked their IQ, so in general racemixing with a nigger you'd expect their IQ to be 85.
Don't mix your genes with shit.
P.s. The above may not apply to East Africans like Eritreans and Ethiopians who are known to have ~30% Caucasoid (Semitic) admixture, but like with negroes who have IQ >=100, same considerations about encouraging damaging trends apply.
>>29722328
White are better looking than Asians in average by they look better mixed with black. And I'm full black, you dog eating chink.
>>29722331
Who cares about iq if you're attractive?
>>29720138
>>29720279
lmoa
>he thinks /pol/ can decide what is acceptable or not
get with times. the only people with your mentality are subhuman tribalists
>>29722357
Keep guessing my race wrong lmao I don't think I've gotten anyone this angry before. Your 'people' do have the reputation for being quick to anger though...
>>29722396
I'm not angry. Just need an excuse to post pictures of cute mixed people.
>>29722415
But you're only posting niggers. When are you gonna get to the cute ones?
>>29722428
Half black half white are the only cute ones. Anything else is inferior.
>>29722446
Keep telling yourself that :)
Damn it feels good not to be black
>>29722473
But it feels even better to be mixed
>>29722415
hehehe his kids are going to be basically all white when he gets with a white girl. That's right, black man, breed yourself out of existence. Your grandchildren will be white boys
>>29722559
I have nothing against white people. I just find that mixed people are better looking.
>>29722378
Anyone considering someone else as a potential father or mother because even if they have supermodel looks such that they will be successful no matter how stupid they are, their children could easily not be attractive enough to live off their looks alone.
Lots of beautiful actresses and models end up with kids who are only quite attractive.
>>29720122
probably because men, especially the kind of inexperienced, low self esteem men who hang around here, have fragile egos, and black racemixing is nearly always BM/WF which makes the aforementioned men feel cucked.
personally i don't care because i wasn't going to fuck those coalburning sloots anyway, but I'll sure as hell fuck their gorgeous mixie daughters
>>29722378
women. ever noticed how most of them don't have kids with the most attractive man they can find, and instead with the most financially stable and high status men they can find?
and it's been shown that a man's attractiveness doesn't determine the attractiveness of his kids anyway, so it's almost as if this is how we've evolved.
>>29722331
>That's why race mixing with niggers should be discouraged as much as possible.
I see it the other way around. In fact, I just had a long discussion about this on another board where I argued it is the responsibility of high IQ Europeans to breed better blacks for the good of humanity.
Blacks don't have to be wild, aggressive low IQ savages who chimp out and rape, murder or enslave one another at the drop of a hat. We just need to control who is reproducing. We should obviously start by IQ testing and sterilizing the 85% of blacks with double digit IQ (but we can keep them alive to perform relatively unskilled manual labor; no need to euthanize them outright).
From there, we'll start artificially inseminating nignogs and other low IQ dark skinned people with sperm from high IQ European donors so that they give birth to higher IQ mixed race offspring. If nothing else, this would ultimately reduce the money spent on foreign aid since they might figure out how to feed themselves without digging for rats. Pic related.
How to actually go about doing any of this in a non-fascist world? That I do not know. It basically has to be voluntary. We'll have to invest money in a propaganda program for indoctrinating people (in white western countries as well as shitskins from less developed countries) from birth in the benefits of new eugenics.
>>29723796
>it is the responsibility of high IQ Europeans to breed better blacks for the good of humanity.
in order to truly do this successfully you basically need to get rid 95% of the existing black male population, and genocide is usually frowned upon.
>>29723869
>You basically need to get rid 95% of the existing black male population
I addressed that in my second paragraph where I said "We should obviously start by IQ testing and sterilizing the 85% of blacks with double digit IQ (but we can keep them alive to perform relatively unskilled manual labor; no need to euthanize them outright)."
>and genocide is usually frowned upon.
Eugenics in general, however benign in theory and practice, is usually frowned upon. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't at least try to fight the good fight. We are essentially fighting a genetic war. We--that is, comparatively high IQ people of European or East Asian heritage--should absolutely aspire to spread our genes as much as possible to counterbalance those doing the same with their shit genes. I'm lamenting the impending so-called white extinction so much as the reduction of the positive genetic traits in the global gene pool largely inherent to whites.
The western world is obviously on track to become a victim of multiculturalism (not that it isn't already). We're letting low IQ savages into the first world and we're getting rape-game playing refugees as a result. The rapefugees ironically enough will probably win the genetic war because they aren't inhibited by things like a conscience; they spread their genes forcefully--without even considering whether it is moral, let alone the long term societal consequences--while we sit on our thumbs, terrified of offending delicate minds by actually wresting control of the ship called humanity.
We need to do something to resist this. Deporting rapist migrants is obviously a necessary first step but to take it to the next level, we need to start fighting fire with fire. In the simplest terms, we either remake the world in our own genetic image or watch as genetically inferior trash remake it in theirs.
>>29724044
>genetically inferior trash
if they win out in the end, clearly they aren't inferior.
>>29724184
It depends on your definition of superiority, but I agree with this observation in principle. To wit--
-They're superior at diverting and consuming resources.
-They're "superior" at behaving immorally and even amorally.
-They're superior at behaving selfishly, like a tribe, rather than suffering from lofty ideals like pluralism.
Basically, they behave instinctively and do whatever will advantage their genetic interests whereas westerners are burdened by their conscience. Westerners suffer from being too evolved for their own genetic good.
This does raise the question whether the western world is even worth saving but when you consider the alternative--letting humanity fester into an enormous cess pool of genetic waste--I think it's a battle well worth fighting.
This concludes my rambling for now.
>>29720122
miscegenation is always a bad idea and anybody who tries to tell you definitively and absolutely otherwise is a brainwashed leftist
>>29724400
I'm >>29723796 and I don't see how anyone could possibly read my posts ITT and describe me as a brainwashed leftist.
To be honest, you're the one who comes across as a little brainwashed. It's like you literally never once stopped to think about winning the genetic war on a more grand level than simply existing in an unpolluted state.
Us artificially inseminating high IQ nignogs--at no cost to our own pure white families--won't deteriorate the genetic stock of the white race.
Mulatta chicks are gorgeous, /pol/fags are only pretending to not like them.
Do /pol/ weaboos expect to have a fob Chinese wife and then produce some sort of ""master race"" kids?
>>29720122
>mulattos are more attractive than Eurasians
you think
half black half white girls have the BEST bodies
>>29722331
>substituting "IQ" in place of "socioeconomic disparity"
Why do retards always do this and how can you convince me you're not a retard
>>29724902
i know a guy at school like this.
literally white nigger. hes a real fatass and smelly too. all he does is talk about gta 5
>>29724868
Well the Chinese are gross...
I've only dated half-Asians and half-Koreans are the best looking people ever.
>>29725213
point is, /pol/ weaboos are huge autistic faggots
>>29720122
Black people are violent and stupid while Asians aren't? What's the confusion here?
>>29725333
Barack Obama is the president of the United States and Elliot Rodger is a dead psychopath
>>29720122
because niggers
>its been proven time and time again that mulattos are more attractive than Eurasians.
this is where youre wrong
Oh boy oh boy!I wonder who could be behind this post?
>>29725382
No, I think he's right
I think mulattas are really hot, eurasian girls can be hot too though.
>>29720122
Tfw 70% white and some people aprichiate that.
mixed people tend to be darker than in the pics in this thread.
>>29725129
i dunno, man, why do poor and middle class asians still manage to outscore even whites? why do blacks adopted into well to do white families still underperform academically?
humans have breeds, and there are obvious genetic differences between them.
if there's only a 4% difference in the dna between humans and chimps, and it makes such an enormous difference, who's to say that some 0.1% difference in the dna between "races" doesn't make a significant difference as well?
there's really not enough objective research on the subject, because you're stigmatized as a racist for even entertaining the idea in left-leaning academic communities.
>>29725283
the entirety of /pol/ are trumpcock sucking autist faggots.
>>29725594
there's way less than a 0.1% difference in DNA between races. Dog breeds aren't even considered different subspecies, and they have wider genetic gaps than those between human races.
>>29725283
What even is /pol/?
>>29725613
yes, that too. Miserable people.
>>29725594
Asian culture, at least China, has stressed academic for a very long time. So even a poor Asian family will focus on scholarly success, generally.
It's not that Asians are magically superior.
Do Asian chicks have smelly feet?
because black people are gross now fuck off reddit
hgjhghjgjhgjhghjgj
>>29725763
I see /pol/faggots doing similar things, what's your point?
Crybaby /pol/ weaboo autist
>>29720122
Race mixing is not acceptable if you are north european
you have nothing to gain
>>29725594
>i dunno, man, why do poor and middle class asians still manage to outscore even whites?
There are less poor Asians than poor blacks. They perform better on average because Asians do not give up their culture easily. Large numbers of blacks live in disaffected communities where they have little chance from childhood onward to adapt values that allow them to compete on a wider scale.
>why do blacks adopted into well to do white families still underperform academically?
Adopted children in general face problems such as finding appropriate mentors and feeling disconnected from the host family. I would say that they're more prone to social pressures.
>who's to say that some 0.1% difference in the dna between "races" doesn't make a significant difference as well?
This is a better point. But we can look at specific races, such as highly isolated communities of Ashkenazi Jews, and say that the specific genetic differences that incidentally promote intelligence are very, very rare. Tay-Sachs for example is a mutation caused by inbreeding. It is one of the very few diseases we can point to and say, "Look, this is definitely responsible for intelligence". If we wanted a better measure of intellectual difference we would compare retards to average people, and note that retards are overwhelming retarded because of genetic mutations that are not supposed to occur. If we wanted to be even more precise, we would compare average people to gifted people. As you move further along the curve, you see that cultural and economic conditions have a significant effect on intelligence. Educational achievement is one obvious outcome here. Then you have personality differences which raise/lower measured IQ depending on the circumstance, and so on. Going further we see that extremely intelligent people also become more rare, just like retards who were the product of inbreeding or some unusual genetic deficiency.
(cont'd)
which race of women has the best smelling asses?
>>29725594
>>29725940
My argument for you on the last point is that, if there is a very small genetic difference between races, we haven't seen it affect intelligence very much.
Also, as we know, IQ only tests the kind of intelligence we're looking for in highly rational, industrial societies. Modern languages have huge vocabularies, but poor black youth do not need so many words to operate in their social circles. Progressive matrices and spatial comprehension ask us to look more than a few steps ahead, but the Indian restaurant owner who deals entirely with accounts and recipes has no use for these complexities.
>there's really not enough objective research on the subject, because you're stigmatized as a racist for even entertaining the idea in left-leaning academic communities.
I agree.
>>29726196
I read something about US born Mexican-American IQ going up over the years, if that's true then it would be cool to see the findings be published.
>>29726239
That's really cool. I'd like to see this published as well. On that note, I'm waiting for European countries to publish falling scores due to mass immigration :^)
>>29726315
It's not "PC" to test for differences among races, in the end though this kind of fucks minorities because now the racial autists will keep spouting outdated info.
>>29726040
probably Latinas, followed by Asians
>>29726349
Yeah man. Disparities are a bitch and people are quick to inject their own biases.
