>RoboChad will be a reality sooner than expected
How can we even compete?
The question will be how roasties will compete if female sex bots are a thing.
No more beta orbiters for them nasty roasties :^)
WE'RE ALL GOING TO HAVE SEX IN 9 YEARS?
>>29651156
>some beta thinks that robots will change Chads
Robots (actual ones) will be merely dildo v2 for roasties, not actual thing.
>Stupid bait click article trying to make women feel superior about sexbots even when feminists say sexbots are sexist.
>Hey, sexbots are sexist toys for rapists and misoginists who can't handle real women, BUT I guess we wymenz have it better with them.
Fucking kill me.
>>29651196
They won't need orbiters once the government subsidizes everything for them.
>>29651259
That's because feminist lack long term vision.
Most women may not lust after a generic idealized version of an individual of the opposite sex like men do, but most women love men that have been given a high status, and which they have seen share some kind of emotion. Singers. Actors. Politicians.
Most can't get to be brutally fucked by Idris Elba, Justin Bieber and Michael Fassbender. So they rely on fanfiction and deviantart fanpics.
They can't get it. But if they choose to, would they? Probably. And sexbots will allow that. Modular physical features, voices, behaviors. Vibrating 10 inch cocks that cum gallons of sweet nectar. They'll just have to do or buy the clothes.
What do I want to do this Friday night? Be spitroasted by some popular rappers? Raped (under my conditions) by that guy from Walking Dead? Maybe masturbated to unconsciousness by a young James Dean?
If feminists don't ban them first, women will be the biggest consumers of robo companions, just like they are the biggest consumers of literature (because of romance novels), tv (because of gossip and romance shows), etc.
Haha dumb roasties
they are still used to emotional connections
when they switch to robots expect mass suicide from emotional women who can't handle the loneliness,
we are ready, they are not
>as common for women as watching porn is today
So, markedly less common than it is for men, then.
>>29651383
I don't get why women don't admit touching themselves and watching porn/otomes.
I mean, I don't go telling everyone I fap to doujins or watch porn, but I can talk about that with friends and people I have confidence with, but women get angry the instant you ask them about that.
>emotional creatures will take the most emotional and intimate act with another human and replace it with a lifeless plastic robotic dildo
Wow I'm definitely investing in this idea
>>29651544
>implying robots won't be actually capable of love, unlike real women
Besides, robotic men won't have status, or money or whatever, which is what women really want
>>29651469
>I mean, I don't go telling everyone I fap to doujins or watch porn, but I can talk about that with friends and people I have confidence with, but women get angry the instant you ask them about that.
Women prefer to fuck Chad and be done with it, because they have this option readily available. So many still don't even bother watching porn, it's just a men fetish to imagine women watching the same kind of porn and loving every second of it.
>>29651156
by that point the average 21 year old virgin will have fucked his robofu more times thatn a chad has sex in his whole life
>>29651469
Because women see porn as a form of cheating.
They think that you suspect them of this "cheating", independent of they do or do not masturbate.
>>29651357
>They won't need orbiters once the government subsidizes everything for them.
good luck with that when most men fuck off from the system and become ramen eating neets happy to play videogames and fuck their robots all day
>>29651357
Nigga the fuck you on about? A lot of dudes would be pretty content with a realdoll that has realistic feeling skin/vagina and can bend over on it's own after a voice command, which is pretty much all these things are going to be for a very long time. By the time machines can be dominant, assertive, and otherwise successfully emulate fucking a celebrity up to female standards humanity will be collectively obsolete anyway.
>>29651156
I feel like sexbots just won't be as appealing to women as they will be to men.
Sexbots have no status, and they won't make other women jealous because they can just buy their own chadbot that looks and acts exactly the same. Men just want sexbots to cuddle and have sex with.
feminist reversal fantasy
women can't live without the attention of men while men can easily fuck off to escapist fantasy worlds and end up dying there.
>>29651156
Yeah that's not gonna happen. RoboChad won't be able to get shit off the tall shelves or pay for expensive shoes.
>will be as common as watching porn
90% of women don't watch any porn at all
Why would you watch porn when you can get sex anytime you want. Fucking athiests.
