![og6go10[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/awApuvc.jpg "og6go10[1].jpg")
Okay this is a subject only for fembots.
Speaking purely in the sense of sex as a whole, and sexual appeal, how important is dick size? I want a resolute answer.
Is it always "BIGGA DICKS BETTA" or is it more complex? As a guy, I know that big breasts and big asses aren't always "bigger is better" and it has a lot to do with shape and proportion, and a lot of guys even prefer small, tight butts.
But for women, is sexual intercourse with a larger dick vastly preferred, or is it just a meme? If there were two guys both with likeable personalities, same height, but one had a bigger dick than the other (noticeably), would you prefer the larger over the other guy? Or is this question too general, and am I ignoring that specific size matters more because a 7 inch dick which may please one girl, may be too big for another girl?
Asking because I'm average but on the fence about investing in penile enlargement (bathmate, pumps, etc) tools.
it matters
>>29593979
Girls care as muh as height. I have 7 inch. I am happy. No girl thinks 7 inch is too big.
Depends on the girl. Most don;t care. Obviously being way too small or big isnt a good thing.
>>29593979
It matters a lot. Smaller dicks are not sexual like bigger dicks are.
![Eros_Farnese_MAN_Napoli_6353[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/O8LOfH6.jpg "Eros_Farnese_MAN_Napoli_6353[2].jpg")
>>29594011
>>29594043
>big dick insecurity intensifies
>not sexual like bigger dicks are
Here's the Greek god of love.
Well it varies from woman to woman when it comes to "ideal penis size". Just like how guys junk comes in all dimensions and sizes so too does a girls vagina. I have a very narrow and shallow vagina so my BFs dick, who is only like 5 and a half inches, cant even go "balls deep". he can fit most of it in but not all before hes ramming straight into my cervix and causing pain.
This board always makes me laugh. You guys seem to think your experts on women but are under the impression that every single vagina is the same. It obvious of virgin talk really.
>>29594152
I'd be pretty pissed off if my gf's vagina was too shallow to take my whole cock. Disgusting.
>>29594152
Okay, I was aware that vagina's aren't all the same, but porn has really warped my perception on size, and the increasing amount of cuck porn has been making me feel...Uneasy.
Overall it's reassuring to hear this.
>>29594152
With such a small vagina you have, if you were male i reckon it would be no bigger than 3 or so inches. As a general rule, turn the vagina inside out or measure the distance to her cervix, that is her "penis size"
>>29594239
Are you a complete fucking idiot, or just a total troll?
The clitoris is the literal female penis, you dipshit.
>>29594230
She's telling you lies. If her vagina is actually that small she has a medical condition
>>29594279
I dated a girl once that had an alarmingly shallow vagina. I could feel her cervix just by fingering her. I was inexperienced at the time, so it made me wonder if she was like part-hermie or something, where her vagoo didn't develop fully in the womb.
>>29594269
Then explain why men with big dicks sisters have big vaginas?
>>29594279
WRONG. It could be because she is much smaller, probably 5"1 or 5"2.
Smaller women have shallower vaginas.
>>29594312
>Then explain why men with big dicks sisters have big vaginas?
[citation needed]
Who the fuck told you that, lol, do you fuck your sister?
>>29594315
>smaller women have shallower vaginas
Prove it. Are you saying smaller men have thinner urethras too? NO
>>29593979
I don't know, I'm a virgin. I don't think I'd care too much unless it's micro penis tier
>>29594279
Implying a permavirgin like you knows anything about vaginas
>>29594315
It is a complete myth that short, petite girls have smaller, tighter vaginas than taller or bigger girls.
>>29594400
How do you know im a permavirgin. I know more than most women do about vaginas because i read real internet facts about them, u dont need to stick your hand in one to know
Does anyone else think vagina is a disgusting word? It just sounds weird
>>29594370
>false equivalency
Either way, it enlarges during arousal anyway, so a small girls vagina can be just as large as a taller girls vagina.
>>29594418
>I know more than most women do about vaginas because i read real internet facts about them
Anon, its time to stop posting.
To be honest, without knowing what dicks actually feel like, a larger dick would likely be preferred because aesthetically, that is what girls are conditioned to think is better. But there is a golden size range between like 5" and 7" which is perfect for giving blowjobs. Any larger than that and the chick would need a huge mouth for it to be enjoyable for both her and the guy.
>>29594418
Permavirgin ogre dick detected.
>>29593979
Lots of women opt for guys with smaller dongs. The guy inside matters first.
It matters but so does being good at sex. I'd rather a 5 inch guy who knows how to use it than a 7 inch guy who doesn't.
It really depends on personal taste though. I don't really care for penises larger than 7 inches while a female friend of mine is okay with her bf being 4 inches.
>>29594308
she might not have been fully aroused, the vagina expands somewhat upon arousal. yes, secret internal vagina erections are real and fun
in response to op's question; average dicks can provide sufficient stimulation for most, larger ones are fun but not necessary, considerably smaller than average dicks are not ideal unless you really like the person
>>29594447
>that is what girls are conditioned to think is better
Guy confirmed.
Largest consumer of pornography is men. Men are the only ones being "conditioned" to think larger is better in order to sell penile enlargement tools and supplements.
>>29593979
me on the Ieft
d
>>29594454
You have a small putrid penis
>>29594152
i have same size of wee wee, any tips on doing good on gf? im great with hands and mouth so making her cum is not a problem but i notice quite the difference with sex, she enjoys but cant cum that easily
>>29594489
Kek, and yet more girls want to fuck it than your baby-arm, get fucked, oh wait, you can't.
>>29594149
They put baby dicks on statues for the same reason she stated. Small dicks are not sexual, if they put a man-sized dick on there it would be viewed as pornography, with a kid dick it's art.
That or they wanted to troll women into thinking their husbands had massive dicks, as women would most likely only see a small number of dicks in her life at that time. If all you've seen as examples were babydick statues then saw your husband's average sized pecker, you'd think he's hung like a horse.
My opinion, it does matter, if yours is small it's just another disadvantage to overcome. It isn't everything.
>>29594473
Small penis confirmed. Keep trying to deny reality cuckboy, the truth is big dick is the best and always has been and womens preferences for bigger cock will only increase with time
>>29594239
This is probably one of the dumbest fucking things I've read in a while. this is straight up uneducated "bro science" if I've ever seen it. clearly you slept though your health class on the day they were explaining the phase in a fetus when it develops into male and the differences from female.
>>29594506
Stimulate her clit while you're fucking her.
>>29594506
It's always more difficult in general for a woman to cum from penile stimulation alone. Even if you have a 20 inch dick and you're fucking a size queen, you'll still most likely have to use your hands and mouth on her clit and breasts.
Unless of course you aim and position yourself well enough to hit her G-Spot. That's one bonus to not having a huge dick, you can easily get your head to rub up against it.
>>29594203
This is the type of mentality we have to go back to. Women are meant to serve men, we're the ones that need to be picky. Your dick is never too small, the whores pussy is too big. Its never too big, her pussy is too small. Dont care what they think, this is our fucking world. They have no right to choose in sexual selection.
>>29594536
An anime faggot taking the bait - no surprises there. Who would have thought that somebody autistic enough to enjoy anime would have trouble picking up on social cues?
>>29594520
>They put baby dicks on statues for the same reason she stated. Small dicks are not sexual, if they put a man-sized dick on there it would be viewed as pornography, with a kid dick it's art.
Wrong, the Greeks thought huge penises were disgusting and barbaric. That's why you had their enemies who they deemed uncivilized and un-cultured to have larger more "cartoony" penises.
Please, tell me more about how the God of love, was given a smaller dick size so as NOT to be sexualized, you fucking inbred retard.
>>29593979
>fem
>bot
Pick one
>>29593979
Size absolutely matters, just not exactly in the way men are obsessive about.
Girth matters more than length. The ideal girth-o-penis is exactly a miniscule bit larger than the vaginal width under conditions of baseline penetration.
This is because the basic use of penetration during normal-sex, for a woman, is the feeling of fullness it causes. When the girth of one's penis is slightly bigger than the width of your vagina during normal-penetration, it stretches you just right, and maximises this feeling, which is really pleasant (though not in an ecstatic sense) and enhances the felt intimacy.
The vaginal canal is not sensitive beyond the first few centimeters. While a good girth enhances the feeling of sexual pleasure caused by friction, this is not a major deal.
When girth < width, this feeling is lessened, though not diminished outside edge cases.
When girth > width (beyond what normal vaginal elasticity can account for) sex is either impossible, or painful (in the cramps-and-general-discomfort way, not in a sexual way) and may cause tears, which are not meant to be caused in one's vagina. Don't believe me? Go tear your dick and try to fap. That'll give you the idea.
>>29594506
vaginal orgasm isn't possible/easily attainable for most women
try extra stimulation of other areas at the same time
effort mode: nipple play, clit-rubbing, butt fingering (my personal favourite)
easy mode: get her to hold a magic wand to her clit/vulva or get her to wear an internal vibe like the we-vibe
>>29594552
yeah i do that too, hard to syncro hand and pelvis tho
>>29594556
yeah i try to do angling to hit different spots...changing rhytm also important? or doesnt really matter? girl likes very fast trusts but i cant do that for a long time
>>29593979
>>29594607
Part 2
Length is more complicated. The lengthier one's penile extension is, the better the sex will be if the guy is proportionally skilled. Sex will be worse the less skilled the guy is. This is because, and as I stated above, the vaginal canal is *not* sensitive beyond the entrance. There is however the anterior and posterior fornix spots (A-spot and P-spot) which are two of the *most* sensitive spots and are burried deep into the pussy, right above and below the cervix, poking which tends to hurt. So a long dick can reach these spots, while a shorter one can't. But if the guy isn't skilled to hit them and is hitting your cervix, sex may even become unbearably uncomfortable. Conversely, If the dick is not long, he can't hit these spots, but if less skilful, won't risk hurting you. Outside edge cases (of dicks which are unmanageably large or below ~3.5 inches), a longer dick is best suited to skilled lovers, and a moderate or smaller dick is suitable for unskilled ones.
While a longer dick may be useful to accomplish certain magical feelings, or with proper skill even moderate cervical contact for people who like rough sex (but who also won't make it through a guy directly punching their cervix with their dickspear), a moderate one is less risky and does not result in below baseline satisfaction for one's partner.
A major component of sexual satisfaction for girls is one's pubic area rubbing their clitoris, hence the importance (beyond enhancing feelings of intimacy) of skin contact, from a purely instrumental perspective. This can be substituted by means of manual manipulation of the clitoris.
>>29593979
>>29594625
Part 3/3
Ideal sex for the average female human can be represented by the equation
>Vw*Ve + VL = Pg + PL*RSM / Ls + Sc
Or the perfect sex consists in sexual intercourse with a maximally skilful lover (Ls) possessing an instrument with girth (Pg) equal to vaginal width (Vw) multiplied by vaginal elasticity (Ve) and length (PL) equal to aroused vaginal canal length (VL) (length may receive a Rough Sex Multiplier), and maximal skin contact or clitoral manipulation (Sc)
Seriously though: The best sex is with a guy whose girth matches your width as far as your elasticity allows, whose length matches your length and he is skilled enough to hit the go and not the no zones, and where your clitoris gets maximally stimulated when aroused.
Also bigger dicks are funnier to play with. But a guy with a moderate dick is adequate where an unskilled lover with a long dick is inadequate and too girthy a dick is prohibitive.
>>29594587
Hahahahaa poor needledick ok whatever you say boy
>>29593979
First off, penis enlargement is a meme. It doesn't work permanently without consequences.
On the issue. Big dicks GENERALLY look better, but this is subjective and cultural. In america bigger is always better, but in places where men can wear non knee length shorts big dicks can make you seem creepy.
For actual sex its really even more specific than just girl to girl preferences. It comes down to session to session preferences. Sometimes I want to have gentle sensual slow sex. Small dicks are way better. I dont want to have anything large inside me for very long.
Sometimes I want to have rough sex. Small dicks win again. You really cant be rough with a big penis without risking actual internal damage, especially if the dick in long and thin.
Some times I crave the feeling of stretching and deep penetration. Obviously Big dick is great for this.
My personal preference lies toward rough sex most of the time. So average dicks are best for me, and I can always use a toy if I want a stretching sensation.
Holding all else equal, I would say the guy with the bigger dick LOOKED hotter, But the guy with the more average dick would be a much better long term sexual partner.
Source: Imma grill.
>>29594622
Practice makes perfect.
You have to read her body language. Once you start doing something she likes, keep doing it. If she says "don't stop", don't switch things up, just keep going. Every girl is different to some degree. My last gf would just grind on my dick until she climaxed. Kinda sucked though, 'cause I just felt like a dildo lying there.
>>29594587
The greeks were sexually retarded then. What did all the other cultures think? My culture today says no. The god of love also looks like he's 12 years old and his penis is 10 years old
>>29594657
>>29594669
>big dick insecurity intensifies
>needledick
My girth is 5.5 inches, but okay, whatever you say Shrek.
>>29593979
I have a regular 6 inch dick. I've had the two women I've shown it to tell me it was too disgusting and small and basically laughed me out of the room. Women will only accept a thick, aesthetic, big dick or nothing.
>>29594646
Why is it so complicated? Why aren't all vaginas and penises just one size
>>29594697
>ITT: things that never happened
What, did you hook up on craigslist and lie about your dick size to women looking for gigantic dicks?
>>29594697
>having to physically hold down your mons fat
i wonder why
>>29594697
Your length really isn't the problem here you're just really lacking in girth.
Those women were really rude though they could have just said they weren't interested.
>>29594695
Thank you for calling me shrek. You may see shrek as an insult to me but shrek is one of my favorite cartoon characters and his big penis is desirable. What is the length of your penis? Is it smaller than your circumference? :/
>>29594697
Well it certainly looks way cleaner than mine
>>29594660
FUCKING WHORE GET THE FUCK OUT REEEE
>>29594697
hope it's bs
if not, sorry for your feels anon
>>29594667
yup i agree, reading her is basic yet apparently very overlooked generally. but you know, you never end to learn, so hearing some tricks might turn out in nice surprises
she was my first gf and was quite experienced but when i was first making her squirt i was quite pleased
>>29594660
Stop, youre destroying hope
>Asking because I'm average but on the fence about investing in penile enlargement (bathmate, pumps, etc) tools.
You will likely end up destroying your penis (and by extension pretty much your entire life) if you go this route.
Ask a doctor about it first. If he knows anything about how the penis works he'll tell you not to do it.
Or, go on PEGYM and listen to the advice of a bunch of guys who mutilate their own dicks all day, lol
>>29594724
>What is the length of your penis? Is it smaller than your circumference?
No.
>>29594711
Because pubic fat is the number one reason why most average sized men think they're smaller than they actually are?
>>29594724
how do we know shrek has a big penis
what if shrek had a microdick all along and fiona had to deal with it because they didn't fuck before they got ogre married
>>29594774
The best was a girl I briefly dated that got off on being told to cum. It was like fucking on easy mode. At any point I wanted, "Come for me, slut", and 10-15 seconds later, boom.
>>29594790
Porn mostly
It is as important as height.
>>29594758
>>29594775
What did I do wrong? Please explain!
>>29594811
kek so much for the reading body language skilz
did you get anyone who liked getting choked?
Anyone else have a sneaking suspicion that the chad tier guys are also the ones with the huge dicks as well? Its like they got everything else gifted by genetic, why wouldn't their dicks be huge also? When you see a short, balding middle aged cuck looking office rat do you really think he has a dick over 5 inches?
>>29594777
Depends. There's a lot of mixed results from penile extension tools, but the general consensus is, if you're not careful you can easily, permanently handicap your penis in the long term.
The only medically certified way of enlarging ones penis is through surgery, which has similar long-term consequences of the tools you can use, but at a lower risk.
Doctors can and have prescribed pumps and surgery to men with micro penises.
She tells you not to worry about penis size
When Chad unzips his pants she can't believe her eyes
>>29594858
kneejerk reaction to someone having the hubris to openly be a woman on 4chan, even when the thread in question asks for female posters to reply
>>29594239
legit lost my shit reading this
thanks for the laughs
>>29594855
Scientists determined that factually speaking, height was more important than dick size. Who knew?
>>29594858
You gave an answer.
>>29594723
I figured my dick was average girth, but I guess it's thin as fuck.
>>29594711
Yeah, I'm overweight. That's not the issue though, my dick is. I got to the point where I was able to get a woman into my bed and I had them leave because my dick didn't please them.
>>29594897
If you get surgery you could never have big hard errctions again
>tfw stuck with this 7"x5.3" pencil dick
I'd trade 1" of length for .7" of girth.
Fuck this shit it looks skinny as fuck.
>>29594928
show us yer candlestick lad
>>29594152
>le small vagina
well i just watched a porn video of a petite getting wrecked by a 11 inches pole, she looked happy
>>29594955
It looks like an average penis on an overweight hairy guy.
Its nothing special and has some gross scars.
who cares if you're circumcised
>>29593979
>be Asian manlet
>4 incher
>encouraged enough to buy hooker
>MUH dream qt blonde
>"I might not have a big one tho" before drop pants
>white girl cannot hold her laugh
>storm out of room and didn't even pick up the $100bill on table
>she said sorry behind
>didn't turn around. Just ran
>>29594928
oh poor you :(((((
try being 6x4 you fucking chad
>>29594698
Sexual selection works thus:
Sperm competition (caused for instance in gangbangs where multiple males ejaculate in a single female) tend to result a) in penises shaped so as to scoop out sperm (for instance like mushrooms) and b) in bigger balls (which produce more sperm)
(I should also note that where sexual selection is less lovey dovey fashion show, and more hold-her-down-fast-fast-fast dicks end up in shapes which latch onto one's vagina and don't let go, and the species ejaculates as fast as possible)
Male sexual competition equilibriates penis length and girth with vaginal width and length (as penises not matching these are inadequate compared to those which do)
Practical application: the more mushroom shaped your dick or bigger your balls, the more gangbangs your ancient female relatives had. The more moderate your dick, marginally more of your male relatives were freely chosen by their mates.
So the answer is: the greater variance of sizes, the less of our ancestors selected their mates under conditions of pronounced sexual competition.
>>29594988
Chad doesn't care about penis size.
Chad fucks bitches even with a micro penis.
>>29594152
>"only 5.5 inch"
So big dick matters then
I don't know why big dick assholes on /r9k/ keep acting insecure when they don't have any idea how a guy with real small penis feel
>>29594927
Depends. The surgery I'm referring to gives you length, but no width. They take the erectile tissue that's deeper inside your body, and basically extend it out-ward.
I mean, doctors have successfully performed penile transplants, so it's getting easier and safer every year to elongate your penis.
>>29593979
>tfw have had women literally tell me they will never have sex with an uncut guy
I guess I'm somewhat lucky my parents decided to have me scarred.
>>29594697
You deserve it with your STD riddled dick.
>>29594152
>anime girl
lol don't tell me you guys fell for it
>>29595011
4.9 inches to 6.7 inches is considered average. After that you get an extreme drop off in sizes among the population.
Some studies will say between 5 and 7 inches, but that's only to round the numbers.
>>29595051
Whoever did your circumcision did a really good job
You guys will never understand what it's like for me. I have to pull my foreskin down for the head to be seen. Literally kill me.
>>29595051
will never understand what the first guy performing this had in mind, nor why people keep doing it today...just dont chop up your dick come on
>>29595051
Women say a bunch of stupid shit. I've never had a woman turn down my uncut dick. They'll joke about it being weird, but they're curious enough to try....and then, it's off to the races.
That is a pretty nice dick, though.
fuckin NORMIES
a as 30 yo permavirgin robot with a small penis
this thread makes me want to kill myself even more
>>29593979
Bigger= WOW! IMPRESSIVE! I AM SURPRISED!
It's like if you just do a backflip outta nowhere. It's just a cool surprise.
Normal:
Yay! Thank god he doesn't have a baby dick! This is plenty to satisfy me.
Small: ah damn... Well... I guess he makes up for it in other ways.
Micro penis:
Nope. Bye
>>29595051
>american girls will only have sex with mutilated cocks
I wonder who's responsible for this...
>>29595057
>I'm a virgin
>people say I look like I have an std
JUST
>>29594017
Nah height's infinitely more important. Especially considering that a lot of girls don't even orgasm from PIV it's not that important (because a big dick more often than not can't do much for them either), but height on the other hand is a huge factor in general physical appearance.
>>29594370
smaller man have smaller dicks
my dick is 5,2 inches but looks in good proportion to my body. if I had wider bones I am sure my dick was bigger too.
>>29594152
If I get a gf will I have to worry about being too big? Can't I just not hit the cervix if the woman is not into that?
>>29595137
This is dumb. My best bro is a manlet, and every single girl he's dated has made some comment about his huge cock.
>>29595137
Right because the penis is just another bone
>>29595105
It's pretty much common knowledge that in the mid 1800's, with the huge surge of immigrants, and the increase of worry about germs, that wealthier American's decided to go for circumcision, as it made them stand out among what they considered the "unclean, poor hordes of migrants".
Read up on it.
>>29595099
70% of the comments are insecure big dicks, or men pretending to be women, calm your shit.
>>29594918
>Scientists determined that factually speaking, height was more important than dick size. Who knew?
The first thing a woman looks at is the glutes. So if you have been doing your deadlifting and you got a firm tight butt, then most women will be attracted on first impression. Until they notice your manlet stature of course.
>>29594697
Same dick, different pic. Now do you guys see that an average dick is unattractive? It might have to do with the fact I'm not circumcised.
>>29595183
there's something comforting about the fact that whatever your gender or orientation, everyone appreciates having a nice firm arse to grip onto
>>29595183
Get out /fit/
>>29595091
It was done for health reasons, actually. It originated in a certain area with lots of sand, and not very lots of water. In such an area you would risk phimosis (since you couldn't really wash your dick very often and the area was conducive to little shit stuck under your foreskin) and circumcision was a precautionary operation to which was eventually attached religious and then cultural meaning. Incidentally, this is why people with plenty of access to water continue mutilating their dicks for no reason today. What was once a desperate measure for desperate times has become a socially sanctioned cultural practice which people discipline one another into perpetuating.
>>29595183
>tfw have a dash of negro blood and so have a naturally massive ass, no squats required. You should have seen my great grandmas ass, out of this world
>>29595196
those better be pimples on your shaft
>>29595196
>rudolph the red-cocked robot
>had a very shiny cock
>>29595229
There are small health benefits you anti-circ retard.
At least you've read up on the history of its origins at least.
Being slightly large is a small bonus.
Girls don't care if you're average.
It is very possible to be too big or too small.
You have to understand that things like breast and ass size are purely aesthetic. However, dick size is much more than that. If you are too small or too large, you will not be able to pleasure her. Compensating for aesthetics is completely different than giving up the physical feeling of proper penetration. Size absolutely does matter.
>>29595196
Ew what the fuck did you do to it
>>29595229
wow really? thx for explanation, sounds more or less logic
still doing it is barbarian tho, i love my unchopped dick
>>29595079
Does it get bigger when you poke on it?Because if it didn't I would mercy fuck you, to avoid the second-hand embarassment of sending you away, and all the guilt that would ensue if you were ok, but we would never see each other again with pants down
>>29594928
That's still above average girth dumbo
>>29595158
>>29595161 listen too
he might be a manlet but his whole body is wide, I noticed this at people. I bet his wrist is relatively wide or above avrage wide so his whole body is bigger.
if you took 2 people in the hight 175 cm, the one with the bigger bones will have bigger dick(of curse the dick is not a bone but it's mean all of his organs is bigger including his dick.
even tall person(like 185-190 cm but with really small skeleton will have small dick.
I've only fucked one person with a 4.5 inch penis.
Feels pretty good, I don't quite get why you would want a particularly large penis inside of you.
>>29595280
I'mfully erect.
Do you guys understand now?
>>29595286
Nope, he has a very small frame and small wrists. I have a waaaaay larger frame than he does, am 6'1" and my dick is average length (but above average girth).
>>29595266
>purely aesthetic
That matters a lot to a guy. He's constantly looking at and becoming aroused by your body, so bigger breasts can easily make him shoot a larger, harder load than a girl with small breasts (if that's what he prefers), or even make him cum sooner rather than later.
There's also boob-jobs and ass-jobs.
There's 2 things to consider if it takes your man a while to cum:
1- He's either got very good stamina, or
2- Your body isn't that great but he likes you as a person a lot
>>29595079
I don't think I would even need to turn you down. How would you even get it in a vagina?
How the fuck do you fap? Do you delicately grab it with chopsticks or something?
>>29595286
you are a hopeless retard, kill yourself now
>>29595238
I think they are. As I said before, I'm a virgin. KHV.
>>29595259
There are also potentially massive drawbacks to getting circumcised. The health benefits are small as you said unless yours is phimotic.
>>29595306
are you lowkey intersex or something
>>29595280
>>29595306
Yes, we understand you're samefagging, fuck off.
>>29595259
>implying that if you watch this video and actually try to address the arguments instead of calling people names you wouldn't be completely wrong
https://youtu.be/m_zkKciuIpA
>>29595306
I'm really sorry dude. I just hope the medical sciences develop and we get a nice welfare state which shelters people from the arbitrary contingencies of nature by giving them new shiny synthetic dicks when the need arises.
>>29595332
>potentially massive drawbacks to getting circumcised
There's also potentially massive drawbacks to getting laser eye surgery.
I think it's pretty hot when girls say they prefer big dicks.
>>29595323
I don't know. I'd probably be balls deep right by the clit.
I fap by twisting my head with my fingers like I was opening a bottle.
>>29595306
this is so cruel
>>29595336
Sorry to dissapoint, but your mentalist powers evidently need to be polished.
>>29594980
That's ridiculous, I thought hookers were in the business for money not dick size.
>>29595342
>Stefan molyneux
Everything he said in that video is objectively wrong or exaggerated.
His "35% chance of complication" is a complete farce and any google background check on those numbers proves he's a lying dipshit. The ACTUAL percent chance for risk of complication is 1.5%, and that's from ALL complication. Most complications are minor, such as excessive bleeding.
>>29595306
Dude just become some serial killer/raping sicko. Nobody would really blame you after you mr story gets revealed on news
I have small penis so I understand the worst fear to us is to let others know this fact. That's why I'll never think about having sex with girls because they'll find out and potentially tell others
You at this point, should be raping and murdering therefore they won't tell anyone after you're done
>>29595326
no
kys in original way
>>29595369
>he knows how to use the turkey baster tool and paint bucket with rectangle select
>>29595383
It must be a lie. I knew a girl that was an escort in college and her favorite clients were a) limpdicks, b) premature ejaculators and c) people who just wanted to talk and feel like they have a friend.
I imagine it's like any other job. You prefer the assignments you can be done away with as fast as possible and with as little effort as possible.
>>29595383
>implying that qt blonde is afraid of scaring off 1 costumer
White girl is too qt. and that type of girl can easily find 5 beta providers within minutes. She doesn't really consider a costumer as something valuable. It's sellers market bigger than buyers market
>>29595398
HOW WOULD HE BECOME A RAPIST?
What would he rape? Skin pores?
Lets settle this shit. Femanons, which of these men would you rather date?
>6'4 but thin 3.5 inch babydick
>5'1 emperor of manlets but thick 9 inch python dick
It matters, but the one thing that trumps it is circumcision.
Uncircumcised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
I also like viens but only on uncut cocks. A smooth, uncut cock with some veins bulging are fucking dreamy
Viens on cut cocks are literally puke-tier. would never in my wildest dreams think about putting one close to my mouth.
So yeah, a nice, well-shaped uncut cock it better than a cut one, even if the cut one was bigger.
But obviously two nice cut ones, I'd obviously lean towards the bigger one.
Doubt this has helped anybody, but there, thats my two cents.
>>29594970
>dick_size != appropriate_ratio_to body_size faggot.
never seen a manlet with a monster dick?
or a giant with baby dick?
do you even internet?
its the same in woman shithead.
>>29595392
He said 5.1% not 35% here is the source
http://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23905566/Complication_rate_after_circumcision_in_a_paediatric_surgical_setting_should_not_be_neglected_
Care to try a real argument now?
>>29595452
9 inches is too much for most women
change it to 7 inches with nice girth and they'll pick that one
>>29594970
>just watched a porn video
>she looked happy!
>what is acting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6Ygmg_haE0
>>29595452
Neither. I just want a guy of my height and a 5 inch dick.
>>29594928
>5.3
>pencil
YOU UNGRATEFUL MOTHERFUCKER
TRY BEING 4 INCHES IN GIRTH
I HATE YOU SO MUCH FOR MAKING THIS POST
>>29595457
please be a femanon
this is literally my cock
it's really creamy, uncut and veiny and the head doesn't get that red
it literally looks like a hentai cock
>>29595522
Sounds perfect anon
Mine is 7.5 x 5.5. Is that good or too big?
>>29595434
No its not you fucking idiot, they go into that business for a fucking reason usually as a last resort not expecting to have chad tier Clintelle.
Also the whole notion of being turned down by a HOOKER for having a small dick is just ridiculous and stupid. I can understand being turned down if you're extremely ugly or fat
>>29595483
>scroll down
>see this post by Bud389
Nah, I'll just let this guy do my talking for me.
>>29595522
Don't get your hopes up. There isn't a woman in the world who gets that detailed when describing dicks. It's a dude or a tranny.
>>29595486
>believing anything nina hartley says
I dont care if she was in porn shes an absolute psychopath and pseudointellectual with her own sinister private agenda. I cant stand her.
>>29595541
please be femanon or passing tranny
please please please
>>29595567
You havent spoken to many women, huh
Women live by memes. They follow the female collective.
Since stupidly huge dicks dragging on the floor are now fashionable thats what they all lust for. Even if it pounds their cervix and results in several ER visits they don't care so long as the dicking is femcollective-approved.
Why else would they repeatedly practice stretching their vaginas with larger and larger dildos until they see it stretching through their navels.
>>29594152
>haruhi image bait
Pathetic.
I love how the losers here will judge a woman based on the size of her labia but then cry and complain when women judge men on the size of their dick. Just fucking deal with it.
>>29595581
Not sure it matters, but yeah
>>29594607
>lessened though not diminished
those words are synonyms. did you mean "not eliminated"?
>When girth < width
>When girth > width
The word "girth" typically refers to circumference, so logically it will always be bigger than width, which typically refers to left-right diameter.
Are you referring to the front-back diameter when you talk about girth?
>>29595588
They might IRL, but they don't talk about dicks like that on a Tibetan figure skating forum while posting hentai.
>>29595621
Men dont get small dicks by fucking every bitch that throws them attention
>inb4 "i-its genetics!"
>>29595398
you cant do any sports too, otherwise people will see it in shower
>>29595452
>6'4 but thin 3.5 inch babydick
>might finally be able to peg a giant using the less shaft more prostate myth
hue
>>29595622
I also have a really powerful cumshot if you're in to that
literally across the room and about 5 shots
>>29595625
Yes, and yes.
This apparently isn't an original comment
>>29595597
It's actually extremely common for women to invert their vagina. The most common dildo size is 12 inches. No man can compete.
>>29595621
if anything i feel like the roastie thing was an attempt to counter the cultural obsession with differing penis size, before it became a thing on /r9k/ it was fairly rare to hear people talk about dismissing women based on labia size
>>29595656
if you were transported to a universe where hypergamy/sexual value was switched, but your dick would shrink if you fucked too many women/women with really tight cunts, what would you do?
>>29595670
I-I want to believe
>>29595675
The most common dildo size is 9 inches, though that includes them being able to hold it, so the most common functional size women seek is generally around 6-7.
Which is average.
WOW
>>29595168
>It's pretty much common knowledge that in the mid 1800's, with the huge surge of immigrants, and the increase of worry about germs, that wealthier American's decided to go for circumcision, as it made them stand out among what they considered the "unclean, poor hordes of migrants".
This is why Jews adopted it as well. I forgot the time frame but a large Jewish population of former slaves migrated from Babylon to Irael. When they arrived they found many families had mixed with Mediterranean immigrants and had abandoned many of the cultural values the former slaves had enshrined. The leader of the former slaves Jewed his way into a leadership role and returned the Jews to their roots. As a way of distinguishing themselves from the impure families they adopted circumcision among other traditions. Basically it wasn't originally part of their identity but it became popular during a time of conservative revival in Ancient Israel.
>>29595392
>His "35% chance of complication" is a complete farce and any google background check on those numbers proves he's a lying dipshit. The ACTUAL percent chance for risk of complication is 1.5%, and that's from ALL complication. Most complications are minor, such as excessive bleeding.
The complication rate is basically 100%, because all conventional circumcisions destroy the ridged band, the majority of the dartos fascia muscle, and countless specialized sensory end organs of the penis.
The junctional mucosa of the foreskin itself is the most sensitive part of the penis.
>>29595737
It's probably because I only fap every 3 days or so and edge for about 4 hours when I do.
>>29595675
Women aren't the ones buying and using 12 inch dildos
>>29595361
I have an average dick but I wish I could please a size queen.
>>29595621
I am personally a guy in love with the roast. If it looks like a butterfly, I want to eat it more.
There's no discrimination towards any vagina here. I want her to remember my puccikisses.
>>29595560
Doesn't apply to qt blonde escorts. They're usually lazy and dumb. And they're college student who does this as side jobs. Young sluts gives absolutely 0 fucks about life and future. I know many girls who don't consider getting paid for sex "a big deal"
Most hookers are mediocre at best but can choose makeup and slutty clothes to make it to 7/10 looking. But real beautiful ones don't lack any clients and cash
>>29595769
Which is an idea that they got from the Sumerians and Egyptians.
>>29595774
>The complication rate is basically 100%, because all conventional circumcisions destroy the ridged band, the majority of the dartos fascia muscle, and countless specialized sensory end organs of the penis
ITT: Someone who doesn't know anything about the penis.
>>29595675
Is silicon viganas averge? I can't insert 1/4 into it. Which means I'll never satisfy these women since they say it's made according to real size
>>29595168
There's also the fact that Victorian doctors pushed it hard as a way to punish and impede masturbation.
>In cases of masturbation we must, I believe, break the habit by inducing such a condition of the parts as will cause too much local suffering to allow of the practice being continued. For this purpose, if the prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient with present and probably with future advantage; the operation, too, should not be performed under chloroform, so that the pain experienced may be associated with the habit we wish to eradicate.
Athol A.W. Johnson. On An Injurious Habit Occasionally Met with in Infancy and Early Childhood. Lancet 1860;1: pp. 344-345.
>In all cases of masturbation circumcision is undoubtedly the physicians' closest friend and ally...To obtain the best results one must cut away enough skin and mucous membrane to rather put it on the stretch when erections come later. There must be no play in the skin after the wound has thoroughly healed, but it must fit tightly over the penis, for should there be any play the patient will be found to readily resume his practice, not begrudging the time and extra energy required to produce the orgasm. It is true, however, that the longer it takes to have an orgasm, the less frequently it will be attempted, consequently the greater the benefit gained...The younger the patient operated upon the more pronounced the benefit, though occasionally we find patients who were circumcised before puberty that require a resection of the skin, as it has grown loose and pliant after that epoch.
Edgar J. Spratling, "Masturbation in the adult", Medical Record, Vol. 48, 28 Sept. 1895, pp. 442-3
>>29595869
Any instance of that being the case was rare and not considered the cultural norm.
It also just goes to show how little they knew about biology since none of those circumcisions acted as ways to prevent masturbation as not a single report in history has ever backed up the minority belief of that.
>>29595851
>ITT: Someone who doesn't know anything about the penis.
I challenge you to prove me wrong.
>>29595911
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/862071
Done. Where's my prize?
>>29595835
If you eat her out, she might enjoy it, but she will lose respect for you. Going down on a woman makes your subservient to her and she will begin to see you as a beta if she hadn't already.
>>29595909
>Any instance of that being the case was rare and not considered the cultural norm.
There are dozens upon dozens of documented quotations from Victorian doctors urging circumcision as a form of sexual hobbling and corporal punishment. This is a matter of historic record.
>In searching for the link between the Western prohibition of childhood masturbation and the rise of routine circumcision, the psychoanalysts seem to have been the first on the trail. In a study of children with psychological and behavioural problems in the 1930s, Mabel Huschka reported that a high proportion of the boys had been threatened with mutilating operations on their penis if they masturbated. In her introduction to the data she makes reference to a small sample of medical literature which recommended circumcision for girls who persisted in the habit, and a rather more popular German book which recorded that some doctors "armed with great knives and scissors" threaten boys with a "painful operation or even to cut off the genital organs." The same authority added that "small operations" were sometimes helpful: one physician "cured a young fellow in whom ... no punishment had proved effective, by simply cutting off the anterior part of the foreskin with jagged scissors." He also mentioned infibulation a nd chastity cages to block access to the penis.
Continued...
>>29595928
>http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/862071
I don't have a medscape account.
>>29595956
>There are dozens upon dozens of documented quotations from Victorian doctors urging circumcision as a form of sexual hobbling and corporal punishment.
And? I'm not sure what you're trying to prove. The belief that it should be used as corporal punishment in memo's and letters and papers has absolutely nothing to do with why it was done culturally in the first place.
Are you also going to take the documents from doctors urging some form eugenics, and say it was the cultural norm as well?
>>29595956
>(6) Huschka seems unaware that infant male circumcision had become quite common in the USA by the 1930s (between 50 and 60 per cent of newborns--about the same as today), (7) but the high incidence of mutilation threats received by boys, mostly picturing "the doctor" coming to cut their penis in some unspecified but painful way, would be possible only in a medical culture in which the surgical removal of (part of) the penis was frequently recommended and widely performed. There are no reports of such horror stories before the nineteenth century, and the cautionary tale for children with which these threats share the most affinity, "The story of little suck-a-thumb," in Heinrich Hoffmann's Struwwelpeter, was not published until 1847, near the height of the masturbation scare in Germany. (8) Discussing the prevalence of flogging in nineteenth century England, Ian Gibson comments that threats of castration for many varieties of bad behaviour, including playing with the genitals, were "probably not uncommon" and adds: "Circumcision, too, must have also seemed a castration threat to many children and been looked upon as a terrible punishment for having a penis." (9) It would seem that the boys' fears were no more than an expression of medical/moral realities.
Darby, Robert. "The masturbation taboo and the rise of routine male circumcision: A review of the historiography". Journal of Social History.2003. Vol. 27, pp. 737-757
>>29595463
>le code speak
>buzwords
>do you even internet
>shithead
Kill yourself. Honest to god your post is one of the most pathetic things i've read today.
>>29595950
hilarious, i hope this is bait
if anything refusal to reciprocate oral sex makes you look either selfish or sexually inexperienced
>>29595051
That cock would look so much better with skin.
>>29595950
Well then I am beta as ever then.
I just want her to grab me by the hair and push my head further into her bush, almost forcing it.
What the fuck. :(
>>29596080
Are you implying that he has no skin?
How is he alive, dumbass?
>>29596095
>says the skeleton man
>>29593979
>tfw when used to goto happening bars in Japan.
>Japanese not so great but good enough
>No conversation simply having my dick out made half the girls lose interest in other guys and want to start sucking mine because I always had the biggest dick in the room
The best looking girls still required game but girls looking for dick love big ones
>>29596110
That's different, an ancient voodoo priestess resurrected me from a grave down in Georgia.
He has skin.
>>29595950
did your girl fall asleep while you were licking her? time to get over it pham
>>29595562
First body paragraph is silly, he is arguing about what protection means. Protection against the drying of your glans and callousness isn't protection?
Second body paragraph is denying sources because they are biased. He is just assuming that Stefan is lying to his viewers because the source is biased against circumcision. He does not actually address those sources. Also he is misrepresenting Stefan's arguments, as it is whenever someone says "Stefan is basically saying..." it's actually a strawman disguised as a summary of what he was saying. so for the future we will address those fallacious arguments. He said that his sources have no medical credibility which is untrue. More "so what you are saying... (things he never actually said)"
Third body paragraph is trying to discredit the same source which I showed you. Notice that he didn't link the source he used to try and discredit it.
Fourth body paragraph Bud is showing himself unable to step through a logical problem as he seems to forget earlier arguments used, that without protection to the glands it will lose moisture, dry out, and be less sensitive.
Fifth and sixth body paragraphs goes back to the lack of sensitivity in the glans, however premature ejaculation means ejaculating before having a good orgasm. So you can have both.
Seventh body paragraph. I never heard it so it is untrue. UP TO one half of the erogenous tissue on the penile shaft will be removed in a circumcision. An observable fact is not something you should deny because you haven't read any medical journals on it. All the sources are in the link in the description.
Eight body paragraph, no source so we can't see if this systematic review was taking in account the information that we already have on circumcision. If we did have the source we could analyze it and see if it is neglecting any facts previously proven.
>>29594569
>our world
>shitposting on 4chan
>master race
Cool man
>>29596141
Obvious bullshitting liar. Japanese women find that sort of behavior embarrassing FOR you.
>>29596161
>he is assuming that Stefan is lying to his viewers
>he stated that he manually looked through his sources and couldn't find any reliable sites or medical journals
>none of the sources he actually posts on his forum post where he includes all his links are from any medical journals, or are out-dated by DECADES
Nice try Stefan.
>>29596095
Foreskin you dopey cunt, what else would that mean. Do you have autism?
>>29596141
>simply having my dick out
wait, are you saying you literally had your dick out? wtf am I misunderstanding something here?
>>29596050
Falling for obvious bait.
summerfag
>>29596246
Yes of course that's what he means you dingus.
>>29596237
>do you have autism
No, but you do, anti-circ fag.
Quit obsessing over dicks, you fag.
Enough of this talk post more dicks.
>>29596215
I'm sure he read all the sources however if you actually read his comment you can easily point out all the fallacies, the lack of his own sources, and his inability to follow the presentation due to his forgetting earlier points of interest.
And I think the biggest issue is giving a baby a circumcision which should be the person's choice and not the choice of the parent.
>>29596269
>what are preferences
Please end yourself.
> Have small penis
> Never measured it, but I just know by looking at pictures it's well below average
> Yet the condoms they hand out at colleges fit somewhat uncomfortably tight on my dick
The fuck is this supposed to mean?
>>29596362
post dick
preferably with something for size reference
>>29596362
It means you have a chode.
>>29596362
It means your sense of size has been warped by porn and if you measured your dick chances are it would be in the 5-6 inch range, which isn't small. Also, dicks look smaller from the dick wielder's perspective than they would from the perspective of someone else because you are looking down at it.
>>29596362
I get this too. My cousin left some condoms in my bedside table and they were all too tight fitting, painful to put on.
>>29596269
Please, PLEASE, neck yourself my man.
>>29596314
>the lack of his own sources
"The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision 'Technical Report' (2012)"
As for his other quotes, let's see where google takes us.
"A 2013 systematic review found that circumcision did not appear to adversely affect sexual desire, pain with intercourse, premature ejaculation, time until ejaculation, erectile dysfunction or difficulties with orgasm."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-Tian2013-69
Which then led to this
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881635/
Gee, hard to argue with actual sources. Now lets see where Stefan got his sources.
https://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/36819-the-truth-about-circumcision/
Hmm, a forum, not a good start.
http://www.d.umn.edu/~mcco0322/index.htm
Uh oh...
http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb126.jsp
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9417009
Oh, okay! But wait, something's fishy here...(looks at content of articles) Oh....Okay. I get it. The medical journals he quoted were all based on the methodology on circumcision, while the under-represented positives such as HIV prevention and all the other general statistics measuring the overall prevalence of circumcision are all from the medical journals.
But as to ALL his negatives as to why circumcision is evil and horrid, they come from those half-baked anti-circ shill sites which he farms his stupidity from.
I really expected more form you anon. Blindly listening to idiots such as Stefan is harmful, don't you know?
>>29595229
>It was done for health reasons, actually.
This is wrong. Circumcision in primitive conditions is incredibly dangerous to a person's health. Many men circumcised in primitive conditions die from blood loss, gangrene, or suicide after having lost their penis. Cutting off part of another person's penis with no knowledge of germ theory, limited access to water, no modern surgical instruments, and only the most basic and vague understandings of human physiology was never healthy.
>It originated in a certain area with lots of sand, and not very lots of water. In such an area you would risk phimosis (since you couldn't really wash your dick very often and the area was conducive to little shit stuck under your foreskin) and circumcision was a precautionary operation to which was eventually attached religious and then cultural meaning.
There is no evidence that sand in the foreskins is a common problem faced by intact males. This is another myth.
http://www.historyofcircumcision.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30&Itemid=0
>>29593979
>Speaking purely in the sense of sex as a whole, and sexual appeal, how important is dick size? I want a resolute answer.
it really isnt important to most women in the same way im sure most guys dont care about breast sizes
>TFW barely 13x11 cm
>TFW no girl will ever love me for real
>no matter how much I improve myself I'll always be inferior as a man
>Another thread where you guys talk about dicks
Man, no wonder you faggots have no hope and have """"""social anxiety""""". This shit is all you ever talk about.
I'm done.
I can't find my sides.
>>29596532
Breast size has no impact on whether a guy will cum. The size of a dick has direct impact on whether a woman will cum. You're either a man or a tranny because the two are not analogous at all.
>>29596546
microwang detected
>>29596475
The problem with intactivists is that they are insufferable. For instance they may lack upon a post favorable to their position. They will not miss the opportunity to mistake a genealogical account of circumcision according to the historical perception of its utility for a statement regarding its actual medicinal value. They will then "debunk" that post.
This incredible disregard for nuance has them despised by basically everyone else, even people who agree with the position that irreversible cosmetic operations must be left to the will of the person undergoing the operation, and is therefore actively damaging to the progress of their project.
>>29596546
95% of guys will never be loved by a woman. They are only put up with.
>>29596573
Actually it does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D6NI_8-Zks
The "physical" aspect of a woman's body is a very big indicator in how aroused a man will be, how quickly he will cum, and how intense his orgasm will be.
That's why many men focus on their penis so much. Physical aspects are very psychological for men.
>>29596466
>"The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision 'Technical Report' (2012)"
This report has been lambasted by dozens of well-respected physicians as incredibly biased in favor of circumcision and glossing over the human rights issues involved in removing a significant part of a human's healthy genitalia without their consent.
>"The AAP report lacks a serious discussion of the central ethical dilemma with, on one side, parents' right to act in the best interest of the child on the basis of cultural, religious, and health-related beliefs and wishes and, on the other side, infant boys' basic right to physical integrity in the absence of compelling reasons for surgery. Physical integrity is one of the most fundamental and inalienable rights a child has. Physicians and their professional organizations have a professional duty to protect this right, irrespective of the gender of the child.
>There is growing consensus among physicians, including those in the United States, that physicians should discourage parents from circumcising their healthy infant boys because non-therapeutic circumcision of underage boys in Western societies has no compelling health benefits, causes postoperative pain, can have serious, long-term consequences, constitutes a violation of the United Nation's Declaration of the Rights of the Child, and conflicts with the Hippocratic oath: primum non nocere: First, do no harm.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896.full.pdf
>>29596601
Everything I said was true.
>They will not miss the opportunity to mistake a genealogical account of circumcision according to the historical perception of its utility for a statement regarding its actual medicinal value.
There is no evidence that tribal circumcision began for "health reasons" to "prevent infection" and "keep sand out of the foreskin".
That is what I debunked.
>>29596648
Alright, and what about THIS study?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359221/
"Scientific evidence regarding the sexual effects of MC does not substantiate the purported harms to sexual pleasure. The better-quality studies (in terms of sample size, rigor of methodology, accuracy of analysis of findings, and generalizability of results) have found no adverse effect of MC on penile sensitivity [151,161-163], sensation during arousal [164], sexual satisfaction [146,151], premature ejaculation [165], intravaginal ejaculatory latency time [166,167], or erectile function [147,149-152]. Two RCTs found MC does not adversely affect sexual function, sensitivity or satisfaction [45,153], with one of these studies showing that the sexual experience of most men was enhanced after circumcision [45]. Some studies have found that MC reduced the risk of premature ejaculation "
>>29596573
anon depending on the size of the girl the g-spot is like 1-2 inches inside. you could literally make a girl cum if you used enough foreplay and enough motion with a tiny penis. an overly large penis to allot of girls is a negative trait since it actually hurts. the only girls who say otherwise are roast beef
>it's a "penis thread that devolves into cut vs uncut autistic shitflinging" episode
>>29593979
Most girls don't care about dick size. $$$ is more important.
>>29596410
This conservashit idiot just made an argument for abortion. And we know how poor arguments are when they pertain to parents wanting to do whatever they want with their babies, including abortion and circumcision.
Alt-right or no right.
>>29596466
>Hmm, a forum, not a good start.
It's his forum you fool, he is using it as a board to post his list of sources.
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3881635/
Does not even address any of the studies that Stefan provides. I checked
"Although the literature contains a wide range of evidence for and against circumcision, the better quality studies affirm the recommendations of reputable experts who have evaluated the benefits and risks of circumcision as a desirable intervention early in life."
So you take all the studies that you call "better quality" from "reputable experts" of which both of them has no clear definition and is certainly arbitrary, and you completely ignore the other studies which provide different data, and this is the medical study you get. You should get the coincidence detector and look at all your reputable experts defending circumcision.
>>29596753
Refer to
>>29596707
That study isn't linked to even once in his list of resources, and it was made a year before his video.
>>29596707
>cutting off a bunch of nerve endings has no effect on how sensitive the penis is
do really believe that?
>>29596408
Try out the regular magnums. You don't actually need a horse cock to fit them. I'm like 7in with a fairly large head at times and regular ones hurt to wear.
Anecdotal but two of the women I've been with claimed they couldn't even have vaginal orgasms, but after they became comfortable with me they started having them. I think just being able to sense what your partner is feeling is the most important thing, being able to itch deep down doesn't hurt either.
>>29596466
>"A 2013 systematic review found that circumcision did not appear to adversely affect sexual desire, pain with intercourse, premature ejaculation, time until ejaculation, erectile dysfunction or difficulties with orgasm."
Did you read that literature review? I did.
>It is claimed that the foreskin has important functions, 32 but this has been disputed by lots of studies.14,18,19,20,21,22
When they say "it has been disputed by lots of studies", let's take a look at those references.
14
>American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012. 130:585-6.
Not a study, a policy statement. Made no mention of the innervation, musculature, or physiological functions of the foreskin. Already criticized as biased by the international medical community.
18
>Morris BJ, Wodak AD, Mindel A, Schrieber L, Duggan KA, et al. Infant male circumcision: An evidence-based policy statement. Open J Prev Med. 2012; 2:79-92.
Brian Morris is not a reliable source of information. He is not a physician or pathologist, but rather a retired professor of molecular biology. He has documented ties to circumfetish organizations such as the Gilgal Society, Circumcision Fetish, Circlist, and others, as can be seen on this archived copy of Morris's web site. A case could surely be made that this is a potential conflict of interest.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070829145507/circinfo.net/circumcision_websites_online_discussion_groups.html
19
>Waskett JH, Morris BJ. Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis. BJU Int. 2007;99:1551-2. [PubMed]
Jake Waskett is not a doctor, accredited scientist, or medical professional of any kind. He is a software engineer and a member of Circlist. And the paper Tian et al refer to here was not a "study", but a critical LETTER published in a NON PEER REVIEWED letter section of the BJU.
Tian et al's review is poorly referenced and incredibly biased.
>>29596739
>women don't care about penis size
>while no woman would be happy with a 2 inch dick and they all salivate at 8 inch dicks
No woman is ever happy seeing and knowing that a guy they liked has a 2 inch dick. Fuck off with your shilling.
>>29596779
Because it is a shitty biased study, they only address one Korean study which shows negative effects.
There is another(8) which is only addressed by throwing three "high quality" (arbitrarily defined) studies. So if I say that my studies are of a higher quality than your studies, without defining what I mean by higher quality and without it being provable to be objectively true, then we can just throw out all the other data collected because they are not "high quality" oh dear anon I have to go I can't do this all day.
>>29596943
nice b8 m8
who am i even shilling for anon? what incentive do i have? although 2 inches isn't allot and personally i'd prefer slightly bigger but if the dude was still capable of pleasing me and he made up for it in other ways i can honestly say i wouldnt care.
nobody cares about penis sizes anon this meme needs to die all its doing is making robots self conscious
>>29593979
Me on the leftSadly
I'm smaller than the left one senpai
>who /cantfitbigdicks/ here?
>>29597032
Women that are polled all say that penis size is important and that anything less than 4 inches is not pleasurable. Are they lying?
>>29597088
Why? You can have a baby but you won't let me stuff my big one in you? It's not huge, it's smaller than a baby. Can't vagina's stretch?
>>29596175
Yea you've never been to Japan and have definitely never been to a happening bar
>>29596246
By having my dick out I mean usually going there and stripping down to my boxers and letting my dick peak through but occasionally just having a shirt on if its a slow night. Its a happening bar after all
