would you ever consider a serious relationship with a feminist like pic related?
feminists are total whores in bed. they love to be called demeaning names and totally defiled. They know they are living a lie on the outside.
I speak from experience.
>>29577277
A few things.
One is I don't think I could get into a relationship with a girl who resembles taylor swift in any way.
Another is feminists are just hypergamous females who hate the idea of settling with a non movie star boyfriend.
Lastly, feminists will just cuck you and call it sexual liberation.
>>29577277
Her description seems really insufferable tbqh
>>29577335
is that image real? original
>>29577277
Face looks sort-of mannish. Probably a tranny pretending to be a woman.
Even if it wasn't, would rather fuck an anthill.
>I am a human that is interested in connecting with other humans in ways that are yet unclear even to me.
man she's just so witty
>>29578564
but why? use your words
>>29577277
>A fellow creative
>creative
I hate this term so much now. So fucking pretentious. It's basically so non-exactly-artists girls can give themselves social credit as "creative" too since they word has a positive connotation too it.
But no OP, wouldn't not consider relationship with.
Also isn't it funny how women's favorite books are all hipster shit you've never heard of and their favorite shows are all the normiest stuff?
she's not bad looking tbj
pretty original comment
>>29577277
Seems like an airhead but might be fun.
Problem is I'm a heartless pragmatic asshole and not her type at all. Despite her absolutely being mine.
Nice dubs.
>>29578836
looks like lena dunham but photoshopped
are you sure that's not lena dunham?
>>29579025
Eggplant or aubergine is a species of nightshade grown for its edible fruit
>>29577277
>unclear even to me
No reason to go beyond this.
>>29579142
please leave
don't you have girls to stalk?
