>>29542893

I've been there, bro.

I've had women hit on me that looked like the average chad's 10/10, but I just couldn't reciprocate any of it. I can't get excited by giant tits, heavy make-up, or Playboy model "womanly" proportions.

I just want a compact little cutie to cuddle with.

>>29542893

why not both?

original666

>>29543666
>why not both?

Because large "womanly" features just don't do it for pedos. A 4'11" petite cutie with long natural hair in her 20's might fit the bill, but anyone that looks like a "mom", with fat hips, large breasts, heavy makeup, a perm hairstyle, painted nails, lots of tacky jewelry hanging off her wrinkled body... is an instant turn-off.

Sadly, that description fits 90% of women over the age of 18.

>>29543811
>tfw interested in either large "womanly" features or petite "girly" features the inbetween just doesn't do it for me

Truly confusing. Is my personality split or something?