![ucf-short-cheerleader-tall-volleyball-players[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Z6wxh4b.jpg "ucf-short-cheerleader-tall-volleyball-players[1].jpg")
why don't womanlets get made fun of as much as manlets?
Because they're adorable.
Because men still want to fuck small women
But women won't fuck small men
>>29522105
>>29522107
but do you really want inferior manlet sons?
guys prefer girls between 5' to 5'5 and if they have a phat ass or big tits, they are literally god tier
>tfw no tittymonster shortstack gf
J U S T
womenlets are disgusting. as soon as I learn about their height, boner gets killed immediately
>>29522143
>Fucking then means having children with them
Because we don't care about women's height. Unless they're unusually short or tall I don't even notice how tall they are
>>29522226
>implying sexual arousal isn't inherently the urge to reproduce no matter what your conscious thoughts tell you
>implying when you stick your penis in a woman your brain isn't instinctively telling you "good job you're reproducing"
Im a lanky 6'4 guy.
im gonna knock up my 5'0 gf in 5 years probably desu
>>29522075
I'm a "womanlet" myself. Let me tell you why this word doesn't even make sense and why we aren't made fun of.
It's simply because being a small woman is a GOOD thing. Sexual dimorphism tends to exist for a reason. Men and women aren't supposed to look and act the same. Men needs to be tall, strong, rough, hardworking, etc... Women the opposite. Those are the best and most attractive couples. Most men want a gf who is shorter than them, just as most women want a bf who is taller. It's just the natural thing to desire.
>>29522302
Fuck off whore. The stench of your monstrously loose vagina is not appreciated here. Enjoy your sexually transmitted cervical cancer.
>>29522302
>you will never have a taller gf who gently dominates you
SUFFERING
>>29522302
If you are so keen on sexual dimorphism. Have you accepted the fact that you will create manlets who are less attractive? You want the best for your sons right?
>>29522302
Bitch, I'm 6'3" and fucking a girl that's taller than me is my fetish
Womanlets are annoying as fuck to date
>anon can you reach this for me
>anon we can't do that position you're too tall
>I'm sorry I didn't readjust the seat after I used the car, is your knee okay
>can you pass me my (item)? Its easier for you to get it
Any woman under 5'7"=AVOID
Jesus christ how fucking tall are those girls? I'm 6'2" and they look taller than me
>>29522350
>>29522362
>he actually believes that thing is a woman
>>29522375
Which is why really small cuties usually try to get together with lanklets and vice versa
I don't get why this board add -let as a suffix to describe smaller things in every regard. 9/10 there are better words you could use and you end up just sounding like a gigantic dumbass using the made up word with -let at the end.
>>29522362
>>29522378
You have the right to like what you like, but just keep in mind that you guys are the weird ones for liking tall women.
>>29522375
Genetics don't work that way. If kids were always the averaged version of their parents, everyone in the world would be the same height by now. It's not the case, and boys are almost always taller than girls. One of my childhood friends is an example of that. Super tall father, pretty short mother, and he ended up being slightly taller than his father.
I'm 6'3" and women who are 5'10 are the best
>>29522404
>what is vernacular
>>29522302
pls kill yourself
originalsudoku
>>29522302
Pippin was my favorite hawk he's too chill
>>29522411
>you guys are the weird ones for liking tall women.
It's weird to like women that aren't unbearably needy, borderline helpless, and incapable of doing half of the things that make someone a functional adult?
Short women are literally helpless children
>>29522302
You know what else is a GOOD thing? You killing yourself.
>>29522378
>>29522421
>>29522454
>being baited this hard
top kek
>>29522423
He was alright, I guess.
>>29522452
Only freakishly short women would be like that, and yes, you're weird if you actually want a gf who's taller than you. Not saying you're weird for not wanting to date a dwarf.
>>29522468
No bait. It's just my honest opinion and facts.
>>29522075
Because Chad still likes womanlets.
Stacy doesn't like manlets.
tall girls are the fucking shit
when I was 14, I fell in love with a 6' girl for 3 years
my first gf was 6'1'' and my current gf is 6'
me being 5'7'' makes it kind of funny, I suppose
>>29522529
It makes it pretty sad and silly to see for everyone around.
>>29522075
Being small is a feminine trait. Small men = not masculine. Large women = not feminine.
>>29522107
that's not true. i really want to fuck this guy who's a couple centimeters shorter than me. and fat.
>>29522286
Why the fuck are you on here
>>29522350
>>29522375
>>29522421
>>29522454
All these manlets
kys guys the roastie is right
>>29522484
>freakishly short women
That's what a fucking womanlet is, cunt. That is literally the subject of the thread. If you are a womanlet, like you said, then you are this.
>want a gf who's taller than you
At no point did I say I wanted to date a taller girl, I said they were my fetish = I want to fuck one. My girlfriend is shorter than me by about 5 inches, but at least she has the ability to be independent.
>you're weird for one personality quirk
If you call that part of my personality weird, you are correct. If you call me as a person weird for it, you are retarded
>>29522541
>pretty sad
It's sad that someone is in a relationship? What?
>>29522560
>Large women = not feminine
This is not true in the slightest
>>29522302
Exactly this. I'm a 5'4 KV manlet and am fine with admitting that my height makes me objectively less attractive. It's biology, there's no getting around it.
I just see the height preference as further proof that women are biologically programmed to want to be dominated by men (or more precisely, be dominated by the alpha men who make them wet. They're fine with being dominant over the betas). This is why feminism cannot work and is suicidal for men to subscribe to.
This is also why it's extremely hypocritical for any woman who describes herself as a feminist to have preferences for tall men.
>>29522667
>That's what a fucking womanlet is, cunt.
No, it's not. It just means being of under average height. Same with manlets. A 5'5" man is a manlet, but he's not freakishly small like a 4" man would be.
>At no point did I say I wanted to date a taller girl, I said they were my fetish = I want to fuck one.
Fair enough then. That's not as bad, but it's still unnatural.
>My girlfriend is shorter than me by about 5 inches, but at least she has the ability to be independent.
So do I and almost every women.
>It's sad that someone is in a relationship? What?
Yes, I feel bad for her. She probably couldn't find anyone better.
>>29522690
Finally someone with some objectivity appears. Thank you.
>>29522734
>just means being of under average height
If average is the norm, and freakish is abnormal, than yes, it is.
>so do I and almost every woman
Forty keks
>she probably couldn't find anyone better
So a short guy with a high paying job, a big cock, a well-rounded personality, and a lot to offer is inherently not as good as a tall guy with very little to offer?
You know nothing about this guy and are judging him based on nothing but a physical characteristic he has no control over and you make a comment on objectivity and claim you are an adult? I feel bad for whoever dates you.
>>29522843
>If average is the norm, and freakish is abnormal
Abnormal and freakish mean two different things. Learn their definition.
>Forty keks
Not funny.
>So a short guy with a high paying job, a big cock, a well-rounded personality, and a lot to offer is inherently not as good as a tall guy with very little to offer?
Not on a biological standpoint.
>You know nothing about this guy and are judging him based on nothing but a physical characteristic he has no control over and you make a comment on objectivity and claim you are an adult?
You don't know him either, but you assume he's rich with a big cock and a good personality.
>I feel bad for whoever dates you.
So nobody, then.
>>29522690
>KV
>not KHHV
Get the fuck out.
>>29522877
>Abnormal and freakish mean two different things. Learn their definition.
Merriam-Webster defines freakish as "markedly strange or abnormal". It defines marked "notable". If you notice someone is short, and think of them as short, then it is marked, and therefore, freakish. Connotation vs denotation
>not funny
Unlike the notion that most women can function as adults
>Not on a biological standpoint
That is irrelevant. If a woman is kept happy by who she is with, that means she has a good partner. If she is with someone because she can't find anyone better, she is a coward and a child.
>assume he's rich with a good personality
What is a hypothetical. I assumed nothing whatsoever. If you could read above a first grade level you would understand that you made a blanket statement, and I challenged it with a hypothetical situation. I did not say the man in question WAS those things. I asked you, IF he was, a tall deadbeat is still better?
>so nobody, then.
Not remotely surprised
>>29523012
>Merriam-Webster defines freakish as "markedly strange or abnormal". It defines marked "notable". If you notice someone is short, and think of them as short, then it is marked, and therefore, freakish.
Notable doesn't mean noticeable. Notable is something that is worth taking a note of (in this context, because it's rare). Manlets aren't notable. There are probably over a billion of them right now.
>Unlike the notion that most women can function as adults
Stop falling for /r9k/ propaganda. Womanchilds are a minority.
>If a woman is kept happy by who she is with, that means she has a good partner. If she is with someone because she can't find anyone better, she is a coward and a child.
And she probably isn't happy since she's with someone smaller. I admit it's possible that she is, but I wouldn't bet on it.
>What is a hypothetical.
You didn't phrase it that way.
>IF he was, a tall deadbeat is still better?
Better is subjective. It would depend on both persons involved.
>Not remotely surprised
I'm a voluntary celibate.
>tfw when 5'3" male
Is there any hope at all for me?
>>29523203
That rare 4 foot something girl who doesn't insist on a guy over 6 feet.
Please call them "womlets", thank you
>>29523203
Do you have a cute twink-ish face? Then yes, but mostly with gay men.
If you think a 5'7" woman or above is womanly
You think a 5'3" man is manly
No it isnt
Large women tend to be louder, more vulgar, and either look like walking pornstars if they have big breasts and ass or awkard because if they wear heels they will be even taller than the man but will not look as feminine without heels
5'4" to 5'6" are feminine heights
5'0 to 5'3 are womanlets
And anything below 4'12 are freakishly small disgusting women
>>29523102
>Notable is something that is worth taking a note of
You've taken a note of it the moment you label them a manlet. That's what the label is, it's you noting their height.
>stop falling for /r9k/ propaganda
I don't. I have a lot of reasons why i think this, mostly anecdotal, but it's enough for me to draw a conclusion based on it. I've known like 3 women that were capable of truly functioning as adults on their own, with no one to keep them in line. Fuck what the user base of this board thinks of women. I formed my own opinion.
>and she probably isn't happy since she's with someone smaller.
Then... Why in the actual fuck would she let it become a relationship in the first fucking place? Height is one of the few things about a person you aren't blind to in the dating stage. Your line of thinking if you were being logical would be "There must be more to this person than his physical appearance if that girl is sticking with him". Only a stupid cunt stays in a relationship just to BE in a relationship. There is no good reason for that.
>You didn't phrase it that way.
How did I not phrase it that way? Again, reading comprehension. "A short guy", "a tall guy", not "that short guy".
>better is subjective
Yeah, it is. But it was you who stated that she's probably with him because she couldn't find anyone better. Because the guy is short, she has to think there's someone better? That seems like an objective statement on your part.
>voluntary celibate
Stay that way for the good of mankind
>>29522302
>tall, strong, rough, hardworking, etc... Women the opposite
So a stunted, feeble, fragile, laggard roastie?
>>29523382
Sounds about right
oreginamo
>>29523102
Damn I thought the robots on here were pathetic, but womanbots are actually worse.
>hurr I'm a womanlet.
>btw it's biologically normal to be attracted to shorter girls :3
>If you like tall girls you're abnormal :3
>If a girl date a shorter guy then she's not happy inside
>If she's happy than she's abnormal.
>ITS ALL BIOLOGICAL.
>Nothing to do with me being a womanlet and complexing about it, right ?
>btw I'm a voluntary ( lel ) celibate.
It's literraly the feminine version of REEEEE .
This is really pathetic, that kind of faith on absolute biological fact, althrough the research in that domain are in perpetual change and there is no such claim in the scientific world. All of that to justify your own neurosis about your height instead of accepting them.
t. Chad who will date a women a little shorter, a little taller, or the same side but not a womanlet or a a ridiculously tall girl. Find yourself a little taller than you manlet and get over it instead of polluting this board, I'm here to laugh at robots, not at delusional wymenz. Or go to Latin countries and be happy.
>>29522563
Yeah but you're on r9k and fucked in the head with major self esteem issues.
>>29522075
How tall are those freaks of nature?
Who #HobbitFever here?
>>29523572
Like 5'10
The midget looks smaller than they are tall.
>>29523594
kek, the slut is apparently around 6'5
http://www.ucfknights.com/sports/w-volley/mtt/loren_cory_773129.html
>>29522690
>It's biology, there's no getting around it.
It isn't biology, it's just social bullshit
If it was biological, you wouldn't exist - along with other manlets and womenlets (or freaks of nature depending on what you consider more socially acceptable for a woman). It has always been more difficult more manlets to find partners, but the advent of the internet and society allowing women to be more picky about potential partners has made it 100x worse.
Also, if what you said was true, every lanklet on the planet would be dating someone, and the amount of 6'3+ HHKV losers browsing /r9k/ right now kinda blows that theory out of the water.
Biology is just a bullshit excuse women use to justify something they can't even understand themselves.
>>29522302
>i-its natural!
Refuge of idiots. Humans are capable of reflective thought - we can reflect and determine that allowing you to pour your dysfunctional, maladaptive genes into the pool of wider humanity is a terrible idea.
You are for pumping, but you ought not to reproduce. Feeble, low-quality women who tart themselves up to hide their sickly nature should be sterilised for the good of humanity, its obvious that you lot are the avenue through which the worst in humanity continues to survive.
>>29522734
>"My girlfriend is shorter than me by about 5 inches, but at least she has the ability to be independent."
>So do I and almost every women.
Lmao short women are not independent.
Being with a womanlet is like taking care of a small child.
>>29522563
Whore.
Originigamio
>>29524529
She left. Maybe she realized she's retarded
>>29524631
well hopefully other womanlets read it
