You niggers are all made out of this.
Nothing more
Nothing less
n o
o n e
c a r e s
n e r d
Who else /bottom quarks/ here? Why is finding top quarks so hard?
>>29395393
Dude, the idea that we're all made of really tiny things that are all kinda the same has been around for over 2500 years. I think I got the memo, but thanks for the reminder.
>>29395393
You know subatomic particles are a social construct, do you? Nobody has ever seen them, science can barely visualize individual atoms.
>>29395393
yeah, and that bullshit is just condensed energy. Now what, faggot?
>>29395690
>subatomic particles are a social construct
You're not being serious right now, are you?
>>29395393
>Charm quarks
But I have no charming quirks. It's why I've always slept alone in my bed.
>>29395393
I can kind of identify with neutrinos.
>momentum distributions don't check out
>whatever, let's say there is a particle we can't detect
>>29395393
So what the fuck does this mean, fucking nerd?
>>29395393
Not true, there is also the element of structure which makes things what they are; for example look at DNA: one could say that it is "just" C,G,A, and T molecules, but such a person would be wrong--for DNA to function, the ORDER of these molecules matter. This suggests that Naive materialism, such as you are arguing for, is likewise wrong: in addition to matter, there must be some type of organization, which is not itself physical.
Actually most physicists believe there are particles beyond the standard model, as the standard model can't explain things like dark matter or gravity.
Also you aren't made up of every particle listed there either.
>>29395690
>subatomic particles are a social construct
>>29395690
How do you propose you visualize something FAR smaller than a photon?
>>29400379
He's joking, retard.
