Why dont employers just hire more people to work like 30 hours instead of 40.
That way they wouldnt have to pay wage cucks overtime when they need them to stay to finish projects, and the wagecucks get a better quality of life.
Guess wagecucks would complain about making 60k instead of 80k though huh.
>implying a large proportion of the population aren't working minimum wage jobs
>implying getting less hours whilst working minimum wage is a good thing
>implying this isn't conservative propaganda
>>29394500
I dont mean minimum wage jobs, I mean jobs where people are getting paid like $20 an hour.
Just seems like everyone would win if people worked less hours.
Then again employers still have to pay for benefits per employee, so that might be why. I dont know how much employers have to pay to provide health insurance.
>>29394541
>I mean jobs where people are getting paid like $20 an hour.
Congratulations, that's half of what's needed to get that 80k figure you gave before.
>>29394368
FYI Trump keeps saying "We're making less money now, but we're working more. It should be the opposite." while referring to ordinary workers. AFAIK he's the only one that said something like that in a manner consistent with the policies being backed. My main problem with Trump is that I don't trust him because he's kind of a dick, but still.
With globalization it's not really possible to do large scale changes like that to the working hours and salaries because corporations have to compete with other countries and they can just leave. I don't know if Trump really gives a crap though, but at least he talks about it.
