Women exist for the sole purposes of procreation and pleasuring the man. Prove me wrong.
>>29384447I
I've tried to find woman whom I can actually relate with and desu 98% of them are impossible to in that aspect.
>>29384447
did you get cucked that badly?
>>29384475
Found the roastie, shoo shoo roastie.
>>29384447
can't prove you wrong cuz ur right
ok bud.
get a woman to agree to that and get back to me
keep me posted
Couldn't prove you wrong if I wanted to
Men exist for the sole purpose of procreation as well.
Every species on this planet exists to reproduce.
>>29384647
>women sacrifice AT MINIMUM 9 months of their lives to carry a mans seed at no benefit to themselves
Yeah, keep on whiteknighting though!
>>29384447
how's that line of thinking working out for you bud?
>>29384822
don't call me bud faggot
>>29384470
To make it a bit more depressing I'm almost 50 and working in a very social field- come to the same conclusion. It's not going to get better.
>tfw you realize op is right
>>29384447
>Anything existing for a purpose
Read some voltaire
>>29384447
No one could prove you wrong because you're right. Women have slower reflexes, physically inferior in all aspects and are likely inferior mentally (debatable).
It doesnt take a genius to realize they are the inferior gender and only live to service the superior one (carrying the baby, caring for the baby).
>>29385440
>likely inferior mentally (debatable).
oh to be this optimistic again
>>29385476
Its pretty hard to definitely quantify iq itself, thats why i said debatable. Anecdotally of course i would testify women are dumber every time.
>>29384540
THAT FUCKING PICTURE.
WHY DOES IT HAVE TO BE LIKE THIS?! WHY NO ONE PRESSED CHARGES AGAINST HER? WHYYYYYYYYY
Is this "equality"? I'm so fucking mad.
>>29385949
We want to teach women that they are not accountable for their actions and that they can falsely accuse people without recourse.
(She was 11 when she did it, though. Shouldn't that alone save her from accountability?)
