SEXISM TEST
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001
You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/
How sexist is /r9k/?
I got a 0 in both
>>29356387
0.5 on both
Quiz lacked a neutral response, which I felt was dumb.
going straight on pol with that shit
>gender identity
Mr Rodgers was wrong and all funding should be cut from this shit show
>>29356387
Super sexist.
4.8 hostile, below average benevolent.
Women my age are trash and I'm glad I don't have to interact with any, at work or anywhere else.
>Hostile: 3.17
>Benevolent: 0.67
Never touched a bitch in my life but whatever
>>29356387
4.5
2
Original uru
>2.83
>1.33
Half the questions were so poorly worded that they were difficult to answer. Some women DO string guys along because they think it's fun, and others don't. It's not a "yes or no" answer. Dumb quiz.
Hostile: 3.8
Benevolent: 2.5
I guess I'm a shitlord
>>29356751
>5
>1.67
roasties need a reality check nothing i picked was sexist
>>29356387
I maxed out the hostility score
>Hostile Sexism
Fucking kek, I basically took the middle road.
My most radical answer was disagree strongly with men sacrificing to provide for women
>>29356807
same desu except I got a 2.8 on the other one
>>29356579
fucking pleb, you need more extremism
>>29356387
trues out my parents made me a total beta cuck
I got a 1.33 on hostile and a 1 for the other 1
how cuck will i be in the future?
I'm 18 btw
There is literally no way to not be sexist on this quiz.
The answers either give you a hostility/benevolence point depending on whether the question is a women are bad/good answer.
I can totally see this being used in some Guardian rag headlined, "99% of American Men are Sexist"
>>29356387
Not at all, my dear.
>>29356387
Daily reminder she has a white boyfriend.
She only whores herself out as a militant SJW to atone for her racial self-hatred.
>>29356387
Stupid quiz, just answer "strongly disagree" with everything to get the proper score.
>>29356387
Really topping the charts at hostile sexism
>>29356387
>The biggest problem other than there are clear right answers is that wording of the questions is ambiguous.
Surveys can be biased, who knew?
>Hostile: 4.17
>Benevolent: 0
>>29356387
>Hostile Sexism: 3.33
significantly more than both men and women
>Benevolent Sexism: 1.67
less than both men and women
In a nutshell, I believe strongly in female personal responsibility and equal opportunity, but also believe that "feminists" (that is to say, post-Friedanian gender feminists) do indeed use feminism as a means of controlling and oppressing men and undermining time-tested standards that are conducive to a healthy society.
Furthermore, I see nothing wrong with assuming a protective and providing role when appropriate or requested, granted it's a reciprocal transaction of some sort or another. Naturally this occurs more often in relationships, but I'm not beyond being similarly supportive of close platonic male acquaintances.
But that's sexist.
>>29356387
>1. Many women have a quality of purity that few men possess.
what did she mean by this?
0 on hostile, 1 on benevolent because I'm kinda old fashioned and think a guy should take care of a girl a little bit.
>>29357136
The idea that women are somehow more pure/innocent/moral/better. Basically, if you're a "neckbeard gentleman" or an "empowered wyman" who thinks women are better than men at some stuff then BOOM you're a sexist according to this test.
Basically the only way to score 0 is to consider men and women COMPLETELY equal - even pro-women 'feminist'/grrrl-power crap will get scored as sexist.
>average man
>2.24
I guess it's her own statistic.
>>29356387
where are the fucking neutral options? why are these questions worded so wierdly? did a fucking woman make this shit?
Also the only woman i spend time with is my mom and thats very rare. I basically used tv shows and movies and other anonymous imageboards as reference.
>>29356831
r u me desu senpai?
>>29357240
I understand the meaning of our words but i still don't understand. Is this like a jock test. Do people actually have that type of thought process?
>>29356387
Really shitty survey.
>Hostile Sexism
>behavior that overtly threatens, intimidates or abuses women, especially those who defy male-dominated power
>behavior
>the way in which one acts or conducts oneself, especially toward others
All of the questions are about how one feels. Having an opinion does not mean that you act it out.
By resisting women being dominant, you are labeled as hostile.
The only way to get 0 Hostile Sexism is to disagree strongly with all of the questions that might pose women in a negative light, which means you really don't think that there are women who do shitty things to men.
It's like we are really being watched and judged by feminist jews.also 'perfect' 0 0 score is gotten just by strong disagree everything.
>>29356387
>a retarded female wrote this quiz
>look at her job title
>"Data Producer"
fucking lmao PBS made up a position to make their company seem more progressive. A fucking "Data Producer" what does that shit even mean? She writes "progressive" quizzes like these all day and writes down the resuls?
Give me a break.
>>29357377
>i still don't understand
I believe that it serves two purposes. One, to catch the "benevolent sexism" of superior gentlemen. Two, to catch the sexism of self-professed feminists who actually think women are better. So really I guess questions like that is what makes it a true equality test.
>>29357431
I "strongly disagreed" with most things because I intrepreted the questions as pertaining to women as a group, i.e. ALL women. That's the only way that it made sense to me, since it was about attitudes towards women as a whole and not individual women. So to me, disagreeing didn't mean that I don't think ANY women do whatever the question asks - 'cause some clearly do - just that not all of them do, and that it isn't a female-specific behaviour either.
>>29356833
a lot of the questions were bait any way. "do you believe women control men when they get into a relationship". yeah no fucking shit, thats more of a fact than anything else. look at how many guys get whipped when they get married/get a gf
>>29356387
Already taken on the original university webpage
Pic related
>>29357547
It could have been phrased more clearly. It's not "do you believe that some women do X?" but more "do you believe that X is an inherent trait of women as a whole and ONLY women (i.e. that men don't do X much at all)?". You have to bear in mind that your attitude towards womankind as a whole is being tested; not whether or not you believe that SOME women out the billions on the planet do some bad shit.
Also, I'd urge people do re-do the test and pretend that they're a typical sjw-feminist who's actually a misandrist and thinks women are better. You'd get scored as a sexist, albeit a "benevolent" one.
>>29356387
I really wanna smack the smug cunt in that gif badly
>>29356913
You'll learn soon enough.
That 1.3 will get higher as you get older.
>>29356387
tfw I'm a woman. Some women are bad people, and it is easier to use a man than be better than him. Admitting this is not sexist, believing it doesn't exist is what's sexist.
>>29356865
Even more extreme
Daily reminder if you did not get a 5 you are a normal fag
This test is retarded, I fantasize about women dominating me.
>Hostile sexism is a 1.7
>Benevolent is zero
All I said was I agree women get involved with men for benefits and that women tease men and then reject their advances when they reciprocate.
>3.16 hostile sexism
Just because I don't think gender has anything to do with a person's morality, or that men are obligated to provide for women.
What a stupid fucking test. Maybe it should ask if you've ever raped or beat the shit out of a woman instead of those dumb fucking questions?
Sometimes I actually prefer to be around women over men. I lived with 5 for a year. It's pretty sweet they have their own little dramas which you're just not involved in and you feel more important since you're the only guy around.
>>29356387
most fucking retarded survey ever
>>29358724
*quiz sry brain no workerini
originelli
Hostile 4.5
Hostile: 0.83
Benevolent: 2
Hostile: 4.5
Benevolent: .67
wew lad
Hostile: 2.17
Benevolent: 2.17
This quiz is bullshit. I'm not allowed to give neutral answers so everything is at least slightly biased out of necessity.
Got a 4.33 in hostile and a 0.17 in benevolent.
I know I'm sexist to an extent but I have no idea why it's this high.
>>29356751
ye I've heard women talk about that. It's awful sexist of pbs to discredit their experiences like that.
Who /4andabove/ here
>>29359330
Yep, >>29359082 is me.
This quiz is fucking dumb anyways.
I believe that men should take at least a moderate role in providing and protecting their women. How is this sexist against women? I wouldn't even touch a guy that couldn't protect me.
>>29356387
who else is /hostile/
Received 4 in hostile and a 0.33 in benevolent. Not too bad if I do say so myself.
>>29356387
Who else is /cuck/ here?
>>29356579
Holy shit same score
Nice
>How sexist is /r9k/?
KILL ALL WOMEN
>>29356387
I didn't score on "benevolent sexism" because women are not "wonderful, but weak", they are just not wonderful.
Fuck this quiz. It manages to gauge that im somehow hostile even despite being so poorly organized and worded. I would be ashamed if i created this test and it doesnt even adjust for experiences. Maybe im not some guy who grew up idolizing men who beat up on women like the strawman feminists build. Maybe I was abused by women in my life. Maybe my life experiences can give meaning to my answers. Asshole fucking test makers.
I took it earlier today and got 3 hostile and 0 benevolent
If somebody mentions that they're a femanon, r9k goes batshit crazy and starts acting like a feminists, but instead of screaming patriarchy and misogyny, they scream "REEEEEEE WHORE REEEEEEEE SLUT"
I got 4.17 hostile sexism and .17 benevolent. What does that mean?
>>29356387
it's all broad generalisations with no mutual option, this is setting you up for failure and made to pander to leftists.
>>29357431
The thing is ran by PBS (aka leftwing gov't funded shithole) so the whole thing is fucking loaded, and I plan on seeing this at some point used by Hillary this fall
>men should sacrifice to provide for the women they adore
so if you say no you're a shitlord who want's women only to serve you and be your sexual object
and if you say yes you're a shitlord who thinks that women are weak and cannot provide for themselves like a man can
I answered using facts, guess I'm sexists because I'm red pilled lmao
>>29356387
>http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/
I love how there's no neutral or don't give a fuck options.
I'm a normie who has success with women, and this is what I got. Bitches love male supremacy.
I really wish there was a neutral option. Half these questions were dumb as fuck.
I think I passed
[just in case this isn't an original comment]
>>29360891
>I took it earlier today
No one cares how you spend your time normie
>>29360846
Being subjected to trauma doesn't make your opinions more valid, nor does it make them rational.
M'lady I respect you please have sex with me
Gee I sure am tolerant ay lads
>Hostile - 3.83
>Benevolent - 2
What? I rarely answered anything above "slightly" on both ends.
hostile: 3.5
benevolent: 0
>>29356387
4.76, more than twice the average, hostile sexism
I have never hurt, threatened, abused or wanted to a woman in my life. Good to know that my thoughts are more dangerous than violence could ever be for feminism
>>29356387
The premise is sexist because it assumes you know the minds of 4 billion people.
Boom. I don't take cues from shitty quizzes.
![d237910f061049fe8428ad827e5f3b1c[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/ZfyBWwh.png "d237910f061049fe8428ad827e5f3b1c[1].png")
i can't scroll down for some reason, am i supposed to have flash installed?
anyway i got this, my benevolent is probably higher
>>29361895
haven't taken the quiz but danger level is surely not what it's measuring friend. redpill for life tho
ps my grandma is megaracist does that mean she is capable of executing the Final Solution?
>>29356943
I only need one question to get the same results and it wouldn't change the test at all
Are women angels capable of no wrong or demons that want your souul
>>29361929
Hey sure use words that sound dangerous tho like I'm likely to abuse women
>>29362004
>this anon thinks he looks like a threat
the sign didn't say "YES ALL MEN hashtag"
Yeah i love womyn and think they're equal
>>29361905
Actually it's worse
It asks you, should men sacrifice themselves for women
Wtf? No means you are a hostile sexkst pig
Of course m'ladys means you are a condescending sexist pig
In reality I don't think anyone should sacrifice themselves for someone else except maybe for your own children
>>29356751
i have exactly the same results brobot
Hostile 4.17
Benevolent 0.17
Most people in my age bracket 18-34 are pieces of shit and absolutely deserve to be in dysfunctional relationships with each other.
AGE BRACKET GENOCIDE WHEN?
>>29356387
Hostile sexism: 1.67
Benevolent sexism: 0
>>29362074
Completely agree, people are retarded
>Hired durr let's make women our superiors in the office but also keep ftipping divorce courts in their favour because they are frail women that don't make as much as us
Every woman gets abused by evil men except for my girlfriend, the other men are savages
Wait what? Officer, I swear I never hit her
>>29362116
>i'm ranked below the HR bitches
>women rule the world ugh
get good at your career and you'll never deal with women again
hostile is 1.83.
benevolent is 1.
>Hostile: 5
>benevolent: 0
Lol
And I was being honest
>1.Many women have a quality of purity that few men possess.
No they dont.
>2. Women should be cherished and protected by men.
No they shouldn't
>3. Women seek to gain power by getting control over men.
Some do some don't. Same goes if sexes are reversed, some men want power over women some don't.
>4. Every man ought to have a woman whom he adores.
No, men don't deserve a women by virtue of existing.
>5. Men are incomplete without women.
No they're not.
>6. Women exaggerate problems they have at work.
In my experience women are more prone to exaggeration than men.
>7. Once a woman gets a man to commit to her, she usually tries to put him on a tight leash.
Depends a lot do.
>8. When women lose to men in a fair competition, they typically complain about being discriminated against.
Yes this is well documented.
>9. Many women get a kick out of teasing men by seeming sexually available and then refusing male advances.
Many women like attention, so yes.
>10. Women, compared to men, tend to have a superior moral sensibility.
No they don't.
>11. Men should be willing to sacrifice their own well being in order to provide financially for the women in their lives.
No they shouldn't. Women can get jobs men shouldn't be shackled by women.
>12. Feminists are making unreasonable demands of men.
You know exactly the way they're going to score this one. Sometimes feminists do.
I don't know what to make of it.
Are the opposite results those of a cuck?
Funniest part is the
>POST THIS ON FACEBOOK/TWITTER
like, so you and your friends can have another means to pat each other on the back over how great you are? what about me? the "hostile sexist"? Am I supposed to put those fucking results up?
4.33 hostile
0.33 benevolent
desu this quiz is heavily biased and lacks neutral answers aswell as needs less loaded questions.
Hostile sexism. Wtf.
>>29364634
you're a misogynistic monster, anon
sorry you had to find out this way, but at least now you can see that your behaviour must be corrected
> 5 hostile
> 1.17 benevolent
These questions were shit and don't know how anyone could score low on hostile.
> abusing and threatening women
lolz
I'm apparently a very sexist ladyI fucking hate modern feminism
>>29364763
Yes because the first wave was so good.
>4.83 hostile and I wasn't even meming
Basically if you refuse to treat women as children you want to abuse them! This test is so fucking retarded.
>>29365128
Ever think maybe YOU"RE the problem, anon?
>tfw you value traditions of your country
>tfw you still think that men should be men and women should be women
>tfw sexist as fuck
The age when men and women are the same is here my family members. We live in spooky times.
>>29365252
No this is the age where we are supposed to pretend that men and women are the same..
5 on hostile sexism
1.33 on benevolent sexism
0 on both.
You need neckbeards need to get out more.
>5 in hostile sexism
>0 in benevolent sexism
>/pol/ 100%
>>29356387
>>29357105
based
i don't believe in anything you actually wrote tho
>2.83 hostile
>1.5 benevolent
I'm sexist by definition because I believe that both women and men are superior in some ways and inferior than others. I don't deny biology.
This test is still bullshit though.
guess i'm pretty hostile desu
I did the test twice to see if it would say anything other than hostile sexism. It doesn't.
>>29356387
>Hostile
4.83
>benevolant
1.17
im not a native speaker but the sentence "racism and sexism much ? seems totally nonsensical to me
These questions are pretty silly.
>>29356387
>4.5
>2.8
Time to start decking bitches with my awesome male privilege
>>29365907
It is, it's slang/idiomatic. "... much?" is implying you are whatever comes before "much?", so in OP's pic she is saying "You're being racist and sexist".
Don't try to figure out the grammar because it's non-standard.
Languages are dumb.
>5
>0
Only acceptable score for a robot
this is the score i got
>>29356865
we are equally hostile
Cool Survey.
Lemme describe benevolent sexism in a way that will make me seem very hostile sexist:
Women need benevolent sexism, or theyd be competing with men to be better men than men are. Also, theyd have to accept their fate with a proper sense of agency instead of pointing to a result and blaming the patriarchy for it ('the patriarchy' is every single instance where the advancement of women's interests is claimed to be frustrated by culture)
>>29366606
That google tab named "how to take a..."
What is it?
It's bothering me so much tell me please
>>29366953
Throbbing cock up my tender boipucci
You're welcome
>>29357075
Hey fellow hostile but not benevolent bro.
If you got a benevolent sexism score above 1, you're a cuck. Women are pure and should be cherished? My ass.
this survey is a sham
>>29356387
Hostile : 2.5
benevolent: 0.5
Would affirmative action and grants for women in STEM count as benevolent sexism?
2.6
3.5
I sure do love answering incredibly generalizing statements in only two extremes.
>>29356387
Apparently I'm super sexist. Funnily enough I'm pretty much the opposite of a robot. Goes to show what women are actually looking for in a man.
>>29356387
Wooooo!
I am having my SAHW take it now
>>29356387
0 across the board.
>>29367568
My wife got a 2.8 and a 4.16
2.33 and 2.17 . Every woman I know always compliments about how nice I am ... I think being nice is associated with sexism nowadays ....
>>29359409
You don't see how it's sexist to think that a woman can't take care of herself and needs a man to provide for and protect her?
>hostility
3.83
>benevolent
1.64
Should have been a gray area response as that quiz was so black and white... I just answered in general so my scores were high.
>>29359409
>>29367717
Keep in mind that almost all women are unconsciously biased to think of men like that women
A woman's pussy is valuable currency for her desu, no matter how independent a chick is she still needs to barter and get something in return for her pussy.
