>certain combinations of 1s and 0s are illegal to own
>substances that are naturally occurring in the human body are illegal to consume
>certain combinations subatomic particles are illegal to own
>given enough time, a combination of carbon atoms starts thinking what it is and where its going
>certain natural occurring plants are illegal to own
>>29343633
>certain combinations of cells are illegal to penetrate
>ending your own complex biological machine is illegal
>certain combinations of 1s and 0s are illegal to copy exactly
>>29343681
2deep4me
Here's a thought: if we have self awareness. Then if we came from the Big Bang, does that imply the singularity also had self awareness?
>certain sequences of sound waves produced by our vocal folds are considered inappropriate
>>29343769
>certain posts are not green text
>certain combination of letters want me to confess to things I would never ever do I swear I was just joking
>it's illegal to fuck a cow
>it's legal to kill it, cut it up into little pieces and have sex with a steak
What the fuck is wrong with society?
>>29343771
>certain sequences of sound waves produced by our vocal folds that relate to the course of events of complex biological machines on a certain planet are illegal
Laws against historical revisionism are utterly retarded
>>29343803
seriously, it's legal to have pictures of children cut up and mutilated, but other pics with children are illegal. why does one kind get to be protected?
I think all kinds of censorship are retarded, they don't protect anyone
>Movements of a specific combination of atoms is considered illegal.
>>29343846
>Laws against historical revisionism are utterly retarded
you live in europe don't you
>>29343873
yes, Germany
>>29343769
No why would it imply that? If we are made of carbon and we think does that mean the carbon has self awareness? No
>Attention whores are now illegal to be present in public and on the Internet
(we can make the world a better place with this)
>>29343902
You're missing the point; just forget it dude.
>paedos that think using semantics to make anything sound stupid is a valid form of argument
>>29343769
Nope
Self awareness as we know it arose with genetics (an ordered way to pass on structured information)
A rock is not self aware, because its form is not related in any meaningful way outside of proximity. Organisms have millions of year of genetic coding and appropriate sensory organs and are therefore "self aware".
>certain conversations are illegal to have
>>29343965
>tfw this is true
Feels fucking weird man.
>>29343989
Maybe I'm just being dumb today, but could you give an example of illegal conversations?
>>29344171
Asking a minor if they would like to have sex. Asking someone to kill another person for money.
>certain combinations of tissues and organs are illegal to murder
>>29344184
Welp I feel dumb now.
Thank you for answering my question though
>>29344171
The famous example is threatening the presidents life. Totally illegal
>>29343965
Not if you preface it with hypothetically...
>>29343633
>>certain combinations of 1s and 0s are illegal to own
because the existence of those combinations in your disks mean that you are a pedo searching for a prey
>proof: if you erase those "certain combinations", you're still a closet pedo
>>29344338
pirated music makes you a pedophile?
>>29343633
sentient chemicals thinks it can own anything
>>29343681
no it doesn't
a thought is just a thought
there is no 'person' behind it
>>29344171
there are lots and lots of scenerios where this could be the case, like in a job interview, asking certain questions like age etc.
or talking about anything after youve signed a nondisclosure.
or even theorizing about a hypothetical plot to kill someone
etc etc.
>>29344286
even so in some situations like even hypothetically talking about something after signing a nondisclosure
In all seriousness though, this is actually a very good thread.
>>29344354
yes.
if you want to listen "The Hymn Of The Pedos.mp3" you'll have to buy it.
