>She actually believes in the "everyone is beautiful" meme
>She thinks Chad secretly likes her
>>29339341
You will never make out with a girl like that. Think about it anons. Part of you youngsters hearts still hold out slight hope that'll happen.
It's never gonna happen.
>she thinks her best friend is into her
>she thinks someday they'll end up making out
>that they might even have sex and cuddle
oh wait, that one is probably true
>>29339341
>thinks a Dutch Defence is a good opening
>she thinks men are human and are capable of feeling anything except sorry for themselves
I am handsome and rich and perfect boyfriend material. But you can never be my gf because you're fat and have mental issues.
>she thinks she is of any worth besides her looks
>>29339494
>thinks that's what a Dutch Defense is
>she thinks we can't smell her disgusting unwashed vagina
>>29339512
>>29339341
Those dont work, we already know men value nothing but 10/10 looks.
My small consolation if the fact of leaving one more guy girlfriendless, since I gave up on dating.
>>29339498
>she thinks BLACKS are human and are capable of feeling anything except sorry for themselves
>>29339498
and yet you're still herefat vagingo fat vagingo original commentu 4 emperor Hiroyuki
>>29339341
>she thinks he actually notices her
>>29339512
>she thinks she looks cute
>>29339341
>she watches cutesy rom-com and imagines she's going to experience something like that one day
>>29339494
you don't actually play chess, stop appropriating my culture faggot
>>29339636
ok im sorry
'every jack has his jill just keep trying roastie LOOOOOL
>>29339341
>on a board dedicated to being sad they have no gf
>pisses off the only members of the other sex that willingly spend time with them
Genius!
>>29339662
GTFO normie!
You just don't understand the way of the robots.
>>29339534
>She thinks her flappy vagina is normal
>>29339581
>>29339591
>>29339628
>her looks and personality are average
>gets to fuck a Chad once or twice; he was looking for an easy lay
>she goes on believing she's an 8 or above; an LTR with anyone lower would be settling
>she spends her free time harassing bitter, unattractive men online
>>29339662
>she thinks she's special browsing le 4chin
>>29339662
>willingly spend time with
We're on the internet m800
>>29339727
>she thinks she deserves an 8/10 guy because the Chad in her class wanted an easy fuck and slept with her.
>she thought she was a lesbian but then realized it was actually just genuine female friendship she was searching for
>She thinks if she get a new trendy haircut she would finally look pretty.
>>29339827
2real :(
I try to make myself look better by being more fashionable, but it only ends up looking weird with my ugly face and disgusting skinnyfat body so I jut keep dressing like an autist.
>she thinks she can have a career and be a good mother at the same time.
>>29339873
>she thinks someone would want to marry her
>>29339858
post a pic of yourself and let us be the judge
>>29339558
He'll just date a cute Asian girl and make hapa Elliot Rodger children.
>>29339384
Salty femanon lol
>>29339341
It applies to women.
>>29339952
There arent enough of cute asians everywhere, anon
>>29339384
it happened for me and it was just ok. It also taught me that if you're confident enough it doesnt matter how you look and that you can fuck anyone.
>>29339967
I don't know, saw a 4/10 nerdy white guy with a cute 7/10 asian girl in KFC the other day.
He could still date an ugly asian chick.
>>29339384
Maybe I will. Somewhat. With interactive VR porn.
>>29339662
Roasties scouting for beta orbiters is hardly quality time together. We robots are well aware that roasties hate us.
>>29339931
I was dressed up here for a thing, but I wear skirts and t shirts or loose fitting tops more often than not. usually all black. I've tried skinny jeans but they give me a gross muffin top. i've tried tops that show my chest or belly, but they don't look good either.
>>29340015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism
Originale
>>29340015
If that's you the dyed hair and choker look awful
Why is it so hard for women to just dress normal, wear a normal skirt or something, you all look like a generic tumblr user.
>>29340015
She actually did it, the absolute madwoman
>>29339994
>i saw this one guy here
Gee that really changes everything
>>29339858
>>29340015
NO. You do not belong here AT ALL. You are a normie. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
> society will treat you equally to men
It fucking won't and we're going to fight every day until it does. Wake up and join the fight.
![photo[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/v7Mwv83.jpg "photo[1].jpg")
>>29340032
>>29340032
ignore this faggot chokers are GOAT right now. chokers = chad magnets
the worst thing is the hair color IMO. idk why fembots always want to dye their hair crazy colors. it doesnt look bad but it doesnt really look good either. if you were rocking the exact same outfit but had black hair, or just natural hair color, id ravage your poocii
>>29340045
Legit tumblr tier feminists post on r9k.
The dream is dead. Robots find another website.
>>29340077
I've probably been here longer than you m8
>>29340071
Lol I'm the faggot
If you really want a mentally unstable women who you just fuck I'd suggest a flesh light instead, less trouble
>>29340015
you're kind of cute. do you like my little pony or is the hair color a lulzrandom thing?
>>29339737
>>29339756
>>29340013
Haha I thought this thread was for triggering femmebots, how did I get so many (you)
>>29340015
Work on your motherfucking posture, I cannot stress this enough.
>>29340015
I'd say get a new hair dye or go back to your original hair colour. That and get better glasses next time you go the opticians. I think you might look better then, that's just my opinion though.
>>29340092
Baiting robots and shitposting your tumblr tier ideas for years doesn't mean shit.
Actual robots w should stop posting on r9k now that normies have taken over.
>>29340015
>fishing for compliments this much
Don't. You're fine and you know it.
>>29340094
Fleshlights are neither mentally unstable nor women, retard.
>>29340045
>society will treat you equally to men
No. Overall it threats you much better. White women are the most privileged group to ever have existed.
Different story for actual minority women though. But feminists never really cared about them. They just want to use them as shield.
>>29339759
FUCKING THIS
iko8ujyhgtrfed
>>29340256
> White women are the most privileged group to ever have existed
Seriously people believe this? lol
> But feminists never really cared about [minority women]
Someone has never heard of intersectionality
>>29340432
>inb4 someone mentions everydayfeminism
>>29340432
Typical female """logical""" argument
>>29340432
You've convinced me.
>>29339341
>she acutally believes it's normal to not shave vagina pubes
>she actually believes in the "real women doesn't shave" meme
>she actually believes men don't pretend to like "natural" bc their gf is already hot as hell
>>29341024
Have you heard of intersectional feminism?
there's basically two groups of feminists - TERFs and intersectionals. While both want equality for women, they both have very different views on how to get there, because they both view the nature of gender very differently.
Any crazy anti-male shit normally comes from TERFs.
>>29339494
>dutch defence
opening move isnt even discernible from that end game play
>she thinks she'll find a man who will make enough money to be a stay at home mom.
>she thinks she won't have to work while her children grow up in the day care industry.
>she thinks she won't delay having a kid until 32, meaning she'll struggle to get pregnant and it'll end up with downs syndrome.
You just had to go to college and have the latest things didn't you femanon?
>>29340432
If women are so oppressed why is circumcision encouraged for baby boys but illegal for baby girls?
>>29341382
Well, firstly, I'm opposed to male circumcision, as are many feminists.
The second point is that despite sharing a name, they are entirely different practices. Circumcising a man does not impact his quality of life as severely as circumcising a woman. Doesn't mean it's right to do either, but explains why one creates more outrage.
>>29341431
The differences are irrelevant in the western world because all female circ is outlawed.
Explain why one is illegal while the other is encouraged.
>>29341452
> The differences are irrelevant in the western world because all female circ is outlawed.
No, the differences aren't irrelevant. They are the reason WHY one is outlawed.
Circumcision is encouraged for a ton of dumb, unscientific reasoning, eg it being 'cleaner'. I'm opposed to it, as are most feminists.
>>29341452
Don't even bother. They have a post-hoc explanation for everything (e.g., patriarchy hurts men too) because they have an unfalsifiable position.
>>29341490
So why do you think women in first world nations are oppressed? What rights do men have that women don't?
>>29341499
You're basically asking me 'What is feminism?', and that's a hell of a lot of explain. Take a read through this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism#Movements_and_ideologies
I notice a lot of people who criticize feminists with the "WHAT RIGHTS DO MEN HAVE YOU DON'T?!?!" argument don't understand the definition of civil rights, and think the word 'rights' only refers to legal rights.
>>29341552
>think the word 'rights' only refers to legal rights.
so you're basically asking people to change their opinions? That's fucking stupid.
>>29341560
What? Civil rights is the rights of citizens to political and social freedom and equality.
And besides that, yes, we're asking people to change their opinions. What is stupid about that?
>>29341302
Yeah I think I've heard those words before.
You gotta realize when you come here that while we're not a minority oppressed group or whatever, many of us are marginalized individuals and we're not doing too well, at all. You don't have to browse the board for long for it to become obvious. All we keep hearing from the SJW crowd is that white males are over-privileged and that we must atone. And eventually this gets to us...
>>29340249
I said I'd suggest one instead of a woman, nice reading comprehension
>>29341640
I know - people take it personally, or think feminists are saying men can't suffer because they are privileged.
Intersectional feminists KNOW men can suffer. In fact, they often suffer badly as a result of falling out of the ie patriarchy). A pressure to succeed results in higher stress/suicide. Nowhere to turn to help results in higher untreated mental disorders and homelessness. Expectation to behave in 'manly' ways results in workplace accidents disproportionately affecting men.
Equality helps everybody barring those at the very top of the social structure. Unfortunately we do need to discuss this in terms of gender sometimes, but by no means does that mean ALL men are riding high and loving life as a result of patriarchy - in fact, many get thrown under its wheels.
>>29341702
> a result of falling out of the ie patriarchy).
a result of failing to behave in certain ways (ie the patriarchy)
>>29341702
Okay so if you believe that, why do feminists spend more time on trivial shit like scantily clad women in video games and conspiracy theories about how air conditioning is sexist, rather than actual harmful issues like workplace deaths/injuries, infant circumcision, etc?
>>29339512
>tfw ugly
I have failed at the only thing in life
>>29341721
Firstly, it's kind of dumb to dismiss those issues as unimportant, and secondly, why shouldn't people make the changes that are possible to them in their purview? By the logic of 'we're only allowed to deal with the most serios issues first', should we close all cat and dog shelters until we have world peace? Stop funding all other medical research until we've cured cancer?
> scantily clad women in video games
Demeaning and oversexualising women in media isn't trivial
> air conditioning
Issuing guidance on air temperature based on men's preference and ignoring women's preference is horribly outdated.
Why not change what is within your reach, to make the world more equal?
>>29341730
hehh this one was harsh... most of us probably botched it up too if that's any comfort.
>she thinks shes funny
>>29341787
>Demeaning and oversexualising women in media isn't trivial
Are you some kind of idiot who can't separate fiction from reality? That's a sign of schizophrenia.
>Issuing guidance on air temperature based on men's preference and ignoring women's preference is horribly outdated.
I recall those bullshit articles also stating that most women tried to dress "Cute" instead of for work. Maybe they should try the latter.
>Why not change what is within your reach, to make the world more equal?
I guess I see your point, I just think its hypocritical to claim that you care so much and then spend time on things that, at best, only cause indirect harm (and even that isn't really proven) as opposed to things that actually do cause direct harm. Kinda seems like you're just paying lipservice to trick men into supporting your goals without giving them anything in return.
>>29341855
>most women
meant to say most women that were complaining about the air, not most women in general
>>29341855
> Are you some kind of idiot who can't separate fiction from reality?
Do you really not think the media has any influence over society? Enough with the hostility.
> dressing cute for work
Ask yourself why women feel pressured to dress a certain way.
> ts hypocritical to claim that you care so much and then spend time on things that, at best, only cause indirect harm
Like I said earlier, should we all give up trying to change *anything* until we have sorted out whatever you personally judge as the most important issue? Or should we change what we can, and challenge inequality wherever we see it?
>>29341855
An additional point to make to that - this is often an argument you hear from those who are benefiting from the patriarchy, eg the privileged.
"Go spend your limited resources on the stuff that requires huge investment, time and resources! Leave the smaller things that affect my enjoyment of life and require fewer resources to change alone!"
If we take away the oversexualisation of women in media, and make offices slightly warmer, who gets affected? It's certainly not homeless guys, or the suicidal. It's the people at the top of the societal pile.
>>29341914
>Do you really not think the media has any influence over society?
Do I really think guys seeing girls in DOA makes them want to rape women? No I don't. In fact (and I know this is just personal experience) the women I know are the ones who tend to have unrealistic expectations in regards to how attractive they want their bf to be relative to their own attractiveness.
>Ask yourself why women feel pressured to dress a certain way.
Because they want to impress rich Chads? I think that has to do with their vagina tingles, not society.
>should we all give up trying to change *anything*
Maybe you should just stop claiming you care so much when you clearly don't. Feminists have never done anything, ever, to help men despite claiming to care so goddamn much. So many men have thrown their own gender under the bus because women tell them that they're sexists if they don't drop everything to help women's issues.
>"Feminism helps boys too! Patriarchy discourages men's emotions!" she said as she took another sip from her Male Tears mug
>>29341953
Yeah that's a good point too, didn't think about that one.
>>29339341
>she thinks men are nice to her for any reason other than sex
>>29341972
Here's a list of feminist resources tackling men's issues.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/3tn9kc/a_list_of_feminist_resources_tackling_mens_issues/
I know you won't bother reading it, because it goes against your brainwashed narrative, but it's real.
There's little point arguing your other points. Anyone who thinks 'Chads' and 'tingles' are an actual thing is basically living in a different world, devoid of logic.
>>29342011
>tfw you are ugly and know this is not true
>>29341702
Hey I'm the one you replied to with that.
Yeah this all sounds nice and well. But this doesn't make sense from our point of view.
If you exclude the male bankers and politicians and CEOs and all of those jerks, and only consider common people. Surely you don't believe that women have it harder than men? Because we can't accept that; it's too contrary to the evidences we're seeing.
Men don't have problems because of "pressure" or "expectations" about manlyness. They do what they have to do to survive and they don't have much of choice. I'm really not afraid of workplace accidents or stress, they're pretty much the least of my concerns. I'm just afraid of losing my stupid job and not being able to get another one and being screwed.
All we see around us is women leading a much easier life. Generally much more hedonistic too. They have life on easy-mode we say. Partly because men are always willing to support them. Which is not true equality I guess, but it's still the reality of the thing.
>>29342017
>Anyone who thinks 'Chads' and 'tingles' are an actual thing is basically living in a different world, devoid of logic.
Right because there is no such thing as sexual selection preferences.
>>29342017
Oh good lord, you know what I meant. Women don't dress cute because "society" tells them to its because they want to impress the rich hot guys at their office.
>your brainwashed narrative,
So I'm brainwashed for coming to my own conclusions? Thanks.
Another point I'll have you consider- feminists are always going on and on about how so many jobs are male dominated, whether thats politicians, CEOs, engineers, silicon valley jobs whatever, and how that breeds sexism and we need more women in those industries. But do you ever see feminists advocating for more women coal miners, construction workers, tow truck drivers, plumbers, electricians, or any manual labor jobs? No, you don't. Those jobs are 99% male. Could it be that you don't actually care about "male dominated" jobs and just want more women to be in high paying office jobs?
I mean, if thats what you want its fine to admit it, just be honest.
>>29342017
>There's little point arguing your other points. Anyone who thinks 'Chads' and 'tingles' are an actual thing is basically living in a different world, devoid of logic.
Whoa. I'm not the guy you replied to BTW. But whoa. Yes they are. You're asking us to disbelieve what is easily observable. Men act completely retarded when they let their sex drive lead them, but women aren't any better desu. They let it happen too and it really affects their behavior.
>>29342034
> If you exclude the male bankers and politicians and CEOs
Firstly, no. You don't get to exclude those people. Many of them were 'common people' once, who through work and luck reached their position. Part of that luck came from their sex, and denying that is illogical.
>
Men don't have problems because of "pressure" or "expectations" about manlyness. They do what they have to do to survive and they don't have much of choice.
That's the effect of the patriarchy on men. Men are expected to be breadwinners. They are expected not to talk about their problems. This 'lack of choice' you perceive is a direct result of men being viewed a certain way, and women being viewed differently - the very thing feminism is striving to end.
> All we see around us is women leading a much easier life.
Data does not bear this observation out.
As a side point, as a kid, I HATED how much 'easier' men had it. You mean, men don't have to wait to be asked out, and get first pick of girlfriends? Men get to wear comfy clothes with pockets, and shoes that let them run around? Men can drink and be laddish and rude and loud, and still be attractive? Men can have a family AND a great career? Men have a higher chance of making it to the top of their company?
I've since grown up and seen that men and women BOTH face problems, and that in most cases things that support equality help both.
>>29342117
>Data does not bear this observation out.
None of which you have presented.
>>29342117
>the very thing feminism is striving to end.
If that is true then why do feminists still only have eyes for rich men who are socially and sexually dominant? You never see any women dating submissive men, or men with a smaller salary, or shorter men, or anything where the man is "lesser" than the woman.
>>29342117
>You mean, men don't have to wait to be asked out,
Most women don't want to be asked out. There are also many men who would love to be asked out by a woman.
For what its worth I've never in my life observed a woman making the first move on a man, most are happy to let the man do it first and face all the rejection.
>>29342076
>But do you ever see feminists advocating for more women coal miners, construction workers, tow truck drivers, plumbers, electricians, or any manual labor jobs?
Workplace perceptions are a big problem that feminism IS fighting against. But think of it this way - could you imagine being the only woman on a construction site? Women get wolf-whistled even walking past one - that's hardly going to encourage many women into that career path. We need an overhaul of workplace culture.
>>29341702
Your feminist boogie man of the patriarchy is actually an expression of how men like and should behave. At his core every man desires to be needed, to produce and provide for others. The reason for suicide and depression are in many ways a result of denying a man his inherent need to be needed.
You can't understand this desire because you're not a man.
>>29342017
Part of.this is suppressing masculinity and that's fucking retarded
>>29342128
> why do feminists still only have eyes for rich men
... they don't?
When guys say this kind of stuff, it's crazy. Most men, rich, poor, attractive or ugly, shy or outgoing, tall and short, get laid and have partners. I hate to sound harsh, but you're just coming up with excuses when you say stuff like this.
>>29342161
>>29342173
Uh-huh... or is that just what you've been socialized to believe being a man is?
>>29342180
>... they don't?
uh huh, sure
>>29342202
Ah yes, the good old tinder study... based on tinder users. Who are looking to get laid. Hardly a representative sample of society.
>>29342180
you're joking right? the overwhelming majority of women are disgusted by things like femdom and poor guys.
>>29342194
You realize that is the only kind of man women like, right? By encouraging men not to be providers, to be emotional blubbering idiots, etc you're just dooming them to be single for life.
>>29342217
> the overwhelming majority of women are disgusted by things like femdom and poor guys.
Not true.
> You realize that is the only kind of man women like, right?
Again, not true. And if you think that's THE ONLY way men can behave to be successful, then you're the exact kind of guy we're trying to help.
>>29342212
You're in no position to dismiss data until you've presented some of your own.
But I guess as a shitlord, I should just go educate myself.
>>29342232
>Not true.
Yes, true. I've seen it with my own fucking eyes.
>>29342232
>And if you think that's THE ONLY way men can behave to be successful,
I don't just ""think"" that's how it is. For better or worse that is the reality.
>then you're the exact kind of guy we're trying to help.
Oh cut the bullshit, I know you people aren't interested in helping guys like me.
>>29342180
>When guys say this kind of stuff, it's crazy. Most men, rich, poor, attractive or ugly, shy or outgoing, tall and short, get laid and have partners. I hate to sound harsh, but you're just coming up with excuses when you say stuff like this.
I don't though.
Checkmate.
>>29342252
>Yes, true. I've seen it with my own fucking eyes.
Nice anecdote
> Oh cut the bullshit, I know you people aren't interested in helping guys like me.
Yes, we 100% are. Of course, you're hellbent on rejecting that, because it's the only thing you know how to do. But we'll keep fighting for equality, and you'll benefit.>>29342256
>>29342256
you fuckin got me m8
>>29342273
>Nice anecdote
As if you presented fucking evidence? My anecdote is worth just as much as yours is.
>Yes, we 100% are.
Oh really, and how is that? What things are you doing that will help me?
>>29341552
>the word 'rights' only refers to legal rights.
But it does. You can't make laws to cement civil rights without stomping on someone else's rights
>>29342288
Check out this list here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/3tn9kc/a_list_of_feminist_resources_tackling_mens_issues/
>>29342307
Yes you can. Just look at the black civil right's movement of the 1950s and '60s.
>>29342232
Wait, you actually think any significant number of women WANT to be the dominant one in their relationships? Or that a significant number are into submissive men? You're fucking delusional if you believe that.
>>29342366
Why do you think a relationship must have a dominant-submissive dynamic?
>>29342381
I guess what I should've said is that women always want to be submissive. Most women I talk to hate the idea of man who isn't in the lead all of the time.
>>29342390
I strongly disagree. Most women I interact with are looking for or have an equal partnership, myself included. The idea someone must 'submit' is crazily outdated.
>>29342403
I guess we have different experiences then. Living in west texas probably has something to do with it.
Shit sucks senpai
Women's mating strategy works on two levels. On the first level, you're looking for "specialness" in men, something that sets them apart from the throng of eager suitors. On the second level, you're extreme nesters, capable of unconditional love for one man. Once you finally do pick that special guy, you can really be his best friend, his counterpart, his soulmate, for life.
The first level is what often seems so cruel to men, because it's the source of women being sexually and romantically judgmental. Men feel like they're being put through a dehumanizing gauntlet by women. And because this is the only level that many men will ever see, they think it's all there is to female love.
But to a woman, it's obvious that it's 100% necessary to be so picky, because of the commitment required by the second level. The second level is a Big Deal. You can't just let any old guy get to the second level. That is going to be the guy you give your SOUL to. That's even more important than the fact that he's going to take huge chunks of your life by (for example) making you bear and raise his child.
Think about this: Why can't men understand the necessity of the first level? It's because they cannot fathom the second level. Men literally *cannot even comprehend* the second level of commitment and love. They are not nesters. They are built differently.
While you are looking for specialness in a man - looking for those little intangibles that show he has a great, unique soul that you could love forever - a man is looking for any woman who will open the gate for him. He's designed *not* to speak intrinsic specialness, but to COME TO SEE ANYONE WHO OPENS THE GATE AS IPSO FACTO SPECIAL. Because it's so rare to be judged worthy, he needs to be ready to fall in love with any woman who lets him through, immediately.
You're looking for uniqueness in a lover. Men will find anything with tits "unique" if it fucks them for a while.
You will never be as special to him as he is to you.
>>29339384
Already have anon, though she did end up lying to/manipulating me so there ya go
>>29342409
Yeah, it probably does. I live in London and Manchester, so it's probably a different dynamic.
>she thinks she'll remain attractive to her husband who will look relatively the same while her looks fade
>she thinks her husband will be loyal to her instead of pounding some younger girl with daddy issues who wants to fuck a DILF and will do anything in bed
>she thinks she's smart enough to figure out if he cheats and thus is safe
>she thinks anyone who treats her as an intellectual equal isn't pretending because of either pity or wanting to fuck her
>>29342403
>Most women I interact with are looking for or have an equal partnership
Top fucking kek m8
>>29342445
Confidence and aggression are two very different things. In fact, aggression often masks a lack of confidence.
>>29342456
point remains that she still expects men to approach her first and all that jazz while she sits on her ass and waits for prince charming to do all the work and face all the rejection.
>>29342117
>Firstly, no. You don't get to exclude those people.
Oh sure I didn't mean to completely ignore the gender imbalance with them. Just that this does not affect most people. For every banker, CEO and politician there are thousands of ordinary people. If you had to make a thousand men worse off just to make sure one woman eventually made it to the top, is that worth it? I don't think so. The imbalance higher up cannot do otherwise than fix itself if the imbalances get fixed at the lower levels (even though it might take time).
>They are expected not to talk about their problems. This 'lack of choice' you perceive is a direct result of men being viewed a certain way, and women being viewed differently - the very thing feminism is striving to end.
I don't get that. I don't see the expectations or my perceptions of things or me talking about my problems or not having any concrete consequence on anything. I guess you imply that this should drive government policies to change society concretely?
Eh, the job market sucks right now and that's all that pisses me off desu. Things would be much better otherwise.
>Data does not bear this observation out.
It's too big. The reality of it is too big. I can't not accept it. I get that women being dependent on their boyfriends/husbands is not correct, but that can't be completely ignored either. They're being taken care of.
>As a side point, as a kid, I HATED how much 'easier' men had it. You mean, men don't have to wait to be asked out, and get first pick of girlfriends?
No no no no no. You're at the one place where we couldn't accept that not even for a microsecond. Just no.
Men ask out, women choose. I do NOT get first pick of girlfriend, even though I had to ask plenty of them. I get NO girlfriend actually which is why I'm a robot.
>>29342475
That's not automatically submission, though. You're viewing it through the mindset of 'typically male = dominant behavior', but really that's not automatically the case.
>>29342212
>Who are looking to get laid.
>Hardly a representative sample of society.
what?
>>29340015
>literally looks like every normie hipster girl ever
nothing to see here
>>29342345
>reddit link as proof
Holy fuck
>>29342526
She basically just told us shitlords to educate ourselves...
>>29342492
So then what you're saying is, women aren't actually interested in doing the things men typically have to do in dating, i.e. approach women, pay for dates, lead the conversation, bear the entire brunt of rejection, etc.
So what we've suspected is true, feminists want to tear down gender roles that hurt women but are perfectly fine with leaving ones that benefit them at the expense of men.
>>29342232
Helping me by making me submissive? You are going to KILL me. Maybe it SHOULDN'T matter but it does. Being submissive is a dangerous proposition for men.
>>29342483
> Men ask out, women choose. I do NOT get first pick of girlfriend, even though I had to ask plenty of them. I get NO girlfriend actually which is why I'm a robot.
Yeah, I saw this as the other way round. Men chose who to go out with, women sat there and waited/hoped to be picked by a man. It's a matter of perspective.
> Just that this does not affect most people.
Agreed - but the people it does affect are mostly male.
> The imbalance higher up cannot do otherwise than fix itself if the imbalances get fixed at the lower levels (even though it might take time).
See, now this is a problem, because it doesn't tend to happen. Boardroom culture means women are often overlooked when it comes to hiring. It's one reason why you tend to get a glut of female middle managers, and a whole male board. Sure, soe women want to be there (and some decide to stick there then they get a taste of the boardroom culture), but the male middle managers are more likely to be promoted. This is one case where hoping the changes trickle up just doesn't seem to be working.
> I don't see the expectations or my perceptions of things or me talking about my problems or not having any concrete consequence on anything.
Maybe not on you personally, but on men as a whole. For example, you may not have an underlying mental health issue, but if a man who does feels like he can't talk about it for fear of losing his job (and thus place as breadwinner of the family), then we see an issue.
>>29342536
Nope, I didn't say that, and that's a very strange logical leap from what I did say.
>>29342539
> Being submissive is a dangerous proposition for men.
Oh my days. That's why we're trying to change it.
>>29342232
>that's the kind of guy we're trying to help.
Trying to HELP?
A generation of boys denied the ability to see their father, or ever seeing their father because their mother doesn't like him?
A generation of men denied the ability to see their children?
A generation of men who now have to compete with you in the work place, driving down wages even though they'd much rather be the only ones working so you can stay at home and raise the kids?
A generation of boys told that expressions of masculinity that are inherent to them are 'toxic ' and should get in touch with their feelings. If they don't comply they get drugged.
Fuck off, men have had enough of feminist help. You think men kill themselves because work is hard? There isn't any work anymore, and nothing that makes living worth while in your feminist utopia.
>>29342563
>That's why we're trying to change it.
Women hate submissive men though. You can't deny this.
>>29342545
>Men chose who to go out with, women sat there and waited/hoped to be picked by a man.
Are you kidding me? If you were to ask just about any guy out he'd probably say yes.
>>29342403
Women don't say what they really want. About things like that in particular. Doing exactly what women said they wanted is what made us so unsuccessful with them in the first place for many of us. Meanwhile those smart enough to have realize what it is that they actually wanted have been doing very well with them. Women can't get enough of them. They'll still complain about them not being what they claimed they wanted though. Women do that.
>>29342584
Either men don't actually like this, or I was incredibly unattractive.
The only times I've ever scored dates was by waiting to be asked, and me asking always resulted in a no.
It's not like I've done badly with guys either, I get flirted with a lot even now. But asking a guy out has worked exactly 0 times for me.
>>29342613
because you're going after dominant chads who want to be in control.
>>29339384
I already made out with a girl who was better looking than that.
>>29339341
>She can't find a bf even though top %20 of males have relationship with %80 of females
>>29342624
As I mentioned before, I'm after (and in) an equal relationship. Nothing less exciting than a man who wants to be in control all of the time.
>>29340015
tits or gtfo
you know the rulles
>>29342648
This was poorly phrased. I'm not looking for a new relationship now as I'm in one. But it's what i was looking for when I was single.
>>29342636
That's Brazil. Preta favela dwellers don't count, Thiago.
>>29341702
The way you're describing it sounds like you're saying "people have it rough" rather than anything specific to women.
>>29340171
>makes a comment about her just wanting attention and fishing for compliments
>gives her a fucking compliment
KYS
>>29339341
>Will never look good at the beach around popular hunks in a bikini without having D+ cups.
>>29339341
>Spends life forever chasing attractive men who bang younger, bustier chicks only to settle down with a beta orbiter who can handle your used pussy or be alone forever.
>>29342648
>>29342663
Well you're the exception not the rule
>>29339662
>thinks she is undercover and on a secret mission on a board made for alone males.
>actually an unattractive female with nothing else to do.
>she thinks that her 'friends with benefits' chadfriend will eventually fall in love with her
>she thinks that just because she can be the sidebitch of some second rate chad in her 20s that she will be sexually desirable in her 30s
>she thinks that there will be a happily ever after for her
>>29342696
Welp. I blew it. I got a little bit worried about her just before posting my comment so I gave her a little one. As if it was worth something. I can't help it I'm beta as fuck. How do I fight this off? I can't stop it.
>>29339977
then go fuck yourself
>>29340015
Here we go:
Remove hair dye,
work on posture,
wear skirt with no leggings,
show an attempt at cleavage,
get thicker framed glasses (will work with natural hair colour).
More muted colours on clothes (Loose T-shirts would look fine, V-neck style).
Red lipstick, remove choker, get a gold necklace.
Honestly, your "quirkyness" should come off geniunely in conversation, what you're wearing is basically an exclamation point or a paragraph of CAPS LOCK TEXT.
>>29342522
This guy gets it, just kick it down a whole notch or two.
>>29342839
>i got a little bit worried about her
Why you white knight?
>How do i stop?
By not feeding into women who post on this fucking board. Any woman who posts on this bored is cancer.
literally your compliment will not get you anywhere with these women. They will not even fucking respond.
They will not befriend you or date you either.
They literally just feed of your loneliness for compliments to dwindle their insecurity.
Now you know.
>>29342898
Why is being female here necessarily cancerous????
>>29342898
>don't be pleasant towards each other unless you have something to gain from it
>>29342648
Yeah sounds great. Most women aren't like that though. Many of them claim to be feminists because they jumped on the bandwagon, but they don't think like that. Feminism is just an expression of their narcissism for them.
And they say everything the feminists tell them to say and pretend to believe and think all those things. But they abhor men who show weakness. If a man isn't dominant they won't respect him and will be more likely to cheat on him, and being generally cruel and insensitive, etc. Many of us have had to experience that first hand and have realized that the problem was that we were too submissive.
I don't think it's a problem with feminism of course. Just that western women are being showered with attention, validation and affection from all sides these days. Thanks to social media, and cam streaming sites, etc. This is a somewhat recent phenomenon. The impact of it really exploded in the last decade it seems.
>>29342940
it's not being pleasant.
It is feeding someones ego.
>>29342937
Any female who understands this board enough knows the power their gender has on here.
It's one thing to post anonymously, and not mention gender, but when you tripfag, and openly post pics of yourself as a female on this board, I find your actions questionable.
>know your in a place full of desperate and lonely men who
>Know you can be a 5/10 here and literally get showered with attention
It's a cancerous move, and I believe any girl who does that is literally just fiending for attention.
The seriously must know the power they have on this board right?
To give the hopeless, false hope is an abuse of that power.
>>29341822
commie beta orbiting cuck machine detected.
>>29342981
Well if you don't think someone is behaving with equality in mind, call them out on it. I was at an event the other day for trans rights, and had to walk through a crowd of people calling themselves 'feminists' who were OPPOSED to trans people living as their preferred gender. I could not understand that dissonance, that idea that equality is only good when it benefits cis women. They would say I'm not a feminist as I support causes that in some cases harm women. I say they aren't as they don't support equality for all.
>>29342981
Why do you assume this is the case? Os it possible that these are these conclusions you've come to because they grant you the easiest method of interpreting reality while maintaining your self worth?
>>29342981
>Many of us have had to experience that first hand and have realized that the problem was that we were too submissive.
I'm not saying you should allow yourself to be treated poorly, but even if you do that doesn't absolve the people doing the poor treatment of their wrongdoings. In your situation the man is foolish but the woman is evil, and being evil is far worse in my opinion.
>She thinks a quality man will want her used up roast
>>29339384
Kissing is disgusting, degenerate, and extremely unhygienic
>>29342896
>no leggings
NO
NO
NO
NO
LEGGINGS ARE GOD TIER
>>29343002
My only issue with this is the underlying assumption that all of us are male... Any content that is isnt directly related to the plight of being a male leaves room for females to respond, but if they do so in a way that makes their gender obvious, they're seeking attention. If they keep their gender ambiguous, they're assumed to be male. It just seems silly.
Why do you guys even bother arguing with this retarded-ass feminist? You won't change her beliefs, you're only legitimizing them.
After that, she's just gonna continue to see the evil patriarchy everywhere (and more specifically in beta male like ourselves, as we are easy prey), while still begging for Chad to dominate and abuse her.
>>29343104
Why do women come here anyway? They can't be robots. They don't belong here.
>>29343104
Yea, and that's exactly the way it should be.
I don't feel that way about any other board except /r9k/.
If you're a female and you're posts say anything to reveal your gender, you are a twat and you are seeking to leech of the desperate.
>>29343135
PRECISELY.
>>29343097
I'm not saying leggings are bad, I'm saying, with that body type she wouldn't be able to pull it off (perhaps with the changes made).
>>29343135
>>29343150
Why can't they be robots? What is the working definition of "robot"??
>>29343135
/r9k/ has no topic, doofus. We can talk about anything we want. If anything, it's the robots ruining this place by keeping the topic the same every single day.
>>29343020
>Well if you don't think someone is behaving with equality in mind, call them out on it.
*sigh* I would get lynched.
I can't complain because women want dominant men, it's their right. It's not "unequal" in an immoral manner, I believe. It's just their personal preference. If they would have been honest about it things could have went better. (Probably not though I'm pretty beta.)
>They would say I'm not a feminist as I support causes that in some cases harm women. I say they aren't as they don't support equality for all.
Yeah I get that there are schisms like that. I do care about the trans. I don't care that /pol/ says they're degenerates (but I do listen to them on other stuff kek!), they're not. And they actually need help.
Some feminists really seem to actually be "female supremacists" of some sort. They know sex gives them a lot of power over society. It never gave them quite as much as it does today actually. Thanks to the Internet. They just want to maximize the profits they can get from it. Many women buy it into that. They definitively won't want a relationship with a non-dominant man, they're far removed from those notions of "equality" in a relationship.
>>29343104
1. >>>out
2. Download Tinder
3. Hookup with literally any guy you want
If 400lbs landwhales can get cock, I'm sure you can find a bunch of desperate dudes to orbit you and make you feel like a happy little princess without shitting up /r9k/.
>>29343135
DELETE THIS.
oregan0
>>29343171
A robot is someone who has (almost) no friends, no romantic relations, nothing to live for, sometimes a NEET but not always. They are either skellingtons or fat fucks, have bad haircuts and shit clothe and spend most of their time on the computer.
>>29343171
a dysfunctional male that has been ostracized by the normies of society to some extent and lives in some form of exile away from it's activities (or is out of place in wake of them).
>>29342898
>They literally just feed of your loneliness
Ouch.
Thanks anon I think that did it.
I wouldn't mind being 100% sure though.
Don't hesitate to punch me again this is doing some good.
>>29343196
That type of feminist is supposedly a sort of reactionary, kinda like we see some minorities going way overboard in defining themselves and standing out in pride of their identity. I think you're right that it has become something too often positively reinforced, but the only way to make it less of a thing is to avoid acting as though it bothers you emotionally.... Interact with those people and say that yes you believe in equality and what is their point? That sort of thing. They're too often treated like special snowflakes, and their position as such is a direct result of the anger coming from groups like r9k
>>29343233
People who come here for compliments and attention, only do it was practice before going for Chad, so by talking and responding to them you're only helping them in sucking as much big fat cock as they want.
>>29343171
Being a robot is being disenfranchised with social & sexual life.
Women have an upperhand in the dating scene that men do not. They get to pick and choose their men. Often women who complain about not being able to find a partner has had 20 other men show interest in her, for her to reject them.
Now men who have failed to find a partner, usually have been reject 20 times, and have had no offers.
I just find it very hard that the women here suffer in the way that some of the 20+ KV's do.
Most of the females who post on this board, aren't virgins, have had relationships in the past, and have a fairly easy time dating.
They do not share the pain of the robots.
You simply don't understand this board enough, the more your lurk the more you understand.
>>29343198
>>29343230
>>29343231
This is not what robot culture/identity started out as....why do you feel so safe assuming that now???
>>29343288
That's what it is now. Deal with it.
>>29339384
I'm so sad now there goes my reason to live :'(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
>>29343196
> *sigh* I would get lynched.
No you wouldn't - I do it all the time.
> women want dominant men
See, I don't agree with that. I think everyone gets told that - men must be dominant, women must be submissive - but it doesn't exactly hold true for many, many people.
> Some feminists really seem to actually be "female supremacists" of some sort.
These people are called TERFsand represent a small number of feminists. We hate them more than you do, as they throw the whole movement into disrepute. They are totally divorced from the idea of an equal relationship as they view men and women to be so dramatically different from each other that it's not possible for there us to interact without one taking advantage of the other. They are the people that say things like 'all sex is rape', etc. Relationships to them are inherently an act of submission on the part of the woman, and you either accept that or don't be with anyone.
I'm of the school of thought that men and women can get on just grand.
>>29343275
You define this pain as THE ULTIMATE PAIN that nothing can surpass but can you imagine being in a similar situation, but being consistently treated as though your personality and non-physical assets are totally irrelevant? It's comparable to being rich in a sense... Yeah, you have access to sex, but it feels like a fucking joke and is thoroughly unfulfilling
>>29343339
>WAAAAAAAAAH whatever I do, people like me! :''''''(
>WAAAAAAAAAAH even if I'm the shittiest person ever, someone'll still fuck me! DDDD:
>WAAAAAH, it's literally impossible for me to be treated like shit! :((((
>>29343339
>person A doesn't have any food
>person B has so much food that they think its an insult when people offer them more food
>person B thinks they're suffering worse than person A
that's what you're doing
>>29343368
No.....no... people will never like me because they don't see me as a human....sex is terrifying because most men see me as an object whether they want to or not.... and I am treated like shit anytime I put myself out there. You made no valid points.
>>29343288
/r9k/ didn't have a culture it was literally a second /b/ designed to keep shitposting and unoriginal posts to be kept to minimum.
Exiles started gathering here, and that's how it became what it is.
>being consistently treated as though your personality and non-physical assets are totally irrelevant?
Most robots don't even have the assets to get themselves in that situation.
AND YES WITHOUT A DOUBT I'D RATHER BE LOVED FOR MY PHYSIQUE AND HAVE MY PERSONALITY BE IRRELEVANT, THAN BE COMPLETELY IGNORED BY THE OPPOSITE SEX.
You don't know how blessed of a position that is to be in, in comparison to someone who doesn't even experience it.
Spoken exactly like a female who posts on this board.
>wants people to acknowledge her problems and treat them seriously
>but in comparison, her problems aren't as bad
>still she shitposts completely devoid of a sense of self awareness to how petty she sounds
>>29343419
People don't see you as a human? Where the fuck do you live? Africa? Saudi Arabia? India?
If you live anywhere in the Western World, you are full of shit.
>>29343261
Dammit. I won't get into a new relationship or could have fixed a relationship by talking about equality to a woman that doesn't care about any of that (even though she might pretend to). You are thinking from the woman's side. If I'm not pleasing her, she doesn't have to deal with me. She has plenty of options. It's a competition. And the traditionally dominant men keep winning them. And we have to adapt. The feminist indoctrination we've received in school has been screwing us over in the real world.
>>29343339
Part of this post>>29343430
was intended for you>>29343339
>she thinks she's the cute nerdy type that men like
>>29343430
Holy shit are you me?
All of this^
>>29343405
It is not about sex and you know it? It's about someone's will to be around you.
If you claim this is indeed all about not having a vagina to put yourself into, then it is clear to me that our rewards systems are defined by completely different terms. I'm repulsed by the idea of sex with no passion/love behind it. Most of us are.
>>29342800
>she thinks she's going to find a man in her 30s
>>29343475
There are plenty of guys who want relationships. If you stopped exclusively chasing Chads you'd realize this
>>29343339
wahaaah waaaah I have a wide choice of men but I always seem to pick the bad ones it couldn't be me it's always a mans fault
please see this handy guide
>She thinks she is not privileged
>She thinks she can find camaraderie on /r9k/
>She thinks she can fit in
>She believes in fenimism
>She thinks she is not 3DPD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7kP_dd6LU
>>29343430
You're missing the point. There is no "love" in situations like the ones I've described... there is an illusion of love based on me suspending my skepticism and choosing to believe that a person is "good". These guys are so often (EVEN IN CASES WHERE THEY ARE CLEARLY ROBOTS) only interested in the sex or the validation that comes from it in the end, though. They make that so clear by ignoring everything that doesn't have to do with sex. How can I feel validated or good or anything at all if I'm forced to recognize that I've done nothing and am simply being used?
>>29343544
I think that's why all the femitards like to believe that all men want to rape women. Because in the back of their mind they are secretly hoping a guy would be sexually aroused by her.
>>29343475
Self-absorbed female detected.
>LITERALLY COMPLAINING ABOUT SOMETHING A ROBOT WOULD ONLY DREAM OF, SEXUAL ATTENTION.
>Has no self-awareness or idea where she is and how inappropriate her comment is.
Complaining about her relationships not being what she wants them to be, to a board full of men who lack relationships.
As an anon said earlier, it's like complaining to starving people about the quality of your food being poor.GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU GOD DAMN SELF-ABSORBED CUNT
>>29343475
Not him.
Just pointing out that men need sex. They go crazy without it. Just look at the level of insanity on this board. I don't like impersonal sex either but I'd settle for it. Hopefully could talk a little bit though.
Women have an infinite supply. The betas are in the line too an they'll be willing to jump through hoops. They'll talk to them for hours and hours every day.
passion/love you say? Women get that from Chads.
>>29343586
That's gender critical 'feminists', not most of us.
>>29343544
Those who aren't only seeking sex seem to avoid me as a rule! And seem to be fundamentally suspicious of my interest in any sort of relationship with them!
>>29343475
>most of us are repulsed by the idea of sex with no passion/love behind it
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA fucking lies
Casual sex and "it's just sex, it's no big deal" are core tenets of modern feminism. Most women LOVE being able to get fucked any time they want. You're just mad because Chad prefers to fuck more attractive girls than you and you don't want to settle for an average dude or a beta.
>>29343475
Many robots and creepy/beta men are brought up in single mother households. They have poor job prospects (just about everyone does). Competition is paradoxically harder than ever, but not difficult in intuitive ways. There are lots of mixed messages thrown about and the traditional ways a man can achieve psychological fulfillment are mostly removed.
If a man can't provide for or create a family, because he lacks the job. If women insist on being just as good as him, working and making as much as him. What else is he supposed to do than think about getting laid all the time? What the fuck else is there in society besides hedonism?
>>29343596
I really appreciate your level-headedness in responding to me.
The interesting thing about females in this dynamic is that we're attracted to sex as more of a symbol. That is our innate tendency. I seek sex in an attempt to feel committed/close/valued by someone else. And the situation sucks equally for both of us in this case because females have incentive to connect with men as often as possible to fulfill their needs in hopes that one of them will eventually be sincere in what he initially expresses. Whereas men seem to be fulfilled as soon as the sex is over...
>>29343585
>How can I feel validated or good or anything at all if I'm forced to recognize that I've done nothing and am simply being used?The men you are talking about will probably meet women who they can admire physically and emotionally.
Maybe literally thats the best thing you have to offer and you're a shitty person who becomes boring once you've been used.
You're so fucking self-absorbed that you'd complain about something robots want and lack because "WUUUHHH IT'S NOT LOVEY DOVEY ROMANTIC ENOUGH".
Some of the men you're complaining about your sex life to, may never have sex without having to resort to hiring a prostitute.
The reason you're used, is because you have nothing else of value.
>>29343637
>she thinks a man would want to fuck her
probably just a 4/10 that's imagining herself being a classy unattainable female protagonist in a drama that she watchs
>>29343678
He's supposed to define something to live in pursuit of that elevates him from his role within society.
What about the females who are self-aware and paralyzed by aimless remorse living very similarly?
>>29343689
please see this anons post
>>29343544
Might help you out
>>29343724
>>29343544
I can say beyond a fraction of a doubt that I do not treat any males I come into contact with as though I expect them to be creepy or predatory. I see how this could be an issue, but it isn't relevant in my case. Some of my closest friends have been men just like you.
>She has male friends
>She comes to /r9k/ to "fit in" yet all she does is flap her vagina for attention.
>She thinks she is different because she doesn't wants chad
Women lack so much self awareness they will never understand why they shouldn't be here.
They can't understand a place that doesn't worships their axe wounds that eats semen and vomits blood.
>>29343716
It's very difficult to self actualize based on general society things. Not everyone has it in him to become the crusader for the homeless, the endangered animal rescuer,the political reformer etc. It's possible but few are able and not everyone even needs to do it.
But the best thing to live for, to focus on and make a life around are having a wife and kids and working to support them. Feminists have made it abundantly clear that they do not want that. They don't want to be stay at home mom's (the best way to raise a kid ). They want to work at the same jobs, compete for the same wages and leave the kids in daycare. They want divorce on demand and they want betas to shut up and wait while they fuck around with attractive men. Because purity and self restraint is oppressive.
>>29343764
>>29343585
>>29343339
>"WUAAAUAAAH MY SEX LIFE ISN'T LOVEY DOVEY ENOUGH"
>>29343813There's one popular girl whose pictures are posted here a lot, and I asked her about /r9k/ and she says she lurks sometimes, but never posts because she know she has a happy life, and it isn't her place to post on /r9k/
GOD BLESS CRISPY
>>29343816
As a female who does want to be a mom, but also wants to work a fulfilling job, my interest is not in ruling against women ever fulfilling that role in a household... Rather, it's in extending the option to either spouse depending on the circumstances.
I just want to be a person instead of simply a tool. I see what is right and wrong, and will likely choose the right option, but living a "good" life without any choice otherwise...doesn't feel like a "good" choice. It feels like a necessity. Which is why I think feminists are trying to normalize the idea of women working and not having children and whatnot..
>>29343634
We robots have become paranoid about it. We have been "beta orbiters" so many times and been used without ever getting any satisfaction. That's a real thing. We're afraid that we're just jumping through hoops and making fools of ourselves.
Look, I'll be 100% honest about it, when I pursue a relationship with a woman I always want sex out of it. It's pretty much always the primary motivation even I guess. I would probably just never bother with relationships at all if it weren't for the sex. I'd be too lazy for it. I'm not above it any of that. I'm slave to primitive urges. There, all men are pigs.
But I don't want just sex. I don't want the relationship to be built on it either (I don't see how anyway it's not like I'm a Chad). I want the trust and the intimacy and to get to know each others well, and love. That's what matters in the long run. I don't want a relationship without those things developing.
But if I show interest in a woman, I definitively want to fuck her.
>>29343813
You have no idea how often I post on /r9k/, but you feel comfortable saying "all I do" here is flap my vagina...... are you even trying..
>>29343860
truly a female normie problem
>>29340015
>These are the girls browsing /r9k/
I will never feel bad about looking down on girls like you ever again
>>29343916
The idea of women working and not tending to children has been normalized for 20 years at least, now. You're fighting against a boogieman of your own invention. No onr sees you as a tool. No one sees you as an object.
It's funny how feminists describe western male like they are the worst misogynistic scums of the earth, but middle-easterners and afticans get a free pass because >muh culture.
>>29339384
I've fucked girls hotter than that
>>29343916
This
I wanna be a mom too
>>29343931
Thanks for providing a response of substance.
I can totally empathize with that paranoia and I think it's something similar to what females feel when faced with males who all claim to be interested in us. There is no way to tell the difference.
I am fundamentally focused on the trust and intimacy. I can't speak for other women, though. I worry that the sex will fulfill the guy enough that he suddenly realizes the effort he was putting into empathy and conversation with me is no longer worth it. I worry about this because it happens all the time. I wish I knew how to fix this and be a better person
>>29343916
Most women despise men who want to be stay at home dads. Try having a chat with your fellow ladies about it.
>All these triggered whores
Good job guys.
>>29343995
Than be one. No one's stopping you.
>>29343937
>"YOU HAVE NO IDEAA HOW LONG I'VE BEEN HERE!"
For someone whose been here for years, you show little to no self-awareness when you post, and have no clue why we think the way we do.
>>29340039
LOLOL I like how you went full WGTOW cuz you were too fat for Chad. That's literally how lesbians are created.
>>29344025
It's my privilege.
>>29343995
Then be one, ask chad to fuck you but don't expect him to stay, you can always just use child support.
Lots of girls do so.
>>29344025
>see a trigger thread
>scroll down to see females being triggered
>erection intensifies
>>29343937
woah....
...this is the power.....of female posting
are you even trying.....
*unsheates vagina*
>>29343984
It's funny how western males see feminists as the worst, most stupid and self-absorbed cunts in existence, but pure, innocent girls lacking any sort of life experience get a free pass because >paranoid in a cute way.
>>29344012
>Men are only interested in having sex with me
>I wish I knew how to fix this an be a better person
Learn how to make a sandwich
>>29340015
I've fucked worse but I wouldn't enjoy it. Why don't you just try to look normal?
>>29344025
>>29344083
Wait...what... all I see are triggered robots here. And a couple girls chiming in calmly.
>>29344094
>lacking any sort of life experience
you mean ones who don't sleep with a different guy every weekend?
>>29344094
It plays on our protective instinct. We are nothing but monkeys, after all.
Scream all you want, but the id of every human is an animal.
>>29339341
>she thinks high school romance will happen to her at 17 like in the movies
>she thinks the romcom story will happen to her at 23 like in the movies
>she sells her body out of desperation to get laid
>has to go through hoops to get Chad's dick
>ends up with a fat man paying for her shit
She was the cute innocent girl. Now she's the princess she has always wanted to be. Just that she's also a washed up slut.
>>29341602
It's dumb man. People aren't gonna change to make you happy
>>29344099
You're very funny and I can't even begin to guess why you've been exiled to /r9k/
>>29339563
Can't get BBC off your mind?
>>29344151
Are you really suggesting attitudes cannot be changed?
