Why isn't there a worksafe version of /r9k/?
Seconding. r9k has absolutely no reason not to be worksafe. All the best threads were always textual based.
I don't think the average mind of /r9k/ is very worksafe.
1. Most of us are jobless NEETs
2. Porn or no porn, your colleagues will judge you so hard for being on le anonymous hacker site
3.The WS version would eliminate like more than half of the threads. Enjoy your empty boards
Because non of us are safe from work.
Just browse r/4chan ^;)
>>29333285
What half? You mean the cuck-spam threads?
>>29333244
Go to settings and check hide thumbnails. There, you can now safely shit post while working.
none of us have jobs
>implying we have jobs
Subtle bait
>>29333338
/tv/ still has a lot of cuck-spam despite being worksafe.
>>29333373
>>29333376
Why are there so many jobless people here?
>>29333285
Just use the April Fools' CSS, and they won't be suspicious.
>>29333462
that's because the moderation there is atrocious, that or mook gets paid to ignore it
>>29334148
Hellow newfriend
>>29333244
>set browser to not load images
Wow that was hard! Oh my gosh! We really need help for this back-breaking labor!
>>29333244
Who the fuck would ever think it acceptable to browse here at work, no matter what kind of porn is posted?
>>29336743
Maybe op just doesn't want to see porn here. I know I don't
>>29333338
>>29333333
I have to check these digits.
