One of these was up earlier, but got archived so here, have a new thread
>politicalcompass.org/test
Post results
Don't have an exact screenshot, just a bit over to the main center, in the center of the Libertarian Left square
>>29319699
One time I was right in the middle and it triggered a psychosis
lazily copy-pasting from the stats image
>>29319699
Here you go senpai
o r e g a n o
Who is /left/ here
>>29319933
All of us so far, apparently
>>29319699
reminder that if you're far left you're first on the day of the rope.
mine is in hue
Also, filthy lefties all over every board
>>29319699
first time ive seen on these threads on this board, lets rate
>>29319699
I'm Pinochet tier so top right
>>29320044
back to
>>/pol/this post is quite original my good sir, and I take great offense to the implication that it is otherwise
>>29320201
this is a political compass thread, we post our political leanings, this is not a lefty thread or board so please fuck off you Dense piece of shit
>>29320044
>>29320170
>>29320192
Top tier, would hang out and kill commies with
These are really messed up but it's quite hard to position a third positioning on a political spectrum.
*tips fedora*
>>29321107
>it's quite hard to position a third positioning on a political spectrum.
libertarian?
That test is bad. It's better to look at pic related and identify where you think you stand.
>>29321785
I can barely make that clusterfuck out
>>29321908
Are you retarded?
Every number corresponds to a specific political ideology below the graph.
Mine you kneegrows
>>29320201
U HAEVA RITE WING POLITICUL VIEW GOW BAK 2 /POL/ XDDDD
Kill yourself
>>29319699
purple is the only acceptable one
>>29321972
>acceptable
>anarcho capitalism
K E K E R I N O
>>29321785
centrism master race reporting in
sorry for shitty screenshot
>>29321972
Sorry lad but purple is mid tier at best, you need some form of state to keep social order. The free market might be self regulating but society isn't.
wats happenin in here
>>29319699
Always get center leaning on one side from these, but this would be my first time getting Authoritarian Left. I'm more upper right imo, since I just believe that the government should do its job helping niggas out while we should help out the country with making it successful.
>>29321972
*Tips fedora*
Neckbeard
>>29322037
We're having a "My ideology can beat up your ideology" session
>>29321992
>not agressing againt peaceful and non fraudulent individuals is bad
>everything in purple is ancap
>>29322028
Whats the difference between the market and society? Do market forces somehow not affect society?
>>29321928
So what your number corresponds to some random coloured square? How is that better than the test? The thread isn't just "say your political view", it's "see if this test guesses it accurately based on your answers to the questions"
Anyone else do something like this?
who voting for /donald j trump/ here
>being on the left
> Trap living in a European country
This is why I try to avoid talking about politics with normies
>>29322078
The market and society are linked but not to the extent where some measure of social control leads to an infringement upon the free market. Society makes the market but with a lawless society nobody will have any reason not to just take the things they want rather than trade/buy them. There would be no safeguards from retarded anarchists just stealing everything.
>>29322113
I guess this also coincides with your descend into robothood.
>>29322134
>cyberpunk is libertarian right
Wouldn't it be on the upper right hand corner? Cyberpunk is the world being led by megacorps, and that's a form of feudalist authoritarianism.
Who else here moderately left libertarian leaning centrist?
>>29322113
So you gradually devolved?
Sorry to hear that, anon
>>29322078
>helping corporations enrich themselves at my expense is good
>something in purple was mentioned, therefore they meant everything in purple
>>29322307
I don't think it's possible to devolve to anything lower than a communist (except for possibly a neo-lib or neo-con)
>>29321972
>>29322276
The memes has predictive capabilities, and is potentially falsifiable. If we gather enough data we can make a scientific theory that is based on memes. Hypothesis: a statistically significant percentage more of anons are left libertarian leaning centrists compared to the percentage of them among the general population.
We just need more data guys.
>>29322004
>2016
>not using snipping tool
also, looks like you're a week behind
what the fuck, fascism is a socialist thing. How can you be "right wing fascist". That doesn't make any sense hitler was as far left as left lefts.
>>29322557
>hitler
>left
are you retarded?
>>29322557
Fascism is authoritarian, nationalistic and often paired with the sort of racist, sexist, homophobic, eugenics shit that Hitler was such a fan of, how can you get any more right wing?
>>29322557
Pinochet was on the right, also Hitler was fairly right leaning he still allowed private property, allowed most corporations to exist under an independent board of directors, and based his economic policies off of a traditional capitalistic conception of supply and demand.
>>29322668
Was Pinochet a fascist?
I thought he was basically a hardcore liberal economically, so much that he offered free helicopter rides to commies, but could he be called fascist?
>>29322649
>>29322608
Yes remind me how the national SOCIALIST workers party wasn't left wing at all. Please tell me their policies that were right wing. Forget this racism crap that nobody cares about and tell me the policies. If somehow it actually came out to be right wing I'll admit I was wrong on the internet but if you tell me what he actually did with his country and it turns out it was socialist? You get to blow me.
Also just FYI canada is a fascist country. Everybody marching in step and they don't have the "racism" and bigotry and whatever other petty social non-issue. Your argument that they are linked is broken as fuck and makes you look like a retard.
>>29322696
He was a hardcore liberal in the sense that economically he was a neoliberal , but Ronald Reagan was also a neoliberal. And as far as being sympathetic to commies goes, he killed around 1200 to 3200 socialists.
>>29322731
>I'm right wing so I obviously can't be on the same side as Hitler, he must have been a lefty!autism affects one in five
>>29322805
>anyone who disagrees with me is hitler
>muh right wing boogeyman
>>29322731
I'm >>29322668
You didn't even respond to me, and I showed you his policies that were economically rightist, also from the 19th to mid 20th century socialism just meant something that solved the labor problem, i.e. what put food on workers tables, it didn't always signify a specific economic system. It wasn't until after ww2 that the Marxist definition of public or worker controlled production became common.
>>29320044
>>29321946
Patrician. Redpilled. Based.
>>29321785
Test put me as a classical liberal when I would actually call myself more of an agorist but that's not that far off
>>29322912
>agorist
You can be for black markets but be a classical liberal
Agorism is just #blackmarketsmatter
>>29322884
Didn't notice, im washing dishes nigger.
Also, he took over as much business and took away as much land from everybody as he could while hiking up taxes and redistributing wealth. Please tell me thats not socialist.
>>29322419
UKIP are purple through and through. Test is really slanted towards green but somehow all those evil fascist politicians are in blue. Did they ask the leaders of all those parties to take the test? Nah, they just projected 99% of it. Fucking hell.
>>29322934
He took away land from other countries and groups that he sent to concentration camps, but as far as the "Aryan" people of Germany went he allowed them to exist in a fairly capitalistic system. Of course he hiked up taxes Germany had an extreme deficit due to war time spending and embargos; any country will hike taxes during war. And most of his wealth redistribution wasn't giving money to people; it was seizing money from "enemies of the state" and foreign countries, and using it for wartime and industry spending. So no those policies weren't socialistic.
The purple quadrant seems to correspond to corporate shills, so I'm not sure why I keep ending up there. I honestly don't give a shit about the rights of large corporations. I tried to answer the questions as honestly as I could, but they give a certain weight to matters like supporting private ownership over the means of production versus decentralization or whatever. What if I want to live in a society where such concepts don't exist? What if I'm opposed to civilization in general?
>>29322805
>"we are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system..."
>must have been a right wing
>>29323147
>What if I'm opposed to civilization in general?
Then you'd fit in the lowest purple square on the right end of the horizontal axis.
Because pure ancap is basically the end of civilization, and either leads to a Mad Max-style scenario or to feudalism
>>29322805
>>29323152
>Not understanding Hitler hated both systems and set out for a third way
>>29323142
Sorry, I should have elaborated a bit more. The rest of his wealth redistribution was Keynesian in nature, and meant to promote consumer spending.
>>29323142
Its still socialist practices regardless. How can you say "HE DID IT ONLY FOR HIS PEOPLE SO ITS NOT REALLY!"? No matter his reasoning for doing things its still socialist practices. The government controlled everything. Germany was a socialist country. Even with brown shirts making sure the government was in control.
>>29323203
Yes, his third was was to just kill everybody who disagreed.
>>29323247
It doesnt matter if hes trying to "promote consumerism". The government controlled it all regardless.
Some of these questions are just bad. It's hard to take a stance on questions like "Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified" and "Protectionism is sometimes necessary in trade." I'm generally against protectionism and war crimes, but it's tough to argue against those statements when the word "sometimes" is included.
>It is regrettable that many personal fortunes are made by people who simply manipulate money and contribute nothing to their society.
Is this question making the assumption that the finance industry just manipulates money and doesn't contribute to society? Because that isn't true.
>A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system.
This is objectively true. Whatever you feel about the overall merits and drawbacks of a one-party system, I don't see how you can dispute this statement, which makes it a bad question for a test like this.
>>29323307
define "war crime".
>>29323307
This test is made by leftists for leftists and appeals to muh feelings.
If you want a more reliable site, these are good
>http://filteries.com/politics
>http://www.gotoquiz.com/politics/political-spectrum-quiz.html
>green
teenager in age
>red
teenager in mind
>blue
jew
>purple
thinks he's managed to escape the jew
>>29323027
>ukip purple through and through
UKIP has a fuckton of different strains and overall stays more on the authorian side with all the shit they'd like to control, regulate and weigh on. The Farage strain might be a bit more lolbertarian but not by much
>>29323265
Yes, but German companies were still allowed to make decisions off of the market, and weren't accountable to the government when it came to business decisions. And government control doesn't necessarily mean something is socialistic. If businesses still respond to the market, are held by people with capital, and surplus goods are used for investment or personal wealth not public goods or firm improvements then it's still capitalist. Plus redistribution of wealth for the purpose of consumer spending is still capitalistic under that same criteria. Also I'm not arguing that Hitler was a rightist. Germany had a mixed economy. It had both socialistic and and capitalistic components. I thought I should clarify that, since I'm arguing for the capitalist aspects it might be unclear that I do accept Germany was somewhat socialistic in certain industries, and to certain people groups.
>>29323423
>blue
>jew
The fuck m8
little more right than last time but I wager that's thanks to age
I'm righter than last time.
>>29323265
>No matter his reasoning for doing things its still socialist practices. The government controlled everything.
Is that why the Nazi German government privatized the German Railways (the largest single public enterprise in the world at the time? Is that why the Nazis re-privatized many businesses after the Weimar republic fell? Is that why The government sold public ownership in
several State-owned firms in different sectors?
>Germany was a socialist country. Even with brown shirts making sure the government was in control.
This is one thing I don't get when people claim Hitler was fully a socialist. The Brownshirt paramilitary had nothing to do with socialism or capitalism, it was just an authoritarian arm of the party. Also, would a socialist ban all labour unions within the nation? Organized labour is the backbone of socialism. But that's what Socialist Hitler did.
Stereotype me.
>>29323620
Cant stereotype a guy with no opinions.
>>29321785
Who else /minarchist/ here?
>>29323642
I believe in a strong yet small state.
Leftists should be executed, though, and our borders should be closed.
>>29323265
Good ol' left wing socialist Hitler, engaging in the time honoured left wing socialist tradition of hunting down and arresting/killing left wing socialists/communists.
>>29323423
>Jew = Blue
the fuck
>>29323660
'Sup based general. Yea I believe there should be very little laws or regulations but those few regulations and laws must be enforced well.
I don't understand why anyone would want society/government to regulate morality. For example: shit like that is the reason they use to try and pass laws about what can be said/done on the internet. They could decide what kind of porn you are allowed to watch. Wanting an authority figure to decide what is right and wrong in every aspect of your life when it shouldn't matter unless you actually harm someone else or infringe on their rights.
>>29323743
Pretty much. A free market economy is generally preferable, but libertarians and ancaps are delusional.
The thing we need to focus on is a cohesive, powerful nation, where citizens are given strong individual rights but undesirable elements are destroyed.
>>29323793
>undesirable elements
Define undesirable
Best graph coming through
>>29323793
Honestly my position isn't as extreme as yours, I only support keeping our borders closed and keeping crime low, however I honestly am fine with your position and I wouldn't mind living in your ideal country, hell I'd actually enjoy it.
>>29322134
top right would be auschwitz
bottom right would be the same as top left but with "PORKY INC." all over the buildings.
>>29323840
Communists, people whose ideology threatens the security of upstanding citizens (ie. Islam), vocal advocates of cultural marxism and decadence - the "vocal" part is important, people are free to behave like animals in their own homes, but should not expect society to accept such practices as normal, progressive or otherwise.
Also, generally speaking, individuals whose lifestyle is not only unproductive but also detrimental to society as a whole (ie. drug addicts, who should definitely not expect any help from the state).
>>29323934
That song is great.
And yeah, I understand where you're coming from. Keeping crime low implies a set of drastic measures, though, doesn't it?
come at me robots og
>>29323988
Naw, you just need a set of laws that say "no violence pls" and enforce it with a public funded or private funded police force. Also criminals should have a basic set of rights because "innoecent till guilty" but once they're guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt you can do whatever the fuck you want to them as they violated the NAP.
As for keeping cultural marxist degeneracy low, what you have to realize is that this shit started because of increased govt spending that allows people to parasite off of others and not be productive, along with the govt directly funding shitty university gender studies classes. Thus, if the government had less power and the free market reigned, the degenerates would just get killed off via evolution or be a small minority with little power.
>>29324115
>private funded police force
that's a recipe for disaster right there anon, the last thing you want is to hand power over to whoever's got enough money to buy the police force
Uncanny resemblance
>>29324163
Fair nuff, though there are also plenty of cases where the public police can be equally incompetent and corrupt, personally I think it should be up to the people to decide. If >65% think privatization would be good for their region then let it be, but the private police force has to enforce govt laws and be monitored by the gov. And if the private police force is shit, the people can end the contract by voting on it.
>>29324115
A privately funded police force doesn't seem like a good idea to me. A national military and police funded through either mandatory taxation or an increase in consumption taxes seems preferable in order to guarantee cohesiveness and strength.
>criminals should have a basic set of rights
All of them? Why?
You're partly right, but the cultural marxist movement didn't pop out of nowhere. The modern infatuation with postmodernism and relativism (not saying they're inherently negative things by themselves) led to this. Government expenditure was just a catalyst that allowed such movements to grow in power.
If a free market economy (with its own limits) was installed, it's true that the movement would start dying, but it needs to be completely eradicated, and replaced by a new ideological system.
>>29324243
Eh honestly I agree with you on the police force, I essentially believe in a night watchman state that enforces laws with military, police, courts and of course basic stuff like building roads. I'm just keeping my options open.
I do think all criminals should have rights mainly because there is a chance that we got the wrong guy, plus if they haven't been fully proven guilty yet by a jury I don't think they should be mistreated that much because "innocent till guilty".
The reason why I don't believe in ideological supression of cultural marxist shit is mainly an ethical one where I'm against ideological suppression in general. The main reason for this ethical qualm is that if the government is compromised and it has the power to do this, it can sure as hell suppress good ideas as well. Essentially I'm against censorship even if what's being censored is absolute bullshit.
I'm really surprised there aren't more Nazis in here.
>>29324198
nigger nobody can see that
everyone in the red or blue quarter can go fuck themselves
>>29324450
Agreed, authoritycucks are the worst.
>>29322419
I'm stuck in the past man
t. based anon
libertarian center is the master race becuase libertarian center is where georgism lives
>>29324623
I've always wondered, what's centrist anarchism called?
Left anarchism would be ancom and ansyn; right anarchism is ancap
What about center?
Not quite sure what this means, but I was aiming for communist.
>>29324693
found this somewhere on the internet
dunno how accurate it actually is
>>29324786
It's bullshit for several reasons.
>>29324693
can be
>mutalism
>geoanarchism
>anarcho-primitivism
>egoist anarcism
>technoanarchism
centers tend to hold more possible ideologies than edges.
I am a geolibertarian/anarchist
