>Cancer,diease,tech breakthrough article
>NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER heard about it again ever all existence of its knowledged purged
>scientist and the plane disappeared in the middle of the Atlantic ocean
>>29318482
is this a nu-poop pepe?
>>29318482
Go on...
The original post
Thought of these
Cancer isn't 'one' disease. The issue is that it can occur everywhere and once it does its easy to transfer around, depending on when you get in front of a doctor that can easily determine the difference between dying and not.
There's no magic cure or fringe scientist that figured it out. Science doesn't work like that anymore. That sort of thinking came from people like Nikola Tesla who was probably the greatest genius to ever live that was able to make technology that we can't reproduce to the same effect even today.
Today, its all on the net and everyone knows new information. If someone figures something out its a guy looking at all the research all day and he shuffles it to others and does trials that get published then it gets more traction.
Its more a matter of lots of scientists doing a vast amount of work and eventually someone connecting the dots.
>>29319683
>mfw most of the dots are not even true
vast majority of research today (clinical at least) is just people doing what people do to advance their career or get attention.
whatever is on the internet beyond the top journals, and especially what gets into some pop sci article, is usually a bunch of mumbo jumbo. even what's in the journals is presented in a way that makes it meaningless 3 times out of 4.
i'm not even pessimistic about it, breakthroughs do happen really often and there are tons of people who come up with cool shit. it's just that there's a less than 0% chance that you'll be able to see it in the pile of garbage unless you've been trained to. we don't have a system yet where people connect the dots, if someone wants to bring research together they do a collaborative project with someone in the same field, even if it means repeating an experiment which has already been tried and failed many times without being published, or repeating an experiment which ultimately can't be repeated.
>>29318482
>100s of planes full of scientists are crashing into the atlantic with no survivors
>>29319683
>no one can replicate tesla's discoveries even though it is high school level physics
>>29319789
>I can connect the dots but pro scientists can't
