Regarding the pathetic cuckposter that was refuted by research in the other thread that got 404'd:
http://racehist.blogspot.com/2015/05/racial-and-ethnic-variation-in-penis.html
m-muh dick
>>29279046
This stats are useless. There's plenty of evidence in porn and amateur porn.
That said, having a 5 something inches dick isn't the end of the world unless sex is your entire reason for living.
>>29279080
>porn is evidence
can't make this shit up
The thread got 404'd because cuckposting isn't allowed on r9k. Report the post and the threads will be deleted rather than getting into a pointless argument with some ugly small dicked retard that spends his whole worthless life cuckposting on r9k.
>>29279103
>amateur porn
Deny all you want. Saying 5.5 inches is the average now is like saying the average height 2 decades ago is the average height today among the younger generation.
>>29279177
any evidence that shows dick size averages getting bigger over the past generations? All the data is recent, so...
>>29279134
Yeah but it's pathetic how normies and cucks still think that the data from that certain website is anywhere close to reliable when it has been debunked years ago.
>>29279239
Got a tic tac dick anon? Why do you care so much?
>>29279322
He's Asian and got held back by the small penis meme.
Our biggest flaw is our repellent, anti social personalities anyways.
>>29279322
>>29279361
nah quite a bit above average, but I don't like to see false things being thrown around as "facts".
>>29279177
>pornography presents a valid sample size of the population
>most amateur porn isn't dicklets anyways
>There was only one study of 320 men in Negroids and two studies of 445 men in Mongoloids. There are no indications of differences in racial variability in our present study, e.g. the study from Nigeria was not a positive outlier.
>Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full
Daily reminder that cuck fags are mentally ill and need to kill themselves. I'm tired to see the same threads day in day out on here.
>>29279407
There's nothing wrong with having a 5.5 inch penis. But that's about as average as being 5'9 barefoot.
>>29279080
Yes and model sites are evidence that the average human looks like this, fucking retard.
The average rank by population in league is bronze and silver.
5.5 inch penis =bronze/silver
5'8 to 5'9.5 height = bronze/silver
Do you get where I'm going with this? It's not good enough. Gold is acceptable but it's also settling.
Gold = 6+ inch penis, 6+ foot height.
>>29279430
>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full
This journal itself says that no conclusion can be drawn on the given information, just that monograms are useful for the future of penis measurment. It even says that further research into penis size by race is still needed
see the red in my pic
Youre purposely misrepresenting data
What criteria this journal chose for its review is unknown, but if you look at the hundreds of measured sizes from around the world you come to the conclusion that africans have bigger penises. This study you posted alone with the pic in OPs image leaves out hudnreds of other studies all measured. Overall its bad science by the authors and even worse reading by you
The authors were probably like OP >>29279046
posting race biased links like that blogspot link (lol blogspot being scientifc) where its literally a small dicked white man ranting and raving at home about dick sizes cherry picking information
Heres the real list btw
Much of them measured yet shomehow the guy in OPs pic and the guys in that meta analysis left all the other measurments out.
>>29279769
nice projecting
>>29279823
denied. Debunked in the OP
>real
>self reported
>false sources on measured data (e.g. purposed data in Rushton/Lynn that doesn't even exist)
Atleast you tried
>>29279769
>bad science by the author
>my cherrypicked world map is more accurate guys
kys you sub 100 IQ mongrel
My only question is
Why does everybody in Asian porn have a small dick?
>>29279915
Just saying someone is projecting and saying denied isnt debunking
>. purposed data in Rushton/Lynn that doesn't even exist)
I didnt use those as sources, youre just name dropping at this point
Why not refute what i said here:
>This journal itself says that no conclusion can be drawn on the given information, just that monograms are useful for the future of penis measurment. It even says that further research into penis size by race is still needed
os is this somehow wrong and am i somehow wrong for saying that your own source says that there is not enough information to draw a conclusion on penis size by race?
Answer me that
My conclusion based on the numerous reports if seen is that blacks have the largest penises and asians the smallest, white and latino in the middle. The only question i have is why the resource youre using is leaving out hudndreds of doctor measured reports, like do you really think those handful of countries of all the world and all time are the only ones to ever measure penis size? Does that make sense to you?
Lol it doesnt, so that said you can clearly see how OPs pic and that other link that itself says more research is needed, are both bs in saying that penis sizes by race are equal.
All the other evidence outside of that points to diffrent sizes.
>>29280093
I'm average. Where can I sign up to become a pornstar in Asia?
>>29279937
I never posted any map
And no im not saying its bad science im saying its bad interpretation by OP and that other poster who probably is OP
I will post this one though because i believe it to be the accurate representation of human penis size.
>Several European countriea tested
>One African Country
>Didn't test American Blacks
Not a good study or something to refute his claims. Keep crying whyte boi.
>>29280238
>whyte boi.
>KYLE, TAKE OUT THE TRASH!
>MOM I CAN`T IM SHITPOSTING!
>>29280238
I'm not white but I've made women cum without using my dick. I've made women cum using my dick and I am 5.5 inches.
>>29279514
>Gold = 6+ inch penis
nigga thats bronze at best
>>29280157
The first source (OP picture) uses plenty of sources on the premise that they were conducted under similar circumstances, you know, to render it scientifically accurate and comparable to the other studies.
You keep using a picture as "source" that has been debunked years ago, uses non-existent sources etc.
There are 3 instances that prove you wrong itt, the picture in the OP, the link OP provided and the wiley literature link someone posted.
The sad thing is that the source you're relying on has been debunked by the OP link (on 1 of many points) by the use of web archives, showing the blatant alteration of a graph by the admin of the "world penis size map" website, thereby replacing whites as having the biggest average with blacks.
This is we wuz kangz tier revisionism and not scientific, I suggest you try to refute the 3 sources posted or get the fuck out cuckboi.
Gold = 8"
Silver = 7"
Bronze = 6"
9 = pics or it didn't happen
>6 = dicklet
>>29280296
>missing the analysis of averages by population completely
Silver surfer pls go
>>29280309
Here it is because you probably can't figure it out:
>http://web.archive.org/web/20010808092714/http://www.sizesurvey.com/result.html
>2001
>http://web.archive.org/web/20090119052005/http://everyoneweb.com/worldpenissize/
>2009
>photoshop visible on the number 7
evidence is your enemy.
>>29280387
addendum: The fact alone that your pictures posted are from that very same site (that is confirmed to have posted alterated pictures without something to back the numbers up) renders it scientifically inaccurate. Not to forget the shitton of typos ("avarage") in it, and yet you act like it's anything besides clickbait a butthurt minority did because he was insecure, afrocentrism in a nutshell.
Next thing you're gonna say is that egyptians were black :^)
>>29280330
>analysis of averages by population
Who cares, dicklet? I'm a 1%er and my girl, the first time we fucked when she was 15, she thought I was average. Her fingers dont even touch when she holds my dick but she said it was average cuz its not some 9" monster. How do you think girls will react to your dicklet
>implying girls care about statistical analysis
Fact is, only a small subset of men get pussy regularly, and they aren't dicklets. So the working average is probably about 7"
>>29280309
>f sources on the premise that they were conducted under similar circumstances, you know, to render it scientifically accurate and comparable to the other studies.
So it throws out scientifically sound evidence and bases its conclusion on a hyper focused few? Lol no thats not how science works. If its like this link >>29279769
>>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full
then it says in its own study that not enough information has been gathered using these hyper focused set of rules.
This is where you and OP go off the hinge and use the same study to shout that black penises arent bigger for some reason? Im asian btw so I dont really care, i just care that youre wrong.
>You keep using a picture as "source" that has been debunked years ago, uses non-existent sources et
No i dont, as a matter of face i have posted 0 sources, i have just successfully shown the flawed nature of your analysis and conclusions based on purposely misread scientific literature and the false conclusion that OPs pic are the only scientific, measured studies out there.
>The sad thing is that the source you're relying on has been debunked by the OP
His site is bogus and has no scientific validity its literalyl a guy
>by the use of web archives, showing the blatant alteration of a graph by the admin of the "world penis size map" website, thereby replacing whites as having the biggest average with blacks.
can manipulate scientific data to come up with a new conclusion. This is nothing shocking or new. Its exactly what i said earlier. Cherry picked data. And lol at OP using vlogspot as a source
>This is we wuz kangz tier revisionism and not scientific, I suggest you try to refute the 3 sources posted or get the fuck out cuckboi.
YOUR OWN SCIENCE SAYS THERES NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE LOLOLOLOL youre unbelievably dumb!
That said all the other evidence points to africans havign bigger penises, measured on record.
>>29279823
>Argentina
>1488
this is troll bait
>canada
>3.7 inches
KEK
>>29279823
Equador got 6.9 measured
Colombia: 6.7 measured
Bolivia: 6.5 measured
>Thailand: 4.0 measured
Sad
>>29280387
>>29280471
These links are meaningless its some webpage from 2001? Same fallacy as posting a blogspot link from a retard like yourself. Random people on the itnernet posting opinions or photoshopping mean nothing.
>evidence is your enemy.
No evidence is your enemy. You cant even read scientific literature without bias. Tell me again how >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/full concluded any evidence based on race?
>(that is confirmed to have posted alterated pictures without something to back the numbers up) renders it scientifically inaccurate.
Except the soruces it comes from are not photoshoped. Theyre actually soruces you can look up and read but you choose to make random arguments about some weirdo nobody knows about photoshopping?
Face it you have no argument. Everything i have typed has trumped your conclusions.
>Next thing you're gonna say is that egyptians were black :^)
They were black though, it was a mixed society. Next youre going to tell me that the national geographic depiction is accurate :^)
>>29280691
oh so it's a small dicked asian that blames everything on his race like the little cuck boy he is.
>His site is bogus
Less bogus than the "WORLD PENIS SIZE MAP" and actually trying to stay objective.
OP provided better sources than a "world penis size map" that has been proven to use fals sources.
Sad, really. Give us better sources than the OP did or get the fuck out of this thread.
>>29280796
I'd like to see studies on those measured sizes from south america. Medical ones - not a "world penis size map".
This thread is like arguing whether or not a salon article is good journalism. Mr. Cuckposter has all the scientific data thrown at him and yet reverts to the inaccurate part selfreported part made up stats on that website.
>>29280947
>no you, the post
>you have no argument
says the guy citing a website that has been proven to spread false data
>It's some webpage
no, it's YOUR website that you keep using as a proof to your cuck fantasies.
>Everything i have typed has trumped your conclusions
You have been stuck at the point where you use a scientifically inaccurate website as your backup plan. Give up, cuckboi
I think there's nothing more to say than:
KEKPOSTER BTFO
>>29280970
>oh so it's a small dicked asian that blames everything on his race like the little cuck boy he is.
My dick is 6 inches thank you
>Less bogus than the "WORLD PENIS SIZE MAP" and actually trying to stay objective.
I posted it because its more objective than your posts or OPs pic (youre probably OP) since it has hundreds of sources, some measured some not, which i said from the beginning the self measured should be thrown out. Ops pic looks at 1 study 115 africans as proof of all penises for africa lol and thats only because he misinterpreted the scientific journal hes referencing which says itsself no conclusion can be drawn using this methodology yet
>Sad, really. Give us better sources than the OP did or get the fuck out of this thread.
Nothing is sadder than misrepresenting scientifc data. Im not going to jump through your hoops and hunt down 100s of resources
this pic has some though >>29280157
My only objective was to prove why OPs image is horseshit, and ive done just that. So YOU get the fuck out of here or find better evidence. I didnt make this thread you did.
>>29281039
>>no you, the post
Except youve done all of the things youve accused me of
At least im aware of them though and admitted them before i typed anything. Youre unaware of your own ignorance.
for example...
>says the guy citing a website that has been proven to spread false data
Says the person citing a reddit image of misread scientific journal that says itself no conclusion can be drawn. LOL
>no, it's YOUR website that you keep using as a proof to your cuck fantasies.
Its not my website, i have nothing to do with that and cant validate if its a source or not, you couldnt either because it probably comes from somewhere before then.
>You have been stuck at the point where you use a scientifically inaccurate website as your backup plan.
I never posted any websites, you did and now are arguing im wrong? Lol
All i said was that your pic is bogus and it is. Good job being trumped my friend
>KEKPOSTER BTFO
I didnt know that was the nickname you gave yourself
>>29281142
>Ops pic looks at 1 study 115 africans as proof of all penises
and your pic uses 17 congolese people that were asked to state their penis size as a proof of all penises for DRC lol.
If there were better studies with higher sample size for africa they would have been posted, too bad the whole continent is a 3rd world shithole.
You are the only person misrepresenting scientific data, this coming from someone with a physics PhD. Give up m8.
>Don't make me jump through your hoops
He provided 3 scientifically reasonable source libraries, you keep posting that bullshit size map that relies itself on non-existent data.
>It's more objective
No.
As said, pretty sad even for robot standards.
>>29281223
you are using pictures from a single website as "evidence" (which I referred to as your website, I don't think your IQ is THAT low senpai).
>Misread scientific journal
Oh forgot, Science is misread if it doesn't fulfill your cuckold fantasies.
Work on your English sha bi
It's like arguing with a child that can't handle the truth. Wah Wah Wah.
>>29281295
>and your pic uses 17 congolese people that were asked to state their penis size as a proof of all penises for DRC lol.
Youre gettign your papers mixed up, where does it say laynn and Rushton used 17 congolese for their report?
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/an-examination-of-rushton_s-theory-of-differences-in-penis-length-and-circumference-and-r-k-life-history-theory-in-113-populations.pdf
They clearly include self reported and measured sizes for all the groups. As expected self reproted are bigger for all people but the measured results dont lie. This is why you shouldnt read soem rnadom wacko on blogspot that cherry picks data
>He provided 3 scientifically reasonable source libraries, you keep posting that bullshit size map that relies itself on non-existent data.
And he clearly misrepresented them. You didnt even have to read through it, in the conclusion itself on the first page it said that monograms are useful for penis sizes and had no conclusions on race.
>No.As said, pretty sad even for robot standards.
it clearly is more objective too look at all the scitnetifc studies then literally 10 or 20 lol Sad is your understanding of data
>>29281354
>you are using pictures from a single website as "evidence"
No im using the picture to show that there are hundreds of other reported measurments, and to show that you took the context out of the scientific journal.
>Oh forgot, Science is misread if it doesn't fulfill your cuckold fantasies.
Yet science is right if it fits your racist views? Lol get lost loser. The guy in OPs pic clearly misread it, thats why youve been ignoring respondign to me on that point for this whole thread. You cant even admit it was misread and mis intepreted. SAD!
>Work on your English sha bi t's like arguing with a child that can't handle the truth. Wah Wah Wah.
More ad hominem because you have no case :^)
Your original proposition has been debunked and blown the fuck out ;)
>>29281760
>cherrypicks data himself (fails to post more than 1 source through his whole thesis) yet accuses others of cherrypicking
>posts paper that again relies on his world penis size "study"
You were given all the data, educate yourself. Done arguing with low IQ individuals, work on your writing. Read through the 3 links, your target map is scientifically inaccurate and another result of insecurity-driven agenda-pushing.
Don't answer if you can't post a medical study that doesn't rely itself on the debunked targetmap, thanks.
>>29282084
>>cherrypicks data himself (fails to post more than 1 source through his whole thesis) yet accuses others of cherrypicking
I am the only person in this thread to post a comprehensive scientific paper about penis size and race.
No its not some random reddit user, no its not imisterprated scientific papers about monograms either.
You have yet to show any conclusive evidence that isnt circumstantial like OPs pic where its literally cherry picked criteria misrepresented to come to a conclusion.
>>posts paper that again relies on his world penis size "study"
Except it doesnt, you dint even read the paper you just read a blopspot page about the paper which cherrypicked talking points and mislead its reader (you).
>You were given all the data, educate yourself.
YOUR OWN WEBSITE SAID THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH DATA LOL and that was pretainign to using one scientific method not the whole subject.
>Read through the 3 links, your target map is scientifically inaccurate and another result of insecurity-driven agenda-pushing.
I did and thats why ive been saying everything im saying. Youre just an idiot who googled the proof you wanted and copy pasted the first links.
>Don't answer if you can't post a medical study that doesn't rely itself on the debunked targetmap, thanks.
Except it doesnt and it isnt debunked
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/an-examination-of-rushton_s-theory-of-differences-in-penis-length-and-circumference-and-r-k-life-history-theory-in-113-populations.pdf
How about you post a medical study saying theres no distinction between races. Not just some random guy on reddit who thinks he can read scientific literature properly.
>>29282563
as predicted, you couldn't manage to post something besides the already debunked targetmap. I'll bother to reply when you can post studies (that aren't linked to the flawed targetmap) - you failed to do that through 2 threads. The burden of bringing up the next proper point is on you, seeing as there's 3 different sources (each one more valuable than the targetmap) that you seem to dismiss and fail to refute.
Keep trying, cuckboi.
>inb4 b-but it doesn't no but it doesn't omg you stupid racist
>>29282869
Again you ignore this
>YOUR OWN WEBSITE SAID THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH DATA LOL and that was pretainign to using one scientific method not the whole subject.
Just completely ignore it not even talk about it lol.
You also ignored this
>How about you post a medical study saying theres no distinction between races. Not just some random guy on reddit
completely
>as predicted, you couldn't manage to post something besides the already debunked targetmap. I'
Im not posting target map im posting Lynn who use Templer and a few others as resources.
Youre the one who keeps on bringing up the debunked reddit user
>(that aren't linked to the flawed targetmap)
Now it changes from target map to studies linked to it? Lol!
You can make fun of a website that misreprents scientific data like targetmap, but you cant misrepresent the scientific literature so you keep on saying muh targetmap muh targetmap
>you failed to do that through 2 threads.
The last thread was deleted before i could post anything. This thread i have completely proven you a fraud OP.
>The burden of bringing up the next proper point is on you
No its you because youre the one who started the thread with a reddit image and blogspot link. Ive already brought up the proof though
> there's 3 different sources
Already debunked them, sorry OP you cant read
>>inb4 b-but it doesn't no but it doesn't omg you stupid racist
You are racist though. Why dont you like the truth when someone else says it?
>>29280157
>>29279823
>no source or citation
Another """rigorous"" argument.
>>29283128
this pic has sources.
and heres a whole paper on dick size and race.
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/an-examination-of-rushton_s-theory-of-differences-in-penis-length-and-circumference-and-r-k-life-history-theory-in-113-populations.pdf
>>29283204
>surveymonkey
>genitalsize.com
This doesn't depict rigorous methods of measurement.
The link you provided seems more reasonable. Reading it now.
>>29283337
As i said before i posted those pics to illustrate that OPs image is false and there are numerous other studies showing penis size that are measured.
Also like i said before, self reported measurments (surveys) should be thrown out.
>>29283117
you haven't debunked the reddit user that has simply provided a list of medical studies, while leaving out self reported and poorly conducted crap. you tried "debunking" the other source by denouncing in as a racist blogspot, nothing more than that.
>this thread i have completely proven...
you have proven to be unable to rely on more than your worthless targetmap, cuckboi
>rr-RACIST!
nuff said, nice autismfit with your long responses that have zero substance.
>>29283128
yeah, he's pretty pathetic and is stuck at his 1 debunked shit source. Still couldn't link a single study with a substantial sample size.
But gotta give it to you, you keep baiting people with actual arguments into arguing with you, good trolling skills m8.
>>29283204
linked with the targetmap. Next try, cuckboi
>>29283417
Studies can be biased through weird methods of measurement and non randomized subject pools.
I am not claiming to know how long a nations average dick is, but I am merely promoting rigorous data.
>>29283441
>s simply provided a list of medical studies,
Cherry picked lists and a gap of information
>only 1 study of 115 people for all of africa
that he used to prove his theory his wrong theory btw.
Whether he literally meant those are all the studies on penis length or not is unknown. If he meant it literally then he is totally wrong, if he didnt mean it literally then he is being deceptive. If he only used some specified criteria to only use those sources then hes ignoring the body of scientific evidence agaisnt his views.
Theres no sceanrio where that reddit user is correct. Sorry OP.
>you have proven to be unable to rely on more than your worthless targetmap, cuckboi
get bent loser i already debunked you with Lynns work which youve never read and you also had no clue of the other measured reports, just that reddit image.
>nuff said, nice autismfit with your long responses that have zero substance.
You are racist though, this is probably why youre so invested in proving your argument right even though its wrong
>yeah, he's pretty pathetic and is stuck at his 1 debunked shit source
still havent told me how it was debunked
>linked with the targetmap. Next try, cuckboi
except earlier you said this was before targetmap
nice try
>>29283511
No shit sherlock
Youre not smart, youre just annoyingly anal
>>29283620
>Ad hominems out of nowhere.
Not sure what you are trying to achieve here, but you made me chuckle.
>>29283511
the funny thing is that he's calling the OP racist while using Rushton/Lynn as an example - probably unaware that the paper seeks to prove the r/K simplification.
For a supposed asian, it's weird how he keeps using the biased targetmap that takes a low outlier of penis size for asian countries (all while, as OP shows, there are countless of studies done in Asia where they score even slightly larger than Africans in the other study).
All the while, he is unable to give us proper medical studies on africans, yet tries to further argue with his porn-fueled fantasies.
I wanna see proper, bpel/non-bpel/flaccid/flaccid-stretched medical studies by the asian guy disproving me, otherwise he shouldn't answer.
>>29279823
This bullshit list is a mix of self-reported data (useless), made-up data (useless), and a minority of legit data
>>29283588
>Cherry picked lists
Not really. You, on the other hand, use 1 study per country, part self reported, part low sample size.
>that he used to prove
he proved that there is no evidence that africans are larger on average, and there is none at the moment. The only studies where africans score larger are self reported.
>I already debunked you
you haven't.
>You are racist though
Nice projections
>haven't told me how it was debunked
There's a post ITT (search it yourself) where he shows the website acting highly unscientific - using a photoshopped picture (where it switched out blacks and whites as archives PROVE - as someone said before, the evidence is your enemy).
>last point
it's linked with targetmap which is linked with the world penis map that has been proven to enforce cuck-agenda through non-scientific measures. Post independent studies or gtfo.
>nice try
you still haven't progressed past the cuck map, cuckboi
