The reason you don't have a girlfriend or interest from women is a simple equation:
There are 1:1 male female,
Women's mating age: 14-45 (31 years)
Mens mating age: 5-110 (105 years)
This means the default ratio is 3:1 male to female,
66% of men can be completely ignored and never have sex and women won't need to care.
Even if 66% of men went MGTOW or remained virgins their entire lives women would not even notice.
They would only notice at about 70% of men killing themselves or remaining virgins
Now the 25% of men women actually need can be further whittled down by finances.
The average western woman needs 850k from a man,
The 1% have 90% of the wealth and so each 1% male can buy 20-80,000 women each.
This is why guys are checking out of society, shooting up schools, killing themselves, living in their parents basement forever etc
>>29185567
But we can be fairly confident that 5 and 110 year olds aren't dating. This post is completely retarded, I bet it gets hundreds of replies.
>>29185838
Yes they are
It is only the chads however,
Again 66% of men in any age group can get absolutely 0 play and all women will still be satisfied.
And closer to 90% in each age group can be effectively ignored too
So to onlookers it might look like 5 yr olds aren't dating...and most of them aren't but its because so many older guys are cucking them out of all of their women
>>29185908
>5 year old are at mating age and are currently dating 14 year olds
>110 year olds are at mating age and are currently dating 45 year olds
This is what robots actually believe.
>>29186034
the 1% of 5 year olds are all it takes....
we know hundreds of women who have been accused of raping 5 year old boys who are almost all from rich families, tall,connected kids.
There are also huge numbers of very wealthy very old men who bang young women
>>29186144
>the 1% of 5 year olds are all it takes
No it isn't, if something is that rare then it's not going to affect anything.
>There are also huge numbers of very wealthy very old men who bang young women
Again a vanishingly small number, it's not going to affect dick.
You're just one more faggot on 4chan who's desperately trying to find an out for his own sexual failure. And as far as pathetic excuses go this one truly stretches the limits of credulity.
>>29186204
look at the maths in the first post...
the 1% of men in that age are getting play, but 100% of women in that age are getting play
The rest of the math adds up to well over half of men being completely ignored for their entire life
>>29186281
Let's just accept for a moment that 1% of the population affects the average. Say we have 99 1 and 1 100, so we have 100 numbers altogether, the average comes out at 1.99, so what you're saying is that you think a group of 5 year olds and 110 year olds are getting, at least, 100 times more pussy than the average.
You're delusional, please kill yourself for the betterment of humanity.
>>29186364
no dumbass, the math is completely sound,
the ratio is heavily skewed for women in that mating age range in the first post, because small numbers of men from younger and older ages are trying to bang them.
the opposite isn't true, so the ratio adds up to at least 3 men for one woman, and probable closer to 10
>>29186481
>no dumbass, the math is completely sound,
For one you've not posted any math (how did you get from 1:1 to 3:1? You don't detail you methodology). Second I'm not even critising that you fucking moron, I'm critiquing your assumptions which are clearly retarded.I also don't trust maths by anyone who calls a ratio an equation
Again, kill yourself.
>>29185567
>Men's mating age
>5
>>29186546
if 1% of male 5 year olds and 1% of male 110 year olds get getting pussy that means 66% of men across all ages can live their entire lives without being needed or having sex with women.
>>29185908
>5 year olds
>getting cucked
Dude you changed the fuckin game when it comes to being fucked in the head.
>>29185908
>So to onlookers it might look like 5 yr olds aren't dating...and most of them aren't but its because so many older guys are cucking them out of all of their women
am i the only one that finds this sentence hilarious
>tfw learning that virgins all have brain damage and deserve the life they get
i thought you guys said you were good at math. this shit sounds like its coming from someone who smears shit on the walls.
>>29186571
If a 5 year old is "getting pussy" they're being sexually abused by some sick fuck who likely has no interest in adult men anyway. Also I'm not really understanding your math.
>>29185567
This assumes all men want a woman of "mating age". It's retarded op.
>>29186144
What women do you know?
>>29186281
Except most people date around their age.
Also is at remotely possible for a 5 year old to be of "mating age", as in capable of impregnating a woman? I thought girls became sexually mature earlier than boys and yet you list their mating age as beginning 9 years later than boys.
>>29186617
This whole thread is pretty fuckin funny.
>>29186683
Op is literally making stuff up and has never gone outside at all.
![seal41[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9FpDmkt.jpg "seal41[1].jpg")
>>29185908
>So to onlookers it might look like 5 yr olds aren't dating...and most of them aren't but its because so many older guys are cucking them out of all of their women
Oh Jesus Christ in heavens
>>29186571
It's probably like 99% of men have had sex by age 25
It's sad how this guy will come up with this nonsense theory and do "math" just to justify not asking out women and being fat.
"It's not my fault I can't date. Chad 5 year olds are stealing all my 14 year old women"
>>29186541
Re read it idiot,
And it is an equation, the ratio is part of the reasoning
the number of men going after the markedly smaller number of women gives you that ratio
then you factor in the 90-95% variance in sex/marriage determined by money that ratio gets even more skewed because very few men hold all the wealth.
>>29186595
5 year old boys should be as hot and sexually attractive as 5 year old women,
except they aren't in reality, because of the maths in the first post. 5 year old women have dozens of guys and at least 3 at bare minimum trying to bang them .
5 year old boys have none, 66% or so will be completely ignored by women as large numbers from the older ages are trying to bang the women in their age.
Man when I was five all i wanted was some steamy cunt, but my older brothers kept hogging it all. I almost got with this hot fucking milf but my grandpa came in with his checkbook and it was over.
>>29186741
>except they aren't in reality, because of the maths in the first post. 5 year old women have dozens of guys and at least 3 at bare minimum trying to bang them .
i hope you think this is real
>14 to 45
Yeah good luck having a kid at 45 that isn't retarded
it's more like 14-35
Why must you remind me of this. Leave me in my sweet forgetfulness.
>>29186782
It literally happens every day.
>>29185567
Thisthread gave me the hmmms.Nice Elliot, btw.
>>29186782
yeah i know that, and the fact that women over 50 are non existant, and you will go to maximum rape prison for banging a chick under 5.
But the feminists have convinced a bunch of women that its healthy to have a kid at 40-45
>>29186845
Feminists did?
You're delusional
>>29186858
yes its considered mysogyn to suggest that older women cannot have healthy children, or that older women are less attractive than they were when they were younger.
Women can do this sort of mental gymnastics because there are at least 3 men for each 1 woman, even for the 1/10 women.
>>29185567
>Men's mating age: 5-110
why do autists post this bullshit
>>29186879
Oh so you just believe whatever so you don't have to admit you're a loser for being a virgin.
Old people married to each other sort of proves everything wrong.
>>29186879
But people do regularly have normal kids at those ages. Being at a higher risk for something doesn't mean that you absolutely wil have it happen.
>>29186907
Also, I love how OP just pretended that you can only have sex if you're able to have kids as a result. Ignoring the rest of the dumb shit, that part sticks out to me as funny.
>>29186901
old rich guys with multiple families and who have chadded hundreds of pussies over their lifetimes married to one woman who came froma rich family with a dowry to the husband.
Anecdotal evidence is pretty weak fag
>>29185567
that picture gave me a panic attack. the three guys front and center look like elementary school classmates of mine.
>tfw you will never know what happened to scotty pippin.
>>29186935
No, I meant like everyone's grandma and grandpa. Over half of all sexual relationships have people within 3 years of each other. So that pretty much also destroys ops nonsense.
>>29186741
>Re read it idiot,
I have done, I'm still not getting it. I've done a quick approximation and found that women in the range 14-49 would be about 50% of the female population. So if we assume that you're right, then we assume that 100% of men are going after 50% of women then that still leads to a 2:1 ratio. I've literally no idea how you did this and I'm going on to do my M.Sc in theoretical physics in a couple of months.
>tldr Even if you're right, you're still wrong.
>then you factor in the 90-95% variance in sex/marriage determined by money that ratio gets even more skewed because very few men hold all the wealth.
This is just purely retarded (from what I can make out), unless you honestly believe that about 1% of the population of the west is having enough sex to make a dint in the 99% of people. Just to put that in perspective if you take the population of the US, assume that the average number of sexual partners is on the order of 10, 1% of the US population is about 10^6 people, clearly then we'd expect this 1% of the population to bang, on average, 1000 women just to get an average that's of the same order of magnitude as the rest of the country (since 10^8 x 10^1 = 10^9 = 10^6 x 10^3). So, we require out 1% to have at least 1000 sexual partners, but you go one step further and claim that this 1% is skewing the average, which means that we should expect 1000 to be the greatest lower bound on their number of partners. I'm not too sure how to estimate the upper bound but clearly what you're saying is total bullshit.
>And it is an equation, the ratio is part of the reasoning
Then lets see your equation and it's derivation.
>>29186882
See
>>29186204
>You're just one more faggot on 4chan who's desperately trying to find an out for his own sexual failure. And as far as pathetic excuses go this one truly stretches the limits of credulity.
>>29186983
The sad part is he thinks 5 year olds are stealing women from him.
>>29186950
That gave you a panic attack? Damn. That's really pathetic. I'm sorry.
>>29185567
Seems pretty bullshit senpai, but I agree that women need much less man. And you forgot to add 1:1 ratio is usually not true in western societies anymore because women tend to live 10+ years longer than men. Even in my country which is pretty poor by western standards we have the 1:1 ratio only if you include all men and women. However there are much less young women than men and more older women than men. In my age group there are thousands more men than women. So, since I'm a bottom tier male even if I want I could not get a gf.
>>29185567
I have no input on this but pretty interesting theory OP.
>>29186998
yeah, i really dont want my photo on 4chan. what if they posted a zoomed out scan of it and i was there?
>>29187045
so what, no1 knows who u are
unless ur horribly deformed ur fine
>>29187066
>unless ur horribly deformed ur fine
i'm a black woman, that counts, at least on this board.
>>29187102
HAHA SPICY U BITCH
>mens mating age 5-110
Fucking what??? this is the most bullshit thing I've read here in a while. You purposely inflated the lower and upper extremes to get the ratio you wanted. 5, fucking 5 years old? nigga really? its more like 15. also who the fuck over age 60 as a man is knocking bitches up? sure it does occasionally happen but I'm pretty damn sure no one over age 70 is getting bitches pregnant mostly because they can't even get it up.
The REAL mens mating age would be from about 15 to 60. only 45 years total, less than half of your bullshit OP.
>>29187102
Uhhhh, you know there aren't any black people in the picture, right?
>>29187117
>SPICY
i dont know who that is,
>>29187138
i said what if they posted a zoomed out scan of that photo, which is clearly a class photo.
>>29187119
Even 15 is a bit low, most 15 year olds aren't knocking anyone up. If we're not talking outliers, I'd put it closer to 18-50, which is a much much smaller population than what OP posted, and also almost identical to that of women.
I'm sure there's some legit data on this somewhere actually, but I can't be bothered looking.
>>29187119
You must have been a REALLY late bloomer. I could cum when I was 12. That's just cumming. I've fucked pillows since I was five.
>>29187162
Most young girls do similar things at young ages, it's just little kids going "oh, that feels good, I'll keep doing that". It's not sexual based at all, though sometimes retards think it's proof of sexual abuse.
Also, ejaculation is possible before you're fertile, and fertility isn't the be all end all of sexual activity.
>>29187153
Men become fathers on average around 25-28.
>>29187222
>25-28
>this early
>grab your lifetime subscription now at www.mylifeisfuckingover.com
>>29187004
its worse than 1.1:1 male female,
its literally like 6:1 because of the chads in other age groups cucking you
yes that means 5 year olds cucking 20 year olds...
and 6 year olds and 7, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 etc
>>29187358
Most men are actually men and not autistic child hating manbabys.
>>29187393
i don't believe that
WHERE ARE THE PROOFS
>>29187382
But over 50% of sexual relationships are with people who are at most 3 years apart in age.
>>29187407
Proof of what?
>>29187382
>yes that means 5 year olds cucking 20 year olds...
Bwhahahaha. How much of a failure do you have to be to think that 5 year olds are taking ur women?
>>29187408
kek by OP's retarded logic pedos are getting cucked (by 9 year old bois fucking 6 year old girls)
>>29185567
There isn't a 1:1 male:female ratio.
It is more akin to 1.25 - 1.5 :1 male:female
But your numbers may have something too it.
In my experience there are always a lack of women.
> Any club = 3 : 1
> Public Transport = 2 : 1
> Schools 1-20 : 1
> Workplaces 2 : 1
> Friend groups 2-4 : 1
> Dating apps 5-100 : 1
>>29187477
However there are more males in some places
> Gym 1 : 2-5
> Military 1: 25
>>29187477
On Wikipedia it says there are like 1.05 men to woman from 15-65. Close enough to one.
>>29185567
>The reason you don't have a girlfriend is a simple equation
It really is. The only 3DPD I would ever want to fuck are young enjoy to get me put behind bars for life.
>western woman
Can you retards stop coming here from /pol/? This isn't your hugbox, you know. "Western" women are no fucking different from ANY women.
>>29185567
Op you really need to get outside. Your view on the world is just so warped at this point.
>>29186571
>if 1% of male 5 year olds and 1% of male 110 year olds get getting pussy
Yeah, and IF I had a ten foot penis I'd be famous.
Do you have any fucking idea just how many 5 year olds there are on the planet? 1% of 5 year old guys smashing pussy in any modern society is a fucking huge value.
>>29187533
You don't live in a country which mass imports immigrant muslim men.
Seriously, 71% are men.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gp.se%2Fnyheter%2Fdebatt%2Fabnorma-antalet-unga-m%C3%A4n-ett-problem-f%C3%B6r-sverige-1.15076&sandbox=1
>>29187609
>Caring about Germany and/or Sweden
They did it to them selves.
>>29187609
Muslim men aren't going after white women. All that happens here is YOU have more women to choose from.
>>29187626
Fuck my cuck government.
I'm going to move soon.
>>29187628
Sure they aren't
Its not like i see disgusting somalis with white women all the time
Or read about how muslims group rape people
Not too long ago there were 4-5 muslim men who wanted to rape an 11 year old, but for once it was stopped by a passerby (very uncommon in sweden)
>>29186879
Feminists didn't do this, you fucking moron.
FEMALES did this.
Females are responsible for raising AOC around the world and also responsible for pushing away the social stigma of having kids when you are older. Older women always go out of their way to demonise the sexuality of younger women as a means of manipulating their sexual market value. There is a reason why women aren't going out of their way en mass to publicly disagree with feminists, and that reason is because feminist interests are female interests.
Stop trying to separate feminism form female nature.
>>29187662
>Fuck my cuck government.
Where you from senpai?
>>29187662
Uh, you're not competing with rape.
>>29187218
>It's not sexual based at all
Yes, pleasure from mimicking a sexual act, generated from interacting with the sexual organs is not at all sexual in nature.
Let me guess, little girls fingering themselves because it feels good is also not sexual?
Where on earth do you people come from? The fucking moon?
>>29187685
Sweden ;(
>My countrymen are cucked
>My government is cucked
>My collegues are cucked
>My family is cucked
Dear senpai, make me a bird. So I can fly far. Far, far away from here
>>29187829
They don't understand its sexual you creepy pedo
>>29187833
Oooo, that's rough.
>>29187829
Wow, you might actually be autistic.
>>29187662
>Or read about how muslims group rape people
Do you really think this is a common thing?
Does your entire worldview come from mainstream media which is targeted towards the braindead masses?
>>29187829
Are you implying that a 3 year old, who has no idea what sex actually is or how it works is mimicking the sexual act by rubbing their junk against stuff?
A sexual act has to have sexual intentions. These kids are doing it because it feels good, not because they're aroused and want to have sex but this is the closest they can get right now.
It's painfully obvious you're a pedophile more interested in fetishising kids than applying any actual logic by the way.
>>29187861
Understanding is irrelevant you fucking cunt. People don't gain enjoyment out of things based off understanding.
Do you have to understand what is happening to your brain to enjoy alcohol? Do you think most teenagers really understand what happens during sex when they lust for each other? Do you think people thousands of years ago had the slightest fucking clue what sex or masturbation was aside from something that felt good and something that can induce pregnancy?
>>29187876
>Wow, you might actually be autistic.
Wow, you might actually be a braindead normalfag who things this is a valid response.
>>29187609
>https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gp.se%2Fnyheter%2Fdebatt%2Fabnorma-antalet-unga-m%C3%A4n-ett-problem-f%C3%B6r-sverige-1.15076&sandbox=1
>71% are men
>Among the unaccompanied in 2015 the gender distribution was 11 boys per girl
>unaccompanied children
Look at this pic. It is a typical unaccompanied 35 yo teenager claiming to be 14.
You know what it means? The real % of men rapefugees is not 71, but rather 99.
>>29187914
>Are you implying that a 3 year old, who has no idea what sex actually is or how it works is mimicking the sexual act by rubbing their junk against stuff?
Yes, you dumb fuck, that is exactly what I am saying.
>A sexual act has to have sexual intentions.
NO
IT
FUCKING
DOESN'T
Cognisance isn't something we have evolved to have. What we have evolved to have is urges were are not taught how to act on, yet still manage to act on entirely successfully. Do you think people had to be taught how to fuck before they could fuck or knew what it was about?
>It's painfully obvious you're a pedophile more interested in fetishising kids than applying any actual logic by the way.
It's painfully obvious that you're a normalfag who has no fucking idea about biology.
>>29187924
>Understanding is irrelevant you fucking cunt.
>autism_speaks.jpg
>>29187961
Fuck off back to /pol/ you braindead tradcon.
>>29187979
Do you think people had to be taught how to fuck before they could fuck or knew what it was about?
How about you either answer this of fuck off back to facebook with the rest of your anti-intllectual breed of braindead normalfags?
Let me guess, knocking someone up without understanding about sex isn't a sexual act because the two people didn't intend to get pregnant.
Honest question: have you hit puberty yet?
>>29185908
>So to onlookers it might look like 5 yr olds aren't dating...and most of them aren't but its because so many older guys are cucking them out of all of their women
You're killing me op
>>29187833
Reminder to ignore all swedecuck cowbird posters
>>29188006
>Autism_overwhelming.jpg
![tumblr_nte5ijtgJc1uesx1ho1_1280[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/MQAPjso.png "tumblr_nte5ijtgJc1uesx1ho1_1280[1].png")
>>29187888
>Do you really think this is a common thing?
It actually is common.
I know people who have been raped and there are cities of less than 60 000 people in them, where there can be 13 (reported) rapes in a week.
Our main stream media try to tone it down.
They are pretty much all leftists.
There has been multiple incidents of them saying shit like "Swedish men rapes women" which later gets confirmed to be all freshly arrived immigrants.
During Cologne rapes (similar things happened in swedish cities aswell) our media ignored it.
Mostly it is because immigrants have infiltrated our media channels so much, that they can now make propaganda in the name of diversity.
>>29187961
Is a real thing.
Our immigration department had gotten orders to, and i quote "Let in anyone as a child if they say they are, as long as they look below 40"
Put them rapey muslim 20-30 year olds with our 14-15 year olds.
It will work out perfect
>>29187979
You're the only one sounding like a sperg, here, anon, if you think that people have to be conscious of what they are doing when they go in for a kiss or grind up against each other in order for it to be a sexual act. These are reflexive things all humans do with people they are sexually attracted to. That attraction isn't something they have to understand for it to be sexual in nature.
>>29188037
See above.
>>29187967
Okay anon, I'm sure your own fetishes (which you didn't deny by the way) are more important than what pediatric psychiatrists and other forms of researches who've spent decades studying this believe.
Also, do you not see how fucking dumb saying
>Cognisance isn't something we evolved to have
is? We clearly fucking did evolve to have it, and it's why our sexuality is so different to all other species (most of which don't derive any pleasure from sex, by the way).
Children do not have the biological urge to have sex, full stop. Sometimes sexually abused children act in a way that suggests they may, but they're just mimicking what they've been exposed to rather than actually desiring it. We develop that desire in puberty.
These are medical facts.
>>29188006
>being this autistic, even for r9k
>>29188042
>5 year old shoots someone
>It was a murderous act, they deserve the same punishment as someone who is 18.
This is your argument.
>>29188042
You have to have the intent to act sexually for something to be a sexual act. It's why it's not sexual to check someone's breasts or testicles for a tumor, but groping them in other situations is. You don't need to consciously decide "Okay, I will do this in order to lead me closer to intercourse", but no-one's fucking saying that. Being conscious of doing something doesn't mean you're thinking out in advance what you'll do.
You saying stupid shit like this is why people are calling you a sperg.
>That attraction isn't something they have to understand for it to be sexual in nature.
The attraction is something they don't even possess you retard. Stop injecting your fetishes into shit and trying to pass it off as biology.
>>29188041
>I know people
Epic.
>where there can be 13 (reported) rapes in a week.
So you're a feminist how? Do you also think that 25% of females in university will also get raped?
>During Cologne rapes
They weren't "rapes", you fucking moron.
You're just another tradcon trying to make out like when your womuns take a liking to cock that isn't yours, they must be being raped.
>>29188044
>We develop that desire in puberty.
Exactly.
Some people hit puberty that early.
>>29188075
>This is your argument.
No, that's your pathetic strawman because honestly engaging my argument would mean overcoming religiously held personal beliefs.
>>29188104
>Some people hit puberty that early.
No-one hits puberty at fucking three, or even at five. You're moving the goalposts now, no-one was talking about adolescents.
>>29188099
>You have to have the intent to act sexually for something to be a sexual act.
NO
YOU
FUCKING
DON'T
>You don't need to consciously decide "Okay, I will do this in order to lead me closer to intercourse", but no-one's fucking saying that. Being conscious of doing something doesn't mean you're thinking out in advance what you'll do.
Actually it fucking does, you dishonest piece of shit. Teenagers who have no fucking idea about sex still perform the same actions as adults who are educated about sex. They have no conscious intention or understanding and they act on reflex.
Fuck off with your normalfag bullshit emotional retorts. You have no fucking arugment, just like the retard who can only respond with meme greentext.
>>29188137
There have been instances of five year old girls getting pregnant.
>>29185908
flawless
cilantroburrito
>>29188104
>No, that's your pathetic strawman
It's not a strawman, it's applying your exact argument (that engaging in a particular act implies that you understand the act) to something else. In this case it's 5 year old shooting a murdering someone, by your own argument, it must mean that the child understood what would happen.
You don't want to accept that argument but still insist that a child engaging in a sexual must understand that the act is sexual. You're a filthy hypocrite.
>>29188137
desu anon, precocious puberty is a thing. But biological readiness isn't really what we're talking about, so it's still shifting the goalposts.
>>29188153
I clearly explained why sexual intent was paramount to a sexual action being just that, with an example of why an act normally considered sexual would not be with different intent and context. Your response just boiled down to "nuh uh".
>Actually it fucking does, you dishonest piece of shit.
Are you actually this autistic, that you have to plan out everything you to in advance or else you say you had no awareness of doing it? Holy shit.
>Teenagers who have no fucking idea about sex still perform the same actions as adults who are educated about sex. They have no conscious intention or understanding and they act on reflex.
Teenagers literally all watch porn or movies with sex in it. They also have sexual education classes. Ones with minimal exposure to sex still hear about it from peers, and will only do very basic stuff as a result. Do you really think people with no exposure to it instinctively think of all the different sexual acts we engage in, including ones that have nothing to do with reproduction?
And once again, teenagers with biological urges are not young children.
>You have no fucking arugment
Saying I have no argument isn't an argument anon. And when your entire point boils down to "nuh uh" with no explanation, or moving the goalposts to shit that fits your point, you're in no situation to judge.
>There have been instances of five year old girls getting pregnant.
Last I heard the youngest recorded age ever was like 8, and even then, 5 is an incredibly young age for puberty, to the point where it's not even worth mentioning it would be so statistically rare. Some people have two cocks as well, but we don't call that the norm, or even bother talking about it in sexual discussions.
>>29185567
you're forgetting about all the males in prison.
face it. there's more females than there are males and the reason we're single is because chad is hogging all the girls.
>>29185567
Alex Layko explains why you're wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1qGKD4zfsw
>>29188496
This.
You don't even need math.
Thanks to the Women's rights movement, females no longer have a need for the skills and protection of a male. They can work any job they want and climb the corporate ladder, they can receive help from the government, they are protected by law enforcement and the judicial system. So really the only thing left to be desired in a male is sexual gratification. And of course, this means tall, good looking guys, with enormous dicks. They get all they need from society and get the dick they need from Chad. And all the other Males are left to a life of bitter loneliness and sexual deprivation.
Rewind to a time before Women's rights, and you would find that girls more often settled for someone who is actually in their league. Because they had to, because they couldn't work and were treated as Females were meant to be treated and had been treated throughout history. Our entire species was built on a foundation where Females knew their place. No longer is the case in the modern World. Elliot happenings are a side effect of gender equality, and there will only be more of them.
