If you were born 10,100,1000, or even 10,000 years in the past, do you think your life would have been better?
>>29165391
well considering if I was born 100 years ago I would be rotting in a trench in europe clinging to a springfield and crying, I'd say my life is better in the present
>10,100,1000 years in the past
Seeing as to how not even bidepal apes of the human lineage existed back then I'd be some dumb animal with no self awareness
I think I might have liked being born 10 years ago
At least I wouldn't be on this website
It's between that and 10k I'd have to say
>>29165913
>not wanting to fight in WWII
>>29165970
You know what I ment
If you were born ten years ago you would be underage.
>>29165391
Medieval days would be dope as fuck if you were a lord because all the peasant women would be desperate to suck your dick so they could live in your castle
Caveman days would be dope as fuck if you were a strong alpha male, you could fuck anyone anywhere and you made the rules, betas would be scared of you and cower away
Today would be dope as fuck if I was a 10/10 chad billionaire.
My point is the time you were born doesn't matter, your genes/upbringing/status do matter
>>29167036
WWI you uneducated fuck
>10 thousand years ago
>you and beta posse kill Chad and his harem
the original beta uprising
>>29167160
>you made the rules
Until say 5 guys in the tribe kill you and takeover.
>>29165391
Well I was already born 24 years in the past.
With the question rephrased "would you like to live in the past", the answer is "Fuck no."
>>29167128
No you are stupid if you think people lived half a million years ago,let alone the absurd number you posted
>>29165391
>10
No
>100
yes, could go die in great war
>1000
Hell yes, I either die at birth, young, working like a mule, fighting the right way, or being a part of some education/religion/court. In any case, I'd likely die alot sooner, thank god.
>10,000
what a glorious and deadly world it would be
10 years yes. Then id be 11 right now. Younger is better
>>29168379
you can't fight in the war being a baby, retard. If you were born 100 years ago you would only be able to fight in the WWII
>>29168654
>born in 1916
>gets drafted as a 3 year old
Nice
if I was an 80s kid instead of a 90s kid I might have had a C64 in my childhood instead of a Playstation. I would've started programming much earlier in my life. technology would've been much simpler too, I could've had a MS-DOS box and I could've toyed with real life viruses, and I would've used ye olde BBS boards instead of this shitty web.
It would probably be an improvement.
Except for the fact that I would've started with BASIC, you can't have everything in life huh?
