> No (You)s
Silly isn't he?
>>29127281
no (You) for (You)
actually need an original comment wtf
> when get no (You)s
> got no (You)
tfw want to talk with people
tfw not good at talking with people
>29127281
Here, have a (you)
Haha jk ;^)
>>29127281
It's not about the (You)s, it's about the conversation.
I have probably received a fair number of (You)s this past week, but I can count on one hand those that actually were more than tangentially related to what I posted.
will reveal darkest secret of humanity when get 10 (you)s