So is it unethical to have kids if you're ugly?
Yes, I believe in strict eugenics.
t. non-breeder.
It's unethical to have children at all.
>>29111186
When did eggman become chad
Something tells me this is a photoshopped eggman in OP's pic
>>29111186
That's silly anon, because of genetic mutations you're always taking the risk of having an ugly child, regardless of how attractive you might be. I'd say it's more like: It's unethical to have children in general. Life sucks, to need and want is to suffer and thus making it a cruel thing to do to a person, giving them life.
>>29111186
Eggman that fucking cheating scoundrel was wearing a robot disguise the whole time!
no it is not. originally i just said no but it wasnt original at all
>>29111186
no.
>what is genetic variation
you can be an ugly balding manlet and have supermodel tier offspring
It is however unethical to take that risk
>>29111186
>being attractive is everything in life
It should be illegal for beautiful people to have children with ugly people.
My mom was an 8/10 and my dad was a 5/10 manlet. feels bad.
>>29111186
It's unethical to have kids at all. Regardless of your appearance, financial status, etc., the suffering of existence always outweighs the net benefit in the end. Even if you live a full and happy life you still die and experience all that happiness being torn away from you. Anti-natalism is the only true virtue, especially now that it's indisputably clear that human evolution reached a dead end.
>>29111559
did your hot stacy mom give you handies to ease your sexual frustration at least
>>29111578
n-no, is that the norm?
>>29111186
No, it's only unethical to have children if you're poor. Money can solve any other issues you may have genetically.
>>29111244
This this this
Only an uncaring normalfag could have kids.
It's unethical to have children in general.
>>29111568
Everyone that will post in this thread will skim through your post and ignore it because the truth is too ugly to bare.
>>29111186
You look like you would be in some russian secret police that beats people for no reason. I'm gay so I'd still suck you off. White + green or blue eyes + not fat + not old = good enough
facial aesthetics are random so attractive people can have ugly kids too
>>29111608
>Money can solve any other issues you may have genetically.
No it can't. That's just nonsense.
>>29111186
It's unethical to have kids.
Only the rich and beautiful should have kids, imo.
>>29111638
welcome to r9gay buddy
>>29111608
Even death?
>>29111698
>beautiful
just rich, beautiful people can have ugly kids
>>29111638
Please, boards.4chan.org/out/
>>29111721
No, I mean only the beautiful amongst the rich. The rich and ugly should just adopt or wait until we can accurately design babbys via gene editing.
>>29111767
Why should they reproduce?
>>29111186
Having children is inherently unethical, yes. Always.
That being said there isn't really anything wrong with doing unethical things. Knock yourself out, cause suffering, make children who are forced to endure suffering, suffer, yes, suffering is more interesting than nothingness, I suppose.
>>29111787
Rich + good-looking = happy children 75% of the time
Ideally, no one and nothing should reproduce, and we should just destroy all life on earth.
>>29111827
All human life on earth*
We are the problem.
>>29111834
No, every carbon life form is a cancer.
The entire system is built in suffering. It's all about killing those lower than you and fighting and fucking and hunger. life, all forms of L, is a curse and we should rid this planet of it.
>>29111599
it is in my japanese anime cartoons, yes
>>29111908
Plants don't suffer. Same goes for 99% of the animals.
>>29111270
He was chad the whole time.
You just fell for the meme.
>>29111637
yeah even here on this tasmanian bible transcription board, the assumption is creeping in that there is a positive answer to be found. absolute definition of normie shit.
>>29111923
99% of animals are eaten and have to work for their meals.
