please tell me if im being extremly naive but im confused at the emphasis on the choice of the romantic partner in this thread >>29098653
i am not actively involved in the choice of my partner because i dont choose who im falling in love with
or do the most people dont care about this and just try to form a relationship with someone they find attractive ?
>or do the most people dont care about this and just try to form a relationship with someone they find attractive ?
Its this. Like you I once thought the first was how relationships are formed, but among normies (and most robots) its just looks.
>>29101899
bumporghini
>>29101899
Don't date based on looks, it will never last.
You'll know when you meet "the one". All you can do then is pray that you're her "the one".
>>29102044
>the one
There is no such thing. The idea of 'soul mates' is a myth which is bad for mental health.
>>29102066
Obviously coming from someone who has never met their "one".
I'm not saying there is only 1 person out of 7 billion that we are destined to have a bond with, but the number of "ones" in the world is limited.
Don't break everything down to pure science and chemistry. It takes the magic out of life.
>>29102143
>Obviously coming from someone who has never met their "one".
Can't meet something that doesn't exist.
>I'm not saying there is only 1 person out of 7 billion that we are destined to have a bond with, but the number of "ones" in the world is limited.
By definition, "the one" is ONE. Not 100. Not 50. Not 2. One.
Now you're backpedaling and basically saying "the number of good partners for a particular person is limited" (which is true), yet somehow trying to force "the one" into there.
Multiple people =/= "the one".
