Red flags for opinions.
>post's typed in all lowercase
>>29100168
furious capshitter
end yourself, the true scum are phoneposters
>>29100168
>resorts to "jew cuck shill!!!" when losing
>claiming there's "no point in explaining" their point because "you're too stupid to understand anyway (aka they cant)
>>29100266
>He actually cares about what electronical device other people use to browse his favorite imageboard and actively focuses on disliking them for it
>>29100266
>dumb lowercase poster
>thinks his opinion is worth something
>>29100168
>Writes "post's", which is a contraction of "post is".
This is a significant red flag for me.
>>29100168
people strictly capitalize their sentences are more pretentious and can't detect irony in my experience. whenever I see people who think they're superior for holding a shift key it just makes me cringe, it's basically the grammar-fedora
>e uses te letter 'h'
ilarious. We disregard your post immediately
>>29100337
>electronical
>>29100399
>using proper gramma means you're pretentious
And it's not about being "superior" at all, it's just that lowercase posts usually are also low quality.
All the twitter normalfag memes use lowercase now, so you're basically welcoming that type of cancerous mentality here.
>greengrocers' apostrophe
>schizophrenia ellipses
>"btfo", "rekt", "lulz", "wew lad", other played-out memes
>the tumbler's um ("um, that's not okay")
dumbposters are fucking killing me
>he responds with a smug frog instead of an argument
>carefully ignores your point and instead hammers on a grammar error
>refuses to source their "data"
>obvious samefagging
>tripcode
>anything posted here
>'would of' or any variation
>starting a green text with 'be me'
>posts strawman comic to support his argument
I won't even bother reading these
A person who adds a lot of question marks to a non-question.
>>29100743
What about "be"?
>be
>do thing
>get fucked in the ass
etc.
>>29100168
using ded
using ITT unironically
wants [r9k] to be /lit/
>tripfag
>anime reaction image
>>29100168
>its coming from /r9k/
>uses the word "cuck" or "shill" (obvious /pol/try) or conversely "manbaby" or "neckbeard" or "anime-masturbating loser" or something along the lines "you wear a fedora" (obvious SJW or tumbltard)
>says "go back to [insert] place that opposes my views]"
>uses irritating played out memes like Penn Jillette" or "smug bipolar diarrhea frog" (aka pepe)
>uses short green-texts instead of elaborating why he doesn't like something
>he implies without a reaction image
>>29101439
i've only got a few reaction images and i don't want to overuse them
>>29100416
10/10 post hipster nigger, have a (You)
>>29100168
>opinion uses analogies
if you don't see why that's wrong you are not as intelligent as you think you are
>>29101473
>not having thousands of reaction images organized in folders within folders, reflect the meme-reinforced plunge of your psyche into an infinitely regressed id running through the circuits of hating humanity, hating yourself, feeling hopeless, and masturbating and playing videogames
Uses the following words in an otherwise "serious" argument:
>cuck
>sjw
>shill
>goy
>nigger
I'm sure there are more buzzwords but those are the ones posted most.
>>29101587
does this one even happen
>>29100168
>triggered by something legitimately arbitrary like all lowercase writing, an anime reaction image, or some particular buzzword or meme.
>>29100397
>post is typed in all lowercase
What's the problem?
>>29101702
people use "clever" analogies as comebacks all the time.
Anything can be proven using analogies in the sense of comparisons.
Here's a proof that 1+1 = 1
1 salt heap + 1 salt heap = 1 salt heap
Retards do this all the time, and it takes tremendous effort to shank their stupidity away.
>>29100168
thats me faggot, caps are fucking overrated and so is grammar
>>29101807
no i mean on this board
>>29101780
It's not "triggered", it just means the poster behind those "legitimately arbitrary" terms is a faggot or a shitposter.
I mean, for example, will you talk to someone who uses tumblr/twitter memes and acronyms when he tries to discuss something?
>>29101873
it happens on all boards and all the time in the world, where people deceive themselves and others intentionally or unintentionally by thinking analogies are allowed in arguments
retards can't tell the difference between when 2 things are the same and when they are just analogical
>anime pictures attached to post
>>29100168
>hear argument
>say disagree
>hear opposite argument
>say disagree
>get beer smacked out of hand
>see people in face shouting
>FACT! FACT!! FACT!!!