[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why are gold-diggers a bad thing? At least you can sort of control
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
File: 1462069892436.jpg (77 KB, 479x638) Image search: [Google]
1462069892436.jpg
77 KB, 479x638
Why are gold-diggers a bad thing?
At least you can sort of control your wealth.

You can't control your looks.
You can't control your personality.
You can't control your intelligence.
All of those are determined at birth, and no one calls girls shallow for dating guys exclusively on those aspects.
>>
>why are people who make a conscious choice to lie, cheat, ruin families and lives for personal gain looked badly upon
>>
>>29098855
>You can't control your looks
That's wrong at some point, but I get it.

>You can't control your personality
That's wrong.

>You can't control your intelligence
That's wrong.
>>
>>29098855
Wealth too, is determined by birth.
>>
>>29098855
Gold diggers are laughably pathetic. Do people not know that prenups exist?
>>
>>29098855
>looks
>personality
>intelligence
These are aspects directly linked to you at least, meaning that she cares about you in a way. I also would not call prefering people with a good personality or high intelligence shallow. Only caring for your wealth though means that they don't give a fuck about you as a human being at all, they just use you as a tool.
>>
>>29098855
They don't really love the rich men they date. They use them for their money while cheating on them with more handsome men.
>>
Because they destroy lives and families, you dipshit.
>>
>>29098968
Judges can overturn prenups, that doesn't mean shit in CURRENT YEAR
Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.