Who will be voting trump?
>>29088264
Do you actually know anyone that's pro-clinton?
I mean, I've heard a few people talk about how they hate trump so much they're probably voting for her, but almost every single person I know is all-trump, including me.
>>29088297
Older people that liked the time when bill was president, and some women because muh vagina
American democracy is a scam, it would be more productive to shoot up your local polling location than to actually vote for any candidates.
>>29088264
Nah won't help anything and doesn't even really want to try, he just wants attention
Donald Trump does nothing for me, the NEET. Why would I vote for him?
>>29088526
He will make neetbux great again and give you a job at Trump Tower.
>>29088526
Why should he? If you're not going to do anything and you aren't disabled then I don't want my money going to you.
>>29088526
>builds wall and gets rid of illegals
>suddenly a large vacuum of jobs
>barriers of entry for said jobs are relaxed
>NEETs everywhere can finally get decent entrylevel work
>>29088526
>>29088826
Also a friendly reminder that neets CAN'T BE ROBOTS. If your parents or the government cares enough to provide for you YOU ARE NOT A ROBOT. Robots fend for themselves.
>>29088914
>he thinks I want the shit jobs that illegals have
KEK
>>29088934
>muh no true Scotsman fallacy
>muh black and white thinking
Sub 100 IQ detected
>>29088948
>he thinks they won't become less shit simply by the fact that if legal citizens have to work it the conditions are improved
>>29088934
There's a lot of contradictions on what is and isn't "robot".
Who gives a fuck anyway? It really doesn't matter at all, man.
>>29088264
>pro-NSA
>pro-government power
>wants to "defend" social security and medicare, aka make us pay more to boomers
>anti-trade, thinks he can solve economic problems caused by government intervention with more government intervention
>pathological liar who says whatever he thinks the people in front of him want to hear
there's no difference between Trump and Clinton. I'm going to be Feeling the Johnson
>voting for a democrat who pretends to be a libertarian
>>29088973
If you're IQ isn't <90 you ARE NOT A ROBOT. It's simple.
>>29088983
If you don't get autistic about grouping people into categories YOU ARE NOT A ROBOT.
>>29089095
meant forrrerer
>>29088985
I'm voting Sanders.
How many of you will consider suicide if he doesn't win?
I don't mean "wahhh this sucks i should just kill myself i'm so mad", I mean literally killing yourselves with no intention of failing. I'm talking cyanide pill then gunshot to the head suicide, the kind you can't possibly fail at.
>>29088264
me magasan
I'm voting to build the wall.
>>29088526
Less NEETbux for dirty spics = more NEETbux for honest white robots.
>>29089220
>dude wall lmao
Sorry boys, but this election has already been decided.
>>29089095
>>29089175
and who exactly would you have me vote for instead? Guy's not a perfect libertarian but he's far and away better than Shillary or Drumpf
>>29088297
Yeah, Trump is pro-Clinton. Why do you think he's blowing up the GOP?
i'm disabled and Trump would reduce the meager 750 dollars a month i get and can barely survive as is. he would also make it even harder for me to see my psychiatrist and other doctors. there is absolutely no reason for me to vote trump.
hillary is terrible as a person but trump is literally against every single thing that is important to me: my income, my health, my schooling, etc. he would make life harder for me and thus i will never vote for him even if the alternative is satan incarnate.
>>29089268
Bill Clintons
>>29089306 wah wah wah im a piece of shit and trump won't wipe my ass for me
>>29089435
see, people who say stuff like >>29088826
>If you're not going to do anything and you aren't disabled then I don't want my money going to you.
always end up resorting to one of two arguments when you bring up the fact that trump is not in best interest for disabled people.
1. "You're not disabled enough under my arbitrary determinations. You could just stop being 'disabled' and go find more work. Stop being lazy. You don't get money unless you have no arms and legs and even then there is still work you can be doing!"
or
2. "FUCK THE DISABLED GAS THEM ALL"
you fall under the first one.
i don't need trump to wipe my ass for me; i simply need him to leave things as they are for me so i can continue subsisting. my disability is such that i was approved in less than 2 months and was not required to take any medical interviews. just so you're aware, usually it takes years and multiple appeals and multiple interviews with people.
so no, i won't ever vote for someone that will make it harder for me to live when i'm barely living as is. if that triggers you then deal with it.
>>29088409
explain your theory big guy, its interesting.
>>29089513
Let's not forget that the poor are supposed to never ask for a handout. They're supposed to have market discipline. On the other hand the rich can and will influence policy to build up a nanny state for themselves and they have. The rich get low taxes and a nanny state that bails their massive companies out and everyone else is just supposed to shut up and pick up the tab.
>>29089670
So why is it wrong to bail out the rich and not wrong to bail out the poor? Shouldn't nobody get a bailout?
>>29088688
>>29088914
>implying I want a job
Fucking wagecucks make me sick.
>>29089716
>So why is it wrong to bail out the rich and not wrong to bail out the poor? Shouldn't nobody get a bailout?
Just world fallacy, or libertarian delusion.
Allowing the rich to be bailed out allows them to make exceedingly poor and/or risky decisions that could have devastating consequences for the economy because they know they have little to lose from the decision, and everything to gain.
I would also say that rich people should be held to a higher standard of responsibility with their money. Everyone likes to say "the poor are poor because they don't know how to save or spend" or some such variation, right? Well the rich should be rich because they DO know how to do that, and not because they have erected a system such that it is impossible for them to fail or suffer consequences.
Bailing out the poor who can't even provide for themselves because of circumstances out of their control is solely a humanitarian effort. Not letting people who can't work die in the streets as they would in the days of old. There is no risk/reward in helping these people.
>>29089655
>explain your theory big guy
>big guy
uuuu
u
u
u
>>29089791
I've seen a lot of poor people who are that way, or keep themselves that way, because they insist on making poor decisions. Mainly to do with being unable to save any money they come across and blowing it the first chance they get. Fairly rural midwest area, you'd be surprised how many people have trouble making the rent/mortgage, the car payment, or putting food on the table, but have brand-new pickup trucks and guns, in addition to drinking and smoking a lot.
>>29088526
This is how self-conceited and selfish people are, it's not about the good of the nation, it's about free stuff you may be promised.
>>29089879
>I've seen a lot of poor people who are that way
I'm not saying that many poor people aren't poor of their devices; they are. I was mainly talking about disabled people or people who can't find jobs because of their lack of experience or other factors.
>>29089883
> it's not about the good of the nation, it's about free stuff you may be promised.
If you were given the proposition of voting for someone who would keep you from being homeless, and voting for someone who would make it much more difficult for you to not be homeless at the expense of "making America great again," which do you think you would choose?
I don't think many would choose "the good of the nation" over their own existence.
>>29088264
My cousin in Seattle is voting Clinton, because he's not retarded enough to think Bernie will do anything but too gay (very homosexual, I mean, he's a flamer) to vote Republican in the current year.
Registered just to vote Trump
>>29089791
>letting NEETS die in the street
I see nothing here you parasites should be dragged out of your basements and publicly humilated then beheaded with a blunt knife.
>>29091144
see >>29089513 #2
i wasn't even talking about NEETs, you just chose to read "disabled" as "NEET."
at least try to be less predictable.
>>29088264
Whats the first picture of in the picture? And no I wont be voting for trump because I'm not american and my country isnt progressive enough to let memes run for president.
>>29088914
you don't actually believe anyone wants the jobs illegals take, do you?
>>29091753
it doesn't matter to him if people want them. if there are jobs he expects people to fill them or die.
not such a bad philosophy until you consider what the illegals get paid and how that job market would shrink once the people who employ the illegals are forced to pay at least 7.25/hr instead of 3/hr.
>>29088264
cyka blyat
>pic related
>>29089655
He's right though. By voting, you're affecting one vote (which is basically nothing). By killing 100 voters, you're influencing a hundred votes (a hundredfold increase!). It's more effective than campaigning, debating, etc.
>>29089218
my nigga bro
>>29091226
It is gum.
>>29088264
>Falling for the "your vote matters" meme
