Why do fictional traps and futas look so much better than real ones?
Because you can easily draw a girl, add a penis and call it a boy.
>>29075619
Do people actually jerk their weiners of to pictures like that? Haha thats pathetic.
>>29075619
Because they're just girls with dicks
Whereas in real life they're men trying to look like girls
because 2d>3d
>implying
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MpnpcCLvtM
>>29076621
I'm on the camp of some traps being cute, but you picked a disgusting sample size.
Because 3D can never match up to this divine perfection.
>>29075619
OP picture is Western horseshit that the artist probably expects you to give money to muh Patreon for. Note the shitty craftsmanship and ridiculous fetish - they probably also draw vore or fat people.
Meanwhile glory like this
>>29076535
>>29077668
is available freely. Absolute masterpieces.
>>29077752
>Western art
>Genitals covered by Patreon Logo, please donate for uncensored version!
>Eastern art
>Genitals are a pixelated mess, redraw it yourself if you want an uncensored version
>>29077910
At least the Eastern art isn't lazily, shoddily drawn shite. And usually it's little more than a single line like in that picture above. And, there's plenty of uncensored shit out there. If you can't find it you're a plebeian, honestly. Any enthusiast should know where to look for the things they want.
>>29077910
>Western
Blame Americans grubby little money obsessed haands. They all want to be rich without putting the effort to be good anything
>Eastern
Blame child protection laws in Japan.
>>29077910
I mean, western artists usually only draw it for money, degenerates are willing to invest a lot of money in their fetishes
>>29077991
I'm a massive degenerate and have never spent money on any of it.
I really hate how all Western art is now, mostly, badly drawn, often catering to silly fetishes, and they all expect you to give them money for it? Fuck off. I remember a time not too long ago when people did it for the love of it, not for money. Japanese art is the only way.
>>29078059
when it comes to porn? yeah. otherwise, no.
>>29078153
Well that is what this thread's about you stupid autist so yeah.
>>29078059
I mostly agree, but I mean artists have to eat too. At the very least patreon has brought us a lot of consistent work of artists like Doxy, Incase and Powfoo among a bunch of others.
Take the good with the bad, no?
>>29078205
>artists have to eat too.
Then they should get a job. I don't see all these Japanese H-artists shilling for muh patreon all over the place. They just post their shit on pixiv without comment or complaint, simply because they enjoy their hobby.
Doxy is complete shit by the way. I've seen their work. Mediocre at best, so much better stuff out there, even among Westerners, and they want you to give them money. Ha. I don't know why you mention them.
>>29078264
I think he's color usage tends to be really interesting and his poses really dramatic. I suppose it's a matter of opinion.
The fact of the matter is that he (among others) puts a lot of time into their work.What's wrong if those of us who don't work at Mc Donalds reward that work with a few dollars.
It's not like you're entitled to free porn just because you say you are.
p.s
Doxy's stuff is objectively better than the shit the other anons were fawning over. That's why I brought it up.
>>29078527
I'm not entitled to anything. All I'm saying is that artists produce better content when they do it because they love it, not because they have to in order to eat.
And those people aren't entitled to my money so they should stop acting like they are by plastering that fucking Patreon logo all over their poorly drawn pregnancy fetish vore bullshit.
You think Doxy's material is better than >>29076535
>>29077668
these? You have outed yourself as having the most awful taste, and I'm going to cease our discussion here as a result. Good day.
>>29078626
Pffft, kay. Have fun.
>>29075619
not that one
>western art
