Why does her past matter if she loves you?
I will gladly accept any woman that loves me
because she also "loved" the legions of men in her past.
women are incapable of loving
>>29021834
This is a tautology. 'The past is fine if it doesn't influence the future.'
The problem is that the past DOES influence the future, as in, women don't just magically mature.
"I don't care about the past
None of it was made to last
It's not who you've know,
But who you're knowin'"
Etc. Eels feels.
they look like spiders
>>29022310
this robot gets it desu
>>29021834
>Have no interest in IC/cucking
>Love the look of the average/slightly older/worn out women who always do it
Just take her as she is brah
>>29021834
This meme is an attempt to bypass a male's sexual selection criteria. There are good reasons why a woman's sexual history matters to a man.
>>29021834
Love is just a word.
Feelings are just neurons popping off in your brain.
I need objective measures of "love."
>>29022633
>There are good reasons
Name even 3 good reasons.
>>29022882
Risk of STDs (STIs, whatever)
Higher chance of cheating with a past lover, due to higher quantity thereof
Girls who get around don't usually change and tend to have a high number for a reason (comes back to trustworthiness again)
If you HAD to choose one and had no option to pick neither, would you:
a) pick a sandwich that has had one dick on it
or
b) pick a sandwich that has had 15 dicks on it
For the sake of choice, both sandwiches are still provided to you still considered in an edible condition, no stains on them, not rotten or have any leftover gunk etc.
> Apply same principle
>>29021834
>black man eating pussy
clearly this is shooped
>>29023098
I wish I remembered the full quote from the Cleveland show about the can of soda.
'Would you rather have an unopened ca, or one that's had seven penises in it?'
'I'd go with the new can, because the other one might have blood in it.'
>>29022882
>Number of sexual partners is associated with increased risk of infection by HPV
http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/174/4/679.full.pdf
>The number of sexual partners a woman has had predicts marital dissolution.
http://atavisionary.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Premarital-Sex-Premarital-Cohabitation-and-the-Risk-of-Subsequent-Marital-Dissolution-Among-Women-teechman.pdf
>High amounts of impersonal sex is associated with past sexual abuse for women. It therefore likely has an indirect relationship with mental health.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.484.9923&rep=rep1&type=pdf
>>29023098
sandwiches dont seek dicks to be put into them
terrible comparison
also stop objectifying women :^)
>>29023256
It was an example about something happening in the past and you having the choice to take it or leave it you absolute fucktard. Go whiteknighting somewhere else
>>29023256
>>29023216
>The number of sexual partners a woman has had predicts marital dissolution
Thank you for your full answers. Im reading through them. This study shows that marriages whereby first sex is with later husband, divorce is a lower risk.
Im cant see where it says what you say.
>>29021834
because she can easily be "loving" someone else the next day.
>>29023216
This is a worrying development.
Do I (and I imagine you) have a condition of hypersex?
Also - am I a cuck for not cheating of my gf?
>>29023460
My bad, the abstract says "... women who have more than one intimate premarital re-
lationship have an increased risk of marital dis-
solution", so I assumed they had found a linear relationship. But reading the paper more carefully, they did not look at number of intimate partners.
So the strong claim I made does not stand up, but nonetheless sexual history predicts marital dissolution.
>>29023098
The one with 15 dicks
Because I love dick
>>29023032
>Risk of STDs
get tested
>Higher chance of cheating with a past lover
meh that is a factor, but sounds like a case by case thing than an absolute
>Girls who get around don't usually change and tend to have a high number for a reason
literally just the second reason
so you have 1 ok reason for being more wary, but I don't think a good reason to just automatically rule people out
>>29023496
>logo from their pop trash period
>>29023098
I think this is interesting argument, I wonder to which degree it is influenced by the idea of vag being devalued by being used and to which degree it matteres that it's been dicked as opposed to girl being actually promiscuous.
I think that vag/silverware and hands/mouth/dick can serve as nice illustrations of that phenomena.
Would you rather use silverware that was touched/used or being touched by dick? I think there's quite clear hierarchy of touch>mouth>dick in place, but does the same applies to woman being fingered/having cunnilingus/being dicked? Personally probably yes, but is it really totally analogous to silverware?
Hmm, I guess it all comes to personal preference of how much one thinks that woman is devalued by having sex, which seems rather arbitrary in many cases.
