Anyone here ever join a volunteer organization that helps out pedophiles and protect children on the internet? Is it a rewarding experience? Does it look good on a resume?
>>29014297
>helps out pedophiles
That's a pretty loaded way of saying "fucks them over for life".
>>29014360
i Meant help in outing and exposing them.
I probably could have worded that better.
But yes pedophiles should be fucked over for life
>>29014445
Why? I haven't harmed anyone, I'm not going to harm anyone, and I would just like help managing an attraction I never chose to have.
>>29014445
why do you write like a retard
I've seen you post about this shit at length and you write like a very stupid person
>>29014496
This is the first time I've ever posted about this and i'm kind of buzzed and exhausted right now
>>29014462
Because normies have dehumanized you, that makes it okay to torture you to death.
>>29014462
I hope you're sticking to 2D if you live in America or you're imagination in any other part of the world
Otherwise kill yourself pedo scum
>>29014551
Yeah man, being against harming children is a normalfag plot to opress the masses. better take the redpill xD
>>29014462
how about you keep your head down and your mouth shut?
>>29014588
Being a pedophile isn't legal.
>>29014577
People who look at 3D should get help, not thrown behind bars. Heroin addicts get sent to rehab you know.
>>29014297
>helps out pedophiles
What's it like working for Nickelodeon
>>29014661
Doing heroin doesn't harm anyone besides yourself, looking at cp does. Especially because theres a whole network that if you look at it it contributes to the harm of children.
>>29014721
Looking at CP harms the child as much as looking at murder kills someone. Maybe if they were trading CP or getting CP directly from the person making them it'd make sense, but I doubt that's how it usually goes.
>>29014297
just do Americorps like a normal person, you in-denial retard
>helps out pedophiles
>>29014577
>being against harming children
This and that are different things.
>>29014661
>implying pedophilia is the same as molestation
Nice logical fallacy there, friendo. I can only assume you believe all homosexuals to be sodomites as well, in spite of their wretched tendencies?
>>29015424
I wasn't though. Where did you get that idea?
>>29014297
>a volunteer organization that helps out pedophiles
You mean like NAMBLA?
>>29015442
Pedophilia = A thought pattern (i.e. sexual attraction to younger children) without inherent action upon said
Molestation (omitting other forms of potential action for the sake of brevity) = Actual sexual activity with younger children with pedophilic thoughts/attractions as the basis.
tl;dr I'm just saying that your argument is analogous to saying that all animu fans with a lolicon fetish are just as liable to stalk and rape actual 3D little girls. The main thought process may be the same, but it's the manifestation that is the main difference (with one being internal and inherently unregulated by law, and the other one being an inherently-illegal and bestial act).
>>29015554
I literally never argued or even implied that pedophilia was molestation.
>>29015578
No, but you did imply directly that it is illegal. Which, as I just dissected so ably, is an inherent fallacy unless the base attraction is drawn out towards something more than mere attraction (or fapping to 2D lolicon/shotacon for that matter).
>>29015612
I didn't say it was illegal either though...
>>29015626
So how else are we meant to interpret
>Being a pedophile isn't legal
?
If something isn't legal, it is inherently illegal. It's quite amusing to see how often your story changes to suit your own pedantic ends, however, so please continue.
>>29015658
That was a typo. Read the post I was responding to. Also the second half of the post. I meant to type "illegal".
>>29015677
Whoops, my bad. kek
It's so weird when people act like being attracted to underage females is abnormal. Like, low key, every man thinks that 11-17 year old girls are hot, but of course they keep it to themselves and don't talk about it. So I find it weird when these "pedophiles" who haven't actually done anything out themselves and stuff. Like don't get me wrong, death to child rapists and those who make and distribute child pornography, but low key every man who sees a 12 year old girl naked would get a little aroused.
>>29015953
>low key every man who sees a 12 year old girl naked would get a little aroused.
You only think this way because you're a pedophile so you think every other man is one too. If you were a normal man you wouldn't be attracted to kids that young, and you wouldn't assume every other man would be as well. Only 1% of all men are actually natural pedophiles, so very few men would really agree with you. You're in denial and you don't want to be ashamed for your sick degenerate urges, so you try to make yourself feel better by saying "well everyone finds kids attractive" when in reality, no. It's just you and a small minority of men that would be attracted to an 11 or 12 year old.
>>29016070
>1%
that's some preddy hard science there pal
you got p-values to go with that?
>>29016070
Well I wasn't talking about myself. My friend told me that and I just typed it and posted it.
>>29016106
It's a number established by many psychologists and people who both advocate for and against pedophilia in the community. The highest I've EVER seen it go is 3%.
>>29016125
Pedos stick together, I guessv
>>29016191
that's probably actual pedophilia and not any of the made-up new demarcations for "attracted to pubescent women"
