Were knights Chads or fedora tippers?
>>29002635
neither.
Modern feminism brought on the beta-alpha culture we have today.
>>29002635
romanticized knights never existed outside of poetry and literature.
>>29002635
Chads, but only the oldest brothers
Any knights or nobility were high status and had a better chance at securing a mate, in addition to having many mistresses
Talking about feudal society through the lens of a bourgeois alpha/beta system is disingenuous.
People interacted differently, so there will be differences.
Sex is not important when you can just take a mistress from any of the despicable sheaths offering themselves to you.
>>29002651
Believe it or not /fit/ procured the alpha-beta culture from their steroid fuelled broscience and insecurities.
>>29002914
Bitter skeleton detected.
>>29002635
Is the guy on the right a cuck?
Is this medieval cuck porn?
>>29002635
There was monogamous marriage where every man had a shot at a wife. It was a different time
>>29002929
Virginal roidlet detected.
Enjoying those useless, vestigial testes?
>>29002635
knights were lesser nobility of europe. they were much better off than peasants, but their lords' lives were a lot better. most lords inherited their titles while knights had to first go through the process of being a squire and apprenticing for a knight.
they could become lords if they were particularly renowned, but most knights didn't really do too much beyond their official duties (managed land given to by monarchs primarily besides military stuff)
>>29002983
>virgin
>an insult
>on /r9k/
>>29002635
Neither, women (for the most part) had zero economic power, so the only way a women could get by was to get married to a man. A Knight could be ugly, but if he was rich and powerful he could marry a woman of greater nobility, and probably have a peasant mistress on the side.
*tips fedora* is slowly sliding down the path towards linguistic irrelevancy, like cuckold and hipster before it. Soon it's going to mean "someone who's opinion I disagree with in various degrees of vehemency"
>>29002929
I'm an oldfag whom observed /fit/ rise to its peak and then degenerate into its cancerous homoerotic state.
No homo
>>29003483
Fedora is older than cuck you cuck.
And both cuck and hipster still retain their original meaning although expanded.
>>29002651
Whatever excuse lets you sleep at night.
>>29003199
Nice dubs, but that guy was from /fit/, angsty virgin central.
Robots take virginity in stride, I can't fault a man for that, but /fit/ has a particularly irritating way of spreading their neurosis to the uninfected.
>>29002667
this. the "knight codes" weren't even written until long after the knights stopped being relevant.
>>29002980
With the widespread adoption of primogeniture from around the 11th century there were actually a lot of men who remained unmarried. Only the eldest sons tended to marry since they would one day inherit the patrimony. Younger sons wouldn't get any sort of land through inheritance if their older brother was still alive, so unless they were able to make their own fortune or on a rare occasion were able to marry an heiress, chances are they would remain unmarried. Not every man had a shot at getting a wife.
