Should sex be regulated as a commodity or should the sexual free market be allowed to do it's thing?
>>28942903
The free market
Individuals acting in their own self-interest is more rational and efficient than a centralized collective beauracracy
>>28942903
>should
nigger are you serious there is no "should" there is only what happens.
>human behavior is a commodity
Stop being retarded
>>28942926
This, socialism/collectivism is for economic illiterates.
>>28943005
If websites can profit selling your browsing preferences, then I'd say that yes, behavior is a commodity.
>>28942926
libertarded manchild detected
"Individuals acting in their own self-interest" is a full description of barbarism. I never stop finding it hilarious how stupid libertarians are that they think that human beings removed from regulation and the threat of punishment would somehow manage to hold society together.
People behave like ANIMALS. "Acting in their own self interest" doesnt mean investing in stocks and starting companies, it means rape and theft.
Maybe it does need to be regulated somehow. Men need to have wives and families to properly incentivize them into being a part of the workforce. Also, to reduce overall aggression and antisocial tendencies. There is an ever increasing number of men who never get to have these things, so it leads to a veneration of the NEET lifestyle, and often a repressed sort of rage that stirs beneath the surface of this Western culture. It's not a good outlook for us.
>>28942903
Definitely a commodity. Women aren't even people.
>>28942931
You, I like you. This guy gets it.
>>28942903
Actually, when you have a proper distribution of all the other socioeconomic factors (money, education, culture, ethics, blah blah), the distribution of sex fixes itself just fine.
In a "free market" aka crony capitalism, it's going to be like your pic because there is only one value system instead of a bunch of parallel ones that you can be "judged" by and still get sex just fine.
Our waifus are being stolen by Chads. I don't blame Chads, I have many friends who are Chad. But they're too perfect for us robots and they're ripping us off. I make six figures, I bathe, and I'm above 5'9", believe me. And that should be enough. I don't say those things braggadocios way, I say it because that's the kind of thinking we need in our women.
>>28943048
>collectivism bad
>>28942903
No such thing as sexual free market. We should let human nature do its thing.
This thread makes me cringe at what I used to be.
The sexual free market doesn't take into account externalities and will therefore never be efficient, especially with female hypergamy
>>28943539
>trying to support collectivism
>posts picture of retarded collectivist
Good one
>>28943056
B-but muh private security companies will solve everything
>>28943634
Isn't that just feudalism?
>>28943706
Feudalism doesn't exist, it was invented as a blanket term
>>28943706
Getting rid of the government just means the next strongest institution becomes the next government.
Trying to create an anarchist society is a practice in futility.
>>28943800
It did exist but in exactly what form is slightly undetermined. The basic premise of trading military service for land and privileges did in fact exist but whether money was involved at all or not, within the context of "feudalism" as a form of government, is where things get debatable.
>>28942931
Second post best post. One person talking about "should" doesn't change trends.
>>28943931
Government wasn't thrust upon an unwilling population anyways. The vast majority of people want stability and security above all else and therefore demand some form of government.
