Is Tinder undeniable proof that looks are the only thing that matter?
Is there any hope for non-hot people?
what else is there when all you got is a bunch of pics?
>>28930858
But pics are all people want to see because they just want to see what you look like and they don't give a shit about anything else.
Undeniable proof that looks are the only thing that matter for guys
If you're an ugly girl you'll still get more attention by far than a guy that's even 4 points more attractive than you
>>28932261
I swipe right on every woman I see, EVERY WOMAN!
>tfw 6'3
>tfw 7.5 inch dick
>still a virgin at 23
meanwhile 18 year old 4/10 girls have already fucked 5 different guys
>>28932481
You could have easily fucked 5 guys by 18 too anon.
>>28932481
>daily reminderSelect all images with a store front.
>>28931576
But there are other dating websites that are popular as well. The implication of looks mattering so much on tindr is pretty obvious, and can be deduced by looking at what tindr is primarily used for: casual sex. Yes, we come to the mind-blowing conclusion that looks are what matters most when it comes to casual sex.
>>28932703
>he believes in relationships
Go talk to people who have been married for more than 3 years, separately of course.
>>28932614
the sad fucking part is i know exactly why that guy is with her
i've gone sexless through the best years of my life and i'm ready to take any hole as a goal
i don't care if she looks like a literal goblin i just want to know what the insides of a woman feels like, i want to know what its like to be a normal person with normal experiences
>>28932614
Even when they're physically deformed they have life on easy mode
Fuck my life
>>28932807
>i'm ready to take any hole as a goal
You don't have to. Just get a VR headset and enjoy some VR/POV porn.
I could never fuck a girl I don't find at least somewhat attractive.
BTW a girl once wanted to fuck me but she was a) ugly, b) told me she has had over 30 sexual partners (she was 21 at the time). I just couldn't bring myself to it.
>>28932877
>having options
you aren't a robot and should get off this board. i would have jumped at the chance to finally lose my endless torment
who cares if the girl isn't attractive, do you enjoy carrying the weight of virginity around? because i'm personally sick of being constantly burdened by it and having it hold me back from having a proper social life
>>28932965
This was literally the only time in my life where a girl wanted anything from me. She was an ugly slut, that's it. She even joked about it, she told me on festivals people call her "the free slut" (or something like that). And literally 3 weeks later after I "friendzoned" her so to speak, she was already in a relationship with another guy. She was just a confused roastie, I didn't want to do anything with her (it was almost 3 years ago - at the time I still believed that true love will eventually fall in my arms, so maybe I would take the chance now - not sure though).
>>28933054
the point stands that you could have lost your virginity (the number one factor for being a robot) if you weren't such a faggot
just remember you had the option unlike any true robot, i'm 23 and never had that option like you did and there is no end in sight
>>28933154
All robots have the option of going to a prostitute. They choose to be virgins.
>>28933154
Then why don't you fuck a dog or a goat? You don't care whose hole is it, right? You have the option, dude. Don't be a faggot.
>>28933221
>implying fucking a hooker counts
>>28933222
did you seriously compare a female human to a animal?
>>28933221
that's different, sure anyone can pay for it but only normal faggots can get it for free
>>28933251
It's still sex you mongoloid. A penis entering a vagina.
>>28933261
>did you seriously compare a female human to a animal?
No, you did. A warm hole is a warm hole. Fuck that dog already, what are you, a pussy?
>>28932703
OKC has done multiple studies on it and attractiveness is really the only thing that matters unless a guy makes insane money
women also think that 80% of guys are ugly, so there's that
online dating, and dating in general is a rigged game, so it's better to not play
>>28933261
There is no such thing as free sex, anon. Even if you're a perfect 10 you still have to invest lots of time if not money.
You'll get your chance when you stop placing so much value on sex & relationships.
>>28933221
>implying classic robots would have funds, social skills or confidence to find a prostitute
Also, why should you pay for it? Everyone else is throwing it at each other for free. Why do you have to pay?
>>28933389
You have to pay the "ugly tax"
>>28933389
If you can't afford to rent or don't know how to find a hooker, then you have bigger problems then getting your penis wet.
>tfw poor but handsome
is tinder worth it for me?
>>28930347
It's not really proof that looks matter. Have pic of yourself wearing a military uniform on your tinder profile. You'll get matches even if you're an ugly cunt.
>>28932481
>tfw 6'3
>tfw 7.5 inch dick
Put "I am 6'3 and have 7.5 inch of dick btw. ..."
in your tinder bio, and if you are not majorly obese and the worst Autist in the world, you WILL get laid within the next month.
>>28933397
But they tax the rich more than the poor. Because the rich can afford it and it helps the poor. Surely the beautiful should have to pay for sex and the ugly get it cheap or free?
Sexual welfare when?
>>28933304
Link them pls, senpai.
>>28933499
> tfw nearest hooker is in my neighbourhood
> fuck no, I aint paying 200/h, pussy is worth 1/8 that at most
It's an option, but paying for something so overpriced does not sit well with me.
>>28930347
If looks are the only thing that matters, then I would have never had the amount of gfs I've had.
/fit/, /soc/, and /r9k/ all rated me a maximum 4/10 and a 3/10 on average. I have had 4 long term relationships, 3 of them were virgins. I've performed the mating dance with all of them.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Ever heard of how no one sees 1 color the same? Think of it like that. Someone will see something attractive in you that no one else can see. A girl doesn't even necessarily have to find you attractive physically. Just like there are loads of guys that would harpoon a fat chick, there are girls that would happily date/fuck a conventionally unattractive guy because for whatever reason, they find them attractive.
At least, that's the way I see it. It keeps me from focusing so much on my appearance.
>>28933341
Lol. I am a normie that is perhaps a 6, and I never invested either much into a woman. Still got sex a lot while single (albeit not atm, cause atm i am in a relationship with a christian girl that wants to wait.)
>>28933852
>I never invested much into a woman
>I am in a relationship with a christian girl that wants to wait so I can't have sex
>>28934519
Yes, I never did and I am.
We both are students of Lutheran theology at the university of Leipzig, Germany.
We both are 24, and while her family is slightly richer than mine as students financed via the state's BAFOeG "neet" bux, we are of equal wealth. Why the fuck would I invest in her?
Atm I even owe her more money than she me, albeit not much (8,50 Euro she payed on the weekend cause we visited the Voelkerschlachtdenkmal, and drank a coke afterwards, and I didn't have my money with me).
Out of my 3 past GFs 2 have been richer than me, one of comparable wealth. Again: Why would I invest in any of them?
A relationship ain't about being a sugardaddy, senpai.
>>28933718
>and if you're not an autist
this is the problem most of r9k has and nothing can fix it
>>28930347
Man I'm as ugly as someone can possibly be and I get matches on Tinder
No dates though and not even any conversation
I think a lot of girls just try to see how many matches they can get so they can show off to their fellow roasties how desired they are
>>28930347
>Is there any hope for non-hot people?
yes, other non-hot people
>>28934824
No one wants to accept that
Better to die alone than to die with some obese fuggo
>>28934749
>fucking euromormons
>>28934869
if that's your standard then you ought to be alone tbqh
>>28934824
non-hot girls can catch a chad who's in a slump or dry spell, or they can milk a beta orbiter for money. or (seems to be the popular option) they can just do without until someone who meets their standards comes along
non-hot guys can either be rich or get a hooker and that's it
>>28930347
Tinder is for hooking up. In the hook up game, all that matters is looks, especially since its online and the deciding factor is the picture and some follow up conversation. The chaddiest, buffest dudes will be getting the most tail of course, all the girl is judging them from is a pic or two. They could be a total dipshit with no personality, it doesn't matter when it comes to sex.
When you start to use OKcupid and other potentially more serious dating sites as well as IRL, you can play the long game more and show off your personality, similar interests you may share, goals you both might share etc etc... you can start slow with a coworker or someone in your school, get them to fall for you (or atleast be open to dating) even if you aren't great looking by saying the right things. You can't do this on Tinder, its either fuck at first sight or ignore.
>>28934964
Why Mormons? Lutheranism is vastly different from Mormonism. Your comment doesn't even make sense.
>>28930347
Power is all that matters
>>28935067
feel free to explain the difference
(not that I care)
>>28935066
>>28930347
Try BlendR instead. Way better app.
>>28932845
>easy mode
What?
>>28930347
>is a platform where the only thing you can show of yourself is what you look like proof that looks are the only thing that matter?
>>28932845
Especially when they're deformed. Deformed is a 6.5-8/10 equivalent. Places them well above normal fat ugly women.
>>28930347
Depends on the country.
In a country with social welfare, looks are 90%.
In a country with lots of poor people, money is 90% of what matters.
Women always go for the rare resource.
I live in Germany and women are nearly only interested in looks.
>>28935103
Lutheranism is basically just orthodox (as in mainline, not as in eastern orthodox) christianity, without the pope, without praying to the saints and/ or mary, and without free will for the most part, but with a lot of emphasis on the bible.
Mormonism is a heretical sect, that has 3 other books beside the bible that overrule it when there are contradictions, that god is a physical entity that lives on the planet Kolob, that we all become god after our death, that the lost tribes of israel colonized the US first and the indians were made red as a punishment for attacking them, that for salvation it is mainly important to know the secret handshakes that give you access to the celestial hall in the endowment ceremonies in temple, that we pre-existed as souls before our birth, and that souls that were eager when they were commanded to become humans became whites, such that rejected gods commands became demons, and that those that were like "eh - if I have to" became blacks. I shit you not.
never compare me with such a cult again, pls.
>>28935232
>I live in Germany and women are nearly only interested in looks.
Which is why I (>>28934749 >>28933852) got several without good looks (am perhaps a 6/10 a 7 at best), right?
>>28935177
>Is the very existence of a platform where the only thing you can show of yourself is what you look like not proof that looks are the only thing that matter?
>>28935246
>the believer of one made up fictional story bashed other people who believe something else that is equally ridiculous
>my sides
>>28935296
I don't think you understand.
This board is for people who are 5 and below.
Of course, a 6-7 can get lots of sex. The difficulty is exponential. It's 10x more difficult to get sex when you're a 5 then when you're a 6.
>>28935378
>The difficulty is exponential.
I think you meant logarithmic.
>>28930347
>tfw hot but socially unfunctuanal
What am I supposed to o? I don't even talk with females
>>28930347
Tinder is only for looks, but okcupid and plenty of fish are mostly for personality. POF has a whole detailed profile while tinder is just an optional few sentences
>>28933304
>women also think that 80% of guys are ugly
they're not wrong
>>28935378
Not when you go for a woman your status.
When I can pull what are 7-8 in my eyes as a 6, you can pull 5-7 as a 5, but most certainly a 4 or even 3.
Don't act as if you had no options.
>>28935409
It's the same concept.
Exponential : e^x
Logarithmic scale: 10^x
But yeah I know what you mean.
Fill your tinder profile with picture of your expensive car and nice house. Oh wait you have neither of those. Online dating is for degenerates, meet people at the bar like god intended.
>>28933304
I guess looks would be most important in an online type of environment because females could use some kind of mental gymnastics to attribute other positive traits to the more attractive guy. This is much harder to do irl though, and other traits like confidence and general social skills become king. Of course, I am not saying confidence and charisma alone will get a guy girls but that those traits are just as important as attractiveness. And in situations where those traits are going to stick out more, such as anywhere but online dating, they will play a significant part in if a female finds a guy attractive.
>>28935466
You're right. I have options.
But fucking breaks my balls to know that I've worked my ass off forever to be successful professionally and, in the end, girls don't really give a fuck because I'm just a 5.
"You're a doctor? yeah whatever, you're still a 5. not interested"
"You're an engineerr? yeah whatever, you're still a 5. not interested."
"You're a lawyer? yeah whatever, you're still a 5. not interested"
>>28935562
>But fucking breaks my balls to know that I've worked my ass off forever to be successful professionally and, in the end, girls MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN ME don't really give a fuck because I'm just a 5.
Fixed that for you.
But I get what you mean and that it frustrates you. That being said: You didn't go into a good career just for pulling girls, did you?
>>28935372
With the difference of my "fictional" story both not being inherently racist and not disprovable in it's claims, while their's is both.
>>28935562
those are fedora fields, you need to be in showbiz to get girls as an average looking guy, harry styles is a 6/10 but look how adored he is
>>28935638
Well, in other countries, where survival is also based on how smart you are, I would have a chance to date girls MORE attractive than me.
If at least, the 5s I were dating were doctors or engineers, I could consider that we're well matched.
This being said: no, I went in a good career for self-fulfillment. To see how far I can go.
>>28935715
>not disprovable in it's claims
>being this delusional
No wonder muslims and niggers are taking over your shitty country.
>>28935732
doctor, lawyer: fedora fields?
I don't consider myself autistic. Not saying I'm the smoothest talker out there, but I'm also not the worst.
>>28935755
>not disprovable in it's claims
It ain't. While god cannot be proven it neither can be disproven.
Antique Israelites sailing to the Americas and having permanent settlements CAN be disproven though!
>>28935476
those are both exponential scales. Logarithmic scales grow very slowly.
e^x: 0, 2.718, 7.388, 20.079, 54.576, 148.336, ...
10^x: 0, 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, 100,000, ...
log(x): undefined, 0, 0.301, 0.477, 0.602, 0.699, ...
if difficulty grows exponentially with decreasing attractiveness, difficulty quickly gets very large as you get less attractive. If difficulty grows logarithmically with decreasing attractiveness, things are little more difficult for unattractive people than attractive people, even if the difference in attractiveness is large.
>>28935960
for god's sake: it's the same concept
it's just looking at the same thing from two opposite directions
addition / subtraction
multiplication / division
exponential / logarithm
>>28936077
Yes, logarithms are literally the inverse of exponentiation. They are indeed two closely-related concepts, but being closely related doesn't mean that they aren't very different, for the same reason that X and 1/X are very different because they're inverses. You should use the correct term to describe the thing you mean, especially with math.
>>28936159
I think the level of autism in this thread is increasing exponentially.
>>28936159
yes, you're right 10^x is not a logarithmic scale. my bad.
but I was answering to the moron who said that I meant that the difficult is logarithmic, when I meant exponential.
Because the formula I described was:
Difficulty = 10^-x, where x is attractiveness.
No way what I described could correspond to a logarithmic function.
>>28933304
>women also think that 80% of guys are ugly
We never stood a chance
