>normies talking about relationships
>1 normie says eww when i bring up the fact that sex bots will be replacing women in the near future
>stacies get offended and immediately start attacking me
Get blown the fuck out of the social circle cause i was almost about to get beat up by some feminist women
walk away, i should of just shut my mouth right /r9k/??
Do most of you failed normies just not think before you speak?
>>28923537
Lol did this actually happen? You should probably go into more detail.
That was just kind of stupid, sex robots are a meme. They're not going to 'replace' women. If you can't get women you're not replacing anything you're just getting a fancy sex doll.
>>28923537
Hiding your power level is not a meme dumby.
You never say this shit to normies no matter how true it is.
It's like going up to a king and trying to take his crown. Did you expect them not to be pissed?
>girl gets a vibrator/dildo
>she's so kinky and sexy and it's a huge turn-on for everyone, she knows what she wants and she gets it, you go girl!
>guy gets a pocketpussy
>ewwww what a creep, lol, can't even get a girl? absolutely disgusting! what a pervert!
>>28924003
>herpaderp walking pocket pussy will replace teh roasties!
I think OP has to be trolling it's so cringe worthy, but on the other hand there's fresh cringe being sighted in the wild everywhere all the time.
>>28923537
>you're not wrong
still edgy ass shit to say tht though lmfao
>>28923537
just had to butt in to the conversation didn't you, you creep?
>>28923537
>eww
wtf kind of reaction is this? how is fucking a clean, sterile machine more disgusting than a herpes-ridden cunt filled with chad's old sperm? btw I guarantee you these whores use vibrators.
>>28924003
>>girl gets a vibrator/dildo
>>she's so kinky and sexy and it's a huge turn-on for everyone, she knows what she wants and she gets it, you go girl!
>>guy gets a pocketpussy
>>ewwww what a creep, lol, can't even get a girl? absolutely disgusting! what a pervert!
Why do you bring up something completely unrelated to OP's story?
Also, what you're saying is not true at all. I've been in several situations in which guys brought up that they had tried pucketpussies or whatever these things are called with women present, and the girls didn't react like that at all. They wanted to know how similar they feel to the real thing and if it was really better than using your hands etc.
Also, you're free to shit talk/ dislike girls who use sex toys.
>>28923537
>the fact that sex bots will be replacing women in the near future
Bullshit. There's no way anyone would say something this autistic in an actual conversation.
>>28923537
Nope piss the normies off whenever you get the chance you did the right thing OP
>>28923854
>They're not going to 'replace' women.
>this is what roasties actually believe, meanwhile scientists publish articles how every brothel in 2050 will be all robots
>kids will be grown into mechanical wombs that haven't been torn apart and coated with chad's cum for ages
>women can't even begin to comprehend that they failed and will never recover again
like pottery
>>28924003
Now that I think about it, when sex robots arrive, nobody will even say anything about the women who get the male fuck bots.
But when the men get those fembots, all HELL will break loose.
>AI replacing men for most of the shit they still do
oh well it's just progress can't fight the future done deal really just economics
>AI replacing women for one of the things they do
how the fuck do we criminalize this shit
>>28923537
>it's another reddit-tier "tfw friends and gf are normies ree" thread
Genuinely surprised the OP image isn't that stupid frog
>>28924792
women want to be dominated /raped and provided for, but male sexbots won't be able to do either. The future is not bright for roasties.
>>28923537
>sex bots will be replacing women in the near future
So you are saying that the only thing women can do is fuck? That's retarded. Women are not things only meant to be used. We're people too, and even IF all guys would reject us, that doesn't mean that we wouldn't have a life anymore. Plus we could just turn lesbian or take a male sexbot.
>>28924890
They probably can to be honest
>>28924003
You can use a vibrator on a girl while you have sex with her. It opens up a whole new world of giving another person nice feelings.
You can't use a fleshlight on a guy. Well you probably could, but it kind of defeats the purpose, since it's not designed to add to sex, it's designed to replace it.
That's the difference
>>28924950
This original post ostensibly is designed to remind you where you are
Staceys got triggered, because it's never nice to hear someone or something is going to replace you with the only skill you ever had.
You should understand them.
>>28924950
>Women are not things only meant to be used.
Yes, they are.
>We're people too
No, you aren't
>>28923537
Here's what you did wrong:
>presenting your opinion as fact
Sex bots may become an increasingly popular option. You may have been able to start a debate of their merits, but not by automatically assuming most men will prefer them to human women.
>using the words "replace women"
The words "replace women" are offensive because they imply women are nothing more than sex bots themselves, with annoying drawbacks like personality and a will of their own. You basically spouted an /r9k/ meme in real life.
The moment men freed themselves from vagina slavery all roasties will lose their power over humanity, that's why they were scared because inside they know that is true.
Probably in the future fuck a Stacey will be easier.
>>28925058
>they imply women are nothing more than sex bots themselves
>implying they aren't
Why do you think they got so mad? I would too, if someone told me that the robot is going to do the only thing I can do well better than me
>>28923537
There already are many ways to replace women, for example getting a lobotomy.
>>28925122
That would be becoming a woman, not replacing it
>>28924726
holy moley this is like a breath of fresh air for the eyes
>>28924950
After the sex robot revolution happened you women won't have betacucks and whiteknights to defend you anymore, the providers will be out. Probably few Chads and Jamals will marry but since most of them are dangerous beasts I can say future is dark for women.
In the future women will beg for a betacuck.
>>28925144
Not becoming a woman, but becoming something neither man or woman. Check out a video that was presented at a seminar about social psychology : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxCkULUnVH0
Still waiting for my robot waifu.
>tfw trump will make Chobits real.
>>28925144
roasties toasted
>>28925180
those comments
""ayla""
>no offense but how can you not see those motionless things as corpses
they're truely toast in the coming years
I think the bigger problem will be the AI, there are mechanisms good enough for the sex action but if they implement an AI close enough to a human being we could have a sex robot close to a roastie but without the cons that a woman offers.
>>28925222
the third guy is a combo of r9k and pol
>>28925258
maybe something like pic related
>unironically posting about a 'sex bot revolution'
You people are idiots.
>>28925258
You don't think they can develop a script to imitate women? how hard can it be to remove the I from AI?
>>28925144
>>28925360
Holy fuck this thread just keeps getting better and better
>>28923537
You shouldn't have spewed your bullshit is all.
Sex bots will replace the absence of women for you, I assure you chad will still enjoy flesh on the daily.
>>28924974
Both toys are literal artificial replacements for the opposite sex's genitals. Saying "You can use a dildo on the girl" is the same as "You can use a fleshlight on a guy". You're just changing the sexes. Sex toys are designed for sexual stimulation, nothing else. Whether or not you use it to add to sex or use it to replace sex is up to each individual person. Implying that dildos are not designed to replace sex is demonstrably false. Fuck you.
>inb4 "stfu beta kissless virgin"
>>28925360
/originalendingtothethread
>>28924950
>Plus we could just turn lesbian or take a male sexbot
imagining a bunch of stacies trying build a robot
keking hard
>>28924726
How does that replace women? The only replacement there is really your lust for a sex object. Really sounds like you got some mental issues t b h baka.
Enlightened Female here. Sex bots are gonna be awesome for us married chicks who don't want to put out every day. I'd surprise my babe with a sexbot any day. Especially if she is multi-purpose and can hold things or pick up the house.
>>28927020
literally no one would bother with females if they can get laid with a robot that looks and feels like a female and doesn't carry stds, there is simply no reason to bother with a woman, if you want a child you can have a synthetic womb give you a perfect and healthy child instead of a woman that has been abused due to her own stupidity and has a risk of diseases
>>28927096
>literally no one would bother with females
Yes they would. Man that all just sounds pathetic. I know I've talked to you about this before because you always say the same fucking thing about this.
brothels, synthetic wombs, replace teh wimmenz.
I really do hope they can make you a robot companion sooner than later it's just fucking sad how obsessed and fucked up your world view is.
>>28927199
lmao your delusion is flaring up again, we have not talked about this but many men are anticipating this because they are sick of women's shit
explain to me why would you have a child with a woman that can take it away from you with lies in the court that favors her, and not in a synthetic womb that can actually provide optimal environment for the child, a woman with messed up hormones from abuse from alphas will give an autistic and sick child
you might try to shame us now but this is just your dying kicks, after synthetic wombs become a thing there will be next to no marriages, it will be a thing of the past
>>28927070
just let your husband fuck other women, cuckette. have a live-in she can be the maid too.
>>28927096
>>28927266
Most men actually enjoy the company of women and appreciate them as people. I know that's hard to believe.
>>28923537
if anyoen is being replaced by sexbots in the future, it's men
men + sexbots = no way to procreate unless an artificial womb is made
women + sexbots = procreation, we have millions of sperm samples on ice, just insert one into your bot. hell of a lot simpler than creating an artificial robot womb to house a flesh baby.
but yeah, i don't talk about fucking flesh lights in public either OP, that's the equivalent of what youre bringing these normies into
>>28927284
there is literally nothing to appreciate about a woman, besides using her wet hole for a while, men want you to believe otherwise though so you can give them access to that hole
>>28927274
If some chick is gonna be trustworthy enough to hire as a maid then whatever. But would hire a flesh-and-blood 3D woman to comb through your personal artifacts every day without making it into a tumblr event? I rest my case.
>>28927308
artificial wombs will be made originnaly to help unfertile women
>>28927311
As someone who has a GF and female friends I can tell you that not all men agree.
>>28923537
>fabricates a story
>its not even funny or amusing
was this supposed to make people upset that sex bots are nowhere near a reality?
>>28927266
we have virtual reality already and men are still picking the real thing. weird.
>>28927266
how exactly would it be possible to make a synthetic womb. where would you get the genetic material from the female to make a baby? how the fuck would a living organism be able to feed off of something that is decidedly not organic at all? what would you do with the biological females that would be born from this?
also, there's hardly any technological invention that is just universally accepted. there will still be people that prefer the old, organic model just like there are people that prefer chess to cawadoodie eighty seven super black special ops
>>28927357
Shh, he will run out of memes soon
>>28927334
we don't need artificial wombs to help unfertile women when we already have surrogate mothers that are happy to help and also get paid for what they're doing.
also, how many of you will have your lonelinses truly quenched by a pre-recorded response generator? how long until it becomes monotonous? once you've figured out every possibility for a reaction, you'll get bored with your bot. even if AI is decent, it will still be like fucking a mentally handicapped child, so hopefully you already enjoy talking to walls and fucking a sextoy because thats all a sexbot is gonna be for the forseeable future
i find it hard to imagine you'll have an easy time introducing something that's supposed to phase out the majority of the population. there are more women on earth than men, and i sincerely doubt that they'd be fine and dandy with letting men have sexbots without having ones of their own.
>>28927357
>>28927378
>The artificial womb exists. In Tokyo, researchers have developed a technique called EUFI -- extrauterine fetal incubation. They have taken goat fetuses, threaded catheters through the large vessels in the umbilical cord and supplied the fetuses with oxygenated blood while suspending them in incubators that contain artificial amniotic fluid heated to body temperature.
>>28927346
As the president of the United States I can tell you another four years.
>>28927408
the womb was not able to create its own fetuses. it simply housed someone else's. you will still have to have organic women unless you find a way to create an artificial egg, or artificial genetics.
>>28923537
why were they angry? what did they say?
>>28926759
It's a fun thought, but surely there will be industry manufactured sexbots for females just like there will be for men? Seems reasonable to think someone in a capitalistic society would choose to make easy money by offering such products for females as well.
>>28927266
Delusions of persecution you have a pretty big complex there. Yes I've seen you go off on this exact same rant before, same exact wording if I didn't know any better I'd think you're a chatbot copy pasting the same drivel out again, but somehow I think you're just pathetic enough to really believe this.
I wouldn't want to have a child with a female I think would make a bad mother, I don't want to raise children my standards are too high and I don't have the patience, resources, and probably skill set.
A synthetic womb honestly grow up. Only super rich people will be able to afford that crap and clones that are raised outside a womb always live shorter life spans and are more prone to defects.
I'm not trying to shame you, that's just your persecution complex. Why the fuck would you want to raise a kid anyway? You're likely to pass on some hereditary mental illness, you have to care for it all the time, your neet bux isn't going to cover it children are expensive.
You seem way too immature to have a female companion or a child.
>>28927420
>people with GFs on /r9k/ are as absurd as the president on /r9k/
>>28927637
>i don't wanna shame you
>tries to shame anyway
stupid nu-male that has adopted female traits is what you are
>>28927684
>stupid nu-male that has adopted female traits is what you are
no u r
>>28927308
>Women
>Mental capacity to maintain and engineer sexbots
Lmoa
>>28923537
do you know the first rule of MGTOW? DON'T MOTHERFUCKING TALK ABOUT MGTOW! (in your social circle, online is fine)
>>28923854
it's not about being able to get a woman, it's about having to (for sex)
>>28924003
withholding sex and affection is the only power roasties have (without the state)
>>28924438
>all are masturbatory aids
>unrelated
k
>>28924819
>>28925074
>>28925144
>>28925162
>>28927096
>>28927266
>>28929424
:)
>>28924950
nobody_cares.gif
>>28925019
>You should understand them.
and laugh at their misery while you're at it
>>28925360
>how hard can it be to remove the I from AI?
*facepalm*
>>28927199
>>28927331
mad roastie detected
>>28927284
>being this naive
>>28927308
go ahead. then tell me how society will survive without men. protip: it won't.
>>28927346
you wouldn't be a white knight if you weren't an incel virgin...
>>28927357
>we have virtual reality already and men are still picking the real thing. weird.
VR is still too expensive and shamed to oblivion
>>28927407
you don't know what an AI is, do you?
>>28927446
stem cells, madafaka
>>28927637
>I'm not trying to shame you
you're still successful, roastie
>>28924453
>>28924950
fuck off stacy it's true though
literally no one would date if they could get sex without having to deal with smelly biological pms slags
haha with artificial wombs women will be LITERALLY obsolete
>>28925058
women ARE nothing but organic sex bots and you know it's true otherwise you're a literal faggot cuck
>>28924726
Won't happen. There are big religions like Islam that will never allow themselves to do this. Pretty sure most Christians won't do this either. This won't happen until all religions that don't allow for such a thing to cease to exist. Which won't be for a long, long, long time.
>>28930254
Yeah these idiots aren't taking into account religion preventing this.
You guys really think a religion like Islam will allow for artificial babies? Or fucking of a robot?It simply won't. It alone has 1.6 billion followers and growing. Similar things will occur with other religions.
This is pretty much strictly for atheists and the like. Which is a tiny portion of the world population. You will be dead before your fantasy world is realized.
>>28930348
good thing i'm not a muslim then
>>28930254
>>28930348
>2016
>religion mattering
fucking lmao, what is this, the dark ages?
literally only retards care or believe in religion, china or asia in general doesn't give a fuck and when they start mass producing synthetic wombs and sex robots and start to generate insane profits you bet your shitstained ass the west will do anything necessary to enter the market since feminism is no longer profitable and is draining on the state funds and also wrecks the family as the biggest spender, a huge mass of lonely men doesn't pay taxes or spend much at all
>>28923537
The way I see it, is that at first, like with videogames, us lower folk will use such wiafu bots in place of women, since we never get any of them and they just want to use us as resources/utilities (beta cucks and whatnot). Women get angry, because the thought of them being unnecessary rekts their ego (sort of like a forced midlife crisis). They do what the normies have always done, ridicule and exclude anyone different. This doesn't affect most because we've already been there, and we know wiafus are better than these meatsacks, and since they will be programmable, they won't be roastie manipulatorshopefully. Feminism and nu males and such will create an uproar, for it destroys their safespace of being entitled to whatever men they choose, even if they would never touch those men at all (maybe a "they want their cake and to eat it too" moment?). Also since mgtow would most likely jump on the idea of a programmable bot, and it is "objectifying the female essence" or something, they will cry sexism even though it's a programmable computer that has no thought outside of its parameters. Computer doesn't care, it just does what its programmed to, and it's better than what these women want, forcing males, humans that have abstract thoughts and emotions/feelings and whatnot, to allow them to walk all over them, and enable this attitude, like they're mere robots, programmed for cuckoldry (like a double standard, but with women who have no ethics). There will be people too self aware to embrace the escapism, for it isn't "legitimate love" but programmed love. There's a sense of achievement when you get a manipulative, selfish being to genuinely care about you and want your companionship, hard and unlikely, but at least it's not "artificial". Also since the media is against us, they will perpetuate the "real womyn" meme and sadly keep some males bluepilled, hopefully the internet and good marketing plans can beat the moist hole Jew.
Pt.1/4
>>28930830
Eventually I think that society will split into two (and a half) parts, the men who can't get women, so they use the bots, and the chads who get all the women anyways, especially after the sexual revolution, who don't care about bots because they can get and control their harems (and the poor bluepilled betas still clinging onto/being manipulated by the 3DPD). I don't know where it may go on from here, maybe all the robot genes get removed from the gene pool and only chads remain, and natural harem life goes on. I think this is unlikely, because some beta genes reside in the ever breeding female. Also the gynocentric cycle will continue, but with higher standards since everyone is Chad, and because 3rd wave/normie culture wants to promote max pleasure and no virtue, women won't want to sit around with one man, there will be "open relationships" everywhere. Society might collapse at this point, I dunno. Maybe because of this max pleasure idea, people stop making children and the western world dies off (because the Muslims and such wont stop making children, and just take over), that would be nice. This might motivate the development of artificial woumbs, which I will get to later.
Pt. 2/4?
>>28930850
Anyways, here's what I think is most likely. Because robots and such are not breeding or caring about women, their numbers diminish, but not by much, because Chad can breed robots, especially if society rejects them for being slightly different, and women have bad genes to share too. If robots die off or not, it doesn't matter, for during that time span, the wiafubot industry would have gotten pretty big. They are a business after all, and they want more customers, (since, if they build good quality bots, there will usually one time purchases, and the rest is maintenance) so they expand their marketing. If the robots die off, then the bot market has more incentive to expand to the chads or they lose their income. What I think will happen is that come chads (probably the "lower chads") will discover the wiafubot, either through peers that have them, the internet (this is the information age after all), or, ironically, the feminists complaining about it. Since women have less beta cucks to leech from, they have to try their tactics on the chads, which probably won't work because they are more assertive and such. They might try and breed "Chad cucks" but that might redpill the grown up chads even faster once they catch wind. Hip-hop is fairly redpilled anyways (side note, lots of blacks are anime lovers, and lots don't like their own women, so they might promote this idea, since no one likes dealing with farming equipment), and society is pretty sucky, so it's only a matter of time until the normies learn that they don't need the roast at all. Why settle down with some goods you KNOW are used up? That you and your friends have shared? Chads know the attitudes of women more than we do, and have no idealized view of them, especially if they try their beta bux strats on them now that the real betas are done with them.
Pt 3/4?
>>28930901
They are Chad, why must they settle for what the betas used to settle for? Why not get an obedient, never aging robot that does what you want? That you can customize? That you don't need to constantly manage? Ideally chads start moving towards the bots, and at a faster pace than the robots since they have no care for what the women think, and this also helps motivate the artificial womb process. If the Jews don't mess it up, we might be able to make the female human "species" go extinct, oh what a day that would be.
Female husbandobots might start popping up, and they might try and make the men go extinct, but considering how women dont have a track record of building and maintaining societies, and men can do the housewife role as well, I dont see the females being able to create and maintain bots like the males can, the male libido is an amazing things, the things it can build. Female libido just manipulates and leeches, the male libido creates. Futa bots may be created and females may hijack that, but if the male vs female debate happens, males will probably win if we go by objective standards. A male can do what females can and better to boot. things men can't do? We got wiafu bots remember? Male only fertilization may be the only problem that we face, and that might ruin it all because normies want to perpetuate the human species for some reason.
Pt 4/5
>>28930802
>you'll pay for the whole seat
>but you'll only need
>THE EDGE
seriously though, get back to highschool
>>28930921
Tldr: females are bad, get rid of them, male comradeship and wiafubots are the way to go. We have used technology to surpass many of our natural limits, why not use them to remove the dehabiliting need for female companionship?
That's just my thoughts/speculations on it, there's probably tons of limitations and obstacles and social things to overcome, but if done, it'll probably be bretty good m8. My concern would be controlling the population with sex, like women have done, but considering the male libido, and the innovations it can create, I'm pretty sure we're safe from the government controlling our wiafus.>inb4 the Jews make these bots and unleash them on the white man and have control over them so they start conditioning them to do degenerate things but not on themselves so they win or something
The autism it took to write all this out wasn't too bad desu. I do it for you guys
>>28930934
What in the fuck's name are you even trying to say you memeing fucktard? Do you have brain damage?
>>28927308
yes because women have been at the forefront of science and technology and engineering and anything thought related.
Read a history book
>>28930969
whoa, haha, oh shit
we're reaching edge levels that should never be possible
>>28930348
>>28930254
My youth group leader led a "spiritual warfare" course that was actually about teaching us not to masturbate. Good luck to religion pal.
>>28931034
you are embarrassing yourself. please desist.
>>28923537
PIT. BULL.
Terrier~
LOVE that song. LOVE Die Antwoord
Love Chappy
