[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Show me the slutfax!
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001

Thread replies: 54
Thread images: 2
File: 3157875298_1_2_LW0XxHcw.jpg (18 KB, 300x296) Image search: [Google]
3157875298_1_2_LW0XxHcw.jpg
18 KB, 300x296
What is Slutfax?

Slutfax is a user-contributed site where anyone can share the sexual history of a woman. The format of this site is inspired by wikis and textboards. The site has its ideological roots in the Manosphere and Redpill movements.

How do I access Slutfax?

Get the TOR Browser Bundle from the tor project.

https://www.torproject.org/download/download.html.en

Then navigate to slutfaxx5p3m33g5.onion

Signup with an email and password. Currently, you do not need to activate using a verification email (you a fake email if you wish). Just immediately sign in with the password and email you used to sign up.

How do you prevent falsified information?

Users can reply to others posts and verify factual information. It is up to the user to do more investigation based on information contained in dossiers. Nevertheless, an algorithm is in the works that can estimate how trustworthy a user is but it requires a large userbase to be effective.

Why are there so few dossiers?

The site is pretty new and our new users haven't been very active with the site. We need people like you to help contribute!
>>
File: 1366109019939.png (6 KB, 160x224) Image search: [Google]
1366109019939.png
6 KB, 160x224
>>28921087
How do you stop being a huge fucking advertising faggot?

Oh wait

too late
>>
>>28921087
Kek this is fucking retarded

How about make a site that isn't darknet. Retard
>>
>>28921087
Why don't you make this accessible for those who don't have access to tor at the moment you fucking faggot
>>
>>28921119

Why shouldn't I try to get more users to grow the site? People don't even know about it and I think they deserve the chance to. Shit isn't going to advertise itself.

>>28921166
>>28921223

Because it'll be taken down and targeted on the clearnet.
>>
How do we know this isn't a honeypot?
>>
>>28921382
You don't. Welcome to the real Internet.
>>
>>28921411

I guess it doesn't matter. Revenge porn laws aren't applicable to me in this case.
>>
>>28921382
Because it's on tor and doesn't require an email address or any of your info?

Stupid question desu and I'm getting tired of it.
>>
you would have more success posting on /b/
>>
>>28921619
You're probably right, anon.
>>
>>28921300
>Because it'll be taken down and targeted on the clearnet
There's all kinds of garbage on the regular Internet that goes untouched. I don't have access to tor and I won't for quite awhile but I would use this if you made it available for everyone. This is actually a good concept desu.
>>
You have a new entry. Better formatting might be helpful.
>>
>>28921087

Why not keep a history for men too?
>>
>>28921836
What's the point of that?
>>
>>28921871

Same reason you want a history of women
>>
Advertising your shitty website is against the rules.
>>
>>28921833

Thanks you for your post and thanks for the feedback. Better formatting for the dossiers or for the layout?
>>
>>28921915

Dossiers. Paragraphs disappear.
>>
>>28921915

Why not extend the service to women by showing men?
>>
>>28921536
>tor
>not an fbi-controlled honeypot

lol okej
>>
>>28921836

It already exists, don'tdatehimgirl, or something like that. Apparently there were plans at a point for them to make a version targeted towards men, but it didn't happen. That was before all of the feminist shit really cooked off, so fat chance of it happening now.

I'd have probably put it on the clearnet and hosted it out of eastern europe or somewhere else that doesn't give a fuck about feminist rhetoric, OP, but I'll check it out regardless.
>>
>>28921892
Fuck off, roastie.
sih;uhf;uhp;foh;oh;foihi;oij
>>
>>28921936
Yeah, I'll look into fixing that.

And I'll format the old dossiers to look better too so don't worry about yours.
>>
>>28921999

It does seem like an ok idea but there have been other guys who did the same thing and then went to jail.

I don't want to leave a record behind.

And eventually I might want to allow image uploading once the site becomes bigger and I have some more money for hardware. In that case, the legal area becomes really quite gray.
>>
>>28921087
>How do you prevent falsified information?
>Users can reply to others posts and verify factual information

Okay, so it's verified by other people who don't know what they're talking about? There's no burden of proof, anyone can put up anything and then it will have to be shown that the woman in question didn't do it because someone did put up a comment, and as we all know that's next to impossible even for the most innocent.

Even if the motivation behind this wasn't just as repugnant as Don't Date Him Girl and that kind of shit, it's also just as useless because the primary contributor will be shitting all over his ex right after the breakup or bashing women that turned him down.
>>
>wants users to post sexual experiences
>advertises on board full of kissless virgins

Good thinking there.
>>
>>28922080

> There's no burden of proof

Sure there is. Posters should try to be backing up their claims with some kind of evidence.

The people verifying would be people who also know the girl.

Same thing happens in gossip. Or here on 4chan. You don't believe everything you read on r9k, do you?

>Even if the motivation behind this wasn't just as repugnant

lel at this roastie apologist.


> the primary contributor will be shitting all over his ex right after the breakup or bashing women that turned him down.

You say that like it's a bad thing. I personally believe it's during those moments when a guy is going to be the most truthful and will bring out all the dirt he has got.
>>
>>28922147
What's the motivation behind this website? Is it to attract posts from bitter virgins who report a girl as a slut because she turned him down and went out with another guy instead? Is it to say "this girl is not a virgin lol avoid", about which absolutely no one relevant gives a shit about?
>>
>>28922239
Not the same anon youre talking to, but guys dont like slutty dirty girls who sleep around. Grow up and deal with it.
>>
>>28922415
The definition of slutty on /r9k/ from angry virgin robots is a girl who has sex with someone other than them.
>>
>>28922239
I'm pretty sure any man who is considering committing himself to a woman would want to check the list.

You don't hear normal men talk about it much because they know all women will gang up on him, leading to social ostracism and probably losing his job. Trust me, they talk about it when women are not present.
>>
>>28922493
It could be useful to know which girls are easy. So you could target them on dates and know they will put out.
>>
>>28922477
No the definition is more than 1 sex partners by 18, 3 by 21, 6 by 25, 8 by 29 and anything over 10 after the age of 30 is slutty
>>
>>28922548
Right, ignore all the "I refuse to have a gf who is not a pure virgin" posts on /r9k/ all day long.
>>
>>28922477
It used to be that most men would marry virgins.

The world we're living in today is unprecedented where more women are having more that 10 sex partners by the time they are 25.
>>
>>28922613
Pure virgin is 0 sex partners, most robots would be okay with a girl who has less sex partners than fingers on one hand
>>
>>28922548
those are normalfag numbers.

as a KV I am entitled to a virgin partner (I am aware it limits my options, but they're more common in certain environments). I don't see how someone can be upset that I want a woman who is equal to me in this regard.
>>
>>28922654
>le people did not have premarital sex until this generation meme

That is just completely untrue. You'd have to be quite stupid to believe that.
>>
>>28922694
>I am entitled to my pure virgin 10/10 gf who will love me for who I am (fat neet) and must be given it for free
>>
>>28922753
Except that it is true. People in the past had fewer sex partners and less sex because the consequences of having sex were much higher.
>>
>>28921087
>The site has its ideological roots in the Manosphere and Redpill movements.
Just say reddit. You're not fooling anyone.
>>
>>28922819
Nah it wouldn't be legit.

It actually has it's roots in PSL (Puahate/Sluthate/Lookism), which is a redpill FA community.
>>
>>28921836
There was an app called lulu but it was illegal in a lot of countries, Australia being one iirc.

>>28921223
>>28921806
See above. You could literally be breaking the law with this crap
>>
>>28922944

Europeans seem to be. With Murricans it varies state by state.

My state has a revenge porn law, but it's got so many gaping loopholes that it's inapplicable to many situations.
>>
>>28922789
If I'm just a fat neet why would you care about what I want?

personally I don't really mind if I never get a virgin gf. I can die happy knowing that I tried for something worthwhile and never became a beta provider cuck.
>>
>>28923040

legit.

Better to be alone because you knew the girl was a slut than get married only to get divorced 3 years later.
>>
>>28922797
Except that's not true. People have always had sex. You just believe it based on 50s sitcoms.
>>
>>28923099

> People have always had sex.

Yes, let's make no distinctions about frequency.

Premarital sex was much less common. Period.
>>
Gossiping and badmouthing people into solitude is a main reason why robots exist.
Whoever came up with this site is a fucking Chad sociopath and is directly opposed to the r9k philosophy of inclusion.

Do not support this site, call it out for the cancer upon humanity that it is.
>>
>>28923212
>r9k philosophy of inclusion
what are you talking about, you delirious newfag? Our goal is to exclude as many women, SJWs, and normalfags as possible.
>>
>>28923119
Source? Your ass doesn't count.

Surprisingly unoriginal.
>>
soo, kinda like pinkmeth?
>>
>>28923355

Yeah pretty much like pinkmeth.
Thread replies: 54
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.