>"but at least I have sex!"
Why is this the go-to remark for chads? What does it even imply?
>>28786214
it implies that they are not such an apalling failure of a human being that they have at least had sex with a woman
>>28786214
Is she supposed to be Ryuko?
they have sex and you don't, something you desire and will never have that they receive in abundance
>>28786214
It means that women see value in them, which is their only way of measuring a man's worth
>>28786214
>What does it even imply?
That he had sex and you don't.
>>28786214
Because they have no other redeeming qualities and they need to support their fragile ego.
Not that having sex is a redeeming quality. The vast majority of people that get laid on a regular basis were just willed into it.
It means that they see themselves as more valuable than you.
At the same time, their value system is based on societal norms, organized into a ladder system marked by age. Which is extremely fragile and unfulfilling. So it also implies that they are very insecure about themselves, and are likely very grateful for your presence.
>>28786214
It's the regular argument evasion of breaking the context. You know how Buddhists always say '...you might be right, but your mind is disturbed, you should stop being so mad'? They bring up unrelated, irrelevant things, such as agitation (which frequently often isn't even there), and then pretent that it's somehow more important that the issue at hand that you were arguing and right about. They cannot address the arguments, so they arbitrarily posit that their shift of subject is what ACTUALLY SHOULD be discussed. 'At least I have sex' is exactly the same: extending the argument while pretending that it's still relevant. In fact, it's a kind of equivocation.
>>28786214
because it's the only thing they've done
>>28786296
Snorted. True.
>>28786214
Literally nobody says that, retard.
>>28786308
The thread is obviously about the general kind of 'you're a loser' ad hominems.
>>28786315
I don't think ad hominem means what you think it does
>>28786279
tl;dr it's about the other person hoping to make you accept that their insult is 'still relevant', their definition of relevance.
>>28786322
Explain please.
>>28786315
This thread is just projection of angry robots about what they think others are like.
>>28786336
Some guy calling you a loser virgin faggot isn't an ad hominem anon
>>28786346
What is then?
Right, blox.
>>28786353
Someone using your personal traits to undermine your argument. An anon bringing up the fact you will never have sex to insult you isn't a logical fallacy, it's just harsh.
>>28786402
Something being true doesn't make it a fallacy. Fallaciousness depends on intent and relevance.
(Just like something being a fallacy doesn't make it a logical fallacy, fyi.)
>>28786402
>"but at least I have sex!"
i agree it's not a strict ad hominem but it is an implied ad hominem - "you haven't had sex therefore your views are worthless"
>>28786422
>Something being true doesn't make it a fallacy.
*not a fallacy
>>28786308
You must not get out much... I heard this all the time back when I used to have a social life.
>>28786422
It's not a fallacy because it's not an ad hominem, it's an insult. It being factual or not is irrelevant, although it's factual in your case.
>>28786444
You are making stuff up again.
>>28786214
Post more of this girl, preferably taking uncut dick.
>>28786214
Personally, for me it applies not failing at trying to leave living descendants behind since this is our most basic purpose as living beings but I think thats not what they are trying to imply.
P.S: At least I have sex.
>>28786214
It's literally the go to term for "people want me in this world enough to have sex with me". It means you were genetically superior enough to be with the opposite sex. It implies a lot of things.
>>28786543
anzujaamu, a shitskin turk
hope the kurds find and rape her
>>28786214
You are able to fullfill the most basic activity that a human can do. It's objectively one of the most important aswell. Leave behind your genes in the next generation.
If you can't find someone to fuck and leave your seed with, then there's something wrong with you. Something wrong with how you're wired and you're not supposed to leave anything behind.
Keep in mind this whole thing is kind of skewed these days.
>>28786590
Wish cosplayers would stop beating around the bush and just do porn.
>>28786214
It's the nuclear option for robots, when conventional arguments have failed. Anyone who says that right off is just trolling you, bud. They probably haven't had sex more than once or twice themselves.
>>28786607
>important
>objectively
>>28786683
Made the post sound as autistic as possible. I guess it worked
Empty life where the most pleasurable thing seems like the most meaningful.Chads aren't normally like this thoughplease forgive my fellows t. Chad
>>28786214
Remove Turkroach
It means that Chad deserves to exist.
Sex nowadays is largely divorced from reproduction, but on its most basic level, it's all about that. A woman fucking you is basically her saying, "On some subconscious level, I think more people like you ought to exist, and thus I want your dick inside me. You are worthy enough of existence that I desire for people like you to continue existing in the future, and I'm willing to contribute my own eggs and biological resources to that cause." Keep in mind the fact that childbirth used to be much more risky, and on some subconscious, evolutionary level, she's even saying, "I'm willing to risk my life so that more people like you exist."
Incidentally, this is also why mothers have an inflated sense of their own sons' attractiveness. A woman's son is the product of her own genes (which she automatically wants to perpetuate) and those of a man who she's already fucked (which she wants to perpetuate; see above). She can't fathom why every woman on the planet isn't lining up for her handsome son's awesome sperm.
You can argue that possessing traits that women find attractive and fuckable isn't a good indicator of a person's actual worth, but having sex does at least indicate that you possess those traits and are thus evolutionarily viable.
>all this projection ITT
Its weird a board of self admitted NEETs, virgins and otherwise losers would believe anyone else to be insecure or lacking in excitement in their own lives.
>>28786828
>On some subconscious level, I think more people like you ought to exist
Never really thought of this that way. Now this is a valid reason to say that sex boosts self-esteem.
>>28786828
This post gave me a boner desu senpai
>>28786958
Star ahegao has that effect on people.
>>28786228
normie wormie think
>>28786249
what's actually happening
>inb4 u a virgin 5eva waaaaah!
>>28786214
ooh she's pretty and cute! i'd love to push her down the stairs!
>>28786983
Is that a euphemism?
>>28787007
no, i'd literally like to do that to her. but obviously she wouldn't be down for that so i'd compromise and settle for "rough sex". every stupid fucking roastie thinks they're a special snowflake because they like to be choked and manhandled during sex.
>>28787021
I'd greatly appreciate it if you would elaborate on why you want to push her down stairs and what else you would do.
>>28787051
because she's so damn cute. it would be fun to ruin her, naw mean? idk, i wouldn't do much after pushing her down the stairs. i'd probably go to jail at that point if some white knight didn't kill me first.
>>28787071
Why not ruin her in a way that makes your dick feel nice and warm though? Do you like seeing cute girls all beat up?
>>28786980
Just because you make such a post, doesn't mean you aren't a turboautist kissless virgin.
>>28787095
>Why not ruin her in a way that makes your dick feel nice and warm though?
yea that would be rough sex. god roasties are so fucking stupid. they will never understand the male experience. yes i'm from /r9k/
>>28787051
Not him but I'd do the same sort of thing. It's like, I want to take that attention whoring roastie and make her learn that any man could at any time control her life and ruin her. Teach them humility, y'know? Modern women are too cocky, they fail to realize that they're only safe because the entire world is built around babying a protecting them. When someone ignores society's rules, women are always going to be the weaker gender.
>>28786828
>It means that Chad deserves to exist.
Fuck, that hurts to hear anon, because that the exact feeling I desire, to feel like someone thinks you deserve to exist.
>>28786607
>Keep in mind this whole thing is kind of skewed these days.
This. Any low life can get laid these days. Robots must be a special kind of fucked up.
>>28787107
tfw not a virgin
>>28786214
It's annoying when people have to fake their eye colour like that
It works on a value system.
"Normies" and "Chads" base self worth on social acceptance and ego boosts.
I was hoping to write a whole pretentious post on this but I think it really is that simple. They operate on another level.
>>28787139
Wouldn't you want to rape her too though? Why just inflicting some pain and fleeing?
>>28787281
>Wouldn't you want to rape her too though? Why just inflicting some pain and fleeing?
While rape would be nice for my dick, the point isn't for me to get off. It's to crush her world view. If I raped her, she could rationalize it under "He was being violent so he could rape me. People value my genes enough to want to reproduce with me".
Rape would leave her with something she could say she is valued for. Showing her that someone can hurt her like that, without any particular reason behind wanting to do so is more powerful.
I'd rough her up a bit more than pushing her down the stairs though.
>>28787403
Well she isn't even a feminist and also I think this is just your mindbreak fetish rather than some grand societal statementgo on
>>28788083
>Well she isn't even a feminist
Nah, but all attentionwhore staceys need to be taught a lesson
>also I think this is just your mindbreak fetish rather than some grand societal statement
I'm not really jacking off to the thought of breaking her world view, just saying it would make me happy to be improving the female hyper-slut problem>go onMaybe later, I'm playing vidya now. Or you could give me an account I could add you and and talk about it. Up to you
>>28788213
>>28788083
Forgot an ORIGINAL picture, sorry bots
>>28786214
It implies that, because getting sex is "JUST THAT EASY" for them, something must be really wrong with you if you can't get it.
Like, women never turn them down, so if you get turned down you're worth less than them.
>>28786214
>Chad is so insecure he has to qualify himself to the mental defectives of r9k
Anyone who says something so beta is not "Chad". He's just slightly less loserish than you. It implies that while he might be just as pathetic as you in other areas of life he at least has managed to fulfill the simplest most primal biological urge of a man.
