>>28766784
You are aware that humans ARE robots? You ALREADY have robots capable of love: it's the homo sapiens. Human beings are fully mechanical. What you ask for is literally humans who are capable of unconditional love. Your thread is literally asking for slaves.

>>28766834

I don't want a human girl. Human girls are mean and they don't like me and they make me feel like a hunchbacked eunuch troll. I want a robot girl, programmed to love me so that I can feel comfortable loving her back some day.

>>28766784
At least 40 more years for them to come into the consumers price point.

>>28766880
You misunderstood. I was not offering *you* human girls, I pointed out that, robots being indistinguishable from humans and all anthropocentric ideas of human uniqueness being false, it's as unethical to force a sufficiently complex 'robot' to love you as it is to neurologically reprogramming a human girl to love you unconditionally -- which is the same fucking thing.

>>28766922

>unethical

I don't care.

If I could reprogram human girls to love me unconditionally, I would.

>>28766922
>>28766880
In short, I was speaking for 'robots'' (that's not really a meaningful term, there are just more and less complex machines) rights.

>>28766948
Ah. That's consistent then. Carry on.

>>28766784
How much would ypu actually pay for a sex robot, no meme price

I would rent them, probably low hunneths per day

>>28766922
you just came here to talk to yourself out loud? alrighty then

>>28766971

If you rent them they may as well just be prostitutes.

I would pay a maximum of 20,000 for one, I think. I'd happily save money for a chance to feel loved.

>>28766971
Eh. I'd prolly be willing to drop 10-15k

I mean, I spent 9 on a motorcycle, so I feel like the true love robot would bring me even more happiness