[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Oh my....
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001

Thread replies: 205
Thread images: 50
File: ubisoft then and now.jpg (221 KB, 966x1280) Image search: [Google]
ubisoft then and now.jpg
221 KB, 966x1280
Look at all that diversity
>>
File: huffington post editors meeting.png (517 KB, 572x654) Image search: [Google]
huffington post editors meeting.png
517 KB, 572x654
Women in the workplace
>>
File: gender equality.jpg (408 KB, 836x1570) Image search: [Google]
gender equality.jpg
408 KB, 836x1570
Doing the jobs they were meant to do
>>
File: bgV4zNg.jpg (14 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
bgV4zNg.jpg
14 KB, 480x360
>>28728505
they ruined everything
>>
no wonder their games suck now
>>
File: 1463805017888.png (344 KB, 467x453) Image search: [Google]
1463805017888.png
344 KB, 467x453
>>28728553
All I feel is rage from this image
>>
>>28728505

Meh. You're being silly.

Not about the overall point the picture makes.

Just this one.

It was as simple as this:

This a development team. One of many. This isn't the entire employ of ubisoft mtrl.

if you're going to burn things for fuel, it helps if you use wood instead of garbage.
>>
File: chocolateflavor.jpg (427 KB, 1912x2052) Image search: [Google]
chocolateflavor.jpg
427 KB, 1912x2052
>>28728593

some chocolate flavor ?
>>
File: 1463253466774.jpg (27 KB, 321x322) Image search: [Google]
1463253466774.jpg
27 KB, 321x322
>>28728505

amazing

so many woman in 1 room, and not a single one is fuckable
>>
No wonder everything ubi does sucks cock
>>
File: roastie.jpg (36 KB, 400x418) Image search: [Google]
roastie.jpg
36 KB, 400x418
>>28728602
t. Stacy Roastie
>>
the senior ubisoft modelers and animators i know of are men, so what are all of those woman doing
>>
>diverse
>all white
>>
File: ubisoft.jpg (409 KB, 1357x743) Image search: [Google]
ubisoft.jpg
409 KB, 1357x743
>>28728667
/b/ was talking about this
Here is some anon's interpretation of what is going on at ubisoft
>>
the office probably smells much better now though
>>
>>28728683
>No white men

And that is what makes it diverse
>>
>>28728657

Nah. I distrust women and dislike the trend you're illustrating.

It's just called critical thinking.

I prefer to get mad over real things instead of imaginary slights. Call me crazy.
>>
>>28728683
Don't expect people to be sincerely happy with multiculturalism in white people's country
>>
>>28728505
They're a shitty company. I don't care about them and neither should you. Life becomes so much better when you stop caring about stupid shit like that.
>>
File: 33797903.jpg (67 KB, 709x765) Image search: [Google]
33797903.jpg
67 KB, 709x765
>>28728505
And we wonder why so many men are choosing the NEET life or straight up becoming an hero

The game is rigged unless you are Chad.
>>
>>28728721
>White knighting is considered critical thinking
>I prefer to get mad over real things instead of imaginary slights. Call me crazy.
>The irony of this being posted on 4chan on its Robot board
wew lad
>>
>>28728505
It is fucking supremely ironic that these cunts who pay lip service to le diversity meme exclusively interact with other bourgeois white women.
>>
>>28728517
Nothing is getting done?
>>
File: 2715528-250px_lucifer16.jpg (25 KB, 250x375) Image search: [Google]
2715528-250px_lucifer16.jpg
25 KB, 250x375
>>28728781

I don't think you know what irony means.

you feeling threatened by a dissenting voice (on here of all places) is a much more fitting description of the term--- If my reaction (skepticism) is such a surprise, Then you're obviously not very bright.
>>
>>28728553
>fuck unbiased merit, let's impose arbitrary 'equality' with no basis in observation
>'that's just the way it is'
>>
>>28728517
This explains a lot of their content.
>>
>>28728553
>"Some men are going to have to give up their hard won roles to allow equality."
>men who earned their place have to be fired
>""""equality""""

At this point I'm almost excited for the hard right crackdown coming to the west. We've earned it.
>>
>>28728949
But anon, women are as competent as men, this has been proven by the fact that women have not been being hired because of patriarchy.
>>
>>28728505
You know the bottom image was some feminist gathering right, retard? Don't believe any shitty edit you see on the internet
>>
>>28728505
no wonder ubisoft has turn into utter shit lately and why their games are poorly optimize. I did not most of them members where replace by women this explains a lot. also why do women have to be such attention whores that make stupid faces on camera?
>>
File: projecting.jpg (73 KB, 490x333) Image search: [Google]
projecting.jpg
73 KB, 490x333
>>28728917
>I don't think you know what irony means.
Irony
noun
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.

Classical irony: Referring to the origins of irony in Ancient Greek comedy, and the way classical and medieval rhetoricians delineated the term.
Romantic irony: A self-aware and self-critical form of fiction.
Cosmic irony: A contrast between the absolute and the relative, the general and the individual, which Hegel expressed by the phrase, "general irony of the world."
Verbal irony: A contradiction between a statement's stated and intended meaning
Situational irony: The disparity of intention and result; when the result of an action is contrary to the desired or expected effect.
Dramatic irony and tragic irony: A disparity of awareness between actor and observer: when words and actions possess significance that the listener or audience understands, but the speaker or character does not; for example when a character says to another "I'll see you tomorrow!" when the audience (but not the character) knows that the character will die before morning. It is most often used when the author causes a character to speak or act erroneously, out of ignorance of some portion of the truth of which the audience is aware. In tragic irony, the audience knows the character is making a mistake, even as the character is making it.


>you feeling threatened by a dissenting voice (on here of all places) is a much more fitting description of the term--- If my reaction (skepticism) is such a surprise, Then you're obviously not very bright.
Don't project your insecurities on me pls

Also a question begging epithet isn't an argument
>>
File: hqdefault (1).jpg (10 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault (1).jpg
10 KB, 480x360
>>28728505
Oh, my...

this comment is originalo
>>
>>28729061
The pic was taken on women's day and only the female devs of ubisoft montreal were in it.
>>
File: 1423301477516s.jpg (4 KB, 185x224) Image search: [Google]
1423301477516s.jpg
4 KB, 185x224
>>28729105

Wow, a copypaste from a fucking wikipedia page.

Sure showed me.
>>
File: hurr.jpg (102 KB, 375x500) Image search: [Google]
hurr.jpg
102 KB, 375x500
>>28729159
Wow, an argument of stone fallacy
You sure showed me
>>
File: 1426518423105.jpg (98 KB, 608x395) Image search: [Google]
1426518423105.jpg
98 KB, 608x395
>>28729172

Yes, thank you.

I know.
>>
>>28728505

I suppose this explains why ubi hasn't put out a half decent game since '07
>>
File: 4303-baby-hurrrr.jpg (50 KB, 404x267) Image search: [Google]
4303-baby-hurrrr.jpg
50 KB, 404x267
>>28729194
>I have no rebuttal and I must comment
Sad to be honest
>>
File: 1423300210637.jpg (211 KB, 700x994) Image search: [Google]
1423300210637.jpg
211 KB, 700x994
>>28729237

I have no need to argue with an arts major.

Here. Take this as a parting gift.
>>
>>28729233
>AC1
>good
>AC 2
>Black Flag
>Rogue
>not god tier
End yourself my man + end yourself for believing le epic troll pic
>>
>>28729131
willing to bet most don't do shit or don't work as hard as the men because they are protected by affirmative action.
>>
>>28729271

AC2 is the only half decent game in your list and even that one is broken.
>>
>>28729254
t. Engineering undergrad that won't get a job
>>
File: retard.png (331 KB, 600x1081) Image search: [Google]
retard.png
331 KB, 600x1081
>>28729254
>How dare you call me out on my bullshit!
>I'm leaving now!
wew lad, seems I struck a nerve there
>>
File: 1448577558433.jpg (51 KB, 385x493) Image search: [Google]
1448577558433.jpg
51 KB, 385x493
>>28729291

Sure you will.

Just gotta make the right friends, man. You'll be good.
>>
>>28729271
>playing the same shit after part 2 or maybe 3

their is no reason why you should be playing fucking ass creed part 10
>>
>>28729254
Nice strawman pic
But you are just as guilty of it as the other anon
>>
File: 128977.jpg (5 KB, 206x244) Image search: [Google]
128977.jpg
5 KB, 206x244
>>28729373

Not really.

I'd have to have a conscious to feel guilt.
>>
>>28729389
You can lie to yourself but you can't lie to us other anon's

But go ahead and hid behind memes and tu quoque whatever helps you sleep at night
>>
>>28728625
Not even a single black one! What a bunch of racists!
>>
>>28729389
>Loses an internet argument and starts to shitpost
Yeah, that's about right
>>
>>28728917
You are correct. The other anon is deeply disturbed.
>>
>>28729519
This is /r9k/ we all are deeply disturbed
>>
File: 1424609942753.jpg (192 KB, 900x692) Image search: [Google]
1424609942753.jpg
192 KB, 900x692
>>28729451
>>28729490

I'm surprised no-one jumped on me for that spelling mistake desu, my senpai-a-lams.

That's like the RL equivalent of chumming the waters and going for a swim off the ausfag coast.
>>
File: why you do dis.jpg (43 KB, 620x413) Image search: [Google]
why you do dis.jpg
43 KB, 620x413
>>28729574
I'm surprised you are still shitposting and attempting damage control like anyone here cares
>>
File: 1426860083952.png (139 KB, 318x308) Image search: [Google]
1426860083952.png
139 KB, 318x308
>>28729625

Oh my. Looks like I hurt some fee-fee's.

nothing personnel, kid. If you want to jam rage suppositories up your ass all day, that's your business.

much good may it do you.
>>
File: sad boo hoo.jpg (45 KB, 360x480) Image search: [Google]
sad boo hoo.jpg
45 KB, 360x480
>>28729699
>Oh my. Looks like I hurt some fee-fee's.
At least you admit your feelings got hurt
acceptance is the first step to recovery
>>
men still do all the shit hard work, don't worry.

women will continue to overtake men in cushy middle management and pencil pushing jobs because they are more obedient and frankly as tasks get less demanding its easier and easier to hire eye candy.

finally unemployed women are a state burden because their offspring have to be cared for. if the woman is the wage-earner in the family unit then the boss can save more on the backend through lower taxes.
>>
File: absolute coincidence.webm (598 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
absolute coincidence.webm
598 KB, 480x360
>>28728553
oy vey


oringnla comment
>>
>>28729863
There is a reason why men have such higher suicide rates.
>>
File: wimmin.png (365 KB, 949x2181) Image search: [Google]
wimmin.png
365 KB, 949x2181
Girls, we run this motha (yeah!) [x4]
GIRLS!

Who run the world? Girls! [x4]
Who run this motha? Girls! [x4]
Who run the world? Girls! [x4]

Some of them men think they freak this like we do
But no they don't
Make your check come at they neck,
Disrespect us no they won't

Boy don't even try to touch this
Boy this beat is crazy
This is how they made me
Houston Texas baby
This goes out to all my girls
That's in the club rocking the latest
Who will buy it for themselves and get more money later
I think I need a barber
None of these niggas can fade me
I'm so good with this,
I remind you I'm so hood with this
Boy I'm just playing
Come here baby
Hope you still like me
F- you pay me

My persuasion can build a nation
Endless power, with our love we can devour
You'll do anything for me

Who run the world? Girls! [x4]
Who run this motha? Girls! [x4]
Who run the world? Girls! [x4]

It's hot up in here
DJ don't be scared to run this, run this back
I'm reppin' for the girls who taking over the world
Help me raise a glass for the college grads

41 rollin' to let you know what time it is, check
You can't hold me (you can't hold me)
I work my 9 to 5, better cut my check
This goes out to all the women getting it in,
You're on your grind
To other men that respect what I do
Please accept my shine
Boy I know you love it
How we're smart enough to make these millions
Strong enough to bear the children
Then get back to business
See, you better not play me
Oh, come here baby
Hope you still like me
F- you hate me

My persuasion can build a nation
Endless power
With our love we can devour
You'll do anything for me

Who run the world? Girls! [x4]
Who run this motha? Girls! [x4]
Who run the world? Girls! [x4]

Who are we? What we run? The world (who run this motha, yeah)
Who are we? What we run? The world (who run this motha, yeah)
Who are we? What do we run? We run the world! (who run this motha, yeah)
Who are we? What we run? We run the world
Who run the world? Girls
>>
File: huffpoparkinglot.jpg (66 KB, 520x346) Image search: [Google]
huffpoparkinglot.jpg
66 KB, 520x346
>>28728517
>Huffington Post Parking Lot
>>
File: 14637955321714.jpg (48 KB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]
14637955321714.jpg
48 KB, 500x375
>>28728505
I love these threads and the fact that men are so oblivious and angry that they can't skate by on privilege alone.
>>
>>28730580
>thatmeanssemen.jpg
>>
>>28728505
is this why videogames are so bad now? because women came in and ruined everything?

i mean when you look at all the fun creative shit being made by nerdy male losers unrestricted by women for VR, it makes you feel like we're about to hit another golden age of videogaming
>>
>>28730580
What privilege? Women have more legal rights then men.
>>
>>28730684
they're bad because big-ass companies got their dirty mitts on the vidya industry and began trying to force you to want things instead of giving people what they want

i havent even played vidya for over 2 years now desu, it's just boring
>>
>>28730684
More like video games became so expensive to make they needed to expand their market into the mainstream and sell to people other than teenage males.
>>
>>28730733
wouldn't it videogames be made more efficiently and thus cheaper with a workforce consisting entirely of men who actually enjoy making videogames?
>>
File: 1451590434391.gif (2 MB, 300x225) Image search: [Google]
1451590434391.gif
2 MB, 300x225
>>28730727
>written law is the only form of privilege

Oh boy, are you in for a wake-up call.
>>
>>28730767
>implying only men can enjoy/be proficient at a specific career

And this is what's commonly known as sexism.
>>
>>28728505
No wonder why Ubisoft's games went to shit lately.
>>
File: kawaii.jpg (73 KB, 300x250) Image search: [Google]
kawaii.jpg
73 KB, 300x250
>>28730768
>privilege based on race and gender is real

lmao
>>
File: 1455071243546.jpg (40 KB, 500x294) Image search: [Google]
1455071243546.jpg
40 KB, 500x294
Most of the images ITT are just cherrypicking for the sake of riling people up.
>>
>>28730768
Social privileges like women getting lighter prison sentences? Or women getting child custody 80% of the time? Or is it when women are 3x more likely to be hired for a stem job with the same application? Or maybe mens high suicide rate that everybody seems to ignore?
>>
>>28730797
it's not the only men can be passionate about playing and making videogames, it's just that the MOST passionate people are men

have you ever seen a women give a genuinely motivational and inspirational speech?
>>
>>28728693
Because women want to work, not to suck dick.
>>
>>28730853
>women want to work
browsing facebook isnt working
>>
>>28730853
hahha good one
>>
>>28730768
The only priveliges that exist are:

Wealth
Genetics

In that order.

But it's the two things SJWs would never be allowed to touch because your masters wouldn't allow it.
>>
>>28730853
>women want to work
lmao no. Women say they want to, then you catch them on their phone or browsing amazon on their computer when they should be working.
>>
>>28728517
>Notice anything about this @HuffingtonPost editors meeting?

THEY'RE ALL WHITE
>>
>>28730876
>>28730891
>shes working on game mechanics and actually being productive
>"hahha good one"
>"why isn't she sucking my dick?"
wew lad
>>
>>28730797
>implying only men can enjoy/be proficient at a specific career
ex: Sports
checkmate anon.
>>
>>28730971
>>shes working on game mechanics and actually being productive
>women being productive
this hypothetical does not exist in the real world so i will not humor it
>>
>>28730944
>catch men doing the exact same thing as described
>nobody bats an eye
So men are good at being super sneaky
>>
>>28729699
Please stop, shitposting may make you feel better but it is pretty fucking irritating.
>>
>>28730841
>have you ever seen a women give a genuinely motivational and inspirational speech?

Yes. Have you somehow not?

If by freak accident you've never seen a woman CEO or politican or professor give a well-conducted, well-rehearsed speech, feel free to check out TED Talks. There's hundreds of them.
>>
File: 1454962707730.jpg (213 KB, 1080x720) Image search: [Google]
1454962707730.jpg
213 KB, 1080x720
>>28731047
Thats what happens when a man writes a script for a woman
>>
File: bay02.png (78 KB, 215x310) Image search: [Google]
bay02.png
78 KB, 215x310
>>28728505
Every single one of them was hired by a dude hoping to fuck them.

They flirted and teased him during the interview knowing the moment they got in they can do whatever the fuck they want and if he tried after the fact to fuck them, they could sue.

It's a whole new form of trapping stupid men and horny bosses.

It's how we got into this state.
>>
>>28730981
Sports are shitty normalcool garbage, but even then you'll find women's teams and leagues.
>>
>>28730997
Like what it says on >>28728693 proving how men can't handle the blue balls when they should be working, same with women. Even if a game turns out great, it will be less value because it was not made by a man. I never understand the loss of product validation thing.
>>
>>28731059
>men don't use scripts
>men don't use teleprompters

You're really reaching for those straws.
>>
>>28731084
only fat feminists watch womens sports
>>
>>28731013
>nobody bats an eye

Yeah, no. If your a man and you're caught by a supervisor not doing your job, you will get fired.
>>
>>28728505

Diversity is all about less white men. The fewer the better. And the main proponents of diversity are white women, the most privileged people on earth.
>>
>>28731084
but no one watches them and they only stay afloat thanks to taxpayer dollars and SJWbux.
>>
>>28731118
Then you obviously never have a job before.
>>
>>28731105
Whaoly fuck can you not read? I never said/implied that men dont use scripts or telepromters, I said that womens scripts are just written by men hehe xd
>>
>>28731108
And only fat manchildren watch any other sports.

Watching professional sports is a way for obese and below average-IQ idiots to feel more manly by vicariously experiencing physical activity they could never manage to perform themselves.
>>
>>28731163
let me guess do sports oppress you?
>>
>>28731142
Actually i've never worked a job that only paid minimum wage where you can get away with shit like that.
>>
>>28731146
>I said that womens scripts are just written by men hehe xd

Oh, okay. So you're just arguing for something that's demonstrably false.
>>
>>28731059
You don't understand TED talks. The speaker is expected to write the script.
>>
>>28731084
>but even then you'll find women's teams and leagues.
He said proficient not a joke.
>>
>>28731163
>Watching professional sports is a way for obese and below average-IQ idiots to feel more manly by vicariously experiencing physical activity they could never manage to perform themselves.
no, that's your cuck fetish.

pretty much all normies love sports because it allows them to express in-group pride without being branded a racist, xenophobe, etc. Or they just enjoy the sport in it's own right for the skill and strategy involved.
>>
>>28731252
>woman does same thing a man does
>It's a "joke"

And this is another example of what's commonly known as sexism.
>>
>>28728616
Neither of those are being developed or published by Ubisoft.
>>
File: 1454720601552.jpg (173 KB, 1080x720) Image search: [Google]
1454720601552.jpg
173 KB, 1080x720
>>28731284
You can only be sexist to humans and women arent humans
>>
>>28731284
It's pathetic in comparison. Cry more stupid cunt.
>>
>>28731273
>express in-group pride

This is a moronic concept. There's no reason you should feel "pride" from simply watching team sports. You've done nothing to help them. You're not a direct part of it. The scandity clad cheerleaders on the sidelines are more directly invested than you are.
>>
Face it, the masters have decided to social engineer white men out of the picture. Nobody likes or respects white boys and men anymore. Non-whites are treated as gods while white men are treated as evil losers. This is your future white boy. It's no surprise that the vast majority of virgin adults are white men.
>>
>>28731308
>>28731340

It was fun, but if you don't have an actual argument left I really don't have any material to work with. :)
>>
>>28729976
it sucks for men right now because we are still in a feminist period they have all the power to pick who gets sex and are top priority in society right now. If this continues society will collapse because it can't prosper under female rule and it has to be something like a soft Patriarchy but not too much patriarchy because men will suffer too because only the top males are going to have access to most of the women.
>>
>>28731192
More like "depress"me.
>>
>>28731340
Stay hypocritical
>>
>>28731344
technically fans do help them by watching TV ads, generating interest, and purchasing merchandise. But as I said, it's just an outlet for the feelings that they want to express.
>>
>>28729976
They're less likely to reach out for help with mental health issues. It's not "tough" or "manly" to talk about "faggy feelings" so they push their emotions out of the picture until they build up to the point where they literally kill themselves.
>>
>>28731344

Spoken like a true cuck or a woman. It's like your flag, your country, your people, your team. You are personally invested in them and are emotionally invested in them. That's why it used to be a personal insult to insult a mans team, flag, and country but men today are too cucked to defend their honor.

You don't have to do anything to be invested, and nothing has to be spoken. Men instinctively know when you're on the same side and you share comraderie and brotherhood even if you aren't on the field, both the battle and playing fields.
>>
>>28730580
what privilege bitch? men have literally no reproductive rights or a large pick from birth control options like women do. also companies/schools are force to accept women because of affirmtavie action and equality laws. also you don't have to get drafted but for some reason you still have the right to vote.Lastly don't forget you get a lesser prison sentence as a man for committing the same crime and women win most of the custody of the child. War on women my ass.
>>
>>28728693
People keep saying this, but the place I work is carried by a woman and be completely fucked without her, even though she is a Grade A bitch. And this isn't some fly-by-night place that's barely holding on, it's a military legal mission. All the higher ups are lawyers and former soldiers. So they're not idiots. They're just absolutely hopeless at managing the logistical and interpersonal stuff she handles. It's actually funny watching them try when she's absent for whatever reason. And yet they come out if every single one of those situations acting like they're hot shit who would handle it if she just packed up and left.

I imagine it's the same for the guys anon described, since men are far more likely to overestimate their competency than women.

Unless you're deliberately maneuvering yourself to be irreplaceable (and most men are just too focused on actually doing their job), assume that you are.
>>
>>28731629
It's competition. Simple. Women and men can't be friends, they either murder each other or love each other.
>>
>>28731623
>what privilege bitch?
Americans dole out opportunities and jobs via a limited meritocracy based on their social networks and a primacy bias (first past the post of competency). As men generally control the capital and hiring decisions, and as their personal networks consist largely of men, the average man is more likely to benefit from indirect gender-based privilege in the workplace.

Obviously the reverse is true in places dominated by woman, but those are the exception, not the rule. Basically we need to confront how much of a role personal bias has in our economic and business decisions.
>>
>>28731705
You know why men control the capital and hiring decisions? It's because through trial and error, men are proven to be more efficient at it.
>>
>>28731705
Did you completely miss the thing about affirmative action and equality laws or are you just ignoring it?
>>
>>28728517
Guess why they're busy taking pictures instead of actually working
>>
>>28731680
Nah. I got along way better with women before I discovered that they basically think I'm going to go Mandingo on them. Then it was stereotype threat all the way down. So when I say it's all men's faults, I don't mean that they're consciously deciding to be dicks. Society sets us up. But if guys could be less entitled pricks in general, that'd help a whole lot.
>>
>>28728693
I literally called this. It's why rainbow six siege was unplayable for the first few months it was out. Absolute shit code was written for. Same with the division, my boss tells me it's impossible to play after the update. Absolute shit coding is done by women which is confirmed by ops picture.
>>
>>28728553
>Australia
Not even surprised
>>
>>28731820
Actually it's because women's property ownership and financial rights were artificially hamstrung for centuries while the work they do was consistently devalued, but feel free to choose the subjectivenemotional appeal. I'll stick with the one that can be backed up with citations of law and economic figures (not that I'm actually going to waste time getting succinct ones for you to ignore because they contradict your pre-existing worldview).

>>28731831
Ignoring it. Academic AA doesn't change employment practices, corporate AA is almost exclusively half-hearted outreach.
>Equality laws
Sure, Tom.
>>
File: 1457810103218.jpg (2 MB, 900x7324) Image search: [Google]
1457810103218.jpg
2 MB, 900x7324
>>28732007
>being a woman in America is not easy, Anon
>>
>>28731284

>sports
>same thing a man does

OH I AM LAFFIN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BTCCjtuKgY

This isn't the one i was thinking but apparently it's a common occurrence

if women could compete or do the same thing a man does there would be coed sports women cannot begin to compare just like the williams sister claiming they could beat any man ranked 20 or so and then got whooped by number 200+ and he said he played shitty to make the game more interesting
>>
>>28731705
yeah but those men who own large companies are just going to hire mostly attractive women to work for them and female bosses are sexist cunts like in that case of yahoo which only hires females and fires men even if they pass a very difficult task that they are told to do.
>>
>>28731705
http://www.pnas.org/content/112/17/5360.abstract

>Here we report five hiring experiments in which faculty evaluated hypothetical female and male applicants, using systematically varied profiles disguising identical scholarship, for assistant professorships in biology, engineering, economics, and psychology.

>men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles

Society is rigged to make it nearly impossible for a woman to fail. Women are being handed a golden ticket and all they can do is complain that it's not platinum.
>>
>>28732106
r34 on business lady

oroginal postpartum
>>
>>28732007
>devalued

Talking completely out of your ass. Women worked in the home and on the farm. And by in the home, I mean they used to make things and perform labor to provide income for the house, such as making things or doing work for other people like knitting and the like.

They contributed to something called a family, same as the man did, and they had equal share in it's prosperity. But keep falling for the tired feminist simple outlook on the past.

Women had ownership, deeds, contracts, and everything as far back as the early Middle Ages and we know this because of church records. It was simply customary and preferable to have everything in a mans name because it was assumed that the man controlled the household, which was not always the case.

But yeah, women were poor oppressed victims before the 1970's and now that we have full female liberation, we can see the full beautiful effect women have on society, and it's a net negative one. Every social, political, economical, and familial category you care to name, we are worse now than before there was "female liberation." And so the question is what were women liberated from? And the answer is their biological and social roles as women.

t. history major

Kill yourself toasty roastie whore
>>
>>28732335
feminists utterly btfo

Based anon
>>
File: 32523523525.png (487 KB, 816x960) Image search: [Google]
32523523525.png
487 KB, 816x960
Reminder that robots are still of less social value than these dumb bitches
>>
>>28732335
Seriously fucking this. Just because you can't put a dollar sign on it doesn't mean it isn't valued.
>>
>all this Ubisoft hate
Wow, misogyny from /r9k/. Never saw that coming.
>>
>>28732106
>Male-oriented jobs paid higher for some reason
>Household work is unpaid
>In a capitalist society, where everything worth doing is supposed to be quantifiable as a value
So yeah that actually doesn't contradict anything I said. The idea that the wage gap exist because women choose the "wrong" jobs rests on the false premise that the current value of any given job is immutable, intrinsic, and accurate as per current market rates. In reality, many very important jobs with a high opportunity cost have had their value pushed down by Prisoner's Dilemma shenanigans.

>Men think they're taking the red pill but they're colorblind
Heheh.
>>
>>28732451
Plenty of reasons to hate Ubisoft that have nothing to do with the women they employ.
>>
>>28730966
It's ok, white females count in their minority quota
>>
>>28732335
but siting at home comfortably is oppressive :^) you men are privilege you get to work on coal mines until you die of cancer and you get to die in war. :^)
>>
>>28728693
Kek

Just like Yahoo.com

You guys remember Yahoo.com?

Exactly my point
>>
>>28732564
that company is worth pennies now ever since women took over.
>>
>>28732161
I just find it funny that the same people who take this study as gospel are silent on the one that showed racial bias in interview callbacks based on the applicant's name. Something about the methodology.

>>28732137
Anon I think you're making things up.
>>
>>28732660
I am not making shit up their is literally creepy old bosses who like to hire only attractive girls and hit on them.
>>
>>28732660
Ah so you're gonna blame everything on the white man aren't you?
>>
>>28732478
>The idea that the wage gap exist because women choose the "wrong" jobs rests on the false premise that the current value of any given job is immutable, intrinsic, and accurate as per current market rates. In reality, many very important jobs with a high opportunity cost have had their value pushed down by Prisoner's Dilemma shenanigans.

People actually think like this?
>>
>>28731629
lawyers maybe, but generally soldiers choose their career because they have nothing else to do.
>>
File: b65.jpg (19 KB, 600x600) Image search: [Google]
b65.jpg
19 KB, 600x600
>When you realize how central the white female aspect of feminism is
huh
>>
>>28732752
It has to be a troll. No one can seriously believe that nonsense.
>>
File: 1418606778559.jpg (744 KB, 2048x1536) Image search: [Google]
1418606778559.jpg
744 KB, 2048x1536
I work as a programmer and the field is still almost entirely male. I am pulling stats out of my ass but I would guess the ratio is 9 to 1. Most of those women are probably not developers but designers/managers/testers and so forth. Most women working in tech gravitate to those positions.

Most women simply don't seem to be interested in CS or software development for whatever reason. I don't see this as a problem. Most men aren't interested in educating children or being therapists and those fields are mostly women as a result.

Most men don't want to be programmers either. CS is not a popular major no matter how you break it down. I think it appeals to a rare type of personality which is extremely slanted toward the left half of the brain. I think you have to be that way to slug through not only undergrad but also years of programming in the workforce. If you aren't capable of being genuinely interested in something like how a graph traversal algorithm works or how to prevent string format exploits you will probably burn out.

The pay seems irrelevant to me, that is dictated by market forces. If you possess a rare skill set obviously you have more bargaining power.
>>
>>28732335
Of course, what you fail to mention is that most of the records you allude to were exceptions that amount to anecdata; outlying situations caused by special circumstances. Common law in the West, and particularly in the radical Christian communities that made up much of the nascent US, held a preference for male ownership and management of capital and assets, whether through the head of household or the community collective run by all-male councils. This in turn influenced codified laws that forbid (and in some cases, stripped) women the right to vote and hold assets when married. As late as mid-century, women were not allowed to hold credit cards without their husband's permission.

Denial of an inconvenient history that satisfactorily explains current circumstance is not new for you guys, but it is definitely getting old.
>>
American entertainment, and to a somewhat lesser extent Western entertainment in general, is a lost cause. Everything is fucked up by "diversity," "social justice," feminists, manginas, narcissism, edginess and pretentiousness.
>>
>>28732721
Absolutely. Well, not the white man. White men. Some of them. Probably not you, if you're on this website. Maybe your dad though.
>>
File: White minority.jpg (44 KB, 600x414) Image search: [Google]
White minority.jpg
44 KB, 600x414
>>28728505
You know there are like 30 different breeds of European?

From Celtic, to Irish, to German, to Dutch, to Aryan, to Nordic, to Slav, to Western Slav

Saying that a group of white people isn't "diverse" is ignorant and idiotic. White countries have some of the most diverse genes. Whites have black hair, red hair, blonde hair, platinum hair, brown hair....etc. Which can either be curly, straight, wavy, or anything in between. What other race can claim this?

Actually blacks, Indians, Chinese....these are the dominant cultures on Earth. Whites are less than 9% of global population. Not a single white country in the world has a positive birth rate (thank you liberal values). America is losing roughly 12% of it's white population every generation, Europe is losing about 25%. Some countries like Portugal are actually HALVING their populations every generation (a generation is about 25 years).

Meanwhile ultra high birth rate immigrant groups are being brought in from the South America, the Middle East and Africa, which will in short order totally displace the native population. It's estimated that in less than 20 years America will lose it's white majority, and in around 50 Europe will lose it's white majority. There will not be a single white majority country on the planet in under 100 years.

This is industrial scale population replacement. It's not happening anywhere else. Not in India. Not in China. Not in Africa. Not in South America. Only in white countries. Whites are a tiny, quickly shrinking minority that's soon to be swallowed up by the bulk mass of humanity, and we are whining and crying about getting "diversity" in our workplaces (where diversity is code for non-whites).

They say this is cultural enrichment. But think about it, does the West really need cultural enrichment? If anything Africa, the Middle East, China, South America.....these are the places that need enrichment. Europe is doing just fine without it.
>>
>>28732756
Not officers.

>>28732752
Fighting that is what unions were for.
>>
>>28732913
>in around 50 Europe will lose it's white majority
I think there's going to be violent insurrections, deportations and ethnic cleansings before that (I doubt voting is going to solve this issue).
>>
>>28732760

Modern feminism is led by single, bitter white women and Jews and their literal goal is changing society for the worse. It's just a tool for communists to attack one of the strongest pillars of society.

Vast majority of feminists today are sheeps that parrot what they had brainwashed into them and don't critically think about what they are advocating for and what they argue about.

Just look at how they took women being allowed to serve on the front lines of war as some great moral victory for feminism when just applying a little logic shows how retarded the whole thing is. Does women on the front lines provide for a better fighting force? And the answer is no, it does not.

Feminism needs to be checked because it is a destructive force on a society. We've got western feminists advocating and converting to Islam and claiming it's the feminist religion. There's something wrong there.
>>
File: depression3.jpg (102 KB, 706x960) Image search: [Google]
depression3.jpg
102 KB, 706x960
>>28731128
It's like when millionaires donate money
>>
>>28732982
>Vast majority of feminists today are sheeps that parrot what they had brainwashed into them
so much of this

Did you guys know they have some kind of intellectual self-defense guide they actually pay for

Reading it is almost mandatory if you want to join one of their communities
>>
>>28732752
yeah, wild speculation as a counter to straightforward explanations is common practice for SJW types.

I mean, you could explain that women are overwhelmingly more likely to choose public sector jobs like education, social work or healthcare, over higher-paid private enterprise but it just falls on deaf ears.

>>28732660
>racial bias
of course, feminists can never stick to their own issues. It's an all-for-one oppression bundle. What's controversial about an employer favoring someone who sounds like they can speak english over an ghetto-raised affirmative action beneficiary or a FOB immigrant?
>>
>>28732335
>And by home, I nean they used to make things and perform labor to provide income for the house, such as mak9ng things or doing work for other people knitting and the like.
Makes sense if the woman happens to have passion in artistian crafts or visual arts, yet they are looked down upon like with everyone else women do -even cooking.
Plus, some women don't like being confined to houses all the time and want to learn things such as science, mechanics etc. because they are determined to learn. Same with men who want to learn. Yet women are rejected for apply a job in those fields. What do you say about that?
>>
>>28732851

No, you're taking The US experience and applying it to the whole West. I'm not as familiar with US customs so I'll just defer to your expertise, but I'm sure if I researched this subject, I would find that men and women shared property rights in a culture that assumed men as the head of household an I can think of several examples of pioneering American women holding farmsteads and general stores. But hey, you can definitively say so, so I assume you've researched the subject.

In Europe, women enjoyed property rights in parity with men, they just doesn't exercise it because as I said, the custom was to defer to men, even as far back as the Middle Ages. The church kept records of who donated land to it and through these records, we can see that women donated land as much as men which wouldn't have been possible if women didn't have property rights.

History and society is much more complicated than people like you and feminists make it out to be and it annoys me greatly how they always, always frame it that men were at the top and dominated women, as if putting the two against each other. It's very Marxist in it's logic.
>>
>>28733104
>if the woman happens to have passion in artistian crafts or visual arts, yet they are looked down upon
Visual art student here

No they don't, they have access to tons of exclusive scholarships and the usual stuff they make is always amazingly well received by the community even when it's generic and lacks any kind of originality
>>
>>28733086
>woman wants to learn how to develop software
>gets good at it, makes a few solo projects in her spare time
>applies for job
> "we can't have work here"
>why?
> "because we think you may ruin the performace of our team with your presence"
> bbut my resume
> "not valid"
>>
>>28733104

They were rejected in the past because there was assumed to be limited space, so only men should have to compete for those jobs because they are generally better than women.

It's just a function of biology, women get pregnant and give birth and are assumed to be the caretakers.

No woman is denied entry today.
>>
>>28733137
In more area of work, i see property deeds dating back to 1800 that only have a woman's name as the sole property owner.
>>
If the wage gap existed, there would be no men with jobs.
>>
>>28733213
>inb4 there were exceptions were they were accepted, but were low key due to fear.

So I'm guessing the concept of 'maternal leave' and home businesses didn't apply then due to being easily abused. Either you work or don't, seems to make sense.
>>
>>28728517
Nothing above a five.
>>
>>28733332
>1-10 scale exist even in the workforce
>cute = more monays
>what is being cooperative in the workforce
wew lad
>>
>>28728505
>even in the 2007 picture, the women are standing at the center of attention
I don't even know who to blame for this shit
>>
>>28733304
>implying women would work in the sewers or oil rigs for any price
>>
>>28733379
Blame men who put the pussy on the pedestal
>>
>>28733404
They would if they had no choice. Beta manginas have put them in a position where they don't have to work at all if they don't want to. They can find men to live off of. You can't blame women for taking advantage of what's trusted into their faces. You'd live life on easy mode too if you had the possibility. You would be an idiot not to.
>>
File: 1404293033896.png (469 KB, 492x611) Image search: [Google]
1404293033896.png
469 KB, 492x611
>>28733193
This doesn't happen, most places would be eager to hire a female dev because they are one in a million and merely by being on the team, management can claim their programming team is not only men.

Women don't study CS because they don't want to. Even though my college had grants and campus organizations only for women in CS, there were hardly any women in the program. For the most part they simply aren't interested.

It's an interest you either have or you don't and most people don't. When I was in high school I wasn't going to parties or after school activities, I was trying to program bots for computer games, alone in my bedroom.

The women who want more female programmers should have become programmers.
>>
>>28728505
>Pretty white girl front and center
>Plain minority girl standing off to the side

Feminism!
>>
>>28733193

that's a good theory, but the real reason is that there's so few women is that they are not as interested as men

i'm doing something that's very similar to computer science, and there's 28 men a 2 women

nobody is preventing them from joining it
>>
>>28729976
A big part of it is that men are "better" (or worse, I guess) at comitting suicide. We're more likely to choose methods like firearms of jumping from tall buildings (success rates of 85% or more) while women are overwhelmingly likely to choose pills (which rarely work).
>>
>>28732913
Which idiot made that map? Places like Argentina/Uruguay/Chile are white, blacks are just 10% of the US population, and nobody in Asia or Central America is black.
>>
>>28734229
>thinking that because the icon of the person is black means they're black rather than just not white

It's just a map highlighting whites while leaving all other races dark. You can't be this retarded
>>
>>28730019

Now post the lyrics to that Megan Trainor song, "No" or whatever its called.

Shes the embodiment of the modern western women's entitlement mentality.
>>
>>28728505
You people are fucking retarded
That picture was made by some faggot during the whole #gg era
3600
>>
>>28732564
I used to be a notorious force on yahoo
I miss those days in the comment sections
>ywn read another Chris Chase """article"""" again
End my life
>>
>>28734827
Bruh
There's some other roastie track that goes like "where do the good boys go to hide away, hide away?"

I have to hear that song every fucking day at work.

I've actually gone to the storage room and just REEEEED'D for a solid minute
>>
>>28730053
rofl my senpai
>>
File: 1463108222920.jpg (91 KB, 459x612) Image search: [Google]
1463108222920.jpg
91 KB, 459x612
>first picture is nearly all white males
>second picture is nearly all white females
lol, you hypocrites couldn't be more insecure if you tried. Both pictures have serious issues with them; more people of different genders (male/female/transmale/transfemale) and cultural backgrounds need to be in the workplace, not all one gender white people.
>>
>>28735462

Yeah I know what youre talking about.

My job is an hour and a half from my house and my car is old and doesnt have an aux port, so I gotta listen to the radio on the way home. And theres nothing but Top 40 radio stations around here and all they play is normie bullshit like that song. So I know your suffering.

But nothing makes me angrier than Megan Trainor. Every song she makes is about some kind of entitlement.
>>
>>28728949

An SJW literally told me that equal treatment (meritocracy and such) is discrimination against women because "society" doesn't treat them the same, so holding them to the same standards as other groups in a society which doesn''t treat them equally is de facto discrimination.

Freedom is slavery, we have always been at war with Eastasia etc.
>>
>>28728553
>some men are going to have to give up their hard won roses to make room for equality

This fucker cannot be serious. Literally fucking ruining some people's lives in the name of equality, surely that in of itself is seriously unequal treatment??
>>
File: image.jpg (34 KB, 286x318) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
34 KB, 286x318
>>28729254
you're right but as a professional 4chan I would've suggested inb4ing
>>I AM SILLY
>>
>>28728836
this.
it's the same thing when politicians talk about diversity and the poor rising up and racism is bad mmkay?
then they turn around and jump in their white Lexus, call their white friends, go home to their white wife and kids and white Golden Retriever in their predominantly white state, in one of the richest neighborhoods in the county.

i think it's called ivory tower syndrome or some shit, lilly pad syndrome.
>>
>>28728836

There is a movement called womanism which seems to have started because feminists from third world countries who were non-white and poor got sick of white middle-upper class feminists from the first world monopolising the movement and making it all about them.
>>
File: image.png (66 KB, 616x596) Image search: [Google]
image.png
66 KB, 616x596
>>28730892
yeah, those two and also
>love
a born rich black kid who's handsome and strong and has good family and friends has no more to complain about than any white person
>>
>>28728836
I think it's important to note that those types of people are the ones that tend to be educated enough to understand that they are privileged.
>>
>>28730971
What game mechanics? Ubisoft releases the same game three times a year. Watchtowers you have to climb, collectibles, copypasted fighting from previous entries of the franchise. Only the art changes, but even then it's nothing groundbreaking, always safe real world settings.
>>
File: image.gif (1023 KB, 265x260) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
1023 KB, 265x260
>>28728553
>in Melbourne
>>
>>28728517
If you look at that tweet she got btfo in the replies
>>
File: image.png (336 KB, 629x463) Image search: [Google]
image.png
336 KB, 629x463
>>28730853
Oh jeez

Not first
>>
>>28731068
Exactly right. Weak men subjugated to their sexuality are the cause of this rise of pandering to women. That's why MGTOW is meaningful and I think porn addiction is the key thing that needs to be overcome by a modern man. Also putting other values above women (such as truth, fairness, hard work and God) must happen because right now 95% of men below 50 just worship the pussy. That is what fucked up this society.
>>
>>28731217
well I got away with it
>>
>>28728625

You didn't look hard enough.
Thread replies: 205
Thread images: 50

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.