Remind me- What exactly was so bad about gender roles?
>>28707287
The same things wrong with every other facet of our existence
>>28707287
That with them you cannot collect neetbux but are expected to pay for a family while your wife does shit, and if you can't do it, you end in the street in tradcon us, or in the gas in tradcon europe.
>>28707287
The fact that they undermine the truth that most people don't want to conform to some dogmatic concept of how their lives should be lived.
>this idealized image accurately represents what the 50's were like for everone
>>28707429
Maybe, until pops is publicly accused of being a dirty homosexual pedo commie.
>>28707287
It's better for both men and women tbqh. This is the future that liberals chose.
Saying gender roles is wrong is saying genetics is wrong
>>28707536
*are wrong
>>28707287
Nothing. Just like there is nothing wrong about giving people choices about tradition or not.
Even the Amish give their kids a choice about living that way, and they consciously choose to be somewhat primitive. What's your excuse.
>>28707547
Depends on where you come from. Some regional varieties of English would analyze that as a singular.
>>28707561
if people can't act like good people, maybe they need to be forced to
>the 50s
>back when you could actually score drugs without having Five-Eyes and spy satellites on your ass
>could get prime teen pussy without much trouble
>no porn, so the infrastructure for whoring still existed
>avoid the draft by saying you're gay
a-at least we have the internet, r-right
>>28707622
>maybe they need to be forced to
That's vague. Morality can't be legislated, though, if that's where you're going. That undermines our freedom of pursuit of happiness, since that would basically take away people's right to do so on their own terms.
>>28707287
>What exactly was so bad about gender roles?
divorce rape!
M G T O W
G
T
O
W
and fuck off with your tradcuck shit
