Is reality just the movement of eternal fundamental particles?
>>28641156
As far as anyone should be concerned, yes; there is no point dwelling on unfalsifiable, mystic conceptions of reality.
/thread
>>28641156
Trips are not fundamental to existence. Now get the fuck out
Depends on how you define reality.
>>28642120
How would you define reality that anything other than the material world could possibly be included with any degree of certainty?
>>28642168
You could easily argue that concepts are real but not based in the material world. e.g. you can show me one cat or one apple but you can't show me "one".
>>28641156
Is reality?
>>28642120
I defined your mom's reality last night.
>>28642300
I'd be content in saying that "concepts" are, to some degree, material things. If our entire being, including the consciousness that we use to experience these concepts, is just the result of particles interacting with each other, then concepts, thoughts, ideas, etc. are nothing more than some particles reacting to other particles.
>yfw there is no reason for the particles of our universe to have any different momentum, charge, or location after the next cycle of the big bounce
>yfw this isnt the first time you lived this life and it wont be the last
>>28641156
Is your statement true, false, or impossible to prove?
>>28641156
Not when you introduce entropy. Then it's the inconceivably long march to that long long dark.
A metaphor for life really.
