>anon, why are you so quiet?
>I would never fuck an introvert
>I could listen to chad tell stories for hours. He's so funny and outgoing!
>>28525324
The only reason they find Chad interesting is because he's attractive.
If you're attractive suddenly everyone cares about your opinion and everything you say is interesting.
>>28525324
their all ugly anyway
>>28525380
>chad's attractive because he has confidence! I love that he loves himself!
cringe
your virginity is palpable OP
>>28525324
the pale one in the middle is the best of the lot to be honest
>>28525380
Not true. Most comedians are ugly.
>>28525547
Yeah and they never get laid either.
Attraction is 100% looks.
>>28525324
Where do you live? Women here don't talk like that.
>>28525642
We get laid all the time. Ralphie May gets laid.
>>28525642
>Attraction is 100% looks
I wish.
Sorry i dont deal with chestlets
>>28525642
>Attraction is 100% looks.
I understand /r9k/ doesn't know shit about social norms and human interactions, but this is a retarded comment even for /r9k/. I'm impressed.
>>28525807
>Mmmm, Chad, you're so funny! So outgoing!
>>28525324
How can there be so many bitches, but all of them are ugly?
>>28525522
that's a tranny, look at the shoulders
Kenjataimu here, this thread is funny beyond belief hahahahaha you sad cunts.... Lol women. Lol.
>>28525789
>>28525817
You guys are delusional.
Do you think this guy has trouble finding a date or getting laid? Of course not. He can literally talk to girls about his Pokemon collection and they will still be attracted to him.
Id much rather be with a hot girl with a shitty personality than an ugly girl with a great one. Why would women be any different?
Did you fall for the "women aren't as visual as men" meme?
Women spend way more time on their appearance and cultivating an image than men. If anything, they're more visual than we are.
soooooooooooey what do we have here?
a bunch of pigs lined up for slaughter?
"Well, I wonder where this will lead us?"
>>28526827
I look better than him and I'm still a virgin.
>>28526827
>Do you think this guy has trouble finding a date or getting laid?
His eyes look like they're upside down.
Just because you want his dick 9 inches down your faggot throat doesn't mean everyone shares you homoerotic fetish
>>28527032
Bullshit you do.
That's Sean O'Pry one of the highest paid male models alive.
If you were more attractive you would have been scouted by a major agency by now.
And of course, you won't post a pic because of some bullshit excuse like your webcam doesn't work...
>>28527082
>being able to tell if a man is attractive makes you gay
Come back when you've finished school.
>>28527124
Who needs school? I learn from my programmers!
>>28526827
he honestly looks ugly to me
>>28527150
That's because you have no idea what makes a man attractive.
You're probably one of these losers who thinks they're attractive but can't get laid because of their personality.
In reality you're just ugly bro.
Haven't you guys noticed how robots are always either manlets, scrawny skinny fat guys, chubby dudes, fucked up faces etc...
I've NEVER seen an attractive robot. It just doesn't exist.
If you were attractive you'd be getting laid. Simple as that.
>I would never fuck an introvert
Something no girl on this planet as ever said with honesty.
Chad's can be introverted as can all alphas.
>>28527252
>alpha
>introvert
what
>>28527216
I've gotten multiple 8's and mostly 7's from /soc/ and /fa/ has told me I have potential to be a model
I'm attracted to people with unique, distinct facial features and that model you posted is the anti-thesis of that.
He is successful because of how generic he looks.
He has the prototypical generic mid-length haircut (short sides, long top slicked up in a cowlick, light product, just on the cusp of being short enough to not look feminine or like you're trying too hard) with a 5 o'clock shadow to add a hint of masculinity to his feminine baby face
His face is too round, his goatee looks disgusting and is poorly shaped, lips are way too thick (they look weird as fuck)
There's way more attractive guys you could've posted than that ugly normie
>>28527406
>anonymous people on a Chinese cartoon board told me I'm attractive
Okay bro. I'm sure your mum thinks so too.
Like I said, if you think you're more attractive than a millionaire male model you're fucking delusional.
But go ahead and post a pic then.
>>28527466
I'm not going to post my face on /r9k/ the board known for having serial killers post on it.
The guy you posted is literally the epitome of "I'm so generically attractive that I can be hired for any role" but no true aesthetes/artists ever use him? Why? Why does he only get work from the most commercial pop-culture producers of content? His thing is looking generic.
Also, he is an example of how modern women have had their perception of beauty warped by the global market. Pic-related is what used to be considered attractive and what is actually legitimately attractive artistically.
>>28525642
>tfw only average looks on a good day
>tfw "manlet"
>poorfag
>tfw considered having a great personality
>nothing to offer but said personality
>tfw qt gf
Obviously some physical attraction is needed, claiming (romantic/sexual) attraction is 100% personality would be delusional and silly, but claiming it's 100% looks is just as ridiculous.
Priorities differ per woman though. Some will find a matching/complementing personality of utmost importance as long as the guy is at last somewhat average looking (beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that), others will find looks much more important and would overlook a shitty personality in favour of that.
The same applies to men, though; >>28526827 is an example of a guy falling in that latter category.
Often the priorities tend to be affected by how serious one is in one's relationships. People looking for flings, ONS, hook-ups, and all-in-all casual sex with no strings attached will have higher standards in looks, while people looking for something potentially serious tend to have higher standards in terms personality; after all, a serious relationship tends to imply living together for longer periods of time, an insufferable cunt personality won't cut it.
Exceptions exist, people thinking 10/10 looks 1/10 personality will somehow allow for a healthy and happy relationship; they tend to either be inexperienced, naive to think they can change that person, blinded by the halo effect/denial, or simply clinging to the first attention someone gave.
>>28526827
You are the desilusional mother fucker. I have seen guy ugly as sin kissing with cuties. It's not all about the looks
>>28527532
A 40+ year old dude with wrinkles and a receding hairline?
Lol GTFO dude. You've proven my point. You're clearly delusional.
>>28527572
Those "cuties" are called escorts anon.
>>28527573
The more I look at the picture of that fag you posted the more I can't fathom how anyone could find him attractive. He literally looks like a tranny with downs syndrome.
Whatever you're into man...
>>28527569
Your gf has settled for you and probably isn't that attractive.
>>28527613
Sure pal.
That's why he's literally getting paid millions for his looks while you post on r9k about how some 2/10 legbeard on soc said you were cute.
Denial to the max bro.
>>28527632
She's not model-tier looking, no, probably around average objectively speaking. But, I find her attractive and she has a great personality, which is basically what she seems to think of me as well.
I doubt she "settled" for me as she could do much better.
She sure as hell didn't settle for my money (so far she has bought/paid more for me than I for her) as I'm a poorfag, nor social status (liked well enough by people, but not anything notable in status, basically average).
Then again, neither of us were actively looking for a relationship nor were we doing the whole casual blind dating thing that seems to be the go-to method of trying to find a relationship - which adds to the whole sense of entitlement of everything and then some for women as men continuously woo them every waking and sleeping moment. Instead we met each other through mutual friends and it clicked.
I honestly think the blind/casual dating culture is what significantly increased the whole imbalance in terms of dating. Rather than socializing, networking, meeting through events/activities of common interests and otherwise getting to know one another at least a little bit first, meeting each other for the first or second time over a date is more common now. As women probably get dozens of date requests a week from men she doesn't even know, dozens an hour if she's online dating to boot, a way to filter through it is by having ridiculous standards and expecting perfection from the guys. They can get away with it as men are not in short supply. They won't have enough time in their lives to date every single man requesting a date at least once (one date a day base), let alone multiple dates.
Trying to compete through that method as anything but the top 10% is practically a waste of time unless extremely lucky in finding a more down-to-earth woman or one who hasn't been in that dating scene long enough yet to use such filters.
